Calculation of Cokernel? Is my solution correct?












1












$begingroup$


I was trying to find the following:



$$ M= begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}\
coker(M) = (x,y,z)*
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}= 0\
2x+3y+z = 0\
4x+2y+z = 0\
z = -x+2y\
2x+3y+(-4x-2y)=-2x+y Rightarrow y = 2x Rightarrow z = -8x\
Rightarrow coker(M) = begin{bmatrix}x\2x\-8x end{bmatrix}$$

Is that correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 5 at 12:01
















1












$begingroup$


I was trying to find the following:



$$ M= begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}\
coker(M) = (x,y,z)*
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}= 0\
2x+3y+z = 0\
4x+2y+z = 0\
z = -x+2y\
2x+3y+(-4x-2y)=-2x+y Rightarrow y = 2x Rightarrow z = -8x\
Rightarrow coker(M) = begin{bmatrix}x\2x\-8x end{bmatrix}$$

Is that correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 5 at 12:01














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I was trying to find the following:



$$ M= begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}\
coker(M) = (x,y,z)*
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}= 0\
2x+3y+z = 0\
4x+2y+z = 0\
z = -x+2y\
2x+3y+(-4x-2y)=-2x+y Rightarrow y = 2x Rightarrow z = -8x\
Rightarrow coker(M) = begin{bmatrix}x\2x\-8x end{bmatrix}$$

Is that correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was trying to find the following:



$$ M= begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}\
coker(M) = (x,y,z)*
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 4\
3 & 2\
1 & 1
end{bmatrix}= 0\
2x+3y+z = 0\
4x+2y+z = 0\
z = -x+2y\
2x+3y+(-4x-2y)=-2x+y Rightarrow y = 2x Rightarrow z = -8x\
Rightarrow coker(M) = begin{bmatrix}x\2x\-8x end{bmatrix}$$

Is that correct?







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 5 at 12:02









Shubham Johri

5,550818




5,550818










asked Jan 5 at 11:41









thebillythebilly

566




566












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 5 at 12:01


















  • $begingroup$
    Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 5 at 12:01
















$begingroup$
Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 12:01




$begingroup$
Yes, that is correct. You can complete the answer by stating $xinBbb R$ or $text{coker}(M)=text{span}{(1,2,-8)^T}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 12:01










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Your question is imprecise.



(1) Cokernels are defined for linear maps $f : V to W$ between vector spaces $V, W$ over a field $K$.



You do not say which field is considered and which are the vector spaces. Most likely you have $K = mathbb{R}$. Then I would conclude that $V = mathbb{R}^3, W = mathbb{R}^2$. See the next point.



(2) You consider a matrix $M$, not a linear map.



Of course, $M$ is the matrix representation of a unique linear map $f : mathbb{R}^3 to mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to the standard bases of $mathbb{R}^3$ and $mathbb{R}^2$. Writing the elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ as row vectors, you have $f(x) = x * M$, where $*$ denotes matrix multiplication.



(3) The cokernel of $f$ is defined as the quotient space $W / text{im}(f)$. It seems you consider the kernel of $f$ which defined as $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid f(x) = 0 }$. In our case $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid x * M = 0 }$. This was calculated correctly.



Perhaps I misunderstood something, but you see the some more precision would be needed. I encourage you to do this in future questions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    $ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 5 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
    $endgroup$
    – thebilly
    Jan 5 at 13:21










  • $begingroup$
    Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Ennar
    Jan 5 at 13:35












  • $begingroup$
    @Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Jan 5 at 13:38












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062639%2fcalculation-of-cokernel-is-my-solution-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Your question is imprecise.



(1) Cokernels are defined for linear maps $f : V to W$ between vector spaces $V, W$ over a field $K$.



You do not say which field is considered and which are the vector spaces. Most likely you have $K = mathbb{R}$. Then I would conclude that $V = mathbb{R}^3, W = mathbb{R}^2$. See the next point.



(2) You consider a matrix $M$, not a linear map.



Of course, $M$ is the matrix representation of a unique linear map $f : mathbb{R}^3 to mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to the standard bases of $mathbb{R}^3$ and $mathbb{R}^2$. Writing the elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ as row vectors, you have $f(x) = x * M$, where $*$ denotes matrix multiplication.



(3) The cokernel of $f$ is defined as the quotient space $W / text{im}(f)$. It seems you consider the kernel of $f$ which defined as $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid f(x) = 0 }$. In our case $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid x * M = 0 }$. This was calculated correctly.



Perhaps I misunderstood something, but you see the some more precision would be needed. I encourage you to do this in future questions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    $ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 5 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
    $endgroup$
    – thebilly
    Jan 5 at 13:21










  • $begingroup$
    Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Ennar
    Jan 5 at 13:35












  • $begingroup$
    @Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Jan 5 at 13:38
















1












$begingroup$

Your question is imprecise.



(1) Cokernels are defined for linear maps $f : V to W$ between vector spaces $V, W$ over a field $K$.



You do not say which field is considered and which are the vector spaces. Most likely you have $K = mathbb{R}$. Then I would conclude that $V = mathbb{R}^3, W = mathbb{R}^2$. See the next point.



(2) You consider a matrix $M$, not a linear map.



Of course, $M$ is the matrix representation of a unique linear map $f : mathbb{R}^3 to mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to the standard bases of $mathbb{R}^3$ and $mathbb{R}^2$. Writing the elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ as row vectors, you have $f(x) = x * M$, where $*$ denotes matrix multiplication.



(3) The cokernel of $f$ is defined as the quotient space $W / text{im}(f)$. It seems you consider the kernel of $f$ which defined as $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid f(x) = 0 }$. In our case $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid x * M = 0 }$. This was calculated correctly.



Perhaps I misunderstood something, but you see the some more precision would be needed. I encourage you to do this in future questions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    $ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 5 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
    $endgroup$
    – thebilly
    Jan 5 at 13:21










  • $begingroup$
    Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Ennar
    Jan 5 at 13:35












  • $begingroup$
    @Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Jan 5 at 13:38














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Your question is imprecise.



(1) Cokernels are defined for linear maps $f : V to W$ between vector spaces $V, W$ over a field $K$.



You do not say which field is considered and which are the vector spaces. Most likely you have $K = mathbb{R}$. Then I would conclude that $V = mathbb{R}^3, W = mathbb{R}^2$. See the next point.



(2) You consider a matrix $M$, not a linear map.



Of course, $M$ is the matrix representation of a unique linear map $f : mathbb{R}^3 to mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to the standard bases of $mathbb{R}^3$ and $mathbb{R}^2$. Writing the elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ as row vectors, you have $f(x) = x * M$, where $*$ denotes matrix multiplication.



(3) The cokernel of $f$ is defined as the quotient space $W / text{im}(f)$. It seems you consider the kernel of $f$ which defined as $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid f(x) = 0 }$. In our case $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid x * M = 0 }$. This was calculated correctly.



Perhaps I misunderstood something, but you see the some more precision would be needed. I encourage you to do this in future questions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Your question is imprecise.



(1) Cokernels are defined for linear maps $f : V to W$ between vector spaces $V, W$ over a field $K$.



You do not say which field is considered and which are the vector spaces. Most likely you have $K = mathbb{R}$. Then I would conclude that $V = mathbb{R}^3, W = mathbb{R}^2$. See the next point.



(2) You consider a matrix $M$, not a linear map.



Of course, $M$ is the matrix representation of a unique linear map $f : mathbb{R}^3 to mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to the standard bases of $mathbb{R}^3$ and $mathbb{R}^2$. Writing the elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ as row vectors, you have $f(x) = x * M$, where $*$ denotes matrix multiplication.



(3) The cokernel of $f$ is defined as the quotient space $W / text{im}(f)$. It seems you consider the kernel of $f$ which defined as $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid f(x) = 0 }$. In our case $text{ker}(f) = { x in V mid x * M = 0 }$. This was calculated correctly.



Perhaps I misunderstood something, but you see the some more precision would be needed. I encourage you to do this in future questions.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 5 at 12:33









Paul FrostPaul Frost

12.4k31035




12.4k31035












  • $begingroup$
    $ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 5 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
    $endgroup$
    – thebilly
    Jan 5 at 13:21










  • $begingroup$
    Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Ennar
    Jan 5 at 13:35












  • $begingroup$
    @Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Jan 5 at 13:38


















  • $begingroup$
    $ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 5 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
    $endgroup$
    – thebilly
    Jan 5 at 13:21










  • $begingroup$
    Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Ennar
    Jan 5 at 13:35












  • $begingroup$
    @Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Jan 5 at 13:38
















$begingroup$
$ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 13:05




$begingroup$
$ker(f)={xin V|Mx=0}$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 5 at 13:05












$begingroup$
I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
$endgroup$
– thebilly
Jan 5 at 13:21




$begingroup$
I see. Thank you. @PaulFrost
$endgroup$
– thebilly
Jan 5 at 13:21












$begingroup$
Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
$endgroup$
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 13:35






$begingroup$
Paul, I understood the question in the following sense: $Vmapsto V^*$ is exact contravariant autoequivalence of category of fd $K$-vector spaces and thus $operatorname{coker} Mcong ker M^*$. Thus, it makes sense to define cokernel as subspace. It shouldn't work for infinite dimensional vector spaces, yet alone modules in general.
$endgroup$
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 13:35














$begingroup$
@Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Jan 5 at 13:38




$begingroup$
@Ennar So we see that the question needs clarification ...
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Jan 5 at 13:38


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062639%2fcalculation-of-cokernel-is-my-solution-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen