simple question about properly divergent sequence
$begingroup$
Is it true that if a sequence ${x_{n}}$ has no properly divergent subsequence, then the sequence is bounded?
I think it is true intuitively considering subsequential limit but i’m not sure about that.
Give me some counter-example or comment. Thank you.
real-analysis sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it true that if a sequence ${x_{n}}$ has no properly divergent subsequence, then the sequence is bounded?
I think it is true intuitively considering subsequential limit but i’m not sure about that.
Give me some counter-example or comment. Thank you.
real-analysis sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If the sequence is not bounded then either there is a subsequence strictly increasing to $infty$ or there is a subsequence strictly decreasing to $-infty$
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 3 at 6:33
$begingroup$
Properly divergent sequence? What is the meaning of this, please?
$endgroup$
– dmtri
Jan 3 at 6:49
$begingroup$
@KaviRamaMurthy Actually, I tried to show your statement in another way using the assumption as above leads a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:25
$begingroup$
@dmtri diverges at plus/minus infinity not oscillate
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it true that if a sequence ${x_{n}}$ has no properly divergent subsequence, then the sequence is bounded?
I think it is true intuitively considering subsequential limit but i’m not sure about that.
Give me some counter-example or comment. Thank you.
real-analysis sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
Is it true that if a sequence ${x_{n}}$ has no properly divergent subsequence, then the sequence is bounded?
I think it is true intuitively considering subsequential limit but i’m not sure about that.
Give me some counter-example or comment. Thank you.
real-analysis sequences-and-series
real-analysis sequences-and-series
asked Jan 3 at 6:31
PrimaveraPrimavera
31619
31619
1
$begingroup$
If the sequence is not bounded then either there is a subsequence strictly increasing to $infty$ or there is a subsequence strictly decreasing to $-infty$
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 3 at 6:33
$begingroup$
Properly divergent sequence? What is the meaning of this, please?
$endgroup$
– dmtri
Jan 3 at 6:49
$begingroup$
@KaviRamaMurthy Actually, I tried to show your statement in another way using the assumption as above leads a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:25
$begingroup$
@dmtri diverges at plus/minus infinity not oscillate
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:26
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
If the sequence is not bounded then either there is a subsequence strictly increasing to $infty$ or there is a subsequence strictly decreasing to $-infty$
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 3 at 6:33
$begingroup$
Properly divergent sequence? What is the meaning of this, please?
$endgroup$
– dmtri
Jan 3 at 6:49
$begingroup$
@KaviRamaMurthy Actually, I tried to show your statement in another way using the assumption as above leads a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:25
$begingroup$
@dmtri diverges at plus/minus infinity not oscillate
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:26
1
1
$begingroup$
If the sequence is not bounded then either there is a subsequence strictly increasing to $infty$ or there is a subsequence strictly decreasing to $-infty$
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 3 at 6:33
$begingroup$
If the sequence is not bounded then either there is a subsequence strictly increasing to $infty$ or there is a subsequence strictly decreasing to $-infty$
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 3 at 6:33
$begingroup$
Properly divergent sequence? What is the meaning of this, please?
$endgroup$
– dmtri
Jan 3 at 6:49
$begingroup$
Properly divergent sequence? What is the meaning of this, please?
$endgroup$
– dmtri
Jan 3 at 6:49
$begingroup$
@KaviRamaMurthy Actually, I tried to show your statement in another way using the assumption as above leads a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:25
$begingroup$
@KaviRamaMurthy Actually, I tried to show your statement in another way using the assumption as above leads a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:25
$begingroup$
@dmtri diverges at plus/minus infinity not oscillate
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:26
$begingroup$
@dmtri diverges at plus/minus infinity not oscillate
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Equivalently, if a sequence is unbounded, it has a sub-sequence strictly increasing to $infty$ or strictly decreasing to $-infty.$
Let $(x_j)_{jin Bbb N}$ be an unbounded sequence in $Bbb R$.
Let $n_1$ be the least $nin Bbb N$ such that $|x_n|>1.$ Define $n_{j+1}$ recursively as follows: Let $$y_j=max (j+1, max { |x_i|:1leq ileq n_j}).$$ Let $n_{j+1}$ be the least $nin Bbb N$ such that $|a_n|>y_j.$
For every $jin Bbb N$ we have $jleq n_j<n_{j+1}$ and $j<|x_{n_j}|<|x_{n_{j+1}}|.$
Let $S={jin Bbb N: x_{n_j}>j}$ and $T={jin Bbb N: x_{n_j}<-j}.$ We have $Scup T=Bbb N.$
If $S$ is an infinite set then the sequence $(x_{n_j})_{jin S}$ strictly increases to $infty.$
If $T$ is an infinite set then $(x_{n_j})_{jin T}$ strictly decreases to $-infty.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060306%2fsimple-question-about-properly-divergent-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Equivalently, if a sequence is unbounded, it has a sub-sequence strictly increasing to $infty$ or strictly decreasing to $-infty.$
Let $(x_j)_{jin Bbb N}$ be an unbounded sequence in $Bbb R$.
Let $n_1$ be the least $nin Bbb N$ such that $|x_n|>1.$ Define $n_{j+1}$ recursively as follows: Let $$y_j=max (j+1, max { |x_i|:1leq ileq n_j}).$$ Let $n_{j+1}$ be the least $nin Bbb N$ such that $|a_n|>y_j.$
For every $jin Bbb N$ we have $jleq n_j<n_{j+1}$ and $j<|x_{n_j}|<|x_{n_{j+1}}|.$
Let $S={jin Bbb N: x_{n_j}>j}$ and $T={jin Bbb N: x_{n_j}<-j}.$ We have $Scup T=Bbb N.$
If $S$ is an infinite set then the sequence $(x_{n_j})_{jin S}$ strictly increases to $infty.$
If $T$ is an infinite set then $(x_{n_j})_{jin T}$ strictly decreases to $-infty.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Equivalently, if a sequence is unbounded, it has a sub-sequence strictly increasing to $infty$ or strictly decreasing to $-infty.$
Let $(x_j)_{jin Bbb N}$ be an unbounded sequence in $Bbb R$.
Let $n_1$ be the least $nin Bbb N$ such that $|x_n|>1.$ Define $n_{j+1}$ recursively as follows: Let $$y_j=max (j+1, max { |x_i|:1leq ileq n_j}).$$ Let $n_{j+1}$ be the least $nin Bbb N$ such that $|a_n|>y_j.$
For every $jin Bbb N$ we have $jleq n_j<n_{j+1}$ and $j<|x_{n_j}|<|x_{n_{j+1}}|.$
Let $S={jin Bbb N: x_{n_j}>j}$ and $T={jin Bbb N: x_{n_j}<-j}.$ We have $Scup T=Bbb N.$
If $S$ is an infinite set then the sequence $(x_{n_j})_{jin S}$ strictly increases to $infty.$
If $T$ is an infinite set then $(x_{n_j})_{jin T}$ strictly decreases to $-infty.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Equivalently, if a sequence is unbounded, it has a sub-sequence strictly increasing to $infty$ or strictly decreasing to $-infty.$
Let $(x_j)_{jin Bbb N}$ be an unbounded sequence in $Bbb R$.
Let $n_1$ be the least $nin Bbb N$ such that $|x_n|>1.$ Define $n_{j+1}$ recursively as follows: Let $$y_j=max (j+1, max { |x_i|:1leq ileq n_j}).$$ Let $n_{j+1}$ be the least $nin Bbb N$ such that $|a_n|>y_j.$
For every $jin Bbb N$ we have $jleq n_j<n_{j+1}$ and $j<|x_{n_j}|<|x_{n_{j+1}}|.$
Let $S={jin Bbb N: x_{n_j}>j}$ and $T={jin Bbb N: x_{n_j}<-j}.$ We have $Scup T=Bbb N.$
If $S$ is an infinite set then the sequence $(x_{n_j})_{jin S}$ strictly increases to $infty.$
If $T$ is an infinite set then $(x_{n_j})_{jin T}$ strictly decreases to $-infty.$
$endgroup$
Equivalently, if a sequence is unbounded, it has a sub-sequence strictly increasing to $infty$ or strictly decreasing to $-infty.$
Let $(x_j)_{jin Bbb N}$ be an unbounded sequence in $Bbb R$.
Let $n_1$ be the least $nin Bbb N$ such that $|x_n|>1.$ Define $n_{j+1}$ recursively as follows: Let $$y_j=max (j+1, max { |x_i|:1leq ileq n_j}).$$ Let $n_{j+1}$ be the least $nin Bbb N$ such that $|a_n|>y_j.$
For every $jin Bbb N$ we have $jleq n_j<n_{j+1}$ and $j<|x_{n_j}|<|x_{n_{j+1}}|.$
Let $S={jin Bbb N: x_{n_j}>j}$ and $T={jin Bbb N: x_{n_j}<-j}.$ We have $Scup T=Bbb N.$
If $S$ is an infinite set then the sequence $(x_{n_j})_{jin S}$ strictly increases to $infty.$
If $T$ is an infinite set then $(x_{n_j})_{jin T}$ strictly decreases to $-infty.$
edited Jan 3 at 9:15
answered Jan 3 at 9:10
DanielWainfleetDanielWainfleet
35.7k31648
35.7k31648
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060306%2fsimple-question-about-properly-divergent-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
If the sequence is not bounded then either there is a subsequence strictly increasing to $infty$ or there is a subsequence strictly decreasing to $-infty$
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 3 at 6:33
$begingroup$
Properly divergent sequence? What is the meaning of this, please?
$endgroup$
– dmtri
Jan 3 at 6:49
$begingroup$
@KaviRamaMurthy Actually, I tried to show your statement in another way using the assumption as above leads a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:25
$begingroup$
@dmtri diverges at plus/minus infinity not oscillate
$endgroup$
– Primavera
Jan 4 at 7:26