Line in a plane, so that it intersects all previously existing lines but no previously existing intersections...












0














I don't know what this has to do with combinatorics, but it appeared in an exam last year.



In a plane, $n$ lines should be drawn, so that the amount of resulting areas are maximal. The amount of resulting areas is denoted as $L_n$



How can one show, that the following is possible?



A line can be drawn in the plane, so that it intersects all the previously existing lines. At the same time it should not intersect with previously existing intersections. (Meaning that all intersections of the line with already existing lines should be different)



So I thought that it could look like below and then the next line, f.ex. $h$ would intersect $g$ and the next line, f.ex. $i$ should intersect both $h$ and $g$ without intersecting any previous existing intersections.



But I don't know how to write this formally and how to find a recursion formula for $L_n$.
enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Proof by induction. Show that it is true in some base case. If it is true for some number $n$, show that one additional line can always be added to the plane.
    – Doug M
    Nov 29 at 20:42


















0














I don't know what this has to do with combinatorics, but it appeared in an exam last year.



In a plane, $n$ lines should be drawn, so that the amount of resulting areas are maximal. The amount of resulting areas is denoted as $L_n$



How can one show, that the following is possible?



A line can be drawn in the plane, so that it intersects all the previously existing lines. At the same time it should not intersect with previously existing intersections. (Meaning that all intersections of the line with already existing lines should be different)



So I thought that it could look like below and then the next line, f.ex. $h$ would intersect $g$ and the next line, f.ex. $i$ should intersect both $h$ and $g$ without intersecting any previous existing intersections.



But I don't know how to write this formally and how to find a recursion formula for $L_n$.
enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Proof by induction. Show that it is true in some base case. If it is true for some number $n$, show that one additional line can always be added to the plane.
    – Doug M
    Nov 29 at 20:42
















0












0








0


1





I don't know what this has to do with combinatorics, but it appeared in an exam last year.



In a plane, $n$ lines should be drawn, so that the amount of resulting areas are maximal. The amount of resulting areas is denoted as $L_n$



How can one show, that the following is possible?



A line can be drawn in the plane, so that it intersects all the previously existing lines. At the same time it should not intersect with previously existing intersections. (Meaning that all intersections of the line with already existing lines should be different)



So I thought that it could look like below and then the next line, f.ex. $h$ would intersect $g$ and the next line, f.ex. $i$ should intersect both $h$ and $g$ without intersecting any previous existing intersections.



But I don't know how to write this formally and how to find a recursion formula for $L_n$.
enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question















I don't know what this has to do with combinatorics, but it appeared in an exam last year.



In a plane, $n$ lines should be drawn, so that the amount of resulting areas are maximal. The amount of resulting areas is denoted as $L_n$



How can one show, that the following is possible?



A line can be drawn in the plane, so that it intersects all the previously existing lines. At the same time it should not intersect with previously existing intersections. (Meaning that all intersections of the line with already existing lines should be different)



So I thought that it could look like below and then the next line, f.ex. $h$ would intersect $g$ and the next line, f.ex. $i$ should intersect both $h$ and $g$ without intersecting any previous existing intersections.



But I don't know how to write this formally and how to find a recursion formula for $L_n$.
enter image description here







combinatorics recursion






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 at 20:38

























asked Nov 29 at 20:30









Math Dummy

276




276












  • Proof by induction. Show that it is true in some base case. If it is true for some number $n$, show that one additional line can always be added to the plane.
    – Doug M
    Nov 29 at 20:42




















  • Proof by induction. Show that it is true in some base case. If it is true for some number $n$, show that one additional line can always be added to the plane.
    – Doug M
    Nov 29 at 20:42


















Proof by induction. Show that it is true in some base case. If it is true for some number $n$, show that one additional line can always be added to the plane.
– Doug M
Nov 29 at 20:42






Proof by induction. Show that it is true in some base case. If it is true for some number $n$, show that one additional line can always be added to the plane.
– Doug M
Nov 29 at 20:42












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














"Is the following possible?" - Yes. Just note that if you already have $n$ distinct lines in the plane, then you can surely pick a line $ell$ that is not parallel to any of these (because there are infinitely many directions to choose from and only finitely many to avoid). Among the infinitely many parallels to $ell$, there is certainly one that avoids the finitely many intersection points between the previous $n $lines. Take ons such line as line $n+1$.



With the above construction, the new line number $n+1$ will have $n$ distinct intersection points on it, thereby being split into $n+1$ segments (with two of the segments infinite). Each of these segments cuts a region in two. Therefore we have the recursion
$$L_{n+1}=L_n+n+1 $$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you very much, that helped a lot. Do you also know how one can get a closed form for $L_n$ with the help of $L_{n+1} = L_n + n + 1$?
    – Math Dummy
    Nov 29 at 20:49











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019167%2fline-in-a-plane-so-that-it-intersects-all-previously-existing-lines-but-no-prev%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














"Is the following possible?" - Yes. Just note that if you already have $n$ distinct lines in the plane, then you can surely pick a line $ell$ that is not parallel to any of these (because there are infinitely many directions to choose from and only finitely many to avoid). Among the infinitely many parallels to $ell$, there is certainly one that avoids the finitely many intersection points between the previous $n $lines. Take ons such line as line $n+1$.



With the above construction, the new line number $n+1$ will have $n$ distinct intersection points on it, thereby being split into $n+1$ segments (with two of the segments infinite). Each of these segments cuts a region in two. Therefore we have the recursion
$$L_{n+1}=L_n+n+1 $$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you very much, that helped a lot. Do you also know how one can get a closed form for $L_n$ with the help of $L_{n+1} = L_n + n + 1$?
    – Math Dummy
    Nov 29 at 20:49
















1














"Is the following possible?" - Yes. Just note that if you already have $n$ distinct lines in the plane, then you can surely pick a line $ell$ that is not parallel to any of these (because there are infinitely many directions to choose from and only finitely many to avoid). Among the infinitely many parallels to $ell$, there is certainly one that avoids the finitely many intersection points between the previous $n $lines. Take ons such line as line $n+1$.



With the above construction, the new line number $n+1$ will have $n$ distinct intersection points on it, thereby being split into $n+1$ segments (with two of the segments infinite). Each of these segments cuts a region in two. Therefore we have the recursion
$$L_{n+1}=L_n+n+1 $$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you very much, that helped a lot. Do you also know how one can get a closed form for $L_n$ with the help of $L_{n+1} = L_n + n + 1$?
    – Math Dummy
    Nov 29 at 20:49














1












1








1






"Is the following possible?" - Yes. Just note that if you already have $n$ distinct lines in the plane, then you can surely pick a line $ell$ that is not parallel to any of these (because there are infinitely many directions to choose from and only finitely many to avoid). Among the infinitely many parallels to $ell$, there is certainly one that avoids the finitely many intersection points between the previous $n $lines. Take ons such line as line $n+1$.



With the above construction, the new line number $n+1$ will have $n$ distinct intersection points on it, thereby being split into $n+1$ segments (with two of the segments infinite). Each of these segments cuts a region in two. Therefore we have the recursion
$$L_{n+1}=L_n+n+1 $$






share|cite|improve this answer












"Is the following possible?" - Yes. Just note that if you already have $n$ distinct lines in the plane, then you can surely pick a line $ell$ that is not parallel to any of these (because there are infinitely many directions to choose from and only finitely many to avoid). Among the infinitely many parallels to $ell$, there is certainly one that avoids the finitely many intersection points between the previous $n $lines. Take ons such line as line $n+1$.



With the above construction, the new line number $n+1$ will have $n$ distinct intersection points on it, thereby being split into $n+1$ segments (with two of the segments infinite). Each of these segments cuts a region in two. Therefore we have the recursion
$$L_{n+1}=L_n+n+1 $$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 29 at 20:42









Hagen von Eitzen

275k21268495




275k21268495












  • Thank you very much, that helped a lot. Do you also know how one can get a closed form for $L_n$ with the help of $L_{n+1} = L_n + n + 1$?
    – Math Dummy
    Nov 29 at 20:49


















  • Thank you very much, that helped a lot. Do you also know how one can get a closed form for $L_n$ with the help of $L_{n+1} = L_n + n + 1$?
    – Math Dummy
    Nov 29 at 20:49
















Thank you very much, that helped a lot. Do you also know how one can get a closed form for $L_n$ with the help of $L_{n+1} = L_n + n + 1$?
– Math Dummy
Nov 29 at 20:49




Thank you very much, that helped a lot. Do you also know how one can get a closed form for $L_n$ with the help of $L_{n+1} = L_n + n + 1$?
– Math Dummy
Nov 29 at 20:49


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019167%2fline-in-a-plane-so-that-it-intersects-all-previously-existing-lines-but-no-prev%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen