Show there are $2^n$ forms a $n times n$ matrix can take, preferably via Pascal's triangle












0














Where "a form" for some RRE matrix is its description in terms of the number of all-zero rows it has and the position of pivots in the non-zero rows.



I've tried using induction, the base case is obvious enough:



$$ left[
begin{array}{c}
0
end{array}
right],
left[
begin{array}{c}
1
end{array}
right] rightarrow 2^1$$



After that, I assume that the total number of forms for the $n$ step is $2^n$, which has to be the sum of the different number of forms for each number $0 ,..., n$ of zero rows, the specifics of which I ignore for now (really, because I couldn't prove it myself).



Then, for each $n times n$ form with given number of zero rows $Z$, I can embed it in a $(n+1) times (n+1)$ matrix where the first zero row $z$ from the embedded matrix can be extended to have an $z_{n+1}$ entry in ${1, 0}$. If $z_{n+1} = 0$, there is a one-to-one correspondence with the sets of $ntimes n$ forms indexed by $Z$, except when $Z=0$. The same argument applies to $z_{n+1} = 1$. Notice that for the $Z=0$ case, the smaller matrix can be embedded in a matrix where the last entry is either $0$ or $1$, which results in two RRE additional forms for the larger matrix.



Finally, the two one-to-one mappings contribute $2^n -1$ forms each. Adding the last two cases, we have $2^n - 1 + 2^n -1 +2 = 2^{n+1}$ forms and the induction is complete.



I feel my reasoning is somewhat convoluted, so I'd appreciate it if any flaws could be pointed out. My textbook had a hint about using Pascal's triangle, and I did notice that the number of forms linked to each $Z$ follows the pattern, but I was unable to set up a counting scheme for all possible pivot positions to show that this applies generally, so I would appreciate guidance in that regard.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What is a n RRE matrix?
    – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
    Nov 28 at 22:26










  • @YiorgosS.Smyrlis I meant to type $n times n$ but the description actually applies to any matrix. RRE means Reduced Row Echelon form.
    – zipzapboing
    Nov 29 at 0:29










  • Hint: how many forms are there for an n-by-n matrix with k non-zero rows?
    – Michael Lugo
    Nov 29 at 1:27










  • ${n choose k}$ and I don't know how to show why
    – zipzapboing
    Nov 29 at 2:02


















0














Where "a form" for some RRE matrix is its description in terms of the number of all-zero rows it has and the position of pivots in the non-zero rows.



I've tried using induction, the base case is obvious enough:



$$ left[
begin{array}{c}
0
end{array}
right],
left[
begin{array}{c}
1
end{array}
right] rightarrow 2^1$$



After that, I assume that the total number of forms for the $n$ step is $2^n$, which has to be the sum of the different number of forms for each number $0 ,..., n$ of zero rows, the specifics of which I ignore for now (really, because I couldn't prove it myself).



Then, for each $n times n$ form with given number of zero rows $Z$, I can embed it in a $(n+1) times (n+1)$ matrix where the first zero row $z$ from the embedded matrix can be extended to have an $z_{n+1}$ entry in ${1, 0}$. If $z_{n+1} = 0$, there is a one-to-one correspondence with the sets of $ntimes n$ forms indexed by $Z$, except when $Z=0$. The same argument applies to $z_{n+1} = 1$. Notice that for the $Z=0$ case, the smaller matrix can be embedded in a matrix where the last entry is either $0$ or $1$, which results in two RRE additional forms for the larger matrix.



Finally, the two one-to-one mappings contribute $2^n -1$ forms each. Adding the last two cases, we have $2^n - 1 + 2^n -1 +2 = 2^{n+1}$ forms and the induction is complete.



I feel my reasoning is somewhat convoluted, so I'd appreciate it if any flaws could be pointed out. My textbook had a hint about using Pascal's triangle, and I did notice that the number of forms linked to each $Z$ follows the pattern, but I was unable to set up a counting scheme for all possible pivot positions to show that this applies generally, so I would appreciate guidance in that regard.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What is a n RRE matrix?
    – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
    Nov 28 at 22:26










  • @YiorgosS.Smyrlis I meant to type $n times n$ but the description actually applies to any matrix. RRE means Reduced Row Echelon form.
    – zipzapboing
    Nov 29 at 0:29










  • Hint: how many forms are there for an n-by-n matrix with k non-zero rows?
    – Michael Lugo
    Nov 29 at 1:27










  • ${n choose k}$ and I don't know how to show why
    – zipzapboing
    Nov 29 at 2:02
















0












0








0







Where "a form" for some RRE matrix is its description in terms of the number of all-zero rows it has and the position of pivots in the non-zero rows.



I've tried using induction, the base case is obvious enough:



$$ left[
begin{array}{c}
0
end{array}
right],
left[
begin{array}{c}
1
end{array}
right] rightarrow 2^1$$



After that, I assume that the total number of forms for the $n$ step is $2^n$, which has to be the sum of the different number of forms for each number $0 ,..., n$ of zero rows, the specifics of which I ignore for now (really, because I couldn't prove it myself).



Then, for each $n times n$ form with given number of zero rows $Z$, I can embed it in a $(n+1) times (n+1)$ matrix where the first zero row $z$ from the embedded matrix can be extended to have an $z_{n+1}$ entry in ${1, 0}$. If $z_{n+1} = 0$, there is a one-to-one correspondence with the sets of $ntimes n$ forms indexed by $Z$, except when $Z=0$. The same argument applies to $z_{n+1} = 1$. Notice that for the $Z=0$ case, the smaller matrix can be embedded in a matrix where the last entry is either $0$ or $1$, which results in two RRE additional forms for the larger matrix.



Finally, the two one-to-one mappings contribute $2^n -1$ forms each. Adding the last two cases, we have $2^n - 1 + 2^n -1 +2 = 2^{n+1}$ forms and the induction is complete.



I feel my reasoning is somewhat convoluted, so I'd appreciate it if any flaws could be pointed out. My textbook had a hint about using Pascal's triangle, and I did notice that the number of forms linked to each $Z$ follows the pattern, but I was unable to set up a counting scheme for all possible pivot positions to show that this applies generally, so I would appreciate guidance in that regard.










share|cite|improve this question















Where "a form" for some RRE matrix is its description in terms of the number of all-zero rows it has and the position of pivots in the non-zero rows.



I've tried using induction, the base case is obvious enough:



$$ left[
begin{array}{c}
0
end{array}
right],
left[
begin{array}{c}
1
end{array}
right] rightarrow 2^1$$



After that, I assume that the total number of forms for the $n$ step is $2^n$, which has to be the sum of the different number of forms for each number $0 ,..., n$ of zero rows, the specifics of which I ignore for now (really, because I couldn't prove it myself).



Then, for each $n times n$ form with given number of zero rows $Z$, I can embed it in a $(n+1) times (n+1)$ matrix where the first zero row $z$ from the embedded matrix can be extended to have an $z_{n+1}$ entry in ${1, 0}$. If $z_{n+1} = 0$, there is a one-to-one correspondence with the sets of $ntimes n$ forms indexed by $Z$, except when $Z=0$. The same argument applies to $z_{n+1} = 1$. Notice that for the $Z=0$ case, the smaller matrix can be embedded in a matrix where the last entry is either $0$ or $1$, which results in two RRE additional forms for the larger matrix.



Finally, the two one-to-one mappings contribute $2^n -1$ forms each. Adding the last two cases, we have $2^n - 1 + 2^n -1 +2 = 2^{n+1}$ forms and the induction is complete.



I feel my reasoning is somewhat convoluted, so I'd appreciate it if any flaws could be pointed out. My textbook had a hint about using Pascal's triangle, and I did notice that the number of forms linked to each $Z$ follows the pattern, but I was unable to set up a counting scheme for all possible pivot positions to show that this applies generally, so I would appreciate guidance in that regard.







linear-algebra combinatorics matrices induction binomial-coefficients






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 at 0:28

























asked Nov 28 at 22:21









zipzapboing

979




979












  • What is a n RRE matrix?
    – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
    Nov 28 at 22:26










  • @YiorgosS.Smyrlis I meant to type $n times n$ but the description actually applies to any matrix. RRE means Reduced Row Echelon form.
    – zipzapboing
    Nov 29 at 0:29










  • Hint: how many forms are there for an n-by-n matrix with k non-zero rows?
    – Michael Lugo
    Nov 29 at 1:27










  • ${n choose k}$ and I don't know how to show why
    – zipzapboing
    Nov 29 at 2:02




















  • What is a n RRE matrix?
    – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
    Nov 28 at 22:26










  • @YiorgosS.Smyrlis I meant to type $n times n$ but the description actually applies to any matrix. RRE means Reduced Row Echelon form.
    – zipzapboing
    Nov 29 at 0:29










  • Hint: how many forms are there for an n-by-n matrix with k non-zero rows?
    – Michael Lugo
    Nov 29 at 1:27










  • ${n choose k}$ and I don't know how to show why
    – zipzapboing
    Nov 29 at 2:02


















What is a n RRE matrix?
– Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
Nov 28 at 22:26




What is a n RRE matrix?
– Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
Nov 28 at 22:26












@YiorgosS.Smyrlis I meant to type $n times n$ but the description actually applies to any matrix. RRE means Reduced Row Echelon form.
– zipzapboing
Nov 29 at 0:29




@YiorgosS.Smyrlis I meant to type $n times n$ but the description actually applies to any matrix. RRE means Reduced Row Echelon form.
– zipzapboing
Nov 29 at 0:29












Hint: how many forms are there for an n-by-n matrix with k non-zero rows?
– Michael Lugo
Nov 29 at 1:27




Hint: how many forms are there for an n-by-n matrix with k non-zero rows?
– Michael Lugo
Nov 29 at 1:27












${n choose k}$ and I don't know how to show why
– zipzapboing
Nov 29 at 2:02






${n choose k}$ and I don't know how to show why
– zipzapboing
Nov 29 at 2:02












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














A form with $k$ non-zero rows will have $k$ pivots which can be in columns $1,...,n$. Since the pivots must be ordered so that each one is to the right of the previous one, they can only be picked in increasing order, that is, only one ordering matters and this is equivalent to picking a combination of $k$ in $n$ elements.



Therefore, for a given $n times n$ matrix, we have $sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} = 2^n$ forms.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017819%2fshow-there-are-2n-forms-a-n-times-n-matrix-can-take-preferably-via-pascal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    A form with $k$ non-zero rows will have $k$ pivots which can be in columns $1,...,n$. Since the pivots must be ordered so that each one is to the right of the previous one, they can only be picked in increasing order, that is, only one ordering matters and this is equivalent to picking a combination of $k$ in $n$ elements.



    Therefore, for a given $n times n$ matrix, we have $sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} = 2^n$ forms.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      A form with $k$ non-zero rows will have $k$ pivots which can be in columns $1,...,n$. Since the pivots must be ordered so that each one is to the right of the previous one, they can only be picked in increasing order, that is, only one ordering matters and this is equivalent to picking a combination of $k$ in $n$ elements.



      Therefore, for a given $n times n$ matrix, we have $sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} = 2^n$ forms.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        A form with $k$ non-zero rows will have $k$ pivots which can be in columns $1,...,n$. Since the pivots must be ordered so that each one is to the right of the previous one, they can only be picked in increasing order, that is, only one ordering matters and this is equivalent to picking a combination of $k$ in $n$ elements.



        Therefore, for a given $n times n$ matrix, we have $sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} = 2^n$ forms.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        A form with $k$ non-zero rows will have $k$ pivots which can be in columns $1,...,n$. Since the pivots must be ordered so that each one is to the right of the previous one, they can only be picked in increasing order, that is, only one ordering matters and this is equivalent to picking a combination of $k$ in $n$ elements.



        Therefore, for a given $n times n$ matrix, we have $sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} = 2^n$ forms.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 30 at 1:57









        zipzapboing

        979




        979






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017819%2fshow-there-are-2n-forms-a-n-times-n-matrix-can-take-preferably-via-pascal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen