Almost sure convergence of a martingale sum












1












$begingroup$


Consider the senquence of iid r.v. $(Y_k)_{kgeq1}$ such that $mathbb{P}(Y_k=1)=mathbb{P}(Y_k=-1)=frac{1}{2}$ and then consider the process $X=(X_k)_{ngeq1}$ such that $X_n=sum_{k=1}^nfrac{Y_k}{k}$. It's very easy to see that $X$ is a martingale w.r.t. the filtration that it generate itself. However i tried proving that it is almost surely convergent using the convergence theorem for martingales but i failed. Is this really almost surely convergent? if yes is possible to prove this using martingales theory or is better to use other techniques like Borel-Cantelli lemmas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Consider the senquence of iid r.v. $(Y_k)_{kgeq1}$ such that $mathbb{P}(Y_k=1)=mathbb{P}(Y_k=-1)=frac{1}{2}$ and then consider the process $X=(X_k)_{ngeq1}$ such that $X_n=sum_{k=1}^nfrac{Y_k}{k}$. It's very easy to see that $X$ is a martingale w.r.t. the filtration that it generate itself. However i tried proving that it is almost surely convergent using the convergence theorem for martingales but i failed. Is this really almost surely convergent? if yes is possible to prove this using martingales theory or is better to use other techniques like Borel-Cantelli lemmas?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Consider the senquence of iid r.v. $(Y_k)_{kgeq1}$ such that $mathbb{P}(Y_k=1)=mathbb{P}(Y_k=-1)=frac{1}{2}$ and then consider the process $X=(X_k)_{ngeq1}$ such that $X_n=sum_{k=1}^nfrac{Y_k}{k}$. It's very easy to see that $X$ is a martingale w.r.t. the filtration that it generate itself. However i tried proving that it is almost surely convergent using the convergence theorem for martingales but i failed. Is this really almost surely convergent? if yes is possible to prove this using martingales theory or is better to use other techniques like Borel-Cantelli lemmas?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Consider the senquence of iid r.v. $(Y_k)_{kgeq1}$ such that $mathbb{P}(Y_k=1)=mathbb{P}(Y_k=-1)=frac{1}{2}$ and then consider the process $X=(X_k)_{ngeq1}$ such that $X_n=sum_{k=1}^nfrac{Y_k}{k}$. It's very easy to see that $X$ is a martingale w.r.t. the filtration that it generate itself. However i tried proving that it is almost surely convergent using the convergence theorem for martingales but i failed. Is this really almost surely convergent? if yes is possible to prove this using martingales theory or is better to use other techniques like Borel-Cantelli lemmas?







      probability martingales almost-everywhere






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 7 at 12:21







      StabiloBoss

















      asked Jan 7 at 12:12









      StabiloBossStabiloBoss

      1016




      1016






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          One can see that
          $$
          mathbb Eleft[X_n^2right]=sum_{k=1}^nfrac 1{k^2}mathbb Eleft[Y_k^2right]
          $$

          hence that the martingale $left(X_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is bounded in $mathbb L^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            $EX_n^{2}=sum_{k=1}^{n} var (frac {Y_k} k)=sum_{k=1}^{n} frac 1 {k^{2}}$ which is bounded. It is well known that this implies uniform integrability and any uniformly integrable martingale converges almost surely.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Sorry I forgot to divide se term in the sum please check the edited question
              $endgroup$
              – StabiloBoss
              Jan 7 at 12:22










            • $begingroup$
              @StabiloBoss I have answered the new version of your question also.
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              Jan 7 at 12:28



















            0












            $begingroup$

            For a « martingale » proof, the convergence theorem for martingales states that if $(X_n)$ is a martingale wrt some filtration, and $mathbb{E}[|X_n|]$ is bounded, then $X_n$ converges pointwise.



            Now note that $mathbb{E}[|X_n|^2]$ is clearly bounded and is not lower than $mathbb{E}[|X_n|]^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$














              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064943%2falmost-sure-convergence-of-a-martingale-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              One can see that
              $$
              mathbb Eleft[X_n^2right]=sum_{k=1}^nfrac 1{k^2}mathbb Eleft[Y_k^2right]
              $$

              hence that the martingale $left(X_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is bounded in $mathbb L^2$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                One can see that
                $$
                mathbb Eleft[X_n^2right]=sum_{k=1}^nfrac 1{k^2}mathbb Eleft[Y_k^2right]
                $$

                hence that the martingale $left(X_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is bounded in $mathbb L^2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  One can see that
                  $$
                  mathbb Eleft[X_n^2right]=sum_{k=1}^nfrac 1{k^2}mathbb Eleft[Y_k^2right]
                  $$

                  hence that the martingale $left(X_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is bounded in $mathbb L^2$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  One can see that
                  $$
                  mathbb Eleft[X_n^2right]=sum_{k=1}^nfrac 1{k^2}mathbb Eleft[Y_k^2right]
                  $$

                  hence that the martingale $left(X_nright)_{ngeqslant 1}$ is bounded in $mathbb L^2$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 7 at 12:28









                  Davide GiraudoDavide Giraudo

                  128k17156268




                  128k17156268























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      $EX_n^{2}=sum_{k=1}^{n} var (frac {Y_k} k)=sum_{k=1}^{n} frac 1 {k^{2}}$ which is bounded. It is well known that this implies uniform integrability and any uniformly integrable martingale converges almost surely.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        Sorry I forgot to divide se term in the sum please check the edited question
                        $endgroup$
                        – StabiloBoss
                        Jan 7 at 12:22










                      • $begingroup$
                        @StabiloBoss I have answered the new version of your question also.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Kavi Rama Murthy
                        Jan 7 at 12:28
















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      $EX_n^{2}=sum_{k=1}^{n} var (frac {Y_k} k)=sum_{k=1}^{n} frac 1 {k^{2}}$ which is bounded. It is well known that this implies uniform integrability and any uniformly integrable martingale converges almost surely.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        Sorry I forgot to divide se term in the sum please check the edited question
                        $endgroup$
                        – StabiloBoss
                        Jan 7 at 12:22










                      • $begingroup$
                        @StabiloBoss I have answered the new version of your question also.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Kavi Rama Murthy
                        Jan 7 at 12:28














                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      $EX_n^{2}=sum_{k=1}^{n} var (frac {Y_k} k)=sum_{k=1}^{n} frac 1 {k^{2}}$ which is bounded. It is well known that this implies uniform integrability and any uniformly integrable martingale converges almost surely.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      $EX_n^{2}=sum_{k=1}^{n} var (frac {Y_k} k)=sum_{k=1}^{n} frac 1 {k^{2}}$ which is bounded. It is well known that this implies uniform integrability and any uniformly integrable martingale converges almost surely.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 7 at 12:33

























                      answered Jan 7 at 12:15









                      Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                      74.6k53270




                      74.6k53270












                      • $begingroup$
                        Sorry I forgot to divide se term in the sum please check the edited question
                        $endgroup$
                        – StabiloBoss
                        Jan 7 at 12:22










                      • $begingroup$
                        @StabiloBoss I have answered the new version of your question also.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Kavi Rama Murthy
                        Jan 7 at 12:28


















                      • $begingroup$
                        Sorry I forgot to divide se term in the sum please check the edited question
                        $endgroup$
                        – StabiloBoss
                        Jan 7 at 12:22










                      • $begingroup$
                        @StabiloBoss I have answered the new version of your question also.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Kavi Rama Murthy
                        Jan 7 at 12:28
















                      $begingroup$
                      Sorry I forgot to divide se term in the sum please check the edited question
                      $endgroup$
                      – StabiloBoss
                      Jan 7 at 12:22




                      $begingroup$
                      Sorry I forgot to divide se term in the sum please check the edited question
                      $endgroup$
                      – StabiloBoss
                      Jan 7 at 12:22












                      $begingroup$
                      @StabiloBoss I have answered the new version of your question also.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Jan 7 at 12:28




                      $begingroup$
                      @StabiloBoss I have answered the new version of your question also.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Jan 7 at 12:28











                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      For a « martingale » proof, the convergence theorem for martingales states that if $(X_n)$ is a martingale wrt some filtration, and $mathbb{E}[|X_n|]$ is bounded, then $X_n$ converges pointwise.



                      Now note that $mathbb{E}[|X_n|^2]$ is clearly bounded and is not lower than $mathbb{E}[|X_n|]^2$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        For a « martingale » proof, the convergence theorem for martingales states that if $(X_n)$ is a martingale wrt some filtration, and $mathbb{E}[|X_n|]$ is bounded, then $X_n$ converges pointwise.



                        Now note that $mathbb{E}[|X_n|^2]$ is clearly bounded and is not lower than $mathbb{E}[|X_n|]^2$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          For a « martingale » proof, the convergence theorem for martingales states that if $(X_n)$ is a martingale wrt some filtration, and $mathbb{E}[|X_n|]$ is bounded, then $X_n$ converges pointwise.



                          Now note that $mathbb{E}[|X_n|^2]$ is clearly bounded and is not lower than $mathbb{E}[|X_n|]^2$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          For a « martingale » proof, the convergence theorem for martingales states that if $(X_n)$ is a martingale wrt some filtration, and $mathbb{E}[|X_n|]$ is bounded, then $X_n$ converges pointwise.



                          Now note that $mathbb{E}[|X_n|^2]$ is clearly bounded and is not lower than $mathbb{E}[|X_n|]^2$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Jan 7 at 12:29

























                          answered Jan 7 at 12:19









                          MindlackMindlack

                          4,910211




                          4,910211






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064943%2falmost-sure-convergence-of-a-martingale-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              To store a contact into the json file from server.js file using a class in NodeJS

                              Redirect URL with Chrome Remote Debugging Android Devices

                              Dieringhausen