How to prove the following problem [closed]












1














$displaystylesum_{n=1}^{infty}na_{n}$ converges. Prove that:
$$
nsum_{k=n}^{infty}a_{k}to0
$$

Wish someone can provide me with some clue about this problem.










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Saad, Alexander Gruber Dec 4 '18 at 4:22


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Is there any condition for $a_n$, such as nonnegativity or absolute convergence?
    – bellcircle
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:45










  • The statement is not true if we take $a_n = -1$ for all $n$.
    – 5xum
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:46










  • @bellcircle No no such conditions are given.
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:48










  • @5xum Well if $a_n=-1$ the sequence is not convergent
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:50






  • 1




    it does not make sense if $a_n<0$. i think there is a missing condition
    – Alexis
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:54
















1














$displaystylesum_{n=1}^{infty}na_{n}$ converges. Prove that:
$$
nsum_{k=n}^{infty}a_{k}to0
$$

Wish someone can provide me with some clue about this problem.










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Saad, Alexander Gruber Dec 4 '18 at 4:22


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Is there any condition for $a_n$, such as nonnegativity or absolute convergence?
    – bellcircle
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:45










  • The statement is not true if we take $a_n = -1$ for all $n$.
    – 5xum
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:46










  • @bellcircle No no such conditions are given.
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:48










  • @5xum Well if $a_n=-1$ the sequence is not convergent
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:50






  • 1




    it does not make sense if $a_n<0$. i think there is a missing condition
    – Alexis
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:54














1












1








1







$displaystylesum_{n=1}^{infty}na_{n}$ converges. Prove that:
$$
nsum_{k=n}^{infty}a_{k}to0
$$

Wish someone can provide me with some clue about this problem.










share|cite|improve this question















$displaystylesum_{n=1}^{infty}na_{n}$ converges. Prove that:
$$
nsum_{k=n}^{infty}a_{k}to0
$$

Wish someone can provide me with some clue about this problem.







sequences-and-series






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 3 '18 at 13:55







DiaryofNewton

















asked Dec 3 '18 at 13:40









DiaryofNewtonDiaryofNewton

355




355




closed as off-topic by Saad, Alexander Gruber Dec 4 '18 at 4:22


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Saad, Alexander Gruber Dec 4 '18 at 4:22


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Is there any condition for $a_n$, such as nonnegativity or absolute convergence?
    – bellcircle
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:45










  • The statement is not true if we take $a_n = -1$ for all $n$.
    – 5xum
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:46










  • @bellcircle No no such conditions are given.
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:48










  • @5xum Well if $a_n=-1$ the sequence is not convergent
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:50






  • 1




    it does not make sense if $a_n<0$. i think there is a missing condition
    – Alexis
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:54


















  • Is there any condition for $a_n$, such as nonnegativity or absolute convergence?
    – bellcircle
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:45










  • The statement is not true if we take $a_n = -1$ for all $n$.
    – 5xum
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:46










  • @bellcircle No no such conditions are given.
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:48










  • @5xum Well if $a_n=-1$ the sequence is not convergent
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:50






  • 1




    it does not make sense if $a_n<0$. i think there is a missing condition
    – Alexis
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:54
















Is there any condition for $a_n$, such as nonnegativity or absolute convergence?
– bellcircle
Dec 3 '18 at 13:45




Is there any condition for $a_n$, such as nonnegativity or absolute convergence?
– bellcircle
Dec 3 '18 at 13:45












The statement is not true if we take $a_n = -1$ for all $n$.
– 5xum
Dec 3 '18 at 13:46




The statement is not true if we take $a_n = -1$ for all $n$.
– 5xum
Dec 3 '18 at 13:46












@bellcircle No no such conditions are given.
– DiaryofNewton
Dec 3 '18 at 13:48




@bellcircle No no such conditions are given.
– DiaryofNewton
Dec 3 '18 at 13:48












@5xum Well if $a_n=-1$ the sequence is not convergent
– DiaryofNewton
Dec 3 '18 at 13:50




@5xum Well if $a_n=-1$ the sequence is not convergent
– DiaryofNewton
Dec 3 '18 at 13:50




1




1




it does not make sense if $a_n<0$. i think there is a missing condition
– Alexis
Dec 3 '18 at 13:54




it does not make sense if $a_n<0$. i think there is a missing condition
– Alexis
Dec 3 '18 at 13:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Nonnegativity is not required.



Suppose the series $sum k a_k$ converges and



$$lim_{n to infty} S_n = lim_{n to infty} sum_{k=1}^n k a_k = S$$



Summing by parts we get



$$n sum_{k=n}^m a_k = n sum_{k=n}^m ka_k frac{1}{k} = n left[frac{S_m}{m} - frac{S_{n-1}}{n} + sum_{k=n}^mS_kleft(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right)right]$$



The last sum on the RHS converges as $m to infty$ since the summand is $mathcal{O}(k^{-2})$. Taking the limit of both sides as $m to infty$ and noting that $S_m/m to 0$ we get



$$n sum_{k=n}^infty a_k = - S_{n-1} + nsum_{k=n}^infty S_kleft(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right)$$



For any $epsilon> 0$ and all sufficiently large $n$ we have for $k geqslant n$,



$$S- epsilon leqslant S_k leqslant S + epsilon,$$



and



$$-S_{n-1} +n (S- epsilon)sum_{k=n}^infty left(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right) leqslant nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant -S_{n-1} +n (S+ epsilon)sum_{k=n}^infty left(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right) $$



Noting the telescoping sum converging to $1/n$, it follows that



$$-S_{n-1} + S - epsilon leqslant nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant -S_{n-1} + S+ epsilon,$$



whence,



$$-epsilon leqslant liminf_{n to infty},, nsum_{k=n}^infty a_kleqslant limsup_{n to infty},,nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant epsilon$$



Since $epsilon$ can be arbitrarily close to $0$ we must have



$$lim_{n to infty} n sum_{k=n}^infty a_k = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Wow thanks, I think that's right
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:38










  • @DiaryofNewton: You're welcome. This is a nice question as it illustrates a combination of several useful techniques.
    – RRL
    Dec 4 '18 at 4:49




















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














Nonnegativity is not required.



Suppose the series $sum k a_k$ converges and



$$lim_{n to infty} S_n = lim_{n to infty} sum_{k=1}^n k a_k = S$$



Summing by parts we get



$$n sum_{k=n}^m a_k = n sum_{k=n}^m ka_k frac{1}{k} = n left[frac{S_m}{m} - frac{S_{n-1}}{n} + sum_{k=n}^mS_kleft(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right)right]$$



The last sum on the RHS converges as $m to infty$ since the summand is $mathcal{O}(k^{-2})$. Taking the limit of both sides as $m to infty$ and noting that $S_m/m to 0$ we get



$$n sum_{k=n}^infty a_k = - S_{n-1} + nsum_{k=n}^infty S_kleft(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right)$$



For any $epsilon> 0$ and all sufficiently large $n$ we have for $k geqslant n$,



$$S- epsilon leqslant S_k leqslant S + epsilon,$$



and



$$-S_{n-1} +n (S- epsilon)sum_{k=n}^infty left(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right) leqslant nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant -S_{n-1} +n (S+ epsilon)sum_{k=n}^infty left(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right) $$



Noting the telescoping sum converging to $1/n$, it follows that



$$-S_{n-1} + S - epsilon leqslant nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant -S_{n-1} + S+ epsilon,$$



whence,



$$-epsilon leqslant liminf_{n to infty},, nsum_{k=n}^infty a_kleqslant limsup_{n to infty},,nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant epsilon$$



Since $epsilon$ can be arbitrarily close to $0$ we must have



$$lim_{n to infty} n sum_{k=n}^infty a_k = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Wow thanks, I think that's right
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:38










  • @DiaryofNewton: You're welcome. This is a nice question as it illustrates a combination of several useful techniques.
    – RRL
    Dec 4 '18 at 4:49


















1














Nonnegativity is not required.



Suppose the series $sum k a_k$ converges and



$$lim_{n to infty} S_n = lim_{n to infty} sum_{k=1}^n k a_k = S$$



Summing by parts we get



$$n sum_{k=n}^m a_k = n sum_{k=n}^m ka_k frac{1}{k} = n left[frac{S_m}{m} - frac{S_{n-1}}{n} + sum_{k=n}^mS_kleft(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right)right]$$



The last sum on the RHS converges as $m to infty$ since the summand is $mathcal{O}(k^{-2})$. Taking the limit of both sides as $m to infty$ and noting that $S_m/m to 0$ we get



$$n sum_{k=n}^infty a_k = - S_{n-1} + nsum_{k=n}^infty S_kleft(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right)$$



For any $epsilon> 0$ and all sufficiently large $n$ we have for $k geqslant n$,



$$S- epsilon leqslant S_k leqslant S + epsilon,$$



and



$$-S_{n-1} +n (S- epsilon)sum_{k=n}^infty left(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right) leqslant nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant -S_{n-1} +n (S+ epsilon)sum_{k=n}^infty left(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right) $$



Noting the telescoping sum converging to $1/n$, it follows that



$$-S_{n-1} + S - epsilon leqslant nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant -S_{n-1} + S+ epsilon,$$



whence,



$$-epsilon leqslant liminf_{n to infty},, nsum_{k=n}^infty a_kleqslant limsup_{n to infty},,nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant epsilon$$



Since $epsilon$ can be arbitrarily close to $0$ we must have



$$lim_{n to infty} n sum_{k=n}^infty a_k = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Wow thanks, I think that's right
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:38










  • @DiaryofNewton: You're welcome. This is a nice question as it illustrates a combination of several useful techniques.
    – RRL
    Dec 4 '18 at 4:49
















1












1








1






Nonnegativity is not required.



Suppose the series $sum k a_k$ converges and



$$lim_{n to infty} S_n = lim_{n to infty} sum_{k=1}^n k a_k = S$$



Summing by parts we get



$$n sum_{k=n}^m a_k = n sum_{k=n}^m ka_k frac{1}{k} = n left[frac{S_m}{m} - frac{S_{n-1}}{n} + sum_{k=n}^mS_kleft(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right)right]$$



The last sum on the RHS converges as $m to infty$ since the summand is $mathcal{O}(k^{-2})$. Taking the limit of both sides as $m to infty$ and noting that $S_m/m to 0$ we get



$$n sum_{k=n}^infty a_k = - S_{n-1} + nsum_{k=n}^infty S_kleft(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right)$$



For any $epsilon> 0$ and all sufficiently large $n$ we have for $k geqslant n$,



$$S- epsilon leqslant S_k leqslant S + epsilon,$$



and



$$-S_{n-1} +n (S- epsilon)sum_{k=n}^infty left(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right) leqslant nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant -S_{n-1} +n (S+ epsilon)sum_{k=n}^infty left(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right) $$



Noting the telescoping sum converging to $1/n$, it follows that



$$-S_{n-1} + S - epsilon leqslant nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant -S_{n-1} + S+ epsilon,$$



whence,



$$-epsilon leqslant liminf_{n to infty},, nsum_{k=n}^infty a_kleqslant limsup_{n to infty},,nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant epsilon$$



Since $epsilon$ can be arbitrarily close to $0$ we must have



$$lim_{n to infty} n sum_{k=n}^infty a_k = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer














Nonnegativity is not required.



Suppose the series $sum k a_k$ converges and



$$lim_{n to infty} S_n = lim_{n to infty} sum_{k=1}^n k a_k = S$$



Summing by parts we get



$$n sum_{k=n}^m a_k = n sum_{k=n}^m ka_k frac{1}{k} = n left[frac{S_m}{m} - frac{S_{n-1}}{n} + sum_{k=n}^mS_kleft(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right)right]$$



The last sum on the RHS converges as $m to infty$ since the summand is $mathcal{O}(k^{-2})$. Taking the limit of both sides as $m to infty$ and noting that $S_m/m to 0$ we get



$$n sum_{k=n}^infty a_k = - S_{n-1} + nsum_{k=n}^infty S_kleft(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right)$$



For any $epsilon> 0$ and all sufficiently large $n$ we have for $k geqslant n$,



$$S- epsilon leqslant S_k leqslant S + epsilon,$$



and



$$-S_{n-1} +n (S- epsilon)sum_{k=n}^infty left(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right) leqslant nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant -S_{n-1} +n (S+ epsilon)sum_{k=n}^infty left(frac{1}{k} - frac{1}{k+1} right) $$



Noting the telescoping sum converging to $1/n$, it follows that



$$-S_{n-1} + S - epsilon leqslant nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant -S_{n-1} + S+ epsilon,$$



whence,



$$-epsilon leqslant liminf_{n to infty},, nsum_{k=n}^infty a_kleqslant limsup_{n to infty},,nsum_{k=n}^infty a_k leqslant epsilon$$



Since $epsilon$ can be arbitrarily close to $0$ we must have



$$lim_{n to infty} n sum_{k=n}^infty a_k = 0$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 '18 at 23:53

























answered Dec 3 '18 at 23:39









RRLRRL

49.3k42573




49.3k42573












  • Wow thanks, I think that's right
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:38










  • @DiaryofNewton: You're welcome. This is a nice question as it illustrates a combination of several useful techniques.
    – RRL
    Dec 4 '18 at 4:49




















  • Wow thanks, I think that's right
    – DiaryofNewton
    Dec 4 '18 at 0:38










  • @DiaryofNewton: You're welcome. This is a nice question as it illustrates a combination of several useful techniques.
    – RRL
    Dec 4 '18 at 4:49


















Wow thanks, I think that's right
– DiaryofNewton
Dec 4 '18 at 0:38




Wow thanks, I think that's right
– DiaryofNewton
Dec 4 '18 at 0:38












@DiaryofNewton: You're welcome. This is a nice question as it illustrates a combination of several useful techniques.
– RRL
Dec 4 '18 at 4:49






@DiaryofNewton: You're welcome. This is a nice question as it illustrates a combination of several useful techniques.
– RRL
Dec 4 '18 at 4:49





Popular posts from this blog

Tonle Sap (See)

I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft