Calculation of Cokernel? Is my solution correct?
$begingroup$
I was trying to find the following:
$$ M= begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}\
coker(M) = (x,y,z)*
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}= 0\
2x+3y+z = 0\
4x+2y+z = 0\
z = -x+2y\
2x+3y+(-4x-2y)=-2x+y Rightarrow y = 2x Rightarrow z = -8x\
Rightarrow coker(M) = begin{bmatrix}x\2x\-8x end{bmatrix}$$
Is that correct?
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was trying to find the following:
$$ M= begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}\
coker(M) = (x,y,z)*
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}= 0\
2x+3y+z = 0\
4x+2y+z = 0\
z = -x+2y\
2x+3y+(-4x-2y)=-2x+y Rightarrow y = 2x Rightarrow z = -8x\
Rightarrow coker(M) = begin{bmatrix}x\2x\-8x end{bmatrix}$$
Is that correct?
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 12:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was trying to find the following:
$$ M= begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}\
coker(M) = (x,y,z)*
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}= 0\
2x+3y+z = 0\
4x+2y+z = 0\
z = -x+2y\
2x+3y+(-4x-2y)=-2x+y Rightarrow y = 2x Rightarrow z = -8x\
Rightarrow coker(M) = begin{bmatrix}x\2x\-8x end{bmatrix}$$
Is that correct?
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
I was trying to find the following:
$$ M= begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}\
coker(M) = (x,y,z)*
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}= 0\
2x+3y+z = 0\
4x+2y+z = 0\
z = -x+2y\
2x+3y+(-4x-2y)=-2x+y Rightarrow y = 2x Rightarrow z = -8x\
Rightarrow coker(M) = begin{bmatrix}x\2x\-8x end{bmatrix}$$
Is that correct?
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
edited Jan 5 at 12:02
Shubham Johri
5,550818
5,550818
asked Jan 5 at 11:41
thebillythebilly
566
566
$begingroup$
Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 12:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 12:01
$begingroup$
Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 12:01
$begingroup$
Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 12:01
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your question is imprecise.
(1) Cokernels are defined for linear maps $f : V to W$ between vector spaces $V, W$ over a field $K$.
You do not say which field is considered and which are the vector spaces. Most likely you have $K = mathbb{R}$. Then I would conclude that $V = mathbb{R}^3, W = mathbb{R}^2$. See the next point.
(2) You consider a matrix $M$, not a linear map.
Of course, $M$ is the matrix representation of a unique linear map $f : mathbb{R}^3 to mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to the standard bases of $mathbb{R}^3$ and $mathbb{R}^2$. Writing the elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ as row vectors, you have $f(x) = x * M$, where $*$ denotes matrix multiplication.
(3) The cokernel of $f$ is defined as the quotient space $W / text{im}(f)$. It seems you consider the kernel of $f$ which defined as $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid f(x) = 0 }$. In our case $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid x * M = 0 }$. This was calculated correctly.
Perhaps I misunderstood something, but you see the some more precision would be needed. I encourage you to do this in future questions.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 13:05
$begingroup$
I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
$endgroup$
– thebilly
Jan 5 at 13:21
$begingroup$
Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
$endgroup$
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 13:35
$begingroup$
@Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Jan 5 at 13:38
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062639%2fcalculation-of-cokernel-is-my-solution-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your question is imprecise.
(1) Cokernels are defined for linear maps $f : V to W$ between vector spaces $V, W$ over a field $K$.
You do not say which field is considered and which are the vector spaces. Most likely you have $K = mathbb{R}$. Then I would conclude that $V = mathbb{R}^3, W = mathbb{R}^2$. See the next point.
(2) You consider a matrix $M$, not a linear map.
Of course, $M$ is the matrix representation of a unique linear map $f : mathbb{R}^3 to mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to the standard bases of $mathbb{R}^3$ and $mathbb{R}^2$. Writing the elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ as row vectors, you have $f(x) = x * M$, where $*$ denotes matrix multiplication.
(3) The cokernel of $f$ is defined as the quotient space $W / text{im}(f)$. It seems you consider the kernel of $f$ which defined as $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid f(x) = 0 }$. In our case $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid x * M = 0 }$. This was calculated correctly.
Perhaps I misunderstood something, but you see the some more precision would be needed. I encourage you to do this in future questions.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 13:05
$begingroup$
I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
$endgroup$
– thebilly
Jan 5 at 13:21
$begingroup$
Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
$endgroup$
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 13:35
$begingroup$
@Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Jan 5 at 13:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your question is imprecise.
(1) Cokernels are defined for linear maps $f : V to W$ between vector spaces $V, W$ over a field $K$.
You do not say which field is considered and which are the vector spaces. Most likely you have $K = mathbb{R}$. Then I would conclude that $V = mathbb{R}^3, W = mathbb{R}^2$. See the next point.
(2) You consider a matrix $M$, not a linear map.
Of course, $M$ is the matrix representation of a unique linear map $f : mathbb{R}^3 to mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to the standard bases of $mathbb{R}^3$ and $mathbb{R}^2$. Writing the elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ as row vectors, you have $f(x) = x * M$, where $*$ denotes matrix multiplication.
(3) The cokernel of $f$ is defined as the quotient space $W / text{im}(f)$. It seems you consider the kernel of $f$ which defined as $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid f(x) = 0 }$. In our case $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid x * M = 0 }$. This was calculated correctly.
Perhaps I misunderstood something, but you see the some more precision would be needed. I encourage you to do this in future questions.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 13:05
$begingroup$
I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
$endgroup$
– thebilly
Jan 5 at 13:21
$begingroup$
Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
$endgroup$
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 13:35
$begingroup$
@Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Jan 5 at 13:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your question is imprecise.
(1) Cokernels are defined for linear maps $f : V to W$ between vector spaces $V, W$ over a field $K$.
You do not say which field is considered and which are the vector spaces. Most likely you have $K = mathbb{R}$. Then I would conclude that $V = mathbb{R}^3, W = mathbb{R}^2$. See the next point.
(2) You consider a matrix $M$, not a linear map.
Of course, $M$ is the matrix representation of a unique linear map $f : mathbb{R}^3 to mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to the standard bases of $mathbb{R}^3$ and $mathbb{R}^2$. Writing the elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ as row vectors, you have $f(x) = x * M$, where $*$ denotes matrix multiplication.
(3) The cokernel of $f$ is defined as the quotient space $W / text{im}(f)$. It seems you consider the kernel of $f$ which defined as $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid f(x) = 0 }$. In our case $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid x * M = 0 }$. This was calculated correctly.
Perhaps I misunderstood something, but you see the some more precision would be needed. I encourage you to do this in future questions.
$endgroup$
Your question is imprecise.
(1) Cokernels are defined for linear maps $f : V to W$ between vector spaces $V, W$ over a field $K$.
You do not say which field is considered and which are the vector spaces. Most likely you have $K = mathbb{R}$. Then I would conclude that $V = mathbb{R}^3, W = mathbb{R}^2$. See the next point.
(2) You consider a matrix $M$, not a linear map.
Of course, $M$ is the matrix representation of a unique linear map $f : mathbb{R}^3 to mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to the standard bases of $mathbb{R}^3$ and $mathbb{R}^2$. Writing the elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ as row vectors, you have $f(x) = x * M$, where $*$ denotes matrix multiplication.
(3) The cokernel of $f$ is defined as the quotient space $W / text{im}(f)$. It seems you consider the kernel of $f$ which defined as $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid f(x) = 0 }$. In our case $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid x * M = 0 }$. This was calculated correctly.
Perhaps I misunderstood something, but you see the some more precision would be needed. I encourage you to do this in future questions.
answered Jan 5 at 12:33
Paul FrostPaul Frost
12.4k31035
12.4k31035
$begingroup$
$ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 13:05
$begingroup$
I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
$endgroup$
– thebilly
Jan 5 at 13:21
$begingroup$
Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
$endgroup$
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 13:35
$begingroup$
@Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Jan 5 at 13:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 13:05
$begingroup$
I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
$endgroup$
– thebilly
Jan 5 at 13:21
$begingroup$
Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
$endgroup$
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 13:35
$begingroup$
@Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Jan 5 at 13:38
$begingroup$
$ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 13:05
$begingroup$
$ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 13:05
$begingroup$
I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
$endgroup$
– thebilly
Jan 5 at 13:21
$begingroup$
I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
$endgroup$
– thebilly
Jan 5 at 13:21
$begingroup$
Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
$endgroup$
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 13:35
$begingroup$
Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
$endgroup$
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 13:35
$begingroup$
@Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Jan 5 at 13:38
$begingroup$
@Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Jan 5 at 13:38
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062639%2fcalculation-of-cokernel-is-my-solution-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 12:01