The derived category is additive












5














Let $mathcal C$ be an abelian category. One way to see the derived category $D(mathcal C)$ is that it has




  • the same objects as $operatorname{Ch}(mathcal C)$,

  • roofs $Axleftarrow{simeq}Z_1rightarrow Z_2xleftarrow{simeq}Z_3rightarrowcdots xleftarrow{simeq}Z_nrightarrow B$ as morphisms.


To see that $D(mathcal C)$ is additive, it suffices to show that it contains finite biproducts, for then we can define the addition of morphisms in terms of $oplus$. So the goal is to find a biproduct of two objects $A, Bin D(mathcal C)$.



Clearly, for the object $Aoplus B$ from $operatorname{Ch}(mathcal C)$ there are inclusion morphisms $Ato Aoplus Bleftarrow B$. Let $T$ be an object with morphisms



$$Axleftarrow{simeq}C_1rightarrow T,quad
Bxleftarrow{simeq}C_2rightarrow T.$$



Note that it suffices to consider single-step roofs because the argument, once established, can be iterated for general roofs as above.



We see that there is a morphism $Aoplus Bxleftarrow{simeq} C_1oplus C_2to T$, making the diagram commute. However, I fail to show its uniqueness: Given another morphism $Aoplus Bxleftarrow{simeq} Zto T$, we have to show that both are equivalent, i.e., there is an object $Y$ with morphisms such that



$$begin{matrix}
&&Z\
&swarrow&uparrow&searrow\
A&leftarrow &Y&rightarrow &T\
&nwarrow&downarrow&nearrow\
&& C_1oplus C_2
end{matrix}$$



commutes, where $Yxrightarrow{simeq} A$.



Question: How to I find this object $Y$, showing uniqueness of the canonical morphism from $Aoplus B$ to $T$?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • the localization of an additive category is additive category.Thus you only need to check homotopy category is additive category.
    – Sky
    Dec 1 at 13:57










  • @Sky That $K(mathcal C)$ is additive is clear. However, it is not totally clear to me that the localisation of an additive category yields an additive one again.
    – Bubaya
    Dec 2 at 20:42
















5














Let $mathcal C$ be an abelian category. One way to see the derived category $D(mathcal C)$ is that it has




  • the same objects as $operatorname{Ch}(mathcal C)$,

  • roofs $Axleftarrow{simeq}Z_1rightarrow Z_2xleftarrow{simeq}Z_3rightarrowcdots xleftarrow{simeq}Z_nrightarrow B$ as morphisms.


To see that $D(mathcal C)$ is additive, it suffices to show that it contains finite biproducts, for then we can define the addition of morphisms in terms of $oplus$. So the goal is to find a biproduct of two objects $A, Bin D(mathcal C)$.



Clearly, for the object $Aoplus B$ from $operatorname{Ch}(mathcal C)$ there are inclusion morphisms $Ato Aoplus Bleftarrow B$. Let $T$ be an object with morphisms



$$Axleftarrow{simeq}C_1rightarrow T,quad
Bxleftarrow{simeq}C_2rightarrow T.$$



Note that it suffices to consider single-step roofs because the argument, once established, can be iterated for general roofs as above.



We see that there is a morphism $Aoplus Bxleftarrow{simeq} C_1oplus C_2to T$, making the diagram commute. However, I fail to show its uniqueness: Given another morphism $Aoplus Bxleftarrow{simeq} Zto T$, we have to show that both are equivalent, i.e., there is an object $Y$ with morphisms such that



$$begin{matrix}
&&Z\
&swarrow&uparrow&searrow\
A&leftarrow &Y&rightarrow &T\
&nwarrow&downarrow&nearrow\
&& C_1oplus C_2
end{matrix}$$



commutes, where $Yxrightarrow{simeq} A$.



Question: How to I find this object $Y$, showing uniqueness of the canonical morphism from $Aoplus B$ to $T$?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • the localization of an additive category is additive category.Thus you only need to check homotopy category is additive category.
    – Sky
    Dec 1 at 13:57










  • @Sky That $K(mathcal C)$ is additive is clear. However, it is not totally clear to me that the localisation of an additive category yields an additive one again.
    – Bubaya
    Dec 2 at 20:42














5












5








5







Let $mathcal C$ be an abelian category. One way to see the derived category $D(mathcal C)$ is that it has




  • the same objects as $operatorname{Ch}(mathcal C)$,

  • roofs $Axleftarrow{simeq}Z_1rightarrow Z_2xleftarrow{simeq}Z_3rightarrowcdots xleftarrow{simeq}Z_nrightarrow B$ as morphisms.


To see that $D(mathcal C)$ is additive, it suffices to show that it contains finite biproducts, for then we can define the addition of morphisms in terms of $oplus$. So the goal is to find a biproduct of two objects $A, Bin D(mathcal C)$.



Clearly, for the object $Aoplus B$ from $operatorname{Ch}(mathcal C)$ there are inclusion morphisms $Ato Aoplus Bleftarrow B$. Let $T$ be an object with morphisms



$$Axleftarrow{simeq}C_1rightarrow T,quad
Bxleftarrow{simeq}C_2rightarrow T.$$



Note that it suffices to consider single-step roofs because the argument, once established, can be iterated for general roofs as above.



We see that there is a morphism $Aoplus Bxleftarrow{simeq} C_1oplus C_2to T$, making the diagram commute. However, I fail to show its uniqueness: Given another morphism $Aoplus Bxleftarrow{simeq} Zto T$, we have to show that both are equivalent, i.e., there is an object $Y$ with morphisms such that



$$begin{matrix}
&&Z\
&swarrow&uparrow&searrow\
A&leftarrow &Y&rightarrow &T\
&nwarrow&downarrow&nearrow\
&& C_1oplus C_2
end{matrix}$$



commutes, where $Yxrightarrow{simeq} A$.



Question: How to I find this object $Y$, showing uniqueness of the canonical morphism from $Aoplus B$ to $T$?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $mathcal C$ be an abelian category. One way to see the derived category $D(mathcal C)$ is that it has




  • the same objects as $operatorname{Ch}(mathcal C)$,

  • roofs $Axleftarrow{simeq}Z_1rightarrow Z_2xleftarrow{simeq}Z_3rightarrowcdots xleftarrow{simeq}Z_nrightarrow B$ as morphisms.


To see that $D(mathcal C)$ is additive, it suffices to show that it contains finite biproducts, for then we can define the addition of morphisms in terms of $oplus$. So the goal is to find a biproduct of two objects $A, Bin D(mathcal C)$.



Clearly, for the object $Aoplus B$ from $operatorname{Ch}(mathcal C)$ there are inclusion morphisms $Ato Aoplus Bleftarrow B$. Let $T$ be an object with morphisms



$$Axleftarrow{simeq}C_1rightarrow T,quad
Bxleftarrow{simeq}C_2rightarrow T.$$



Note that it suffices to consider single-step roofs because the argument, once established, can be iterated for general roofs as above.



We see that there is a morphism $Aoplus Bxleftarrow{simeq} C_1oplus C_2to T$, making the diagram commute. However, I fail to show its uniqueness: Given another morphism $Aoplus Bxleftarrow{simeq} Zto T$, we have to show that both are equivalent, i.e., there is an object $Y$ with morphisms such that



$$begin{matrix}
&&Z\
&swarrow&uparrow&searrow\
A&leftarrow &Y&rightarrow &T\
&nwarrow&downarrow&nearrow\
&& C_1oplus C_2
end{matrix}$$



commutes, where $Yxrightarrow{simeq} A$.



Question: How to I find this object $Y$, showing uniqueness of the canonical morphism from $Aoplus B$ to $T$?







category-theory homological-algebra triangulated-categories derived-categories






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 28 at 8:55









Bubaya

398111




398111












  • the localization of an additive category is additive category.Thus you only need to check homotopy category is additive category.
    – Sky
    Dec 1 at 13:57










  • @Sky That $K(mathcal C)$ is additive is clear. However, it is not totally clear to me that the localisation of an additive category yields an additive one again.
    – Bubaya
    Dec 2 at 20:42


















  • the localization of an additive category is additive category.Thus you only need to check homotopy category is additive category.
    – Sky
    Dec 1 at 13:57










  • @Sky That $K(mathcal C)$ is additive is clear. However, it is not totally clear to me that the localisation of an additive category yields an additive one again.
    – Bubaya
    Dec 2 at 20:42
















the localization of an additive category is additive category.Thus you only need to check homotopy category is additive category.
– Sky
Dec 1 at 13:57




the localization of an additive category is additive category.Thus you only need to check homotopy category is additive category.
– Sky
Dec 1 at 13:57












@Sky That $K(mathcal C)$ is additive is clear. However, it is not totally clear to me that the localisation of an additive category yields an additive one again.
– Bubaya
Dec 2 at 20:42




@Sky That $K(mathcal C)$ is additive is clear. However, it is not totally clear to me that the localisation of an additive category yields an additive one again.
– Bubaya
Dec 2 at 20:42















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016920%2fthe-derived-category-is-additive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016920%2fthe-derived-category-is-additive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen