How do I compute a double weighted average? In other words, an average with two weighting factors.












1












$begingroup$


This might be a simple question...



I was wondering, how does one take a double weighted average? (honestly, don't know if that is what it is called). For example, let's say that we are working with data from the table below:



Cellphone type | # of phones sold | # of hours spent on design | Profit
-------------- ---------------- --------------------------- ------
Iphone 1,000 200 $30K
Samsung 3,000 150 $40K
HTC 7,000 140 $35K


1) I know that the simple average of the profit is: $35K



2) I also know that the average weighed by # of phones sold is: $35.9091K



3) And, that the average weighted by # of hours spent on design is $34.4898K



Now, what is the profit average weighted by # of phones sold and # of hours spent on design? Is it a simple average between 2 and 3?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    This might be a simple question...



    I was wondering, how does one take a double weighted average? (honestly, don't know if that is what it is called). For example, let's say that we are working with data from the table below:



    Cellphone type | # of phones sold | # of hours spent on design | Profit
    -------------- ---------------- --------------------------- ------
    Iphone 1,000 200 $30K
    Samsung 3,000 150 $40K
    HTC 7,000 140 $35K


    1) I know that the simple average of the profit is: $35K



    2) I also know that the average weighed by # of phones sold is: $35.9091K



    3) And, that the average weighted by # of hours spent on design is $34.4898K



    Now, what is the profit average weighted by # of phones sold and # of hours spent on design? Is it a simple average between 2 and 3?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      This might be a simple question...



      I was wondering, how does one take a double weighted average? (honestly, don't know if that is what it is called). For example, let's say that we are working with data from the table below:



      Cellphone type | # of phones sold | # of hours spent on design | Profit
      -------------- ---------------- --------------------------- ------
      Iphone 1,000 200 $30K
      Samsung 3,000 150 $40K
      HTC 7,000 140 $35K


      1) I know that the simple average of the profit is: $35K



      2) I also know that the average weighed by # of phones sold is: $35.9091K



      3) And, that the average weighted by # of hours spent on design is $34.4898K



      Now, what is the profit average weighted by # of phones sold and # of hours spent on design? Is it a simple average between 2 and 3?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      This might be a simple question...



      I was wondering, how does one take a double weighted average? (honestly, don't know if that is what it is called). For example, let's say that we are working with data from the table below:



      Cellphone type | # of phones sold | # of hours spent on design | Profit
      -------------- ---------------- --------------------------- ------
      Iphone 1,000 200 $30K
      Samsung 3,000 150 $40K
      HTC 7,000 140 $35K


      1) I know that the simple average of the profit is: $35K



      2) I also know that the average weighed by # of phones sold is: $35.9091K



      3) And, that the average weighted by # of hours spent on design is $34.4898K



      Now, what is the profit average weighted by # of phones sold and # of hours spent on design? Is it a simple average between 2 and 3?







      average






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Apr 3 '17 at 17:12









      FrankieFrankie

      63




      63






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          You can't do this without further information. The second weighted average should be weighted with respect to how important the metrics are to you - perhaps you care twice as much about # of hours than # of sales. In that case you would do



          $$ave= 2[text{weighted by hours worked}]+1[text{weighted by sales}]$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You make an interesting point. But, I am wondering if the "further information" (the seconded weighted average) can be obtained by a combination of the two weighting factors.
            $endgroup$
            – Frankie
            Apr 3 '17 at 17:24










          • $begingroup$
            @Frankie No, there is no guarantee that that is the correct choice of weights.
            $endgroup$
            – Stella Biderman
            Apr 3 '17 at 17:24











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2216263%2fhow-do-i-compute-a-double-weighted-average-in-other-words-an-average-with-two%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          You can't do this without further information. The second weighted average should be weighted with respect to how important the metrics are to you - perhaps you care twice as much about # of hours than # of sales. In that case you would do



          $$ave= 2[text{weighted by hours worked}]+1[text{weighted by sales}]$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You make an interesting point. But, I am wondering if the "further information" (the seconded weighted average) can be obtained by a combination of the two weighting factors.
            $endgroup$
            – Frankie
            Apr 3 '17 at 17:24










          • $begingroup$
            @Frankie No, there is no guarantee that that is the correct choice of weights.
            $endgroup$
            – Stella Biderman
            Apr 3 '17 at 17:24
















          0












          $begingroup$

          You can't do this without further information. The second weighted average should be weighted with respect to how important the metrics are to you - perhaps you care twice as much about # of hours than # of sales. In that case you would do



          $$ave= 2[text{weighted by hours worked}]+1[text{weighted by sales}]$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You make an interesting point. But, I am wondering if the "further information" (the seconded weighted average) can be obtained by a combination of the two weighting factors.
            $endgroup$
            – Frankie
            Apr 3 '17 at 17:24










          • $begingroup$
            @Frankie No, there is no guarantee that that is the correct choice of weights.
            $endgroup$
            – Stella Biderman
            Apr 3 '17 at 17:24














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          You can't do this without further information. The second weighted average should be weighted with respect to how important the metrics are to you - perhaps you care twice as much about # of hours than # of sales. In that case you would do



          $$ave= 2[text{weighted by hours worked}]+1[text{weighted by sales}]$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You can't do this without further information. The second weighted average should be weighted with respect to how important the metrics are to you - perhaps you care twice as much about # of hours than # of sales. In that case you would do



          $$ave= 2[text{weighted by hours worked}]+1[text{weighted by sales}]$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Apr 3 '17 at 17:17









          Stella BidermanStella Biderman

          26.7k63375




          26.7k63375












          • $begingroup$
            You make an interesting point. But, I am wondering if the "further information" (the seconded weighted average) can be obtained by a combination of the two weighting factors.
            $endgroup$
            – Frankie
            Apr 3 '17 at 17:24










          • $begingroup$
            @Frankie No, there is no guarantee that that is the correct choice of weights.
            $endgroup$
            – Stella Biderman
            Apr 3 '17 at 17:24


















          • $begingroup$
            You make an interesting point. But, I am wondering if the "further information" (the seconded weighted average) can be obtained by a combination of the two weighting factors.
            $endgroup$
            – Frankie
            Apr 3 '17 at 17:24










          • $begingroup$
            @Frankie No, there is no guarantee that that is the correct choice of weights.
            $endgroup$
            – Stella Biderman
            Apr 3 '17 at 17:24
















          $begingroup$
          You make an interesting point. But, I am wondering if the "further information" (the seconded weighted average) can be obtained by a combination of the two weighting factors.
          $endgroup$
          – Frankie
          Apr 3 '17 at 17:24




          $begingroup$
          You make an interesting point. But, I am wondering if the "further information" (the seconded weighted average) can be obtained by a combination of the two weighting factors.
          $endgroup$
          – Frankie
          Apr 3 '17 at 17:24












          $begingroup$
          @Frankie No, there is no guarantee that that is the correct choice of weights.
          $endgroup$
          – Stella Biderman
          Apr 3 '17 at 17:24




          $begingroup$
          @Frankie No, there is no guarantee that that is the correct choice of weights.
          $endgroup$
          – Stella Biderman
          Apr 3 '17 at 17:24


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2216263%2fhow-do-i-compute-a-double-weighted-average-in-other-words-an-average-with-two%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen