To specify $a,b,k$ in $acos(kx)+b$












1












$begingroup$


If we have known that $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ for some $
f:(0,infty)to mathbb C$
,
is there a method of choosing finite $(x,f(x))$ to know what $a,b,k$ are?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How about k in the formula?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 7 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:06










  • $begingroup$
    @SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:06
















1












$begingroup$


If we have known that $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ for some $
f:(0,infty)to mathbb C$
,
is there a method of choosing finite $(x,f(x))$ to know what $a,b,k$ are?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How about k in the formula?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 7 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:06










  • $begingroup$
    @SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:06














1












1








1





$begingroup$


If we have known that $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ for some $
f:(0,infty)to mathbb C$
,
is there a method of choosing finite $(x,f(x))$ to know what $a,b,k$ are?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




If we have known that $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ for some $
f:(0,infty)to mathbb C$
,
is there a method of choosing finite $(x,f(x))$ to know what $a,b,k$ are?







functions trigonometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 13:03









rtybase

11.6k31534




11.6k31534










asked Jan 7 at 13:00









Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘

628




628












  • $begingroup$
    How about k in the formula?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 7 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:06










  • $begingroup$
    @SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:06


















  • $begingroup$
    How about k in the formula?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 7 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:06










  • $begingroup$
    @SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:06
















$begingroup$
How about k in the formula?
$endgroup$
– Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
Jan 7 at 13:04




$begingroup$
How about k in the formula?
$endgroup$
– Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
Jan 7 at 13:04




1




1




$begingroup$
Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 7 at 13:04




$begingroup$
Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 7 at 13:04












$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 7 at 13:05




$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 7 at 13:05












$begingroup$
what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
$endgroup$
– Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
Jan 7 at 13:06




$begingroup$
what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
$endgroup$
– Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
Jan 7 at 13:06












$begingroup$
@SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 7 at 13:06




$begingroup$
@SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 7 at 13:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Even if you require $k>0$ to avoid the sign ambiguity, there will be trouble. After eliminating $a$ and $b$ from the equations $f(x_1) = y_1$, $f(x_2) = y_2$, $f(x_3) = y_3$ you get



$$ (y_2 - y_3) cos(k x_1) + (y_3 - y_1) cos(k x_2) + (y_1 - y_2) cos(k x_3) = 0 $$



from which you want to determine $k$. However, the left side will usually be $0$ for infinitely many $k$. The exceptions are when one of the $x_i$, let's say $x_1$, is $0$, and $y_3-y_1$ and $y_1-y_2$ have the same sign, in which case the only way to satisfy the equation is for $cos(k x_1)$ and $cos(k x_2)$ to both be $1$, and therefore (if $x_1/x_2$ is irrational) $k = 0$.



Thus if the answer happens to be $k = 0$ you can choose the $x_i$ and $y_i$ to prove that, but if the correct $k$ is nonzero you can't determine it.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064980%2fto-specify-a-b-k-in-a-coskxb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Even if you require $k>0$ to avoid the sign ambiguity, there will be trouble. After eliminating $a$ and $b$ from the equations $f(x_1) = y_1$, $f(x_2) = y_2$, $f(x_3) = y_3$ you get



    $$ (y_2 - y_3) cos(k x_1) + (y_3 - y_1) cos(k x_2) + (y_1 - y_2) cos(k x_3) = 0 $$



    from which you want to determine $k$. However, the left side will usually be $0$ for infinitely many $k$. The exceptions are when one of the $x_i$, let's say $x_1$, is $0$, and $y_3-y_1$ and $y_1-y_2$ have the same sign, in which case the only way to satisfy the equation is for $cos(k x_1)$ and $cos(k x_2)$ to both be $1$, and therefore (if $x_1/x_2$ is irrational) $k = 0$.



    Thus if the answer happens to be $k = 0$ you can choose the $x_i$ and $y_i$ to prove that, but if the correct $k$ is nonzero you can't determine it.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Even if you require $k>0$ to avoid the sign ambiguity, there will be trouble. After eliminating $a$ and $b$ from the equations $f(x_1) = y_1$, $f(x_2) = y_2$, $f(x_3) = y_3$ you get



      $$ (y_2 - y_3) cos(k x_1) + (y_3 - y_1) cos(k x_2) + (y_1 - y_2) cos(k x_3) = 0 $$



      from which you want to determine $k$. However, the left side will usually be $0$ for infinitely many $k$. The exceptions are when one of the $x_i$, let's say $x_1$, is $0$, and $y_3-y_1$ and $y_1-y_2$ have the same sign, in which case the only way to satisfy the equation is for $cos(k x_1)$ and $cos(k x_2)$ to both be $1$, and therefore (if $x_1/x_2$ is irrational) $k = 0$.



      Thus if the answer happens to be $k = 0$ you can choose the $x_i$ and $y_i$ to prove that, but if the correct $k$ is nonzero you can't determine it.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Even if you require $k>0$ to avoid the sign ambiguity, there will be trouble. After eliminating $a$ and $b$ from the equations $f(x_1) = y_1$, $f(x_2) = y_2$, $f(x_3) = y_3$ you get



        $$ (y_2 - y_3) cos(k x_1) + (y_3 - y_1) cos(k x_2) + (y_1 - y_2) cos(k x_3) = 0 $$



        from which you want to determine $k$. However, the left side will usually be $0$ for infinitely many $k$. The exceptions are when one of the $x_i$, let's say $x_1$, is $0$, and $y_3-y_1$ and $y_1-y_2$ have the same sign, in which case the only way to satisfy the equation is for $cos(k x_1)$ and $cos(k x_2)$ to both be $1$, and therefore (if $x_1/x_2$ is irrational) $k = 0$.



        Thus if the answer happens to be $k = 0$ you can choose the $x_i$ and $y_i$ to prove that, but if the correct $k$ is nonzero you can't determine it.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Even if you require $k>0$ to avoid the sign ambiguity, there will be trouble. After eliminating $a$ and $b$ from the equations $f(x_1) = y_1$, $f(x_2) = y_2$, $f(x_3) = y_3$ you get



        $$ (y_2 - y_3) cos(k x_1) + (y_3 - y_1) cos(k x_2) + (y_1 - y_2) cos(k x_3) = 0 $$



        from which you want to determine $k$. However, the left side will usually be $0$ for infinitely many $k$. The exceptions are when one of the $x_i$, let's say $x_1$, is $0$, and $y_3-y_1$ and $y_1-y_2$ have the same sign, in which case the only way to satisfy the equation is for $cos(k x_1)$ and $cos(k x_2)$ to both be $1$, and therefore (if $x_1/x_2$ is irrational) $k = 0$.



        Thus if the answer happens to be $k = 0$ you can choose the $x_i$ and $y_i$ to prove that, but if the correct $k$ is nonzero you can't determine it.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 7 at 15:44









        Robert IsraelRobert Israel

        331k23221477




        331k23221477






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064980%2fto-specify-a-b-k-in-a-coskxb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen