How to find a matrix that transforms vectors from basis $B$ into vectors from basis $C$? [closed]












1












$begingroup$


$$B=left{begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
3 \
2 \
1
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
1 \
1 \
0
end{bmatrix}right}
quad C=left{begin{bmatrix}
4 \
5 \
6
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
2 \
4 \
7
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
6 \
7 \
8
end{bmatrix}right} $$



I need to find such a matrix
$A=begin{bmatrix}
a & b & c \
d & e & f \
g & h & i \
end{bmatrix}$
that transforms vectors from $B$ into vectors from $C$, so for example:



$$begin{bmatrix}
a & b & c \
d & e & f \
g & h & i \
end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3 \
end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}
4 \
5 \
6 \
end{bmatrix}text{ etc...}$$

I want to understand the general idea of solving such tasks, so please don't give away the answer!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by amWhy, Math_QED, Rebellos, Cesareo, KReiser Dec 15 '18 at 3:38


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, Math_QED, Rebellos, Cesareo, KReiser

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You will have a system of nine equations in nine variables.
    $endgroup$
    – amWhy
    Dec 14 '18 at 19:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The idea is to write one basis as a linear combination of the other one. Do you want to do a bit on reading on it or should I tell you more right away?
    $endgroup$
    – Riquelme
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:02
















1












$begingroup$


$$B=left{begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
3 \
2 \
1
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
1 \
1 \
0
end{bmatrix}right}
quad C=left{begin{bmatrix}
4 \
5 \
6
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
2 \
4 \
7
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
6 \
7 \
8
end{bmatrix}right} $$



I need to find such a matrix
$A=begin{bmatrix}
a & b & c \
d & e & f \
g & h & i \
end{bmatrix}$
that transforms vectors from $B$ into vectors from $C$, so for example:



$$begin{bmatrix}
a & b & c \
d & e & f \
g & h & i \
end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3 \
end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}
4 \
5 \
6 \
end{bmatrix}text{ etc...}$$

I want to understand the general idea of solving such tasks, so please don't give away the answer!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by amWhy, Math_QED, Rebellos, Cesareo, KReiser Dec 15 '18 at 3:38


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, Math_QED, Rebellos, Cesareo, KReiser

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You will have a system of nine equations in nine variables.
    $endgroup$
    – amWhy
    Dec 14 '18 at 19:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The idea is to write one basis as a linear combination of the other one. Do you want to do a bit on reading on it or should I tell you more right away?
    $endgroup$
    – Riquelme
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:02














1












1








1





$begingroup$


$$B=left{begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
3 \
2 \
1
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
1 \
1 \
0
end{bmatrix}right}
quad C=left{begin{bmatrix}
4 \
5 \
6
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
2 \
4 \
7
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
6 \
7 \
8
end{bmatrix}right} $$



I need to find such a matrix
$A=begin{bmatrix}
a & b & c \
d & e & f \
g & h & i \
end{bmatrix}$
that transforms vectors from $B$ into vectors from $C$, so for example:



$$begin{bmatrix}
a & b & c \
d & e & f \
g & h & i \
end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3 \
end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}
4 \
5 \
6 \
end{bmatrix}text{ etc...}$$

I want to understand the general idea of solving such tasks, so please don't give away the answer!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




$$B=left{begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
3 \
2 \
1
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
1 \
1 \
0
end{bmatrix}right}
quad C=left{begin{bmatrix}
4 \
5 \
6
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
2 \
4 \
7
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
6 \
7 \
8
end{bmatrix}right} $$



I need to find such a matrix
$A=begin{bmatrix}
a & b & c \
d & e & f \
g & h & i \
end{bmatrix}$
that transforms vectors from $B$ into vectors from $C$, so for example:



$$begin{bmatrix}
a & b & c \
d & e & f \
g & h & i \
end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3 \
end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}
4 \
5 \
6 \
end{bmatrix}text{ etc...}$$

I want to understand the general idea of solving such tasks, so please don't give away the answer!







linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations matrix-equations change-of-basis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 14 '18 at 21:55









Batominovski

33k33293




33k33293










asked Dec 14 '18 at 19:51









agromekagromek

315




315




closed as off-topic by amWhy, Math_QED, Rebellos, Cesareo, KReiser Dec 15 '18 at 3:38


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, Math_QED, Rebellos, Cesareo, KReiser

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by amWhy, Math_QED, Rebellos, Cesareo, KReiser Dec 15 '18 at 3:38


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, Math_QED, Rebellos, Cesareo, KReiser

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You will have a system of nine equations in nine variables.
    $endgroup$
    – amWhy
    Dec 14 '18 at 19:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The idea is to write one basis as a linear combination of the other one. Do you want to do a bit on reading on it or should I tell you more right away?
    $endgroup$
    – Riquelme
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:02














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You will have a system of nine equations in nine variables.
    $endgroup$
    – amWhy
    Dec 14 '18 at 19:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The idea is to write one basis as a linear combination of the other one. Do you want to do a bit on reading on it or should I tell you more right away?
    $endgroup$
    – Riquelme
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:02








1




1




$begingroup$
You will have a system of nine equations in nine variables.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 14 '18 at 19:59




$begingroup$
You will have a system of nine equations in nine variables.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 14 '18 at 19:59




1




1




$begingroup$
The idea is to write one basis as a linear combination of the other one. Do you want to do a bit on reading on it or should I tell you more right away?
$endgroup$
– Riquelme
Dec 14 '18 at 20:02




$begingroup$
The idea is to write one basis as a linear combination of the other one. Do you want to do a bit on reading on it or should I tell you more right away?
$endgroup$
– Riquelme
Dec 14 '18 at 20:02










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Consider the following so called commutative diagram:
$$require{AMScd}begin{CD}
mathbb R^3 @>A>> mathbb R^3\
@A(b_1 b_2 b_3)AA @AA(c_1 c_2 c_3)A \
B @>>I> C end{CD}$$

If you have a vector with respect to basis $B$, such as (1,0,0), this vector is actually $mathbf b_1$, the first vector in the basis of $B$. More generally, (x,y,z) with respect to $B$ is $xmathbf b_1+ymathbf b_2+zmathbf b_3$. It means that we can convert a vector with respect to $B$ to the standard basis of $mathbb R^3$ by simply putting the basis vectors of $B$ as columns in a matrix.



In your case, you're interested in the conversion from $B$ to $C$, which is effectively the identity matrix $I$. That is, for instance (1,0,0) with respect to $B$, which is $mathbf b_1$, must be mapped to (1,0,0) with respect to $C$, which is $mathbf c_1$.



To find the corresponding matrix $A$ with respect to the standard basis, we need to follow the arrows, and in reverse where necessary:
$$A = begin{pmatrix}mathbf c_1&mathbf c_2&mathbf c_3end{pmatrix}
cdot I cdotbegin{pmatrix}mathbf b_1&mathbf b_2&mathbf b_3end{pmatrix}^{-1}
$$

Reading from right to left, we start with a vector in the standard basis, convert it to $B$ by the corresponding inverse, multiply by $I$, and convert from $C$ to the standard basis.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    thank you, the diagram helped a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – agromek
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:21



















4












$begingroup$

Here's a good way to start:
let
$$
E = Bigg{begin{bmatrix}
1 \
0 \
0
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
0 \
1 \
0
end{bmatrix},
begin{bmatrix}
0 \
0 \
1
end{bmatrix}Bigg}
$$

and ask "Can I find a transformation taking the $E$ vectors to the $B$ vectors?" The answer is "sure, just put the $B$ vectors into the columns of a 3x3 matrix."



You should do this and convince yourself that this matrix, which I'll call $M_{Eto B}$does in fact take the $E$ vectors to the corresponding $B$ vectors.



Now...what matrix would do the opposite, would take the $B$ vectors to the $E$ vectors?



It's $M_{Eto B}^{-1}$, of course! So we now know that
$$
M_{B to E} = M_{E to B}^{-1}.
$$



Now you can do the same thing and find a matrix that takes the $E$ vectors to the $C$ vectors, right?



Now what happens if you multiply the $E$ vectors by the matrix
$$
Q = M_{Eto B}M_{C to E}?
$$



If you take it one step at a time, you'll see that $c_1$ gets send to $e_1$, which then (by the first matrix) gets sent to $b_1$.



Try this out on a $2 times 2$ example to convince yourself it works --- it's a lot easier to invert a $2 times 2$ matrix!






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Consider the following so called commutative diagram:
    $$require{AMScd}begin{CD}
    mathbb R^3 @>A>> mathbb R^3\
    @A(b_1 b_2 b_3)AA @AA(c_1 c_2 c_3)A \
    B @>>I> C end{CD}$$

    If you have a vector with respect to basis $B$, such as (1,0,0), this vector is actually $mathbf b_1$, the first vector in the basis of $B$. More generally, (x,y,z) with respect to $B$ is $xmathbf b_1+ymathbf b_2+zmathbf b_3$. It means that we can convert a vector with respect to $B$ to the standard basis of $mathbb R^3$ by simply putting the basis vectors of $B$ as columns in a matrix.



    In your case, you're interested in the conversion from $B$ to $C$, which is effectively the identity matrix $I$. That is, for instance (1,0,0) with respect to $B$, which is $mathbf b_1$, must be mapped to (1,0,0) with respect to $C$, which is $mathbf c_1$.



    To find the corresponding matrix $A$ with respect to the standard basis, we need to follow the arrows, and in reverse where necessary:
    $$A = begin{pmatrix}mathbf c_1&mathbf c_2&mathbf c_3end{pmatrix}
    cdot I cdotbegin{pmatrix}mathbf b_1&mathbf b_2&mathbf b_3end{pmatrix}^{-1}
    $$

    Reading from right to left, we start with a vector in the standard basis, convert it to $B$ by the corresponding inverse, multiply by $I$, and convert from $C$ to the standard basis.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      thank you, the diagram helped a lot!
      $endgroup$
      – agromek
      Dec 14 '18 at 20:21
















    1












    $begingroup$

    Consider the following so called commutative diagram:
    $$require{AMScd}begin{CD}
    mathbb R^3 @>A>> mathbb R^3\
    @A(b_1 b_2 b_3)AA @AA(c_1 c_2 c_3)A \
    B @>>I> C end{CD}$$

    If you have a vector with respect to basis $B$, such as (1,0,0), this vector is actually $mathbf b_1$, the first vector in the basis of $B$. More generally, (x,y,z) with respect to $B$ is $xmathbf b_1+ymathbf b_2+zmathbf b_3$. It means that we can convert a vector with respect to $B$ to the standard basis of $mathbb R^3$ by simply putting the basis vectors of $B$ as columns in a matrix.



    In your case, you're interested in the conversion from $B$ to $C$, which is effectively the identity matrix $I$. That is, for instance (1,0,0) with respect to $B$, which is $mathbf b_1$, must be mapped to (1,0,0) with respect to $C$, which is $mathbf c_1$.



    To find the corresponding matrix $A$ with respect to the standard basis, we need to follow the arrows, and in reverse where necessary:
    $$A = begin{pmatrix}mathbf c_1&mathbf c_2&mathbf c_3end{pmatrix}
    cdot I cdotbegin{pmatrix}mathbf b_1&mathbf b_2&mathbf b_3end{pmatrix}^{-1}
    $$

    Reading from right to left, we start with a vector in the standard basis, convert it to $B$ by the corresponding inverse, multiply by $I$, and convert from $C$ to the standard basis.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      thank you, the diagram helped a lot!
      $endgroup$
      – agromek
      Dec 14 '18 at 20:21














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    Consider the following so called commutative diagram:
    $$require{AMScd}begin{CD}
    mathbb R^3 @>A>> mathbb R^3\
    @A(b_1 b_2 b_3)AA @AA(c_1 c_2 c_3)A \
    B @>>I> C end{CD}$$

    If you have a vector with respect to basis $B$, such as (1,0,0), this vector is actually $mathbf b_1$, the first vector in the basis of $B$. More generally, (x,y,z) with respect to $B$ is $xmathbf b_1+ymathbf b_2+zmathbf b_3$. It means that we can convert a vector with respect to $B$ to the standard basis of $mathbb R^3$ by simply putting the basis vectors of $B$ as columns in a matrix.



    In your case, you're interested in the conversion from $B$ to $C$, which is effectively the identity matrix $I$. That is, for instance (1,0,0) with respect to $B$, which is $mathbf b_1$, must be mapped to (1,0,0) with respect to $C$, which is $mathbf c_1$.



    To find the corresponding matrix $A$ with respect to the standard basis, we need to follow the arrows, and in reverse where necessary:
    $$A = begin{pmatrix}mathbf c_1&mathbf c_2&mathbf c_3end{pmatrix}
    cdot I cdotbegin{pmatrix}mathbf b_1&mathbf b_2&mathbf b_3end{pmatrix}^{-1}
    $$

    Reading from right to left, we start with a vector in the standard basis, convert it to $B$ by the corresponding inverse, multiply by $I$, and convert from $C$ to the standard basis.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Consider the following so called commutative diagram:
    $$require{AMScd}begin{CD}
    mathbb R^3 @>A>> mathbb R^3\
    @A(b_1 b_2 b_3)AA @AA(c_1 c_2 c_3)A \
    B @>>I> C end{CD}$$

    If you have a vector with respect to basis $B$, such as (1,0,0), this vector is actually $mathbf b_1$, the first vector in the basis of $B$. More generally, (x,y,z) with respect to $B$ is $xmathbf b_1+ymathbf b_2+zmathbf b_3$. It means that we can convert a vector with respect to $B$ to the standard basis of $mathbb R^3$ by simply putting the basis vectors of $B$ as columns in a matrix.



    In your case, you're interested in the conversion from $B$ to $C$, which is effectively the identity matrix $I$. That is, for instance (1,0,0) with respect to $B$, which is $mathbf b_1$, must be mapped to (1,0,0) with respect to $C$, which is $mathbf c_1$.



    To find the corresponding matrix $A$ with respect to the standard basis, we need to follow the arrows, and in reverse where necessary:
    $$A = begin{pmatrix}mathbf c_1&mathbf c_2&mathbf c_3end{pmatrix}
    cdot I cdotbegin{pmatrix}mathbf b_1&mathbf b_2&mathbf b_3end{pmatrix}^{-1}
    $$

    Reading from right to left, we start with a vector in the standard basis, convert it to $B$ by the corresponding inverse, multiply by $I$, and convert from $C$ to the standard basis.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 14 '18 at 20:13









    I like SerenaI like Serena

    4,2071722




    4,2071722








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      thank you, the diagram helped a lot!
      $endgroup$
      – agromek
      Dec 14 '18 at 20:21














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      thank you, the diagram helped a lot!
      $endgroup$
      – agromek
      Dec 14 '18 at 20:21








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    thank you, the diagram helped a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – agromek
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:21




    $begingroup$
    thank you, the diagram helped a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – agromek
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:21











    4












    $begingroup$

    Here's a good way to start:
    let
    $$
    E = Bigg{begin{bmatrix}
    1 \
    0 \
    0
    end{bmatrix},
    begin{bmatrix}
    0 \
    1 \
    0
    end{bmatrix},
    begin{bmatrix}
    0 \
    0 \
    1
    end{bmatrix}Bigg}
    $$

    and ask "Can I find a transformation taking the $E$ vectors to the $B$ vectors?" The answer is "sure, just put the $B$ vectors into the columns of a 3x3 matrix."



    You should do this and convince yourself that this matrix, which I'll call $M_{Eto B}$does in fact take the $E$ vectors to the corresponding $B$ vectors.



    Now...what matrix would do the opposite, would take the $B$ vectors to the $E$ vectors?



    It's $M_{Eto B}^{-1}$, of course! So we now know that
    $$
    M_{B to E} = M_{E to B}^{-1}.
    $$



    Now you can do the same thing and find a matrix that takes the $E$ vectors to the $C$ vectors, right?



    Now what happens if you multiply the $E$ vectors by the matrix
    $$
    Q = M_{Eto B}M_{C to E}?
    $$



    If you take it one step at a time, you'll see that $c_1$ gets send to $e_1$, which then (by the first matrix) gets sent to $b_1$.



    Try this out on a $2 times 2$ example to convince yourself it works --- it's a lot easier to invert a $2 times 2$ matrix!






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      Here's a good way to start:
      let
      $$
      E = Bigg{begin{bmatrix}
      1 \
      0 \
      0
      end{bmatrix},
      begin{bmatrix}
      0 \
      1 \
      0
      end{bmatrix},
      begin{bmatrix}
      0 \
      0 \
      1
      end{bmatrix}Bigg}
      $$

      and ask "Can I find a transformation taking the $E$ vectors to the $B$ vectors?" The answer is "sure, just put the $B$ vectors into the columns of a 3x3 matrix."



      You should do this and convince yourself that this matrix, which I'll call $M_{Eto B}$does in fact take the $E$ vectors to the corresponding $B$ vectors.



      Now...what matrix would do the opposite, would take the $B$ vectors to the $E$ vectors?



      It's $M_{Eto B}^{-1}$, of course! So we now know that
      $$
      M_{B to E} = M_{E to B}^{-1}.
      $$



      Now you can do the same thing and find a matrix that takes the $E$ vectors to the $C$ vectors, right?



      Now what happens if you multiply the $E$ vectors by the matrix
      $$
      Q = M_{Eto B}M_{C to E}?
      $$



      If you take it one step at a time, you'll see that $c_1$ gets send to $e_1$, which then (by the first matrix) gets sent to $b_1$.



      Try this out on a $2 times 2$ example to convince yourself it works --- it's a lot easier to invert a $2 times 2$ matrix!






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        Here's a good way to start:
        let
        $$
        E = Bigg{begin{bmatrix}
        1 \
        0 \
        0
        end{bmatrix},
        begin{bmatrix}
        0 \
        1 \
        0
        end{bmatrix},
        begin{bmatrix}
        0 \
        0 \
        1
        end{bmatrix}Bigg}
        $$

        and ask "Can I find a transformation taking the $E$ vectors to the $B$ vectors?" The answer is "sure, just put the $B$ vectors into the columns of a 3x3 matrix."



        You should do this and convince yourself that this matrix, which I'll call $M_{Eto B}$does in fact take the $E$ vectors to the corresponding $B$ vectors.



        Now...what matrix would do the opposite, would take the $B$ vectors to the $E$ vectors?



        It's $M_{Eto B}^{-1}$, of course! So we now know that
        $$
        M_{B to E} = M_{E to B}^{-1}.
        $$



        Now you can do the same thing and find a matrix that takes the $E$ vectors to the $C$ vectors, right?



        Now what happens if you multiply the $E$ vectors by the matrix
        $$
        Q = M_{Eto B}M_{C to E}?
        $$



        If you take it one step at a time, you'll see that $c_1$ gets send to $e_1$, which then (by the first matrix) gets sent to $b_1$.



        Try this out on a $2 times 2$ example to convince yourself it works --- it's a lot easier to invert a $2 times 2$ matrix!






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Here's a good way to start:
        let
        $$
        E = Bigg{begin{bmatrix}
        1 \
        0 \
        0
        end{bmatrix},
        begin{bmatrix}
        0 \
        1 \
        0
        end{bmatrix},
        begin{bmatrix}
        0 \
        0 \
        1
        end{bmatrix}Bigg}
        $$

        and ask "Can I find a transformation taking the $E$ vectors to the $B$ vectors?" The answer is "sure, just put the $B$ vectors into the columns of a 3x3 matrix."



        You should do this and convince yourself that this matrix, which I'll call $M_{Eto B}$does in fact take the $E$ vectors to the corresponding $B$ vectors.



        Now...what matrix would do the opposite, would take the $B$ vectors to the $E$ vectors?



        It's $M_{Eto B}^{-1}$, of course! So we now know that
        $$
        M_{B to E} = M_{E to B}^{-1}.
        $$



        Now you can do the same thing and find a matrix that takes the $E$ vectors to the $C$ vectors, right?



        Now what happens if you multiply the $E$ vectors by the matrix
        $$
        Q = M_{Eto B}M_{C to E}?
        $$



        If you take it one step at a time, you'll see that $c_1$ gets send to $e_1$, which then (by the first matrix) gets sent to $b_1$.



        Try this out on a $2 times 2$ example to convince yourself it works --- it's a lot easier to invert a $2 times 2$ matrix!







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 14 '18 at 20:00









        John HughesJohn Hughes

        64k24191




        64k24191















            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen