How do I integrate the discontinuous function $f$?
Let $f(x) = x$ for $0 le x le 1$, $x-1$ for $1 < x le 2$, $0$ for $2<x le 3$.
I ended up writing the double integral as $iint_{D_3 cup D_4} f = int_0^2 dx int_0^1 2x dy = 2 int_0^1 dx int_0^1 x dy$. For $2 int_0^1 dx int_0^1 x dy$, it feels like I'm adding the triangle defined on $0 le x le 1$ twice. I wanted to know how I'm able to do this for this specific function since $f(x)$ is not continuous. If $g$ is continuous on an interval, then $g$ has an antiderivative on $I$. But since the converse doesn't always hold true, it would be nice if someone could explain how we're able to integrate the triangle defined on $1<xle2$, since this second triangle doesn't have a point defined on $x=1$, for this discontinuous function $f$.
calculus real-analysis multivariable-calculus
add a comment |
Let $f(x) = x$ for $0 le x le 1$, $x-1$ for $1 < x le 2$, $0$ for $2<x le 3$.
I ended up writing the double integral as $iint_{D_3 cup D_4} f = int_0^2 dx int_0^1 2x dy = 2 int_0^1 dx int_0^1 x dy$. For $2 int_0^1 dx int_0^1 x dy$, it feels like I'm adding the triangle defined on $0 le x le 1$ twice. I wanted to know how I'm able to do this for this specific function since $f(x)$ is not continuous. If $g$ is continuous on an interval, then $g$ has an antiderivative on $I$. But since the converse doesn't always hold true, it would be nice if someone could explain how we're able to integrate the triangle defined on $1<xle2$, since this second triangle doesn't have a point defined on $x=1$, for this discontinuous function $f$.
calculus real-analysis multivariable-calculus
$f$ is a function of a single variable. Why are you using a double integral?
– helper
Nov 29 at 3:59
I saw an example in my textbook, and decided to separate the region $D$ into two triangles $D_3$ and $D_4$, and integrate over the region $D_3 cup D_4$, since triangle $D_4$ is not defined at $x=1$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:06
1
Not sure if what is bothering you is the fact that the second interval $(1,2]$ is not closed. Integration over a not closed interval has been discussed e.g. here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/56270/…
– mlerma54
Nov 29 at 4:11
yes, that's what was bothering me. I also was wondering if the initial integral I did with the two variables is incorrect, or is it just superfluous given that we're considering $x$ in the interval $(0,3)$?
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:20
add a comment |
Let $f(x) = x$ for $0 le x le 1$, $x-1$ for $1 < x le 2$, $0$ for $2<x le 3$.
I ended up writing the double integral as $iint_{D_3 cup D_4} f = int_0^2 dx int_0^1 2x dy = 2 int_0^1 dx int_0^1 x dy$. For $2 int_0^1 dx int_0^1 x dy$, it feels like I'm adding the triangle defined on $0 le x le 1$ twice. I wanted to know how I'm able to do this for this specific function since $f(x)$ is not continuous. If $g$ is continuous on an interval, then $g$ has an antiderivative on $I$. But since the converse doesn't always hold true, it would be nice if someone could explain how we're able to integrate the triangle defined on $1<xle2$, since this second triangle doesn't have a point defined on $x=1$, for this discontinuous function $f$.
calculus real-analysis multivariable-calculus
Let $f(x) = x$ for $0 le x le 1$, $x-1$ for $1 < x le 2$, $0$ for $2<x le 3$.
I ended up writing the double integral as $iint_{D_3 cup D_4} f = int_0^2 dx int_0^1 2x dy = 2 int_0^1 dx int_0^1 x dy$. For $2 int_0^1 dx int_0^1 x dy$, it feels like I'm adding the triangle defined on $0 le x le 1$ twice. I wanted to know how I'm able to do this for this specific function since $f(x)$ is not continuous. If $g$ is continuous on an interval, then $g$ has an antiderivative on $I$. But since the converse doesn't always hold true, it would be nice if someone could explain how we're able to integrate the triangle defined on $1<xle2$, since this second triangle doesn't have a point defined on $x=1$, for this discontinuous function $f$.
calculus real-analysis multivariable-calculus
calculus real-analysis multivariable-calculus
asked Nov 29 at 3:28
K.M
668312
668312
$f$ is a function of a single variable. Why are you using a double integral?
– helper
Nov 29 at 3:59
I saw an example in my textbook, and decided to separate the region $D$ into two triangles $D_3$ and $D_4$, and integrate over the region $D_3 cup D_4$, since triangle $D_4$ is not defined at $x=1$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:06
1
Not sure if what is bothering you is the fact that the second interval $(1,2]$ is not closed. Integration over a not closed interval has been discussed e.g. here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/56270/…
– mlerma54
Nov 29 at 4:11
yes, that's what was bothering me. I also was wondering if the initial integral I did with the two variables is incorrect, or is it just superfluous given that we're considering $x$ in the interval $(0,3)$?
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:20
add a comment |
$f$ is a function of a single variable. Why are you using a double integral?
– helper
Nov 29 at 3:59
I saw an example in my textbook, and decided to separate the region $D$ into two triangles $D_3$ and $D_4$, and integrate over the region $D_3 cup D_4$, since triangle $D_4$ is not defined at $x=1$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:06
1
Not sure if what is bothering you is the fact that the second interval $(1,2]$ is not closed. Integration over a not closed interval has been discussed e.g. here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/56270/…
– mlerma54
Nov 29 at 4:11
yes, that's what was bothering me. I also was wondering if the initial integral I did with the two variables is incorrect, or is it just superfluous given that we're considering $x$ in the interval $(0,3)$?
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:20
$f$ is a function of a single variable. Why are you using a double integral?
– helper
Nov 29 at 3:59
$f$ is a function of a single variable. Why are you using a double integral?
– helper
Nov 29 at 3:59
I saw an example in my textbook, and decided to separate the region $D$ into two triangles $D_3$ and $D_4$, and integrate over the region $D_3 cup D_4$, since triangle $D_4$ is not defined at $x=1$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:06
I saw an example in my textbook, and decided to separate the region $D$ into two triangles $D_3$ and $D_4$, and integrate over the region $D_3 cup D_4$, since triangle $D_4$ is not defined at $x=1$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:06
1
1
Not sure if what is bothering you is the fact that the second interval $(1,2]$ is not closed. Integration over a not closed interval has been discussed e.g. here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/56270/…
– mlerma54
Nov 29 at 4:11
Not sure if what is bothering you is the fact that the second interval $(1,2]$ is not closed. Integration over a not closed interval has been discussed e.g. here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/56270/…
– mlerma54
Nov 29 at 4:11
yes, that's what was bothering me. I also was wondering if the initial integral I did with the two variables is incorrect, or is it just superfluous given that we're considering $x$ in the interval $(0,3)$?
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:20
yes, that's what was bothering me. I also was wondering if the initial integral I did with the two variables is incorrect, or is it just superfluous given that we're considering $x$ in the interval $(0,3)$?
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:20
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$int_0^1 x.dx + int_1^2 (x - 1).dx + int_2^3 0.dx$
I thought about doing that at first, but for $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$ we have that the function $x-1$ is not defined at $1$, so I'm don't know why I'm still able to integrate $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018120%2fhow-do-i-integrate-the-discontinuous-function-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$int_0^1 x.dx + int_1^2 (x - 1).dx + int_2^3 0.dx$
I thought about doing that at first, but for $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$ we have that the function $x-1$ is not defined at $1$, so I'm don't know why I'm still able to integrate $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:10
add a comment |
$int_0^1 x.dx + int_1^2 (x - 1).dx + int_2^3 0.dx$
I thought about doing that at first, but for $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$ we have that the function $x-1$ is not defined at $1$, so I'm don't know why I'm still able to integrate $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:10
add a comment |
$int_0^1 x.dx + int_1^2 (x - 1).dx + int_2^3 0.dx$
$int_0^1 x.dx + int_1^2 (x - 1).dx + int_2^3 0.dx$
answered Nov 29 at 4:05
William Elliot
7,0702519
7,0702519
I thought about doing that at first, but for $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$ we have that the function $x-1$ is not defined at $1$, so I'm don't know why I'm still able to integrate $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:10
add a comment |
I thought about doing that at first, but for $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$ we have that the function $x-1$ is not defined at $1$, so I'm don't know why I'm still able to integrate $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:10
I thought about doing that at first, but for $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$ we have that the function $x-1$ is not defined at $1$, so I'm don't know why I'm still able to integrate $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:10
I thought about doing that at first, but for $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$ we have that the function $x-1$ is not defined at $1$, so I'm don't know why I'm still able to integrate $int_1^2 (x-1) dx$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018120%2fhow-do-i-integrate-the-discontinuous-function-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$f$ is a function of a single variable. Why are you using a double integral?
– helper
Nov 29 at 3:59
I saw an example in my textbook, and decided to separate the region $D$ into two triangles $D_3$ and $D_4$, and integrate over the region $D_3 cup D_4$, since triangle $D_4$ is not defined at $x=1$.
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:06
1
Not sure if what is bothering you is the fact that the second interval $(1,2]$ is not closed. Integration over a not closed interval has been discussed e.g. here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/56270/…
– mlerma54
Nov 29 at 4:11
yes, that's what was bothering me. I also was wondering if the initial integral I did with the two variables is incorrect, or is it just superfluous given that we're considering $x$ in the interval $(0,3)$?
– K.M
Nov 29 at 4:20