For $f:Xto Y$ and $A$ a subset of $X$, why are $A$ and $f^{-1}(f(A))$ not necessarily equal?












0














I need help with this question:




Let $f: X to Y$ be a function, and let $A$ be a subset of $X$. Why are the sets $A$ and $f^{-1}(f(A))$ not necessarily equal? Under what conditions are they equal?




Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question





























    0














    I need help with this question:




    Let $f: X to Y$ be a function, and let $A$ be a subset of $X$. Why are the sets $A$ and $f^{-1}(f(A))$ not necessarily equal? Under what conditions are they equal?




    Thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0


      1





      I need help with this question:




      Let $f: X to Y$ be a function, and let $A$ be a subset of $X$. Why are the sets $A$ and $f^{-1}(f(A))$ not necessarily equal? Under what conditions are they equal?




      Thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question















      I need help with this question:




      Let $f: X to Y$ be a function, and let $A$ be a subset of $X$. Why are the sets $A$ and $f^{-1}(f(A))$ not necessarily equal? Under what conditions are they equal?




      Thanks!







      functions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 29 at 19:57









      Blue

      47.6k870151




      47.6k870151










      asked Nov 29 at 14:25









      Frida

      1




      1






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Consider the function $f:{1,2,3}rightarrow{2,3,4}, f(1)=2, f(2)=f(3)=3$ and let $A={1,2}subseteq{1,2,3}$.



          $f(A)=f({1,2})={2,3}implies f^{-1}(f(A))=f^{-1}({2,3})={1,2,3}neq{1,2}=A$





          We define the direct image of $Asubseteq X$ as $f(A)={f(x): xin A}$ and the inverse image of $Bsubseteq Y$ as $f^{-1}(B)={x: xin X, f(x)in B }$. Clearly, the inverse image of $f(A)$, that is $f^{-1}(f(A)),$ contains all the elements of $A$ as $f(x)in f(A), forall xin A$. This means $Asubseteq f^{-1}(f(A))$. But this is not to say that $f^{-1}(f(A))$ contains only the elements of $A$. If $exists yin X-A$ such that $f(y)in f(A)$, then $yin f^{-1}(f(A))$ but $ynotin A$.



          The sufficient and necessary condition for $f^{-1}(f(A))=A, forall Asubseteq X$, is that $f$ is injective. You already know from above that $Asubseteq f^{-1}(f(A))$. Can you prove the converse: $f^{-1}(f(A))subseteq A,forall Asubseteq X$ given $f$ is injective?






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018686%2ffor-fx-to-y-and-a-a-subset-of-x-why-are-a-and-f-1fa-not-neces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Consider the function $f:{1,2,3}rightarrow{2,3,4}, f(1)=2, f(2)=f(3)=3$ and let $A={1,2}subseteq{1,2,3}$.



            $f(A)=f({1,2})={2,3}implies f^{-1}(f(A))=f^{-1}({2,3})={1,2,3}neq{1,2}=A$





            We define the direct image of $Asubseteq X$ as $f(A)={f(x): xin A}$ and the inverse image of $Bsubseteq Y$ as $f^{-1}(B)={x: xin X, f(x)in B }$. Clearly, the inverse image of $f(A)$, that is $f^{-1}(f(A)),$ contains all the elements of $A$ as $f(x)in f(A), forall xin A$. This means $Asubseteq f^{-1}(f(A))$. But this is not to say that $f^{-1}(f(A))$ contains only the elements of $A$. If $exists yin X-A$ such that $f(y)in f(A)$, then $yin f^{-1}(f(A))$ but $ynotin A$.



            The sufficient and necessary condition for $f^{-1}(f(A))=A, forall Asubseteq X$, is that $f$ is injective. You already know from above that $Asubseteq f^{-1}(f(A))$. Can you prove the converse: $f^{-1}(f(A))subseteq A,forall Asubseteq X$ given $f$ is injective?






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              1














              Consider the function $f:{1,2,3}rightarrow{2,3,4}, f(1)=2, f(2)=f(3)=3$ and let $A={1,2}subseteq{1,2,3}$.



              $f(A)=f({1,2})={2,3}implies f^{-1}(f(A))=f^{-1}({2,3})={1,2,3}neq{1,2}=A$





              We define the direct image of $Asubseteq X$ as $f(A)={f(x): xin A}$ and the inverse image of $Bsubseteq Y$ as $f^{-1}(B)={x: xin X, f(x)in B }$. Clearly, the inverse image of $f(A)$, that is $f^{-1}(f(A)),$ contains all the elements of $A$ as $f(x)in f(A), forall xin A$. This means $Asubseteq f^{-1}(f(A))$. But this is not to say that $f^{-1}(f(A))$ contains only the elements of $A$. If $exists yin X-A$ such that $f(y)in f(A)$, then $yin f^{-1}(f(A))$ but $ynotin A$.



              The sufficient and necessary condition for $f^{-1}(f(A))=A, forall Asubseteq X$, is that $f$ is injective. You already know from above that $Asubseteq f^{-1}(f(A))$. Can you prove the converse: $f^{-1}(f(A))subseteq A,forall Asubseteq X$ given $f$ is injective?






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                Consider the function $f:{1,2,3}rightarrow{2,3,4}, f(1)=2, f(2)=f(3)=3$ and let $A={1,2}subseteq{1,2,3}$.



                $f(A)=f({1,2})={2,3}implies f^{-1}(f(A))=f^{-1}({2,3})={1,2,3}neq{1,2}=A$





                We define the direct image of $Asubseteq X$ as $f(A)={f(x): xin A}$ and the inverse image of $Bsubseteq Y$ as $f^{-1}(B)={x: xin X, f(x)in B }$. Clearly, the inverse image of $f(A)$, that is $f^{-1}(f(A)),$ contains all the elements of $A$ as $f(x)in f(A), forall xin A$. This means $Asubseteq f^{-1}(f(A))$. But this is not to say that $f^{-1}(f(A))$ contains only the elements of $A$. If $exists yin X-A$ such that $f(y)in f(A)$, then $yin f^{-1}(f(A))$ but $ynotin A$.



                The sufficient and necessary condition for $f^{-1}(f(A))=A, forall Asubseteq X$, is that $f$ is injective. You already know from above that $Asubseteq f^{-1}(f(A))$. Can you prove the converse: $f^{-1}(f(A))subseteq A,forall Asubseteq X$ given $f$ is injective?






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Consider the function $f:{1,2,3}rightarrow{2,3,4}, f(1)=2, f(2)=f(3)=3$ and let $A={1,2}subseteq{1,2,3}$.



                $f(A)=f({1,2})={2,3}implies f^{-1}(f(A))=f^{-1}({2,3})={1,2,3}neq{1,2}=A$





                We define the direct image of $Asubseteq X$ as $f(A)={f(x): xin A}$ and the inverse image of $Bsubseteq Y$ as $f^{-1}(B)={x: xin X, f(x)in B }$. Clearly, the inverse image of $f(A)$, that is $f^{-1}(f(A)),$ contains all the elements of $A$ as $f(x)in f(A), forall xin A$. This means $Asubseteq f^{-1}(f(A))$. But this is not to say that $f^{-1}(f(A))$ contains only the elements of $A$. If $exists yin X-A$ such that $f(y)in f(A)$, then $yin f^{-1}(f(A))$ but $ynotin A$.



                The sufficient and necessary condition for $f^{-1}(f(A))=A, forall Asubseteq X$, is that $f$ is injective. You already know from above that $Asubseteq f^{-1}(f(A))$. Can you prove the converse: $f^{-1}(f(A))subseteq A,forall Asubseteq X$ given $f$ is injective?







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 29 at 15:13









                Shubham Johri

                3,861716




                3,861716






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018686%2ffor-fx-to-y-and-a-a-subset-of-x-why-are-a-and-f-1fa-not-neces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen