What does a “half derivative” mean?












13












$begingroup$


I was looking at fractional calculus on Wikipedia, specifically this section and came across the half derivative of the function $y=x$ which is $frac{d^{1/2}y}{dx^{1/2}}=frac{2sqrt{x}}{sqrt{pi}}$ . The derivative tells the slope at any point on the curve, but what does the "half derivative" mean - it's obviously not $frac{1}{2}$ the derivative of $y=x$ which would be just $frac{1}{2}$.



I do not have a very deep understanding of calculus - I have just taken Calc 1 & 2 out of a 4 series, but anything helps!



Also, I have checked similar questions, but they did not seem to answer my question that I have bolded.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A related here. Here is geometric explanation
    $endgroup$
    – Mhenni Benghorbal
    Aug 28 '13 at 4:38
















13












$begingroup$


I was looking at fractional calculus on Wikipedia, specifically this section and came across the half derivative of the function $y=x$ which is $frac{d^{1/2}y}{dx^{1/2}}=frac{2sqrt{x}}{sqrt{pi}}$ . The derivative tells the slope at any point on the curve, but what does the "half derivative" mean - it's obviously not $frac{1}{2}$ the derivative of $y=x$ which would be just $frac{1}{2}$.



I do not have a very deep understanding of calculus - I have just taken Calc 1 & 2 out of a 4 series, but anything helps!



Also, I have checked similar questions, but they did not seem to answer my question that I have bolded.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A related here. Here is geometric explanation
    $endgroup$
    – Mhenni Benghorbal
    Aug 28 '13 at 4:38














13












13








13


6



$begingroup$


I was looking at fractional calculus on Wikipedia, specifically this section and came across the half derivative of the function $y=x$ which is $frac{d^{1/2}y}{dx^{1/2}}=frac{2sqrt{x}}{sqrt{pi}}$ . The derivative tells the slope at any point on the curve, but what does the "half derivative" mean - it's obviously not $frac{1}{2}$ the derivative of $y=x$ which would be just $frac{1}{2}$.



I do not have a very deep understanding of calculus - I have just taken Calc 1 & 2 out of a 4 series, but anything helps!



Also, I have checked similar questions, but they did not seem to answer my question that I have bolded.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was looking at fractional calculus on Wikipedia, specifically this section and came across the half derivative of the function $y=x$ which is $frac{d^{1/2}y}{dx^{1/2}}=frac{2sqrt{x}}{sqrt{pi}}$ . The derivative tells the slope at any point on the curve, but what does the "half derivative" mean - it's obviously not $frac{1}{2}$ the derivative of $y=x$ which would be just $frac{1}{2}$.



I do not have a very deep understanding of calculus - I have just taken Calc 1 & 2 out of a 4 series, but anything helps!



Also, I have checked similar questions, but they did not seem to answer my question that I have bolded.







calculus fractional-calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 1 at 16:40









El borito

664216




664216










asked Aug 28 '13 at 4:29









zerosofthezetazerosofthezeta

2,53162847




2,53162847












  • $begingroup$
    A related here. Here is geometric explanation
    $endgroup$
    – Mhenni Benghorbal
    Aug 28 '13 at 4:38


















  • $begingroup$
    A related here. Here is geometric explanation
    $endgroup$
    – Mhenni Benghorbal
    Aug 28 '13 at 4:38
















$begingroup$
A related here. Here is geometric explanation
$endgroup$
– Mhenni Benghorbal
Aug 28 '13 at 4:38




$begingroup$
A related here. Here is geometric explanation
$endgroup$
– Mhenni Benghorbal
Aug 28 '13 at 4:38










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

The half derivative itself doesn't have much physical interpretation (though I believe there is a field called fractional quantum mechanics which may use it)



So why does it exist if its not any real physical thing.



I will explain.



Lets consider the idea of counting children at a school. We use whole numbers (positive integers) to count children. The statements are 5,6...201992 children each are meaningful in the sense that they exist mathematically AND have a physical interpretation.



But the set of Numbers isn't just whole numbers. It includes numbers like $1/2$ and $2^{1/2}$. So we could try to ask well what's half a child or square root of 2 children?



These are meaningless questions in the sense that you can't have half a child (contrary to popular belief disassembly and reassembly of children is not an easy or practical thing to do). Irrational quantities are even harder to produce. Put simply, they just DO NOT appear in that context.



So why am I telling you this? Here's why, lets ask the question not what 1/2 means in therms of children but how it came along. It came along because we wanted to generalize the set of numbers to include stuff in between the integers. It came along for applications besides counting children and is in fact most specifically an "accidental-byproduct" of the existence of division.



So what's a fractional derivative? We can easily answer the question that the nth derivative is the "rate of change of the rate of change ... (Repeat n times) of the rate of change of the function". This like children is a discrete structure. Only whole numbers (and if you include integrals then negative integers as well (like a backwards derivative)) work.



The fractional derivative is a consequence of the question "what is the function whom I apply twice to get a first derivative". Rather than "what is the rate of... Rate of change of the function"



So in short. It's an interesting question where we extend our level of control and understanding of calculus but it shares little similarity with the more physical forms that calculus originally had.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I see someone down voted this ( or two people actually since it's -2) I would be more than willing to answer any questions if you'd like to bring them up
    $endgroup$
    – frogeyedpeas
    Jun 16 '14 at 15:40










  • $begingroup$
    Not all appreciate what one does in life, and this is just another instance; forget the downvotes. Well written answer, brings up the concept quite nicely; + 1.
    $endgroup$
    – Kugelblitz
    Mar 15 '15 at 3:35






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I didn't downvote, but I didn't find this answer very enlightening.
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Aug 31 '15 at 4:00






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Don't take offense to this, but I'm downvoting because I don't believe this answer is very informative and has received more upvotes than its quality deserves.
    $endgroup$
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 15 '17 at 14:10










  • $begingroup$
    what a great explanation. if only my understanding of math was 1/10000000th of his.
    $endgroup$
    – Chase CB
    Oct 25 '17 at 22:04



















12












$begingroup$

Short answer: The half-derivative $H$ is some sort of operator (it isn't uniquely defined by this property) such that $H(Hf) = f'$.



Long answer: We can think of the derivative as a linear operator $D:X to X$, where $X$ is some convenient (say, smooth) space of functions. The $n$th order derivative is then, by definition, the $n$-fold composition $D^n = Dcirc cdots circ D:X to X$. Clearly $D^n D^m = D^{n+m}$. Here we've restricted the index $n$ to an integer, but what if we allowed it to be a real number? That is, we want a family of operators $D_t$, with $tgeq 0$ real, such that




  • $D_t$ behaves nicely with respect to $t$;

  • $D_1$ is just the ordinary derivative $D$;

  • $D_t D_s = D_{t + s}$.


(I'm not going to make the first point more precise here, but we ideally want something analogous to continuity or smoothness in $t$. I haven't defined what exactly the space $X$ is or what its geometry looks like, so I'm going to evade the point for now.) Thus, for example, we get an operator $D_{1/2}$ with $D_{1/2} D_{1/2} f = D_1 f = f'$ for suitable $f$.



Where do we get such an operator $D_t$? One place to start is Cauchy's integral formula:
begin{align*}
f^{(-n)}(x) = frac{1}{(n-1)!}int_0^x (x - xi)^{n-1} f(xi), dxi,
end{align*}
where $f^{(-n)}(x)$ denotes the antiderivative of $f$, all normalized to have $f^{(-n)}(0)$ for $n > 0$. The factorial above is only defined for positive integers $n$, but we can use the relation $Gamma(n) = (n - 1)!$ to define something similar for arbitrary $tgeq 0$:
begin{align*}
I_t f(x) = frac{1}{Gamma(t)}int_0^x (x - xi)^{t-1} f(xi), dxi,
end{align*}
Clearly $I_t f(x)$ is just $f^{(-t)}$ if $t$ is a positive integer, and we can show with a bit of work that $I_t(I_s f) = I_{t+s} f$.



Now, that's for an antiderivative. In order to get to the derivative $D_t$ for non-integer $t$, we can use the definition above to get rid of the fractional part. Since $D(If) = f$, we can define
begin{align*}
D_t f= frac{d^n}{dx^n} left(I_tau fright)
end{align*}
for $t = n - tau$ with $n$ an integer and $tauin [0, 1)$. This is not the only possible construction of a fractional derivative $D_t$, though.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Note here that we specifically have $f^{(-1)}(x)=int_0^xf(t)~mathrm dt$ (note the lower bound is $0$) so technically, its not simply the antiderivative (which would be a class of functions differing by a constant) but a definite integral.
    $endgroup$
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 15 '17 at 14:12














Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477888%2fwhat-does-a-half-derivative-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10












$begingroup$

The half derivative itself doesn't have much physical interpretation (though I believe there is a field called fractional quantum mechanics which may use it)



So why does it exist if its not any real physical thing.



I will explain.



Lets consider the idea of counting children at a school. We use whole numbers (positive integers) to count children. The statements are 5,6...201992 children each are meaningful in the sense that they exist mathematically AND have a physical interpretation.



But the set of Numbers isn't just whole numbers. It includes numbers like $1/2$ and $2^{1/2}$. So we could try to ask well what's half a child or square root of 2 children?



These are meaningless questions in the sense that you can't have half a child (contrary to popular belief disassembly and reassembly of children is not an easy or practical thing to do). Irrational quantities are even harder to produce. Put simply, they just DO NOT appear in that context.



So why am I telling you this? Here's why, lets ask the question not what 1/2 means in therms of children but how it came along. It came along because we wanted to generalize the set of numbers to include stuff in between the integers. It came along for applications besides counting children and is in fact most specifically an "accidental-byproduct" of the existence of division.



So what's a fractional derivative? We can easily answer the question that the nth derivative is the "rate of change of the rate of change ... (Repeat n times) of the rate of change of the function". This like children is a discrete structure. Only whole numbers (and if you include integrals then negative integers as well (like a backwards derivative)) work.



The fractional derivative is a consequence of the question "what is the function whom I apply twice to get a first derivative". Rather than "what is the rate of... Rate of change of the function"



So in short. It's an interesting question where we extend our level of control and understanding of calculus but it shares little similarity with the more physical forms that calculus originally had.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I see someone down voted this ( or two people actually since it's -2) I would be more than willing to answer any questions if you'd like to bring them up
    $endgroup$
    – frogeyedpeas
    Jun 16 '14 at 15:40










  • $begingroup$
    Not all appreciate what one does in life, and this is just another instance; forget the downvotes. Well written answer, brings up the concept quite nicely; + 1.
    $endgroup$
    – Kugelblitz
    Mar 15 '15 at 3:35






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I didn't downvote, but I didn't find this answer very enlightening.
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Aug 31 '15 at 4:00






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Don't take offense to this, but I'm downvoting because I don't believe this answer is very informative and has received more upvotes than its quality deserves.
    $endgroup$
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 15 '17 at 14:10










  • $begingroup$
    what a great explanation. if only my understanding of math was 1/10000000th of his.
    $endgroup$
    – Chase CB
    Oct 25 '17 at 22:04
















10












$begingroup$

The half derivative itself doesn't have much physical interpretation (though I believe there is a field called fractional quantum mechanics which may use it)



So why does it exist if its not any real physical thing.



I will explain.



Lets consider the idea of counting children at a school. We use whole numbers (positive integers) to count children. The statements are 5,6...201992 children each are meaningful in the sense that they exist mathematically AND have a physical interpretation.



But the set of Numbers isn't just whole numbers. It includes numbers like $1/2$ and $2^{1/2}$. So we could try to ask well what's half a child or square root of 2 children?



These are meaningless questions in the sense that you can't have half a child (contrary to popular belief disassembly and reassembly of children is not an easy or practical thing to do). Irrational quantities are even harder to produce. Put simply, they just DO NOT appear in that context.



So why am I telling you this? Here's why, lets ask the question not what 1/2 means in therms of children but how it came along. It came along because we wanted to generalize the set of numbers to include stuff in between the integers. It came along for applications besides counting children and is in fact most specifically an "accidental-byproduct" of the existence of division.



So what's a fractional derivative? We can easily answer the question that the nth derivative is the "rate of change of the rate of change ... (Repeat n times) of the rate of change of the function". This like children is a discrete structure. Only whole numbers (and if you include integrals then negative integers as well (like a backwards derivative)) work.



The fractional derivative is a consequence of the question "what is the function whom I apply twice to get a first derivative". Rather than "what is the rate of... Rate of change of the function"



So in short. It's an interesting question where we extend our level of control and understanding of calculus but it shares little similarity with the more physical forms that calculus originally had.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I see someone down voted this ( or two people actually since it's -2) I would be more than willing to answer any questions if you'd like to bring them up
    $endgroup$
    – frogeyedpeas
    Jun 16 '14 at 15:40










  • $begingroup$
    Not all appreciate what one does in life, and this is just another instance; forget the downvotes. Well written answer, brings up the concept quite nicely; + 1.
    $endgroup$
    – Kugelblitz
    Mar 15 '15 at 3:35






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I didn't downvote, but I didn't find this answer very enlightening.
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Aug 31 '15 at 4:00






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Don't take offense to this, but I'm downvoting because I don't believe this answer is very informative and has received more upvotes than its quality deserves.
    $endgroup$
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 15 '17 at 14:10










  • $begingroup$
    what a great explanation. if only my understanding of math was 1/10000000th of his.
    $endgroup$
    – Chase CB
    Oct 25 '17 at 22:04














10












10








10





$begingroup$

The half derivative itself doesn't have much physical interpretation (though I believe there is a field called fractional quantum mechanics which may use it)



So why does it exist if its not any real physical thing.



I will explain.



Lets consider the idea of counting children at a school. We use whole numbers (positive integers) to count children. The statements are 5,6...201992 children each are meaningful in the sense that they exist mathematically AND have a physical interpretation.



But the set of Numbers isn't just whole numbers. It includes numbers like $1/2$ and $2^{1/2}$. So we could try to ask well what's half a child or square root of 2 children?



These are meaningless questions in the sense that you can't have half a child (contrary to popular belief disassembly and reassembly of children is not an easy or practical thing to do). Irrational quantities are even harder to produce. Put simply, they just DO NOT appear in that context.



So why am I telling you this? Here's why, lets ask the question not what 1/2 means in therms of children but how it came along. It came along because we wanted to generalize the set of numbers to include stuff in between the integers. It came along for applications besides counting children and is in fact most specifically an "accidental-byproduct" of the existence of division.



So what's a fractional derivative? We can easily answer the question that the nth derivative is the "rate of change of the rate of change ... (Repeat n times) of the rate of change of the function". This like children is a discrete structure. Only whole numbers (and if you include integrals then negative integers as well (like a backwards derivative)) work.



The fractional derivative is a consequence of the question "what is the function whom I apply twice to get a first derivative". Rather than "what is the rate of... Rate of change of the function"



So in short. It's an interesting question where we extend our level of control and understanding of calculus but it shares little similarity with the more physical forms that calculus originally had.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The half derivative itself doesn't have much physical interpretation (though I believe there is a field called fractional quantum mechanics which may use it)



So why does it exist if its not any real physical thing.



I will explain.



Lets consider the idea of counting children at a school. We use whole numbers (positive integers) to count children. The statements are 5,6...201992 children each are meaningful in the sense that they exist mathematically AND have a physical interpretation.



But the set of Numbers isn't just whole numbers. It includes numbers like $1/2$ and $2^{1/2}$. So we could try to ask well what's half a child or square root of 2 children?



These are meaningless questions in the sense that you can't have half a child (contrary to popular belief disassembly and reassembly of children is not an easy or practical thing to do). Irrational quantities are even harder to produce. Put simply, they just DO NOT appear in that context.



So why am I telling you this? Here's why, lets ask the question not what 1/2 means in therms of children but how it came along. It came along because we wanted to generalize the set of numbers to include stuff in between the integers. It came along for applications besides counting children and is in fact most specifically an "accidental-byproduct" of the existence of division.



So what's a fractional derivative? We can easily answer the question that the nth derivative is the "rate of change of the rate of change ... (Repeat n times) of the rate of change of the function". This like children is a discrete structure. Only whole numbers (and if you include integrals then negative integers as well (like a backwards derivative)) work.



The fractional derivative is a consequence of the question "what is the function whom I apply twice to get a first derivative". Rather than "what is the rate of... Rate of change of the function"



So in short. It's an interesting question where we extend our level of control and understanding of calculus but it shares little similarity with the more physical forms that calculus originally had.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 28 '13 at 4:48









frogeyedpeasfrogeyedpeas

7,66872054




7,66872054












  • $begingroup$
    I see someone down voted this ( or two people actually since it's -2) I would be more than willing to answer any questions if you'd like to bring them up
    $endgroup$
    – frogeyedpeas
    Jun 16 '14 at 15:40










  • $begingroup$
    Not all appreciate what one does in life, and this is just another instance; forget the downvotes. Well written answer, brings up the concept quite nicely; + 1.
    $endgroup$
    – Kugelblitz
    Mar 15 '15 at 3:35






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I didn't downvote, but I didn't find this answer very enlightening.
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Aug 31 '15 at 4:00






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Don't take offense to this, but I'm downvoting because I don't believe this answer is very informative and has received more upvotes than its quality deserves.
    $endgroup$
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 15 '17 at 14:10










  • $begingroup$
    what a great explanation. if only my understanding of math was 1/10000000th of his.
    $endgroup$
    – Chase CB
    Oct 25 '17 at 22:04


















  • $begingroup$
    I see someone down voted this ( or two people actually since it's -2) I would be more than willing to answer any questions if you'd like to bring them up
    $endgroup$
    – frogeyedpeas
    Jun 16 '14 at 15:40










  • $begingroup$
    Not all appreciate what one does in life, and this is just another instance; forget the downvotes. Well written answer, brings up the concept quite nicely; + 1.
    $endgroup$
    – Kugelblitz
    Mar 15 '15 at 3:35






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I didn't downvote, but I didn't find this answer very enlightening.
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Aug 31 '15 at 4:00






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Don't take offense to this, but I'm downvoting because I don't believe this answer is very informative and has received more upvotes than its quality deserves.
    $endgroup$
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 15 '17 at 14:10










  • $begingroup$
    what a great explanation. if only my understanding of math was 1/10000000th of his.
    $endgroup$
    – Chase CB
    Oct 25 '17 at 22:04
















$begingroup$
I see someone down voted this ( or two people actually since it's -2) I would be more than willing to answer any questions if you'd like to bring them up
$endgroup$
– frogeyedpeas
Jun 16 '14 at 15:40




$begingroup$
I see someone down voted this ( or two people actually since it's -2) I would be more than willing to answer any questions if you'd like to bring them up
$endgroup$
– frogeyedpeas
Jun 16 '14 at 15:40












$begingroup$
Not all appreciate what one does in life, and this is just another instance; forget the downvotes. Well written answer, brings up the concept quite nicely; + 1.
$endgroup$
– Kugelblitz
Mar 15 '15 at 3:35




$begingroup$
Not all appreciate what one does in life, and this is just another instance; forget the downvotes. Well written answer, brings up the concept quite nicely; + 1.
$endgroup$
– Kugelblitz
Mar 15 '15 at 3:35




5




5




$begingroup$
I didn't downvote, but I didn't find this answer very enlightening.
$endgroup$
– Mehrdad
Aug 31 '15 at 4:00




$begingroup$
I didn't downvote, but I didn't find this answer very enlightening.
$endgroup$
– Mehrdad
Aug 31 '15 at 4:00




3




3




$begingroup$
Don't take offense to this, but I'm downvoting because I don't believe this answer is very informative and has received more upvotes than its quality deserves.
$endgroup$
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 15 '17 at 14:10




$begingroup$
Don't take offense to this, but I'm downvoting because I don't believe this answer is very informative and has received more upvotes than its quality deserves.
$endgroup$
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 15 '17 at 14:10












$begingroup$
what a great explanation. if only my understanding of math was 1/10000000th of his.
$endgroup$
– Chase CB
Oct 25 '17 at 22:04




$begingroup$
what a great explanation. if only my understanding of math was 1/10000000th of his.
$endgroup$
– Chase CB
Oct 25 '17 at 22:04











12












$begingroup$

Short answer: The half-derivative $H$ is some sort of operator (it isn't uniquely defined by this property) such that $H(Hf) = f'$.



Long answer: We can think of the derivative as a linear operator $D:X to X$, where $X$ is some convenient (say, smooth) space of functions. The $n$th order derivative is then, by definition, the $n$-fold composition $D^n = Dcirc cdots circ D:X to X$. Clearly $D^n D^m = D^{n+m}$. Here we've restricted the index $n$ to an integer, but what if we allowed it to be a real number? That is, we want a family of operators $D_t$, with $tgeq 0$ real, such that




  • $D_t$ behaves nicely with respect to $t$;

  • $D_1$ is just the ordinary derivative $D$;

  • $D_t D_s = D_{t + s}$.


(I'm not going to make the first point more precise here, but we ideally want something analogous to continuity or smoothness in $t$. I haven't defined what exactly the space $X$ is or what its geometry looks like, so I'm going to evade the point for now.) Thus, for example, we get an operator $D_{1/2}$ with $D_{1/2} D_{1/2} f = D_1 f = f'$ for suitable $f$.



Where do we get such an operator $D_t$? One place to start is Cauchy's integral formula:
begin{align*}
f^{(-n)}(x) = frac{1}{(n-1)!}int_0^x (x - xi)^{n-1} f(xi), dxi,
end{align*}
where $f^{(-n)}(x)$ denotes the antiderivative of $f$, all normalized to have $f^{(-n)}(0)$ for $n > 0$. The factorial above is only defined for positive integers $n$, but we can use the relation $Gamma(n) = (n - 1)!$ to define something similar for arbitrary $tgeq 0$:
begin{align*}
I_t f(x) = frac{1}{Gamma(t)}int_0^x (x - xi)^{t-1} f(xi), dxi,
end{align*}
Clearly $I_t f(x)$ is just $f^{(-t)}$ if $t$ is a positive integer, and we can show with a bit of work that $I_t(I_s f) = I_{t+s} f$.



Now, that's for an antiderivative. In order to get to the derivative $D_t$ for non-integer $t$, we can use the definition above to get rid of the fractional part. Since $D(If) = f$, we can define
begin{align*}
D_t f= frac{d^n}{dx^n} left(I_tau fright)
end{align*}
for $t = n - tau$ with $n$ an integer and $tauin [0, 1)$. This is not the only possible construction of a fractional derivative $D_t$, though.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Note here that we specifically have $f^{(-1)}(x)=int_0^xf(t)~mathrm dt$ (note the lower bound is $0$) so technically, its not simply the antiderivative (which would be a class of functions differing by a constant) but a definite integral.
    $endgroup$
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 15 '17 at 14:12


















12












$begingroup$

Short answer: The half-derivative $H$ is some sort of operator (it isn't uniquely defined by this property) such that $H(Hf) = f'$.



Long answer: We can think of the derivative as a linear operator $D:X to X$, where $X$ is some convenient (say, smooth) space of functions. The $n$th order derivative is then, by definition, the $n$-fold composition $D^n = Dcirc cdots circ D:X to X$. Clearly $D^n D^m = D^{n+m}$. Here we've restricted the index $n$ to an integer, but what if we allowed it to be a real number? That is, we want a family of operators $D_t$, with $tgeq 0$ real, such that




  • $D_t$ behaves nicely with respect to $t$;

  • $D_1$ is just the ordinary derivative $D$;

  • $D_t D_s = D_{t + s}$.


(I'm not going to make the first point more precise here, but we ideally want something analogous to continuity or smoothness in $t$. I haven't defined what exactly the space $X$ is or what its geometry looks like, so I'm going to evade the point for now.) Thus, for example, we get an operator $D_{1/2}$ with $D_{1/2} D_{1/2} f = D_1 f = f'$ for suitable $f$.



Where do we get such an operator $D_t$? One place to start is Cauchy's integral formula:
begin{align*}
f^{(-n)}(x) = frac{1}{(n-1)!}int_0^x (x - xi)^{n-1} f(xi), dxi,
end{align*}
where $f^{(-n)}(x)$ denotes the antiderivative of $f$, all normalized to have $f^{(-n)}(0)$ for $n > 0$. The factorial above is only defined for positive integers $n$, but we can use the relation $Gamma(n) = (n - 1)!$ to define something similar for arbitrary $tgeq 0$:
begin{align*}
I_t f(x) = frac{1}{Gamma(t)}int_0^x (x - xi)^{t-1} f(xi), dxi,
end{align*}
Clearly $I_t f(x)$ is just $f^{(-t)}$ if $t$ is a positive integer, and we can show with a bit of work that $I_t(I_s f) = I_{t+s} f$.



Now, that's for an antiderivative. In order to get to the derivative $D_t$ for non-integer $t$, we can use the definition above to get rid of the fractional part. Since $D(If) = f$, we can define
begin{align*}
D_t f= frac{d^n}{dx^n} left(I_tau fright)
end{align*}
for $t = n - tau$ with $n$ an integer and $tauin [0, 1)$. This is not the only possible construction of a fractional derivative $D_t$, though.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Note here that we specifically have $f^{(-1)}(x)=int_0^xf(t)~mathrm dt$ (note the lower bound is $0$) so technically, its not simply the antiderivative (which would be a class of functions differing by a constant) but a definite integral.
    $endgroup$
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 15 '17 at 14:12
















12












12








12





$begingroup$

Short answer: The half-derivative $H$ is some sort of operator (it isn't uniquely defined by this property) such that $H(Hf) = f'$.



Long answer: We can think of the derivative as a linear operator $D:X to X$, where $X$ is some convenient (say, smooth) space of functions. The $n$th order derivative is then, by definition, the $n$-fold composition $D^n = Dcirc cdots circ D:X to X$. Clearly $D^n D^m = D^{n+m}$. Here we've restricted the index $n$ to an integer, but what if we allowed it to be a real number? That is, we want a family of operators $D_t$, with $tgeq 0$ real, such that




  • $D_t$ behaves nicely with respect to $t$;

  • $D_1$ is just the ordinary derivative $D$;

  • $D_t D_s = D_{t + s}$.


(I'm not going to make the first point more precise here, but we ideally want something analogous to continuity or smoothness in $t$. I haven't defined what exactly the space $X$ is or what its geometry looks like, so I'm going to evade the point for now.) Thus, for example, we get an operator $D_{1/2}$ with $D_{1/2} D_{1/2} f = D_1 f = f'$ for suitable $f$.



Where do we get such an operator $D_t$? One place to start is Cauchy's integral formula:
begin{align*}
f^{(-n)}(x) = frac{1}{(n-1)!}int_0^x (x - xi)^{n-1} f(xi), dxi,
end{align*}
where $f^{(-n)}(x)$ denotes the antiderivative of $f$, all normalized to have $f^{(-n)}(0)$ for $n > 0$. The factorial above is only defined for positive integers $n$, but we can use the relation $Gamma(n) = (n - 1)!$ to define something similar for arbitrary $tgeq 0$:
begin{align*}
I_t f(x) = frac{1}{Gamma(t)}int_0^x (x - xi)^{t-1} f(xi), dxi,
end{align*}
Clearly $I_t f(x)$ is just $f^{(-t)}$ if $t$ is a positive integer, and we can show with a bit of work that $I_t(I_s f) = I_{t+s} f$.



Now, that's for an antiderivative. In order to get to the derivative $D_t$ for non-integer $t$, we can use the definition above to get rid of the fractional part. Since $D(If) = f$, we can define
begin{align*}
D_t f= frac{d^n}{dx^n} left(I_tau fright)
end{align*}
for $t = n - tau$ with $n$ an integer and $tauin [0, 1)$. This is not the only possible construction of a fractional derivative $D_t$, though.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Short answer: The half-derivative $H$ is some sort of operator (it isn't uniquely defined by this property) such that $H(Hf) = f'$.



Long answer: We can think of the derivative as a linear operator $D:X to X$, where $X$ is some convenient (say, smooth) space of functions. The $n$th order derivative is then, by definition, the $n$-fold composition $D^n = Dcirc cdots circ D:X to X$. Clearly $D^n D^m = D^{n+m}$. Here we've restricted the index $n$ to an integer, but what if we allowed it to be a real number? That is, we want a family of operators $D_t$, with $tgeq 0$ real, such that




  • $D_t$ behaves nicely with respect to $t$;

  • $D_1$ is just the ordinary derivative $D$;

  • $D_t D_s = D_{t + s}$.


(I'm not going to make the first point more precise here, but we ideally want something analogous to continuity or smoothness in $t$. I haven't defined what exactly the space $X$ is or what its geometry looks like, so I'm going to evade the point for now.) Thus, for example, we get an operator $D_{1/2}$ with $D_{1/2} D_{1/2} f = D_1 f = f'$ for suitable $f$.



Where do we get such an operator $D_t$? One place to start is Cauchy's integral formula:
begin{align*}
f^{(-n)}(x) = frac{1}{(n-1)!}int_0^x (x - xi)^{n-1} f(xi), dxi,
end{align*}
where $f^{(-n)}(x)$ denotes the antiderivative of $f$, all normalized to have $f^{(-n)}(0)$ for $n > 0$. The factorial above is only defined for positive integers $n$, but we can use the relation $Gamma(n) = (n - 1)!$ to define something similar for arbitrary $tgeq 0$:
begin{align*}
I_t f(x) = frac{1}{Gamma(t)}int_0^x (x - xi)^{t-1} f(xi), dxi,
end{align*}
Clearly $I_t f(x)$ is just $f^{(-t)}$ if $t$ is a positive integer, and we can show with a bit of work that $I_t(I_s f) = I_{t+s} f$.



Now, that's for an antiderivative. In order to get to the derivative $D_t$ for non-integer $t$, we can use the definition above to get rid of the fractional part. Since $D(If) = f$, we can define
begin{align*}
D_t f= frac{d^n}{dx^n} left(I_tau fright)
end{align*}
for $t = n - tau$ with $n$ an integer and $tauin [0, 1)$. This is not the only possible construction of a fractional derivative $D_t$, though.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 2 '15 at 19:34

























answered Nov 2 '15 at 19:29









anomalyanomaly

17.8k42666




17.8k42666












  • $begingroup$
    Note here that we specifically have $f^{(-1)}(x)=int_0^xf(t)~mathrm dt$ (note the lower bound is $0$) so technically, its not simply the antiderivative (which would be a class of functions differing by a constant) but a definite integral.
    $endgroup$
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 15 '17 at 14:12




















  • $begingroup$
    Note here that we specifically have $f^{(-1)}(x)=int_0^xf(t)~mathrm dt$ (note the lower bound is $0$) so technically, its not simply the antiderivative (which would be a class of functions differing by a constant) but a definite integral.
    $endgroup$
    – Simply Beautiful Art
    Jul 15 '17 at 14:12


















$begingroup$
Note here that we specifically have $f^{(-1)}(x)=int_0^xf(t)~mathrm dt$ (note the lower bound is $0$) so technically, its not simply the antiderivative (which would be a class of functions differing by a constant) but a definite integral.
$endgroup$
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 15 '17 at 14:12






$begingroup$
Note here that we specifically have $f^{(-1)}(x)=int_0^xf(t)~mathrm dt$ (note the lower bound is $0$) so technically, its not simply the antiderivative (which would be a class of functions differing by a constant) but a definite integral.
$endgroup$
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 15 '17 at 14:12




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477888%2fwhat-does-a-half-derivative-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen