Examples of non-abelian simply connected nilpotent Lie groups.












0












$begingroup$


I am searching for examples of connected locally compact group $G = N rtimes H$, where $N$ is a simply connected nilpotent non-abelian Lie group, $H$ is linear reductive and $H$ operates on $N$ without non-trivial fixed points. Please enlighten me.



P.S. I added the ergodic theory tag because I believe such groups are seen there.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    MO crosspost: mathoverflow.net/questions/317573
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:17
















0












$begingroup$


I am searching for examples of connected locally compact group $G = N rtimes H$, where $N$ is a simply connected nilpotent non-abelian Lie group, $H$ is linear reductive and $H$ operates on $N$ without non-trivial fixed points. Please enlighten me.



P.S. I added the ergodic theory tag because I believe such groups are seen there.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    MO crosspost: mathoverflow.net/questions/317573
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:17














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am searching for examples of connected locally compact group $G = N rtimes H$, where $N$ is a simply connected nilpotent non-abelian Lie group, $H$ is linear reductive and $H$ operates on $N$ without non-trivial fixed points. Please enlighten me.



P.S. I added the ergodic theory tag because I believe such groups are seen there.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am searching for examples of connected locally compact group $G = N rtimes H$, where $N$ is a simply connected nilpotent non-abelian Lie group, $H$ is linear reductive and $H$ operates on $N$ without non-trivial fixed points. Please enlighten me.



P.S. I added the ergodic theory tag because I believe such groups are seen there.







group-theory lie-groups ergodic-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 13 '18 at 0:16









MamboMambo

335113




335113








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    MO crosspost: mathoverflow.net/questions/317573
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:17














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    MO crosspost: mathoverflow.net/questions/317573
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:17








1




1




$begingroup$
MO crosspost: mathoverflow.net/questions/317573
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 21:17




$begingroup$
MO crosspost: mathoverflow.net/questions/317573
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 21:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The (real or complex) upper triangular group in size $ge 3$ is a trivial example (with $H$ the diagonal group).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I believe upper uni-triangular group is nilpotent. but not this.
    $endgroup$
    – Mambo
    Dec 13 '18 at 20:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes: $G$ is the upper triangular group, $N$ is the subgroup of $G$ with diagonal $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry. I don't understand the action of $H$ on $N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mambo
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The action of $H$ on $N$ is by conjugation. You have a result of 1st year undergraduate, which tells you that if a group $G$ has two subgroups $H,N$, with $N$ normal, $Hcap N={1}$ and $HN=G$, then $G$ is semidirect product $Nrtimes H$ with $H$ acting on $N$ by conjugation.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It stabilizes $N$, which does not means it fixes $N$ (which means fix each point of $N$). In this precise case, no element $neq 1$ of $N$ is fixed by $H$, because $H$ equals its own centralizer in the group of invertible matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:41













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037426%2fexamples-of-non-abelian-simply-connected-nilpotent-lie-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

The (real or complex) upper triangular group in size $ge 3$ is a trivial example (with $H$ the diagonal group).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I believe upper uni-triangular group is nilpotent. but not this.
    $endgroup$
    – Mambo
    Dec 13 '18 at 20:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes: $G$ is the upper triangular group, $N$ is the subgroup of $G$ with diagonal $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry. I don't understand the action of $H$ on $N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mambo
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The action of $H$ on $N$ is by conjugation. You have a result of 1st year undergraduate, which tells you that if a group $G$ has two subgroups $H,N$, with $N$ normal, $Hcap N={1}$ and $HN=G$, then $G$ is semidirect product $Nrtimes H$ with $H$ acting on $N$ by conjugation.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It stabilizes $N$, which does not means it fixes $N$ (which means fix each point of $N$). In this precise case, no element $neq 1$ of $N$ is fixed by $H$, because $H$ equals its own centralizer in the group of invertible matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:41


















1












$begingroup$

The (real or complex) upper triangular group in size $ge 3$ is a trivial example (with $H$ the diagonal group).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I believe upper uni-triangular group is nilpotent. but not this.
    $endgroup$
    – Mambo
    Dec 13 '18 at 20:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes: $G$ is the upper triangular group, $N$ is the subgroup of $G$ with diagonal $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry. I don't understand the action of $H$ on $N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mambo
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The action of $H$ on $N$ is by conjugation. You have a result of 1st year undergraduate, which tells you that if a group $G$ has two subgroups $H,N$, with $N$ normal, $Hcap N={1}$ and $HN=G$, then $G$ is semidirect product $Nrtimes H$ with $H$ acting on $N$ by conjugation.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It stabilizes $N$, which does not means it fixes $N$ (which means fix each point of $N$). In this precise case, no element $neq 1$ of $N$ is fixed by $H$, because $H$ equals its own centralizer in the group of invertible matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:41
















1












1








1





$begingroup$

The (real or complex) upper triangular group in size $ge 3$ is a trivial example (with $H$ the diagonal group).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The (real or complex) upper triangular group in size $ge 3$ is a trivial example (with $H$ the diagonal group).







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 13 '18 at 19:34









YCorYCor

7,508829




7,508829












  • $begingroup$
    I believe upper uni-triangular group is nilpotent. but not this.
    $endgroup$
    – Mambo
    Dec 13 '18 at 20:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes: $G$ is the upper triangular group, $N$ is the subgroup of $G$ with diagonal $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry. I don't understand the action of $H$ on $N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mambo
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The action of $H$ on $N$ is by conjugation. You have a result of 1st year undergraduate, which tells you that if a group $G$ has two subgroups $H,N$, with $N$ normal, $Hcap N={1}$ and $HN=G$, then $G$ is semidirect product $Nrtimes H$ with $H$ acting on $N$ by conjugation.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It stabilizes $N$, which does not means it fixes $N$ (which means fix each point of $N$). In this precise case, no element $neq 1$ of $N$ is fixed by $H$, because $H$ equals its own centralizer in the group of invertible matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:41




















  • $begingroup$
    I believe upper uni-triangular group is nilpotent. but not this.
    $endgroup$
    – Mambo
    Dec 13 '18 at 20:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes: $G$ is the upper triangular group, $N$ is the subgroup of $G$ with diagonal $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry. I don't understand the action of $H$ on $N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mambo
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The action of $H$ on $N$ is by conjugation. You have a result of 1st year undergraduate, which tells you that if a group $G$ has two subgroups $H,N$, with $N$ normal, $Hcap N={1}$ and $HN=G$, then $G$ is semidirect product $Nrtimes H$ with $H$ acting on $N$ by conjugation.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It stabilizes $N$, which does not means it fixes $N$ (which means fix each point of $N$). In this precise case, no element $neq 1$ of $N$ is fixed by $H$, because $H$ equals its own centralizer in the group of invertible matrices.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    Dec 13 '18 at 21:41


















$begingroup$
I believe upper uni-triangular group is nilpotent. but not this.
$endgroup$
– Mambo
Dec 13 '18 at 20:39




$begingroup$
I believe upper uni-triangular group is nilpotent. but not this.
$endgroup$
– Mambo
Dec 13 '18 at 20:39












$begingroup$
Yes: $G$ is the upper triangular group, $N$ is the subgroup of $G$ with diagonal $1$.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 20:55




$begingroup$
Yes: $G$ is the upper triangular group, $N$ is the subgroup of $G$ with diagonal $1$.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 20:55












$begingroup$
Sorry. I don't understand the action of $H$ on $N$.
$endgroup$
– Mambo
Dec 13 '18 at 21:11




$begingroup$
Sorry. I don't understand the action of $H$ on $N$.
$endgroup$
– Mambo
Dec 13 '18 at 21:11




1




1




$begingroup$
The action of $H$ on $N$ is by conjugation. You have a result of 1st year undergraduate, which tells you that if a group $G$ has two subgroups $H,N$, with $N$ normal, $Hcap N={1}$ and $HN=G$, then $G$ is semidirect product $Nrtimes H$ with $H$ acting on $N$ by conjugation.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 21:15




$begingroup$
The action of $H$ on $N$ is by conjugation. You have a result of 1st year undergraduate, which tells you that if a group $G$ has two subgroups $H,N$, with $N$ normal, $Hcap N={1}$ and $HN=G$, then $G$ is semidirect product $Nrtimes H$ with $H$ acting on $N$ by conjugation.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 21:15




1




1




$begingroup$
It stabilizes $N$, which does not means it fixes $N$ (which means fix each point of $N$). In this precise case, no element $neq 1$ of $N$ is fixed by $H$, because $H$ equals its own centralizer in the group of invertible matrices.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 21:41






$begingroup$
It stabilizes $N$, which does not means it fixes $N$ (which means fix each point of $N$). In this precise case, no element $neq 1$ of $N$ is fixed by $H$, because $H$ equals its own centralizer in the group of invertible matrices.
$endgroup$
– YCor
Dec 13 '18 at 21:41




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037426%2fexamples-of-non-abelian-simply-connected-nilpotent-lie-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen