How to solve for the sides of a rectangle whose sides are natural numbers given its area is a known natural...
$begingroup$
This may not be the best way to formulate the question but I am looking for a method to solve the following equation $d cdot n'=n$ where $d, n', n in mathbb{N}$ and $n neq1$ is known. How should I approach this problem? Are there guaranteed solutions?
natural-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This may not be the best way to formulate the question but I am looking for a method to solve the following equation $d cdot n'=n$ where $d, n', n in mathbb{N}$ and $n neq1$ is known. How should I approach this problem? Are there guaranteed solutions?
natural-numbers
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
You have basically asked if it is possible to find a factorization of $n$. If you forbid the trivial factorization of $1cdot n = n$, then this problem is at least as hard as determining if $n$ is prime, and probably not harder than breaking the (multiprime) RSA encryption scheme.
$endgroup$
– InequalitiesEverywhere
Jan 1 at 12:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This may not be the best way to formulate the question but I am looking for a method to solve the following equation $d cdot n'=n$ where $d, n', n in mathbb{N}$ and $n neq1$ is known. How should I approach this problem? Are there guaranteed solutions?
natural-numbers
$endgroup$
This may not be the best way to formulate the question but I am looking for a method to solve the following equation $d cdot n'=n$ where $d, n', n in mathbb{N}$ and $n neq1$ is known. How should I approach this problem? Are there guaranteed solutions?
natural-numbers
natural-numbers
edited Jan 1 at 13:22
ClimbingTheCurve
asked Jan 1 at 12:38
ClimbingTheCurveClimbingTheCurve
135
135
3
$begingroup$
You have basically asked if it is possible to find a factorization of $n$. If you forbid the trivial factorization of $1cdot n = n$, then this problem is at least as hard as determining if $n$ is prime, and probably not harder than breaking the (multiprime) RSA encryption scheme.
$endgroup$
– InequalitiesEverywhere
Jan 1 at 12:48
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
You have basically asked if it is possible to find a factorization of $n$. If you forbid the trivial factorization of $1cdot n = n$, then this problem is at least as hard as determining if $n$ is prime, and probably not harder than breaking the (multiprime) RSA encryption scheme.
$endgroup$
– InequalitiesEverywhere
Jan 1 at 12:48
3
3
$begingroup$
You have basically asked if it is possible to find a factorization of $n$. If you forbid the trivial factorization of $1cdot n = n$, then this problem is at least as hard as determining if $n$ is prime, and probably not harder than breaking the (multiprime) RSA encryption scheme.
$endgroup$
– InequalitiesEverywhere
Jan 1 at 12:48
$begingroup$
You have basically asked if it is possible to find a factorization of $n$. If you forbid the trivial factorization of $1cdot n = n$, then this problem is at least as hard as determining if $n$ is prime, and probably not harder than breaking the (multiprime) RSA encryption scheme.
$endgroup$
– InequalitiesEverywhere
Jan 1 at 12:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
They would be any two factors of $n$.
- If $n$ is prime, then the numbers are $1,n$.
- If $n=1$, $d=n'=1$.
- If $n$ is composite, take any two factors $d, n'$ of $n$ such that $dn' = n$.
Solutions are indeed guaranteed for all $n in mathbb{N}$.
This follows from the facts that by definition the factors of a natural number are in turn also natural numbers, and that all numbers are prime, composite, or $1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Should you not mention that your final claim is the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– user150203
Jan 8 at 5:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058448%2fhow-to-solve-for-the-sides-of-a-rectangle-whose-sides-are-natural-numbers-given%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
They would be any two factors of $n$.
- If $n$ is prime, then the numbers are $1,n$.
- If $n=1$, $d=n'=1$.
- If $n$ is composite, take any two factors $d, n'$ of $n$ such that $dn' = n$.
Solutions are indeed guaranteed for all $n in mathbb{N}$.
This follows from the facts that by definition the factors of a natural number are in turn also natural numbers, and that all numbers are prime, composite, or $1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Should you not mention that your final claim is the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– user150203
Jan 8 at 5:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They would be any two factors of $n$.
- If $n$ is prime, then the numbers are $1,n$.
- If $n=1$, $d=n'=1$.
- If $n$ is composite, take any two factors $d, n'$ of $n$ such that $dn' = n$.
Solutions are indeed guaranteed for all $n in mathbb{N}$.
This follows from the facts that by definition the factors of a natural number are in turn also natural numbers, and that all numbers are prime, composite, or $1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Should you not mention that your final claim is the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– user150203
Jan 8 at 5:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They would be any two factors of $n$.
- If $n$ is prime, then the numbers are $1,n$.
- If $n=1$, $d=n'=1$.
- If $n$ is composite, take any two factors $d, n'$ of $n$ such that $dn' = n$.
Solutions are indeed guaranteed for all $n in mathbb{N}$.
This follows from the facts that by definition the factors of a natural number are in turn also natural numbers, and that all numbers are prime, composite, or $1$.
$endgroup$
They would be any two factors of $n$.
- If $n$ is prime, then the numbers are $1,n$.
- If $n=1$, $d=n'=1$.
- If $n$ is composite, take any two factors $d, n'$ of $n$ such that $dn' = n$.
Solutions are indeed guaranteed for all $n in mathbb{N}$.
This follows from the facts that by definition the factors of a natural number are in turn also natural numbers, and that all numbers are prime, composite, or $1$.
answered Jan 1 at 12:43
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
8,68031540
8,68031540
$begingroup$
Should you not mention that your final claim is the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– user150203
Jan 8 at 5:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Should you not mention that your final claim is the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– user150203
Jan 8 at 5:07
$begingroup$
Should you not mention that your final claim is the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– user150203
Jan 8 at 5:07
$begingroup$
Should you not mention that your final claim is the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– user150203
Jan 8 at 5:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058448%2fhow-to-solve-for-the-sides-of-a-rectangle-whose-sides-are-natural-numbers-given%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
You have basically asked if it is possible to find a factorization of $n$. If you forbid the trivial factorization of $1cdot n = n$, then this problem is at least as hard as determining if $n$ is prime, and probably not harder than breaking the (multiprime) RSA encryption scheme.
$endgroup$
– InequalitiesEverywhere
Jan 1 at 12:48