How to model bind a tag helper in asp.net core razor
Is there a way for me to replace the functionality of Html.EditorFor(m => m.ListOfItems)
in Asp.net Core Razor pages?
I was looking at tag helpers which remind me of components, however I haven't been able to get these to model bind correctly (in a loop). Am I basically forced to use editor templates for now?
razor asp.net-core asp.net-core-2.0
add a comment |
Is there a way for me to replace the functionality of Html.EditorFor(m => m.ListOfItems)
in Asp.net Core Razor pages?
I was looking at tag helpers which remind me of components, however I haven't been able to get these to model bind correctly (in a loop). Am I basically forced to use editor templates for now?
razor asp.net-core asp.net-core-2.0
add a comment |
Is there a way for me to replace the functionality of Html.EditorFor(m => m.ListOfItems)
in Asp.net Core Razor pages?
I was looking at tag helpers which remind me of components, however I haven't been able to get these to model bind correctly (in a loop). Am I basically forced to use editor templates for now?
razor asp.net-core asp.net-core-2.0
Is there a way for me to replace the functionality of Html.EditorFor(m => m.ListOfItems)
in Asp.net Core Razor pages?
I was looking at tag helpers which remind me of components, however I haven't been able to get these to model bind correctly (in a loop). Am I basically forced to use editor templates for now?
razor asp.net-core asp.net-core-2.0
razor asp.net-core asp.net-core-2.0
edited Nov 21 '18 at 20:14
SLaks
679k13916301751
679k13916301751
asked Nov 21 '18 at 20:12
GeistGeist
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
According to the documentation here, this is exactly the method show. This means there is no direct tag helper solution anytime soon.
However, instead of doing this with editor templates, you can always create a partial view that uses tag helpers for your Item
class. You can then use the partial tag helper like this:
@foreach (var item in Model.ListOfItems)
{
<partial name="MyItem" model="item" />
}
I think I've tried that in the past and the partial views don't model bind correctly because the name attribute in the html doesn't get set properly. I guess I'll stick to editor templates for now. Thank you
– Geist
Nov 26 '18 at 15:13
yes, the name attribute you need to use without .cshtml
– Neville Nazerane
Nov 27 '18 at 5:08
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419801%2fhow-to-model-bind-a-tag-helper-in-asp-net-core-razor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
According to the documentation here, this is exactly the method show. This means there is no direct tag helper solution anytime soon.
However, instead of doing this with editor templates, you can always create a partial view that uses tag helpers for your Item
class. You can then use the partial tag helper like this:
@foreach (var item in Model.ListOfItems)
{
<partial name="MyItem" model="item" />
}
I think I've tried that in the past and the partial views don't model bind correctly because the name attribute in the html doesn't get set properly. I guess I'll stick to editor templates for now. Thank you
– Geist
Nov 26 '18 at 15:13
yes, the name attribute you need to use without .cshtml
– Neville Nazerane
Nov 27 '18 at 5:08
add a comment |
According to the documentation here, this is exactly the method show. This means there is no direct tag helper solution anytime soon.
However, instead of doing this with editor templates, you can always create a partial view that uses tag helpers for your Item
class. You can then use the partial tag helper like this:
@foreach (var item in Model.ListOfItems)
{
<partial name="MyItem" model="item" />
}
I think I've tried that in the past and the partial views don't model bind correctly because the name attribute in the html doesn't get set properly. I guess I'll stick to editor templates for now. Thank you
– Geist
Nov 26 '18 at 15:13
yes, the name attribute you need to use without .cshtml
– Neville Nazerane
Nov 27 '18 at 5:08
add a comment |
According to the documentation here, this is exactly the method show. This means there is no direct tag helper solution anytime soon.
However, instead of doing this with editor templates, you can always create a partial view that uses tag helpers for your Item
class. You can then use the partial tag helper like this:
@foreach (var item in Model.ListOfItems)
{
<partial name="MyItem" model="item" />
}
According to the documentation here, this is exactly the method show. This means there is no direct tag helper solution anytime soon.
However, instead of doing this with editor templates, you can always create a partial view that uses tag helpers for your Item
class. You can then use the partial tag helper like this:
@foreach (var item in Model.ListOfItems)
{
<partial name="MyItem" model="item" />
}
answered Nov 21 '18 at 22:50
Neville NazeraneNeville Nazerane
2,61621534
2,61621534
I think I've tried that in the past and the partial views don't model bind correctly because the name attribute in the html doesn't get set properly. I guess I'll stick to editor templates for now. Thank you
– Geist
Nov 26 '18 at 15:13
yes, the name attribute you need to use without .cshtml
– Neville Nazerane
Nov 27 '18 at 5:08
add a comment |
I think I've tried that in the past and the partial views don't model bind correctly because the name attribute in the html doesn't get set properly. I guess I'll stick to editor templates for now. Thank you
– Geist
Nov 26 '18 at 15:13
yes, the name attribute you need to use without .cshtml
– Neville Nazerane
Nov 27 '18 at 5:08
I think I've tried that in the past and the partial views don't model bind correctly because the name attribute in the html doesn't get set properly. I guess I'll stick to editor templates for now. Thank you
– Geist
Nov 26 '18 at 15:13
I think I've tried that in the past and the partial views don't model bind correctly because the name attribute in the html doesn't get set properly. I guess I'll stick to editor templates for now. Thank you
– Geist
Nov 26 '18 at 15:13
yes, the name attribute you need to use without .cshtml
– Neville Nazerane
Nov 27 '18 at 5:08
yes, the name attribute you need to use without .cshtml
– Neville Nazerane
Nov 27 '18 at 5:08
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419801%2fhow-to-model-bind-a-tag-helper-in-asp-net-core-razor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown