Jmeter in distributed mode: JVM doesn't stop because of BeanShell server
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
WHAT I HAVE:
Jmeter network created for tests in distributed mode: one Jmeter master plus few Jmeter slaves. BeanShell Server disabled. Everything works fine.
WHAT I WANT TO DO:
I want to enable BeanShell server to be able to modify properties on the fly.
ACTUAL RESULT:
BeanShell server starts and works successfully.
Once the test is done, the following message appears in the log:
The JVM should have exited but did not.
The following non-daemon threads are still running (DestroyJavaVM is OK):
Thread[Thread-7,5,main], stackTrace:java.net.PlainSocketImpl#socketAccept
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl#accept at line:409
java.net.ServerSocket#implAccept at line:545
java.net.ServerSocket#accept at line:513
bsh.util.Sessiond#run at line:65
java.lang.Thread#run at line:748
Thread[Thread-5,5,main], stackTrace:java.net.PlainSocketImpl#socketAccept
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl#accept at line:409
java.net.ServerSocket#implAccept at line:545
java.net.ServerSocket#accept at line:513
bsh.util.Httpd#run at line:64
java.lang.Thread#run at line:748
It's clear that it happens because of BeanShell server that is running and doesn't exit for some reason.
As a result, java process will never exit and will hang.
QUESTION:
Any ideas why it happens? How to avoid it? I don't connect to beanshell server, neither by http nor by telnet.
MORE DETAILS:
All the nodes are running as Docker containers.
All nodes are deployed in AWS.
Can't reproduce the same issue locally on my machine. Even with BeanShell server enabled, all works smooth, and java exists as it should.
WHAT I TRIED:
Tried to set up the following properties:
jmeterengine.remote.system.exit=true
jmeterengine.stopfail.system.exit=true
jmeterengine.force.system.exit=true
Doesn't help, java process still hangs.
The same for
bsh.system.shutdownOnExit = true;
Any ideas are very much appreciated.
jmeter beanshell
add a comment |
WHAT I HAVE:
Jmeter network created for tests in distributed mode: one Jmeter master plus few Jmeter slaves. BeanShell Server disabled. Everything works fine.
WHAT I WANT TO DO:
I want to enable BeanShell server to be able to modify properties on the fly.
ACTUAL RESULT:
BeanShell server starts and works successfully.
Once the test is done, the following message appears in the log:
The JVM should have exited but did not.
The following non-daemon threads are still running (DestroyJavaVM is OK):
Thread[Thread-7,5,main], stackTrace:java.net.PlainSocketImpl#socketAccept
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl#accept at line:409
java.net.ServerSocket#implAccept at line:545
java.net.ServerSocket#accept at line:513
bsh.util.Sessiond#run at line:65
java.lang.Thread#run at line:748
Thread[Thread-5,5,main], stackTrace:java.net.PlainSocketImpl#socketAccept
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl#accept at line:409
java.net.ServerSocket#implAccept at line:545
java.net.ServerSocket#accept at line:513
bsh.util.Httpd#run at line:64
java.lang.Thread#run at line:748
It's clear that it happens because of BeanShell server that is running and doesn't exit for some reason.
As a result, java process will never exit and will hang.
QUESTION:
Any ideas why it happens? How to avoid it? I don't connect to beanshell server, neither by http nor by telnet.
MORE DETAILS:
All the nodes are running as Docker containers.
All nodes are deployed in AWS.
Can't reproduce the same issue locally on my machine. Even with BeanShell server enabled, all works smooth, and java exists as it should.
WHAT I TRIED:
Tried to set up the following properties:
jmeterengine.remote.system.exit=true
jmeterengine.stopfail.system.exit=true
jmeterengine.force.system.exit=true
Doesn't help, java process still hangs.
The same for
bsh.system.shutdownOnExit = true;
Any ideas are very much appreciated.
jmeter beanshell
add a comment |
WHAT I HAVE:
Jmeter network created for tests in distributed mode: one Jmeter master plus few Jmeter slaves. BeanShell Server disabled. Everything works fine.
WHAT I WANT TO DO:
I want to enable BeanShell server to be able to modify properties on the fly.
ACTUAL RESULT:
BeanShell server starts and works successfully.
Once the test is done, the following message appears in the log:
The JVM should have exited but did not.
The following non-daemon threads are still running (DestroyJavaVM is OK):
Thread[Thread-7,5,main], stackTrace:java.net.PlainSocketImpl#socketAccept
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl#accept at line:409
java.net.ServerSocket#implAccept at line:545
java.net.ServerSocket#accept at line:513
bsh.util.Sessiond#run at line:65
java.lang.Thread#run at line:748
Thread[Thread-5,5,main], stackTrace:java.net.PlainSocketImpl#socketAccept
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl#accept at line:409
java.net.ServerSocket#implAccept at line:545
java.net.ServerSocket#accept at line:513
bsh.util.Httpd#run at line:64
java.lang.Thread#run at line:748
It's clear that it happens because of BeanShell server that is running and doesn't exit for some reason.
As a result, java process will never exit and will hang.
QUESTION:
Any ideas why it happens? How to avoid it? I don't connect to beanshell server, neither by http nor by telnet.
MORE DETAILS:
All the nodes are running as Docker containers.
All nodes are deployed in AWS.
Can't reproduce the same issue locally on my machine. Even with BeanShell server enabled, all works smooth, and java exists as it should.
WHAT I TRIED:
Tried to set up the following properties:
jmeterengine.remote.system.exit=true
jmeterengine.stopfail.system.exit=true
jmeterengine.force.system.exit=true
Doesn't help, java process still hangs.
The same for
bsh.system.shutdownOnExit = true;
Any ideas are very much appreciated.
jmeter beanshell
WHAT I HAVE:
Jmeter network created for tests in distributed mode: one Jmeter master plus few Jmeter slaves. BeanShell Server disabled. Everything works fine.
WHAT I WANT TO DO:
I want to enable BeanShell server to be able to modify properties on the fly.
ACTUAL RESULT:
BeanShell server starts and works successfully.
Once the test is done, the following message appears in the log:
The JVM should have exited but did not.
The following non-daemon threads are still running (DestroyJavaVM is OK):
Thread[Thread-7,5,main], stackTrace:java.net.PlainSocketImpl#socketAccept
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl#accept at line:409
java.net.ServerSocket#implAccept at line:545
java.net.ServerSocket#accept at line:513
bsh.util.Sessiond#run at line:65
java.lang.Thread#run at line:748
Thread[Thread-5,5,main], stackTrace:java.net.PlainSocketImpl#socketAccept
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl#accept at line:409
java.net.ServerSocket#implAccept at line:545
java.net.ServerSocket#accept at line:513
bsh.util.Httpd#run at line:64
java.lang.Thread#run at line:748
It's clear that it happens because of BeanShell server that is running and doesn't exit for some reason.
As a result, java process will never exit and will hang.
QUESTION:
Any ideas why it happens? How to avoid it? I don't connect to beanshell server, neither by http nor by telnet.
MORE DETAILS:
All the nodes are running as Docker containers.
All nodes are deployed in AWS.
Can't reproduce the same issue locally on my machine. Even with BeanShell server enabled, all works smooth, and java exists as it should.
WHAT I TRIED:
Tried to set up the following properties:
jmeterengine.remote.system.exit=true
jmeterengine.stopfail.system.exit=true
jmeterengine.force.system.exit=true
Doesn't help, java process still hangs.
The same for
bsh.system.shutdownOnExit = true;
Any ideas are very much appreciated.
jmeter beanshell
jmeter beanshell
edited Nov 26 '18 at 17:10
Konstantin Dobroliubov
asked Nov 26 '18 at 16:36
Konstantin DobroliubovKonstantin Dobroliubov
3581316
3581316
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I don't think there is a way of stopping the Beanshell Server along with the test as it runs in an endless-loop Thread
I would recommend stopping your test and the Beanshell server using a .bsh file like:
stopEngine();
Thread.sleep(5000L); // just in case wait for 5 seconds for graceful shutdown
System.exit(0);
where:
stopEngine()
is a shorthand for StandardJMeterEngine.stopEngine(), it's defined in startup.bsh
System.exit(0);
- basically shuts down the whole JVM with 0 exit status code
So you will be able to turn everything off the same way you amend the properties in the runtime.
You can also achieve the same by executing the System.exit(0);
command automatically from i.e. tearDown Thread Group using OS Process Sampler, however in this case make sure to set the following property:
jmeter.save.saveservice.autoflush=true
otherwise you can loose some results which have not been written to disk yet
Thanks for so quick answer! That's exactly what I do now. But it doesn't help in a case when test already stopped by itself, not by stop command. The idea with TearDown thread looks great in this case, so will add it.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:26
However, still don't have answer for a question why it doesn't stop by itself. The same docker container with beanshell server exits fine locally. So, it seems like something establishes a connection on AWS side, and since connection is opened, it doesn't allow to stop java properly. That is really weird as I don't allow any external connection by FW rules, so connection is done to localhost inside container only.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:29
add a comment |
Finally, I found a workaround, so posting it as an answer here.
Actually, it doesn't answer the original question in fact, but don't want to waste time trying to find an original root cause as it seems to be related to AWS structure (just because I can't reproduce it locally inside the same container I launch remotely).
So, the final schema is:
To update properties on the fly, I don't have to launch BeanShell on slave and master both. Real property change happens on slave, so master is not required. It solves my specific case.
To stop test, you can use existent shutdown.sh and stoptest.sh scripts. No need to do it over beanshell server.
If the test was properly stopped, then -X option (server.exitaftertest=true) also works fine, so force shutdown for JVM is not required, and you don't have to add tearDown thread group that does System.exit. But the idea is nice.
It's worth to have a shutdown.bsh script to force kill it anyway as a tool.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53485433%2fjmeter-in-distributed-mode-jvm-doesnt-stop-because-of-beanshell-server%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I don't think there is a way of stopping the Beanshell Server along with the test as it runs in an endless-loop Thread
I would recommend stopping your test and the Beanshell server using a .bsh file like:
stopEngine();
Thread.sleep(5000L); // just in case wait for 5 seconds for graceful shutdown
System.exit(0);
where:
stopEngine()
is a shorthand for StandardJMeterEngine.stopEngine(), it's defined in startup.bsh
System.exit(0);
- basically shuts down the whole JVM with 0 exit status code
So you will be able to turn everything off the same way you amend the properties in the runtime.
You can also achieve the same by executing the System.exit(0);
command automatically from i.e. tearDown Thread Group using OS Process Sampler, however in this case make sure to set the following property:
jmeter.save.saveservice.autoflush=true
otherwise you can loose some results which have not been written to disk yet
Thanks for so quick answer! That's exactly what I do now. But it doesn't help in a case when test already stopped by itself, not by stop command. The idea with TearDown thread looks great in this case, so will add it.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:26
However, still don't have answer for a question why it doesn't stop by itself. The same docker container with beanshell server exits fine locally. So, it seems like something establishes a connection on AWS side, and since connection is opened, it doesn't allow to stop java properly. That is really weird as I don't allow any external connection by FW rules, so connection is done to localhost inside container only.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:29
add a comment |
I don't think there is a way of stopping the Beanshell Server along with the test as it runs in an endless-loop Thread
I would recommend stopping your test and the Beanshell server using a .bsh file like:
stopEngine();
Thread.sleep(5000L); // just in case wait for 5 seconds for graceful shutdown
System.exit(0);
where:
stopEngine()
is a shorthand for StandardJMeterEngine.stopEngine(), it's defined in startup.bsh
System.exit(0);
- basically shuts down the whole JVM with 0 exit status code
So you will be able to turn everything off the same way you amend the properties in the runtime.
You can also achieve the same by executing the System.exit(0);
command automatically from i.e. tearDown Thread Group using OS Process Sampler, however in this case make sure to set the following property:
jmeter.save.saveservice.autoflush=true
otherwise you can loose some results which have not been written to disk yet
Thanks for so quick answer! That's exactly what I do now. But it doesn't help in a case when test already stopped by itself, not by stop command. The idea with TearDown thread looks great in this case, so will add it.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:26
However, still don't have answer for a question why it doesn't stop by itself. The same docker container with beanshell server exits fine locally. So, it seems like something establishes a connection on AWS side, and since connection is opened, it doesn't allow to stop java properly. That is really weird as I don't allow any external connection by FW rules, so connection is done to localhost inside container only.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:29
add a comment |
I don't think there is a way of stopping the Beanshell Server along with the test as it runs in an endless-loop Thread
I would recommend stopping your test and the Beanshell server using a .bsh file like:
stopEngine();
Thread.sleep(5000L); // just in case wait for 5 seconds for graceful shutdown
System.exit(0);
where:
stopEngine()
is a shorthand for StandardJMeterEngine.stopEngine(), it's defined in startup.bsh
System.exit(0);
- basically shuts down the whole JVM with 0 exit status code
So you will be able to turn everything off the same way you amend the properties in the runtime.
You can also achieve the same by executing the System.exit(0);
command automatically from i.e. tearDown Thread Group using OS Process Sampler, however in this case make sure to set the following property:
jmeter.save.saveservice.autoflush=true
otherwise you can loose some results which have not been written to disk yet
I don't think there is a way of stopping the Beanshell Server along with the test as it runs in an endless-loop Thread
I would recommend stopping your test and the Beanshell server using a .bsh file like:
stopEngine();
Thread.sleep(5000L); // just in case wait for 5 seconds for graceful shutdown
System.exit(0);
where:
stopEngine()
is a shorthand for StandardJMeterEngine.stopEngine(), it's defined in startup.bsh
System.exit(0);
- basically shuts down the whole JVM with 0 exit status code
So you will be able to turn everything off the same way you amend the properties in the runtime.
You can also achieve the same by executing the System.exit(0);
command automatically from i.e. tearDown Thread Group using OS Process Sampler, however in this case make sure to set the following property:
jmeter.save.saveservice.autoflush=true
otherwise you can loose some results which have not been written to disk yet
answered Nov 26 '18 at 17:20
Dmitri TDmitri T
74.9k33765
74.9k33765
Thanks for so quick answer! That's exactly what I do now. But it doesn't help in a case when test already stopped by itself, not by stop command. The idea with TearDown thread looks great in this case, so will add it.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:26
However, still don't have answer for a question why it doesn't stop by itself. The same docker container with beanshell server exits fine locally. So, it seems like something establishes a connection on AWS side, and since connection is opened, it doesn't allow to stop java properly. That is really weird as I don't allow any external connection by FW rules, so connection is done to localhost inside container only.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:29
add a comment |
Thanks for so quick answer! That's exactly what I do now. But it doesn't help in a case when test already stopped by itself, not by stop command. The idea with TearDown thread looks great in this case, so will add it.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:26
However, still don't have answer for a question why it doesn't stop by itself. The same docker container with beanshell server exits fine locally. So, it seems like something establishes a connection on AWS side, and since connection is opened, it doesn't allow to stop java properly. That is really weird as I don't allow any external connection by FW rules, so connection is done to localhost inside container only.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:29
Thanks for so quick answer! That's exactly what I do now. But it doesn't help in a case when test already stopped by itself, not by stop command. The idea with TearDown thread looks great in this case, so will add it.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:26
Thanks for so quick answer! That's exactly what I do now. But it doesn't help in a case when test already stopped by itself, not by stop command. The idea with TearDown thread looks great in this case, so will add it.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:26
However, still don't have answer for a question why it doesn't stop by itself. The same docker container with beanshell server exits fine locally. So, it seems like something establishes a connection on AWS side, and since connection is opened, it doesn't allow to stop java properly. That is really weird as I don't allow any external connection by FW rules, so connection is done to localhost inside container only.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:29
However, still don't have answer for a question why it doesn't stop by itself. The same docker container with beanshell server exits fine locally. So, it seems like something establishes a connection on AWS side, and since connection is opened, it doesn't allow to stop java properly. That is really weird as I don't allow any external connection by FW rules, so connection is done to localhost inside container only.
– Konstantin Dobroliubov
Nov 26 '18 at 17:29
add a comment |
Finally, I found a workaround, so posting it as an answer here.
Actually, it doesn't answer the original question in fact, but don't want to waste time trying to find an original root cause as it seems to be related to AWS structure (just because I can't reproduce it locally inside the same container I launch remotely).
So, the final schema is:
To update properties on the fly, I don't have to launch BeanShell on slave and master both. Real property change happens on slave, so master is not required. It solves my specific case.
To stop test, you can use existent shutdown.sh and stoptest.sh scripts. No need to do it over beanshell server.
If the test was properly stopped, then -X option (server.exitaftertest=true) also works fine, so force shutdown for JVM is not required, and you don't have to add tearDown thread group that does System.exit. But the idea is nice.
It's worth to have a shutdown.bsh script to force kill it anyway as a tool.
add a comment |
Finally, I found a workaround, so posting it as an answer here.
Actually, it doesn't answer the original question in fact, but don't want to waste time trying to find an original root cause as it seems to be related to AWS structure (just because I can't reproduce it locally inside the same container I launch remotely).
So, the final schema is:
To update properties on the fly, I don't have to launch BeanShell on slave and master both. Real property change happens on slave, so master is not required. It solves my specific case.
To stop test, you can use existent shutdown.sh and stoptest.sh scripts. No need to do it over beanshell server.
If the test was properly stopped, then -X option (server.exitaftertest=true) also works fine, so force shutdown for JVM is not required, and you don't have to add tearDown thread group that does System.exit. But the idea is nice.
It's worth to have a shutdown.bsh script to force kill it anyway as a tool.
add a comment |
Finally, I found a workaround, so posting it as an answer here.
Actually, it doesn't answer the original question in fact, but don't want to waste time trying to find an original root cause as it seems to be related to AWS structure (just because I can't reproduce it locally inside the same container I launch remotely).
So, the final schema is:
To update properties on the fly, I don't have to launch BeanShell on slave and master both. Real property change happens on slave, so master is not required. It solves my specific case.
To stop test, you can use existent shutdown.sh and stoptest.sh scripts. No need to do it over beanshell server.
If the test was properly stopped, then -X option (server.exitaftertest=true) also works fine, so force shutdown for JVM is not required, and you don't have to add tearDown thread group that does System.exit. But the idea is nice.
It's worth to have a shutdown.bsh script to force kill it anyway as a tool.
Finally, I found a workaround, so posting it as an answer here.
Actually, it doesn't answer the original question in fact, but don't want to waste time trying to find an original root cause as it seems to be related to AWS structure (just because I can't reproduce it locally inside the same container I launch remotely).
So, the final schema is:
To update properties on the fly, I don't have to launch BeanShell on slave and master both. Real property change happens on slave, so master is not required. It solves my specific case.
To stop test, you can use existent shutdown.sh and stoptest.sh scripts. No need to do it over beanshell server.
If the test was properly stopped, then -X option (server.exitaftertest=true) also works fine, so force shutdown for JVM is not required, and you don't have to add tearDown thread group that does System.exit. But the idea is nice.
It's worth to have a shutdown.bsh script to force kill it anyway as a tool.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 10:40
Konstantin DobroliubovKonstantin Dobroliubov
3581316
3581316
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53485433%2fjmeter-in-distributed-mode-jvm-doesnt-stop-because-of-beanshell-server%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown