Thales theorem - using euclidien axioms [closed]
2
$begingroup$
I wonder if it possible to prove the Thales theorem only with Euclidean axioms.
what do you think?
euclidean-geometry
asked Jan 3 at 6:51
letisyaletisya
517
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by Saad, Paul Frost, user91500, ancientmathematician, Adrian Keister Jan 3 at 13:38
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Paul Frost, user91500, ancientmathematician, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I wonder if it possible to prove the Thales theorem only with Euclidean axioms.
what do you think?
euclidean-geometry
asked Jan 3 at 6:51
letisyaletisya
517
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by Saad, Paul Frost, user91500, ancientmathematician, Adrian Keister Jan 3 at 13:38
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Paul Frost, user91500, ancientmathematician, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
$begingroup$
Euclid's original axioms are flawed (even in his first theorem, Euclid himself has to use assumptions not based on his own axioms). While the idea behind them has been tremendously important to mathematics throughout millennia, to use them directly in this modern age would, in my opinion, not be a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 7:04
1
$begingroup$
There is a proof in Euclid's Elements, if that is what you want.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 10:28
$begingroup$
Yes,I wold like to see it please
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 3 at 11:36
$begingroup$
Here it is: mathcs.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/bookIII/propIII31.html
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 21:11
$begingroup$
perfect! Thankyou.
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 4 at 9:44
add a comment |
2
2
2
$begingroup$
I wonder if it possible to prove the Thales theorem only with Euclidean axioms.
what do you think?
euclidean-geometry
asked Jan 3 at 6:51
letisyaletisya
517
$endgroup$
I wonder if it possible to prove the Thales theorem only with Euclidean axioms.
what do you think?
euclidean-geometry
euclidean-geometry
asked Jan 3 at 6:51
letisyaletisya
517
asked Jan 3 at 6:51
letisyaletisya
517
asked Jan 3 at 6:51
letisyaletisya
517
asked Jan 3 at 6:51
letisyaletisya
517
asked Jan 3 at 6:51
letisyaletisya
517
517
closed as off-topic by Saad, Paul Frost, user91500, ancientmathematician, Adrian Keister Jan 3 at 13:38
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Paul Frost, user91500, ancientmathematician, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by Saad, Paul Frost, user91500, ancientmathematician, Adrian Keister Jan 3 at 13:38
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Paul Frost, user91500, ancientmathematician, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
$begingroup$
Euclid's original axioms are flawed (even in his first theorem, Euclid himself has to use assumptions not based on his own axioms). While the idea behind them has been tremendously important to mathematics throughout millennia, to use them directly in this modern age would, in my opinion, not be a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 7:04
1
$begingroup$
There is a proof in Euclid's Elements, if that is what you want.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 10:28
$begingroup$
Yes,I wold like to see it please
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 3 at 11:36
$begingroup$
Here it is: mathcs.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/bookIII/propIII31.html
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 21:11
$begingroup$
perfect! Thankyou.
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 4 at 9:44
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Euclid's original axioms are flawed (even in his first theorem, Euclid himself has to use assumptions not based on his own axioms). While the idea behind them has been tremendously important to mathematics throughout millennia, to use them directly in this modern age would, in my opinion, not be a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 7:04
1
$begingroup$
There is a proof in Euclid's Elements, if that is what you want.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 10:28
$begingroup$
Yes,I wold like to see it please
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 3 at 11:36
$begingroup$
Here it is: mathcs.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/bookIII/propIII31.html
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 21:11
$begingroup$
perfect! Thankyou.
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 4 at 9:44
1
1
$begingroup$
Euclid's original axioms are flawed (even in his first theorem, Euclid himself has to use assumptions not based on his own axioms). While the idea behind them has been tremendously important to mathematics throughout millennia, to use them directly in this modern age would, in my opinion, not be a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 7:04
$begingroup$
Euclid's original axioms are flawed (even in his first theorem, Euclid himself has to use assumptions not based on his own axioms). While the idea behind them has been tremendously important to mathematics throughout millennia, to use them directly in this modern age would, in my opinion, not be a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 7:04
1
1
$begingroup$
There is a proof in Euclid's Elements, if that is what you want.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 10:28
$begingroup$
There is a proof in Euclid's Elements, if that is what you want.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 10:28
$begingroup$
Yes,I wold like to see it please
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 3 at 11:36
$begingroup$
Yes,I wold like to see it please
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 3 at 11:36
$begingroup$
Here it is: mathcs.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/bookIII/propIII31.html
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Here it is: mathcs.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/bookIII/propIII31.html
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 21:11
$begingroup$
perfect! Thankyou.
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 4 at 9:44
$begingroup$
perfect! Thankyou.
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 4 at 9:44
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
1
$begingroup$
Euclid's original axioms are flawed (even in his first theorem, Euclid himself has to use assumptions not based on his own axioms). While the idea behind them has been tremendously important to mathematics throughout millennia, to use them directly in this modern age would, in my opinion, not be a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 7:04
1
$begingroup$
There is a proof in Euclid's Elements, if that is what you want.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 10:28
$begingroup$
Yes,I wold like to see it please
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 3 at 11:36
$begingroup$
Here it is: mathcs.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/bookIII/propIII31.html
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Jan 3 at 21:11
$begingroup$
perfect! Thankyou.
$endgroup$
– letisya
Jan 4 at 9:44