Reverse Engineering Movable Labels in ArcMap?
I have an .mxd where the labels for most features are fully editable and movable. However, they have NOT been converted to notation. They are stored in shapefiles that have no symbology but also have "Label Features" checked off. When a shapefile is checked off, the labels turn off as well. We can't figure out how this is possible but we'd like to be able to recreate this label style since it works really well.
How can I recreate this?
I am not new to GIS, please trust that I understand what a shapefile is.
I am using ArcMap 10.5.1.
arcmap labeling arcgis-10.5 annotation
edited Nov 30 at 20:23
PolyGeo♦
53.2k1779238
asked Nov 30 at 16:30
Shelby Guercio
1789
|
show 2 more comments
I have an .mxd where the labels for most features are fully editable and movable. However, they have NOT been converted to notation. They are stored in shapefiles that have no symbology but also have "Label Features" checked off. When a shapefile is checked off, the labels turn off as well. We can't figure out how this is possible but we'd like to be able to recreate this label style since it works really well.
How can I recreate this?
I am not new to GIS, please trust that I understand what a shapefile is.
I am using ArcMap 10.5.1.
arcmap labeling arcgis-10.5 annotation
edited Nov 30 at 20:23
PolyGeo♦
53.2k1779238
asked Nov 30 at 16:30
Shelby Guercio
1789
How does the attribute table look like, could you post an extract ?
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:09
Also are you really using a shapefile ? (a file with an .shp extension an the accompanying .dbf .shx and .prj)
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:11
It is a shapefile. If I export the shapefile to a copy and add it to the map, it shows up with the regular symbology. The attribute table is also typical of a shapefile: FID, Shape, etc
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 17:18
2
Is it possible that it is actually annotation stored in the .mxd, rather than a .gdb?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:53
1
Are you sure? You can convert more labels to anno with annotation stored in the .mxd. No annotation groups in the data frame properties?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:58
|
show 2 more comments
I have an .mxd where the labels for most features are fully editable and movable. However, they have NOT been converted to notation. They are stored in shapefiles that have no symbology but also have "Label Features" checked off. When a shapefile is checked off, the labels turn off as well. We can't figure out how this is possible but we'd like to be able to recreate this label style since it works really well.
How can I recreate this?
I am not new to GIS, please trust that I understand what a shapefile is.
I am using ArcMap 10.5.1.
arcmap labeling arcgis-10.5 annotation
edited Nov 30 at 20:23
PolyGeo♦
53.2k1779238
asked Nov 30 at 16:30
Shelby Guercio
1789
I have an .mxd where the labels for most features are fully editable and movable. However, they have NOT been converted to notation. They are stored in shapefiles that have no symbology but also have "Label Features" checked off. When a shapefile is checked off, the labels turn off as well. We can't figure out how this is possible but we'd like to be able to recreate this label style since it works really well.
How can I recreate this?
I am not new to GIS, please trust that I understand what a shapefile is.
I am using ArcMap 10.5.1.
arcmap labeling arcgis-10.5 annotation
arcmap labeling arcgis-10.5 annotation
edited Nov 30 at 20:23
PolyGeo♦
53.2k1779238
asked Nov 30 at 16:30
Shelby Guercio
1789
edited Nov 30 at 20:23
PolyGeo♦
53.2k1779238
asked Nov 30 at 16:30
Shelby Guercio
1789
edited Nov 30 at 20:23
PolyGeo♦
53.2k1779238
edited Nov 30 at 20:23
PolyGeo♦
53.2k1779238
edited Nov 30 at 20:23
PolyGeo♦
53.2k1779238
53.2k1779238
asked Nov 30 at 16:30
Shelby Guercio
1789
asked Nov 30 at 16:30
Shelby Guercio
1789
asked Nov 30 at 16:30
Shelby Guercio
1789
1789
How does the attribute table look like, could you post an extract ?
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:09
Also are you really using a shapefile ? (a file with an .shp extension an the accompanying .dbf .shx and .prj)
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:11
It is a shapefile. If I export the shapefile to a copy and add it to the map, it shows up with the regular symbology. The attribute table is also typical of a shapefile: FID, Shape, etc
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 17:18
2
Is it possible that it is actually annotation stored in the .mxd, rather than a .gdb?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:53
1
Are you sure? You can convert more labels to anno with annotation stored in the .mxd. No annotation groups in the data frame properties?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:58
|
show 2 more comments
How does the attribute table look like, could you post an extract ?
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:09
Also are you really using a shapefile ? (a file with an .shp extension an the accompanying .dbf .shx and .prj)
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:11
It is a shapefile. If I export the shapefile to a copy and add it to the map, it shows up with the regular symbology. The attribute table is also typical of a shapefile: FID, Shape, etc
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 17:18
2
Is it possible that it is actually annotation stored in the .mxd, rather than a .gdb?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:53
1
Are you sure? You can convert more labels to anno with annotation stored in the .mxd. No annotation groups in the data frame properties?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:58
How does the attribute table look like, could you post an extract ?
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:09
How does the attribute table look like, could you post an extract ?
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:09
Also are you really using a shapefile ? (a file with an .shp extension an the accompanying .dbf .shx and .prj)
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:11
Also are you really using a shapefile ? (a file with an .shp extension an the accompanying .dbf .shx and .prj)
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:11
It is a shapefile. If I export the shapefile to a copy and add it to the map, it shows up with the regular symbology. The attribute table is also typical of a shapefile: FID, Shape, etc
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 17:18
It is a shapefile. If I export the shapefile to a copy and add it to the map, it shows up with the regular symbology. The attribute table is also typical of a shapefile: FID, Shape, etc
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 17:18
2
2
Is it possible that it is actually annotation stored in the .mxd, rather than a .gdb?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:53
Is it possible that it is actually annotation stored in the .mxd, rather than a .gdb?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:53
1
1
Are you sure? You can convert more labels to anno with annotation stored in the .mxd. No annotation groups in the data frame properties?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:58
Are you sure? You can convert more labels to anno with annotation stored in the .mxd. No annotation groups in the data frame properties?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:58
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Your labels are not actually labels, they are annotation. You are dealing with annotation created in the map document, rather than in a geodatabase. Open the data frame properties to view all of the .mxd's annotation groups.
answered Nov 30 at 18:13
cl3
1,566921
1
I had no idea you could view all the annotation groups that way, thank you!
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 18:15
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "79"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f304552%2freverse-engineering-movable-labels-in-arcmap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your labels are not actually labels, they are annotation. You are dealing with annotation created in the map document, rather than in a geodatabase. Open the data frame properties to view all of the .mxd's annotation groups.
answered Nov 30 at 18:13
cl3
1,566921
1
I had no idea you could view all the annotation groups that way, thank you!
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 18:15
add a comment |
Your labels are not actually labels, they are annotation. You are dealing with annotation created in the map document, rather than in a geodatabase. Open the data frame properties to view all of the .mxd's annotation groups.
answered Nov 30 at 18:13
cl3
1,566921
1
I had no idea you could view all the annotation groups that way, thank you!
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 18:15
add a comment |
Your labels are not actually labels, they are annotation. You are dealing with annotation created in the map document, rather than in a geodatabase. Open the data frame properties to view all of the .mxd's annotation groups.
answered Nov 30 at 18:13
cl3
1,566921
Your labels are not actually labels, they are annotation. You are dealing with annotation created in the map document, rather than in a geodatabase. Open the data frame properties to view all of the .mxd's annotation groups.
answered Nov 30 at 18:13
cl3
1,566921
answered Nov 30 at 18:13
cl3
1,566921
answered Nov 30 at 18:13
cl3
1,566921
answered Nov 30 at 18:13
cl3
1,566921
1,566921
1
I had no idea you could view all the annotation groups that way, thank you!
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 18:15
add a comment |
1
I had no idea you could view all the annotation groups that way, thank you!
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 18:15
1
1
I had no idea you could view all the annotation groups that way, thank you!
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 18:15
I had no idea you could view all the annotation groups that way, thank you!
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 18:15
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f304552%2freverse-engineering-movable-labels-in-arcmap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
How does the attribute table look like, could you post an extract ?
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:09
Also are you really using a shapefile ? (a file with an .shp extension an the accompanying .dbf .shx and .prj)
– J.R
Nov 30 at 17:11
It is a shapefile. If I export the shapefile to a copy and add it to the map, it shows up with the regular symbology. The attribute table is also typical of a shapefile: FID, Shape, etc
– Shelby Guercio
Nov 30 at 17:18
2
Is it possible that it is actually annotation stored in the .mxd, rather than a .gdb?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:53
1
Are you sure? You can convert more labels to anno with annotation stored in the .mxd. No annotation groups in the data frame properties?
– cl3
Nov 30 at 17:58