Tower of the boxes
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
We have N
boxes. Each box has 3 params: width, length, height.
I need to write a function that generates the highest possible tower using this boxes.
Function must obey the following rule: all params of bottom box should be bigger than box above it.
Example
Let's say we have a box described as int array {width, length, height} -> {1, 2, 5}
, then:
input: boxes = {{2, 2, 3}, {1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}, {4, 5, 4}, {7, 7, 1}}
output: 8
since {4, 5, 4} greater than {2, 2, 3} greater than {1, 1, 1}
Solution
I have found one solution that I can not understand.
void sortArrDesc(int array) {
Arrays.sort(array, new java.util.Comparator<int>() {
public int compare(int a, int b) {
return -1 * Integer.compare(a[2], b[2]);
}
});
}
boolean canPlaceOnTop(int prevBoxIndex, int currBoxIndex, int boxes) {
if (prevBoxIndex == -1) return true;
int bottomBox = boxes[prevBoxIndex];
int topBox = boxes[currBoxIndex];
return (bottomBox[0] > topBox[0] &&
bottomBox[1] > topBox[1] &&
bottomBox[2] > topBox[2]);
}
int getHighestTower(int prevBoxIndex, int currBoxIndex, int boxes) {
if (currBoxIndex == boxes.length) return 0;
int nextBoxIndex = currBoxIndex + 1;
int heightWithCurrBox = 0;
if (canPlaceOnTop(prevBoxIndex, currBoxIndex, boxes)) {
int currentBoxHeight = boxes[currBoxIndex][2];
int heightNextBox = getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
heightWithCurrBox = heightNextBox + currentBoxHeight;
}
int heightWithoutCurrBox =
getHighestTower(prevBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
return Math.max(heightWithCurrBox, heightWithoutCurrBox);
}
int getHighestTower(int boxes) {
sortArrDesc(boxes);
return getHighestTower(-1, 0, boxes);
}
I don't understand what exactly getHighestTower
function do.
I mean when for example, I call function Math.sqrt(5)
I understand that I will get square root of 5. But here, in getHighestTower
function something strange happening.
It is clear that call getHighestTower(-1, 0, boxes)
will return the highest tower.
But! When we do recursive calls, I do not understand what they means.
getHighestTower(prevBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes)
What does this line means?
It seems like that call should return max possible height starting from nextBox
, but then why do we need to use prevBoxIndex
?
Moreover, this call getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
looks like do the same, but instead of prevBoxIndex
we use currBoxIndex
why is that?
P.S. I have already found this question, but it doesn't contain any useful information.
java algorithm recursion
|
show 2 more comments
We have N
boxes. Each box has 3 params: width, length, height.
I need to write a function that generates the highest possible tower using this boxes.
Function must obey the following rule: all params of bottom box should be bigger than box above it.
Example
Let's say we have a box described as int array {width, length, height} -> {1, 2, 5}
, then:
input: boxes = {{2, 2, 3}, {1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}, {4, 5, 4}, {7, 7, 1}}
output: 8
since {4, 5, 4} greater than {2, 2, 3} greater than {1, 1, 1}
Solution
I have found one solution that I can not understand.
void sortArrDesc(int array) {
Arrays.sort(array, new java.util.Comparator<int>() {
public int compare(int a, int b) {
return -1 * Integer.compare(a[2], b[2]);
}
});
}
boolean canPlaceOnTop(int prevBoxIndex, int currBoxIndex, int boxes) {
if (prevBoxIndex == -1) return true;
int bottomBox = boxes[prevBoxIndex];
int topBox = boxes[currBoxIndex];
return (bottomBox[0] > topBox[0] &&
bottomBox[1] > topBox[1] &&
bottomBox[2] > topBox[2]);
}
int getHighestTower(int prevBoxIndex, int currBoxIndex, int boxes) {
if (currBoxIndex == boxes.length) return 0;
int nextBoxIndex = currBoxIndex + 1;
int heightWithCurrBox = 0;
if (canPlaceOnTop(prevBoxIndex, currBoxIndex, boxes)) {
int currentBoxHeight = boxes[currBoxIndex][2];
int heightNextBox = getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
heightWithCurrBox = heightNextBox + currentBoxHeight;
}
int heightWithoutCurrBox =
getHighestTower(prevBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
return Math.max(heightWithCurrBox, heightWithoutCurrBox);
}
int getHighestTower(int boxes) {
sortArrDesc(boxes);
return getHighestTower(-1, 0, boxes);
}
I don't understand what exactly getHighestTower
function do.
I mean when for example, I call function Math.sqrt(5)
I understand that I will get square root of 5. But here, in getHighestTower
function something strange happening.
It is clear that call getHighestTower(-1, 0, boxes)
will return the highest tower.
But! When we do recursive calls, I do not understand what they means.
getHighestTower(prevBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes)
What does this line means?
It seems like that call should return max possible height starting from nextBox
, but then why do we need to use prevBoxIndex
?
Moreover, this call getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
looks like do the same, but instead of prevBoxIndex
we use currBoxIndex
why is that?
P.S. I have already found this question, but it doesn't contain any useful information.
java algorithm recursion
prevBoxIndex
is the index of the box on top of the stack (that box is needed by thecanPlaceOnTop
method).currBoxIndex
is the index of a box which may or may not be added to the stack. This is basically a depth-first search.
– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 21:42
Why is not the output 11 ? I see the following output is valid :{4,5,4} -> {3,3,3} -> {2,2,3} -> {1,1,1}
? Is it a requirement that all dimensions should be strictly larger to define "bigger" ?
– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 21:43
@user3386109 could you explain in more details why we needprevBoxIndex
?
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:35
For example,prevBoxIndex
is 100, andcurrBoxIndex
is 101. Then the function will check if box 101 can be placed on box 100. If it can, the first recursive call isgetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
. The second recursive call isgetHighestTower(100,102,boxes)
. In other words, the first call uses box 101. The second call skips box 101, and finds the best height starting with an attempt to put box 102 on top of box 100.
– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 22:57
@user3386109 Thank you!. According to your comment recursive calls work in the following manner: ThegetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower usingh1 = boxes[101] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. And thegetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower usingh2 = boxes[100] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. If it's true, then why we add height of box[101] to result of thegetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
if it already calculated by recursion?
– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 8:04
|
show 2 more comments
We have N
boxes. Each box has 3 params: width, length, height.
I need to write a function that generates the highest possible tower using this boxes.
Function must obey the following rule: all params of bottom box should be bigger than box above it.
Example
Let's say we have a box described as int array {width, length, height} -> {1, 2, 5}
, then:
input: boxes = {{2, 2, 3}, {1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}, {4, 5, 4}, {7, 7, 1}}
output: 8
since {4, 5, 4} greater than {2, 2, 3} greater than {1, 1, 1}
Solution
I have found one solution that I can not understand.
void sortArrDesc(int array) {
Arrays.sort(array, new java.util.Comparator<int>() {
public int compare(int a, int b) {
return -1 * Integer.compare(a[2], b[2]);
}
});
}
boolean canPlaceOnTop(int prevBoxIndex, int currBoxIndex, int boxes) {
if (prevBoxIndex == -1) return true;
int bottomBox = boxes[prevBoxIndex];
int topBox = boxes[currBoxIndex];
return (bottomBox[0] > topBox[0] &&
bottomBox[1] > topBox[1] &&
bottomBox[2] > topBox[2]);
}
int getHighestTower(int prevBoxIndex, int currBoxIndex, int boxes) {
if (currBoxIndex == boxes.length) return 0;
int nextBoxIndex = currBoxIndex + 1;
int heightWithCurrBox = 0;
if (canPlaceOnTop(prevBoxIndex, currBoxIndex, boxes)) {
int currentBoxHeight = boxes[currBoxIndex][2];
int heightNextBox = getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
heightWithCurrBox = heightNextBox + currentBoxHeight;
}
int heightWithoutCurrBox =
getHighestTower(prevBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
return Math.max(heightWithCurrBox, heightWithoutCurrBox);
}
int getHighestTower(int boxes) {
sortArrDesc(boxes);
return getHighestTower(-1, 0, boxes);
}
I don't understand what exactly getHighestTower
function do.
I mean when for example, I call function Math.sqrt(5)
I understand that I will get square root of 5. But here, in getHighestTower
function something strange happening.
It is clear that call getHighestTower(-1, 0, boxes)
will return the highest tower.
But! When we do recursive calls, I do not understand what they means.
getHighestTower(prevBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes)
What does this line means?
It seems like that call should return max possible height starting from nextBox
, but then why do we need to use prevBoxIndex
?
Moreover, this call getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
looks like do the same, but instead of prevBoxIndex
we use currBoxIndex
why is that?
P.S. I have already found this question, but it doesn't contain any useful information.
java algorithm recursion
We have N
boxes. Each box has 3 params: width, length, height.
I need to write a function that generates the highest possible tower using this boxes.
Function must obey the following rule: all params of bottom box should be bigger than box above it.
Example
Let's say we have a box described as int array {width, length, height} -> {1, 2, 5}
, then:
input: boxes = {{2, 2, 3}, {1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}, {4, 5, 4}, {7, 7, 1}}
output: 8
since {4, 5, 4} greater than {2, 2, 3} greater than {1, 1, 1}
Solution
I have found one solution that I can not understand.
void sortArrDesc(int array) {
Arrays.sort(array, new java.util.Comparator<int>() {
public int compare(int a, int b) {
return -1 * Integer.compare(a[2], b[2]);
}
});
}
boolean canPlaceOnTop(int prevBoxIndex, int currBoxIndex, int boxes) {
if (prevBoxIndex == -1) return true;
int bottomBox = boxes[prevBoxIndex];
int topBox = boxes[currBoxIndex];
return (bottomBox[0] > topBox[0] &&
bottomBox[1] > topBox[1] &&
bottomBox[2] > topBox[2]);
}
int getHighestTower(int prevBoxIndex, int currBoxIndex, int boxes) {
if (currBoxIndex == boxes.length) return 0;
int nextBoxIndex = currBoxIndex + 1;
int heightWithCurrBox = 0;
if (canPlaceOnTop(prevBoxIndex, currBoxIndex, boxes)) {
int currentBoxHeight = boxes[currBoxIndex][2];
int heightNextBox = getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
heightWithCurrBox = heightNextBox + currentBoxHeight;
}
int heightWithoutCurrBox =
getHighestTower(prevBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
return Math.max(heightWithCurrBox, heightWithoutCurrBox);
}
int getHighestTower(int boxes) {
sortArrDesc(boxes);
return getHighestTower(-1, 0, boxes);
}
I don't understand what exactly getHighestTower
function do.
I mean when for example, I call function Math.sqrt(5)
I understand that I will get square root of 5. But here, in getHighestTower
function something strange happening.
It is clear that call getHighestTower(-1, 0, boxes)
will return the highest tower.
But! When we do recursive calls, I do not understand what they means.
getHighestTower(prevBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes)
What does this line means?
It seems like that call should return max possible height starting from nextBox
, but then why do we need to use prevBoxIndex
?
Moreover, this call getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
looks like do the same, but instead of prevBoxIndex
we use currBoxIndex
why is that?
P.S. I have already found this question, but it doesn't contain any useful information.
java algorithm recursion
java algorithm recursion
edited Nov 26 '18 at 21:11
No Name QA
asked Nov 26 '18 at 20:08
No Name QANo Name QA
142111
142111
prevBoxIndex
is the index of the box on top of the stack (that box is needed by thecanPlaceOnTop
method).currBoxIndex
is the index of a box which may or may not be added to the stack. This is basically a depth-first search.
– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 21:42
Why is not the output 11 ? I see the following output is valid :{4,5,4} -> {3,3,3} -> {2,2,3} -> {1,1,1}
? Is it a requirement that all dimensions should be strictly larger to define "bigger" ?
– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 21:43
@user3386109 could you explain in more details why we needprevBoxIndex
?
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:35
For example,prevBoxIndex
is 100, andcurrBoxIndex
is 101. Then the function will check if box 101 can be placed on box 100. If it can, the first recursive call isgetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
. The second recursive call isgetHighestTower(100,102,boxes)
. In other words, the first call uses box 101. The second call skips box 101, and finds the best height starting with an attempt to put box 102 on top of box 100.
– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 22:57
@user3386109 Thank you!. According to your comment recursive calls work in the following manner: ThegetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower usingh1 = boxes[101] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. And thegetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower usingh2 = boxes[100] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. If it's true, then why we add height of box[101] to result of thegetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
if it already calculated by recursion?
– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 8:04
|
show 2 more comments
prevBoxIndex
is the index of the box on top of the stack (that box is needed by thecanPlaceOnTop
method).currBoxIndex
is the index of a box which may or may not be added to the stack. This is basically a depth-first search.
– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 21:42
Why is not the output 11 ? I see the following output is valid :{4,5,4} -> {3,3,3} -> {2,2,3} -> {1,1,1}
? Is it a requirement that all dimensions should be strictly larger to define "bigger" ?
– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 21:43
@user3386109 could you explain in more details why we needprevBoxIndex
?
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:35
For example,prevBoxIndex
is 100, andcurrBoxIndex
is 101. Then the function will check if box 101 can be placed on box 100. If it can, the first recursive call isgetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
. The second recursive call isgetHighestTower(100,102,boxes)
. In other words, the first call uses box 101. The second call skips box 101, and finds the best height starting with an attempt to put box 102 on top of box 100.
– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 22:57
@user3386109 Thank you!. According to your comment recursive calls work in the following manner: ThegetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower usingh1 = boxes[101] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. And thegetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower usingh2 = boxes[100] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. If it's true, then why we add height of box[101] to result of thegetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
if it already calculated by recursion?
– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 8:04
prevBoxIndex
is the index of the box on top of the stack (that box is needed by the canPlaceOnTop
method). currBoxIndex
is the index of a box which may or may not be added to the stack. This is basically a depth-first search.– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 21:42
prevBoxIndex
is the index of the box on top of the stack (that box is needed by the canPlaceOnTop
method). currBoxIndex
is the index of a box which may or may not be added to the stack. This is basically a depth-first search.– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 21:42
Why is not the output 11 ? I see the following output is valid :
{4,5,4} -> {3,3,3} -> {2,2,3} -> {1,1,1}
? Is it a requirement that all dimensions should be strictly larger to define "bigger" ?– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 21:43
Why is not the output 11 ? I see the following output is valid :
{4,5,4} -> {3,3,3} -> {2,2,3} -> {1,1,1}
? Is it a requirement that all dimensions should be strictly larger to define "bigger" ?– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 21:43
@user3386109 could you explain in more details why we need
prevBoxIndex
?– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:35
@user3386109 could you explain in more details why we need
prevBoxIndex
?– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:35
For example,
prevBoxIndex
is 100, and currBoxIndex
is 101. Then the function will check if box 101 can be placed on box 100. If it can, the first recursive call is getHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
. The second recursive call is getHighestTower(100,102,boxes)
. In other words, the first call uses box 101. The second call skips box 101, and finds the best height starting with an attempt to put box 102 on top of box 100.– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 22:57
For example,
prevBoxIndex
is 100, and currBoxIndex
is 101. Then the function will check if box 101 can be placed on box 100. If it can, the first recursive call is getHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
. The second recursive call is getHighestTower(100,102,boxes)
. In other words, the first call uses box 101. The second call skips box 101, and finds the best height starting with an attempt to put box 102 on top of box 100.– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 22:57
@user3386109 Thank you!. According to your comment recursive calls work in the following manner: The
getHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower using h1 = boxes[101] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. And the getHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower using h2 = boxes[100] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. If it's true, then why we add height of box[101] to result of the getHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
if it already calculated by recursion?– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 8:04
@user3386109 Thank you!. According to your comment recursive calls work in the following manner: The
getHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower using h1 = boxes[101] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. And the getHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower using h2 = boxes[100] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. If it's true, then why we add height of box[101] to result of the getHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
if it already calculated by recursion?– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 8:04
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This problem could be solved like this:
Sort the boxes by height.
Then the problem is to look for the increasing subsequence whose sum of heights is maximum - here "increasing" would mean :
currLength > prevLength && currWidth > prevWidth && currHeight > prevHeight
For the input {{2, 2, 3}, {1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}, {4, 5, 4}, {7, 7, 1}}
lets say the sorted by height array is :
{7,7,1}, {1,1,1}, {2,2,3}, {3,3,3}, {4,5,4}
then the increasing subsequence with the above criterion is
{1,1,1}, {3,3,3}, {4,5,4}
Then height is 1 + 3 + 4 = 8
.
Why do you need to sort by height first ?
Because, lets say the input is
{{4,5,4}, {2,2,3}, {1,1,1}, {3,3,3}, {7,7,1}}
and is not sorted by height, then the increasing subsequence by above criterion would yield
{1,1,1}, {3,3,3}
and it gives answer as 1 + 3 = 4
which is not optimal.
Code in Java:
private static int getHeighestTower( int x ) {
Arrays.sort( x, new Comparator<int>() {
@Override
public int compare( int a, int b ) {
return a[2] - b[2];
}
});
int L = new int[x.length];
Arrays.fill(L,1);
int max = 0;
int h = 0;
int hi = 0;
for ( int i = 0; i < x.length; i++ ) {
hi = x[i][2];
int lastAdded = 0;
for ( int j = 0; j < i; j++ ) {
if ( aBiggerThanB(x[i], x[j]) ) {
if ( L[i] < 1 + L[j] ) {
L[i] = 1 + L[j];
hi += x[j][2];
lastAdded = x[j][2];
} else if ( L[i] == 1 + L[j] ) {
hi = Math.max( hi, hi - lastAdded + x[j][2]);
}
}
}
h = Math.max( h, hi);
max = Math.max( max, L[i] );
}
return h;
}
private static boolean aBiggerThanB( int a, int b ) {
return a[0] > b[0] && a[1] > b[1] && a[2] > b[2];
}
I'm sorry but how is your answer connected with my question? I understand why we sort boxes. I do not understand what recursion does, because of two paramsprevBoxIndex
andcurrBoxIndex
. I can not understand the idea behind what recursion calls return.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:34
@NoNameQA I don't think the code with recursion is the correct code, for example :int heightNextBox = getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
why would you compute the height with next box before computnig height with current box?
– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 22:37
The code works perfectly. It is not mine. And I don't understand why it works. And this what I'm trying to find out. If you scroll code to the end you will see that it sorts boxes before start do the recursion calls.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:39
Your code works incorrectly for the following input:{ {7, 3, 8}, {9, 3, 7}, {8, 2, 6}, {6, 4, 4}, {5, 3, 3}, {4, 2, 2} }
– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 9:39
@NoNameQA Got it. Thanks for the test. The algorithm should not actually look at longest increasing subsequence, it should calculate increasing subsequence with maximum sum of heights. I updated my answer and also the code. It should work now.
– SomeDude
Nov 27 '18 at 15:22
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53488279%2ftower-of-the-boxes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This problem could be solved like this:
Sort the boxes by height.
Then the problem is to look for the increasing subsequence whose sum of heights is maximum - here "increasing" would mean :
currLength > prevLength && currWidth > prevWidth && currHeight > prevHeight
For the input {{2, 2, 3}, {1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}, {4, 5, 4}, {7, 7, 1}}
lets say the sorted by height array is :
{7,7,1}, {1,1,1}, {2,2,3}, {3,3,3}, {4,5,4}
then the increasing subsequence with the above criterion is
{1,1,1}, {3,3,3}, {4,5,4}
Then height is 1 + 3 + 4 = 8
.
Why do you need to sort by height first ?
Because, lets say the input is
{{4,5,4}, {2,2,3}, {1,1,1}, {3,3,3}, {7,7,1}}
and is not sorted by height, then the increasing subsequence by above criterion would yield
{1,1,1}, {3,3,3}
and it gives answer as 1 + 3 = 4
which is not optimal.
Code in Java:
private static int getHeighestTower( int x ) {
Arrays.sort( x, new Comparator<int>() {
@Override
public int compare( int a, int b ) {
return a[2] - b[2];
}
});
int L = new int[x.length];
Arrays.fill(L,1);
int max = 0;
int h = 0;
int hi = 0;
for ( int i = 0; i < x.length; i++ ) {
hi = x[i][2];
int lastAdded = 0;
for ( int j = 0; j < i; j++ ) {
if ( aBiggerThanB(x[i], x[j]) ) {
if ( L[i] < 1 + L[j] ) {
L[i] = 1 + L[j];
hi += x[j][2];
lastAdded = x[j][2];
} else if ( L[i] == 1 + L[j] ) {
hi = Math.max( hi, hi - lastAdded + x[j][2]);
}
}
}
h = Math.max( h, hi);
max = Math.max( max, L[i] );
}
return h;
}
private static boolean aBiggerThanB( int a, int b ) {
return a[0] > b[0] && a[1] > b[1] && a[2] > b[2];
}
I'm sorry but how is your answer connected with my question? I understand why we sort boxes. I do not understand what recursion does, because of two paramsprevBoxIndex
andcurrBoxIndex
. I can not understand the idea behind what recursion calls return.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:34
@NoNameQA I don't think the code with recursion is the correct code, for example :int heightNextBox = getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
why would you compute the height with next box before computnig height with current box?
– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 22:37
The code works perfectly. It is not mine. And I don't understand why it works. And this what I'm trying to find out. If you scroll code to the end you will see that it sorts boxes before start do the recursion calls.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:39
Your code works incorrectly for the following input:{ {7, 3, 8}, {9, 3, 7}, {8, 2, 6}, {6, 4, 4}, {5, 3, 3}, {4, 2, 2} }
– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 9:39
@NoNameQA Got it. Thanks for the test. The algorithm should not actually look at longest increasing subsequence, it should calculate increasing subsequence with maximum sum of heights. I updated my answer and also the code. It should work now.
– SomeDude
Nov 27 '18 at 15:22
add a comment |
This problem could be solved like this:
Sort the boxes by height.
Then the problem is to look for the increasing subsequence whose sum of heights is maximum - here "increasing" would mean :
currLength > prevLength && currWidth > prevWidth && currHeight > prevHeight
For the input {{2, 2, 3}, {1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}, {4, 5, 4}, {7, 7, 1}}
lets say the sorted by height array is :
{7,7,1}, {1,1,1}, {2,2,3}, {3,3,3}, {4,5,4}
then the increasing subsequence with the above criterion is
{1,1,1}, {3,3,3}, {4,5,4}
Then height is 1 + 3 + 4 = 8
.
Why do you need to sort by height first ?
Because, lets say the input is
{{4,5,4}, {2,2,3}, {1,1,1}, {3,3,3}, {7,7,1}}
and is not sorted by height, then the increasing subsequence by above criterion would yield
{1,1,1}, {3,3,3}
and it gives answer as 1 + 3 = 4
which is not optimal.
Code in Java:
private static int getHeighestTower( int x ) {
Arrays.sort( x, new Comparator<int>() {
@Override
public int compare( int a, int b ) {
return a[2] - b[2];
}
});
int L = new int[x.length];
Arrays.fill(L,1);
int max = 0;
int h = 0;
int hi = 0;
for ( int i = 0; i < x.length; i++ ) {
hi = x[i][2];
int lastAdded = 0;
for ( int j = 0; j < i; j++ ) {
if ( aBiggerThanB(x[i], x[j]) ) {
if ( L[i] < 1 + L[j] ) {
L[i] = 1 + L[j];
hi += x[j][2];
lastAdded = x[j][2];
} else if ( L[i] == 1 + L[j] ) {
hi = Math.max( hi, hi - lastAdded + x[j][2]);
}
}
}
h = Math.max( h, hi);
max = Math.max( max, L[i] );
}
return h;
}
private static boolean aBiggerThanB( int a, int b ) {
return a[0] > b[0] && a[1] > b[1] && a[2] > b[2];
}
I'm sorry but how is your answer connected with my question? I understand why we sort boxes. I do not understand what recursion does, because of two paramsprevBoxIndex
andcurrBoxIndex
. I can not understand the idea behind what recursion calls return.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:34
@NoNameQA I don't think the code with recursion is the correct code, for example :int heightNextBox = getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
why would you compute the height with next box before computnig height with current box?
– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 22:37
The code works perfectly. It is not mine. And I don't understand why it works. And this what I'm trying to find out. If you scroll code to the end you will see that it sorts boxes before start do the recursion calls.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:39
Your code works incorrectly for the following input:{ {7, 3, 8}, {9, 3, 7}, {8, 2, 6}, {6, 4, 4}, {5, 3, 3}, {4, 2, 2} }
– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 9:39
@NoNameQA Got it. Thanks for the test. The algorithm should not actually look at longest increasing subsequence, it should calculate increasing subsequence with maximum sum of heights. I updated my answer and also the code. It should work now.
– SomeDude
Nov 27 '18 at 15:22
add a comment |
This problem could be solved like this:
Sort the boxes by height.
Then the problem is to look for the increasing subsequence whose sum of heights is maximum - here "increasing" would mean :
currLength > prevLength && currWidth > prevWidth && currHeight > prevHeight
For the input {{2, 2, 3}, {1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}, {4, 5, 4}, {7, 7, 1}}
lets say the sorted by height array is :
{7,7,1}, {1,1,1}, {2,2,3}, {3,3,3}, {4,5,4}
then the increasing subsequence with the above criterion is
{1,1,1}, {3,3,3}, {4,5,4}
Then height is 1 + 3 + 4 = 8
.
Why do you need to sort by height first ?
Because, lets say the input is
{{4,5,4}, {2,2,3}, {1,1,1}, {3,3,3}, {7,7,1}}
and is not sorted by height, then the increasing subsequence by above criterion would yield
{1,1,1}, {3,3,3}
and it gives answer as 1 + 3 = 4
which is not optimal.
Code in Java:
private static int getHeighestTower( int x ) {
Arrays.sort( x, new Comparator<int>() {
@Override
public int compare( int a, int b ) {
return a[2] - b[2];
}
});
int L = new int[x.length];
Arrays.fill(L,1);
int max = 0;
int h = 0;
int hi = 0;
for ( int i = 0; i < x.length; i++ ) {
hi = x[i][2];
int lastAdded = 0;
for ( int j = 0; j < i; j++ ) {
if ( aBiggerThanB(x[i], x[j]) ) {
if ( L[i] < 1 + L[j] ) {
L[i] = 1 + L[j];
hi += x[j][2];
lastAdded = x[j][2];
} else if ( L[i] == 1 + L[j] ) {
hi = Math.max( hi, hi - lastAdded + x[j][2]);
}
}
}
h = Math.max( h, hi);
max = Math.max( max, L[i] );
}
return h;
}
private static boolean aBiggerThanB( int a, int b ) {
return a[0] > b[0] && a[1] > b[1] && a[2] > b[2];
}
This problem could be solved like this:
Sort the boxes by height.
Then the problem is to look for the increasing subsequence whose sum of heights is maximum - here "increasing" would mean :
currLength > prevLength && currWidth > prevWidth && currHeight > prevHeight
For the input {{2, 2, 3}, {1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}, {4, 5, 4}, {7, 7, 1}}
lets say the sorted by height array is :
{7,7,1}, {1,1,1}, {2,2,3}, {3,3,3}, {4,5,4}
then the increasing subsequence with the above criterion is
{1,1,1}, {3,3,3}, {4,5,4}
Then height is 1 + 3 + 4 = 8
.
Why do you need to sort by height first ?
Because, lets say the input is
{{4,5,4}, {2,2,3}, {1,1,1}, {3,3,3}, {7,7,1}}
and is not sorted by height, then the increasing subsequence by above criterion would yield
{1,1,1}, {3,3,3}
and it gives answer as 1 + 3 = 4
which is not optimal.
Code in Java:
private static int getHeighestTower( int x ) {
Arrays.sort( x, new Comparator<int>() {
@Override
public int compare( int a, int b ) {
return a[2] - b[2];
}
});
int L = new int[x.length];
Arrays.fill(L,1);
int max = 0;
int h = 0;
int hi = 0;
for ( int i = 0; i < x.length; i++ ) {
hi = x[i][2];
int lastAdded = 0;
for ( int j = 0; j < i; j++ ) {
if ( aBiggerThanB(x[i], x[j]) ) {
if ( L[i] < 1 + L[j] ) {
L[i] = 1 + L[j];
hi += x[j][2];
lastAdded = x[j][2];
} else if ( L[i] == 1 + L[j] ) {
hi = Math.max( hi, hi - lastAdded + x[j][2]);
}
}
}
h = Math.max( h, hi);
max = Math.max( max, L[i] );
}
return h;
}
private static boolean aBiggerThanB( int a, int b ) {
return a[0] > b[0] && a[1] > b[1] && a[2] > b[2];
}
edited Nov 27 '18 at 15:50
answered Nov 26 '18 at 22:22
SomeDudeSomeDude
4,43531428
4,43531428
I'm sorry but how is your answer connected with my question? I understand why we sort boxes. I do not understand what recursion does, because of two paramsprevBoxIndex
andcurrBoxIndex
. I can not understand the idea behind what recursion calls return.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:34
@NoNameQA I don't think the code with recursion is the correct code, for example :int heightNextBox = getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
why would you compute the height with next box before computnig height with current box?
– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 22:37
The code works perfectly. It is not mine. And I don't understand why it works. And this what I'm trying to find out. If you scroll code to the end you will see that it sorts boxes before start do the recursion calls.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:39
Your code works incorrectly for the following input:{ {7, 3, 8}, {9, 3, 7}, {8, 2, 6}, {6, 4, 4}, {5, 3, 3}, {4, 2, 2} }
– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 9:39
@NoNameQA Got it. Thanks for the test. The algorithm should not actually look at longest increasing subsequence, it should calculate increasing subsequence with maximum sum of heights. I updated my answer and also the code. It should work now.
– SomeDude
Nov 27 '18 at 15:22
add a comment |
I'm sorry but how is your answer connected with my question? I understand why we sort boxes. I do not understand what recursion does, because of two paramsprevBoxIndex
andcurrBoxIndex
. I can not understand the idea behind what recursion calls return.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:34
@NoNameQA I don't think the code with recursion is the correct code, for example :int heightNextBox = getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
why would you compute the height with next box before computnig height with current box?
– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 22:37
The code works perfectly. It is not mine. And I don't understand why it works. And this what I'm trying to find out. If you scroll code to the end you will see that it sorts boxes before start do the recursion calls.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:39
Your code works incorrectly for the following input:{ {7, 3, 8}, {9, 3, 7}, {8, 2, 6}, {6, 4, 4}, {5, 3, 3}, {4, 2, 2} }
– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 9:39
@NoNameQA Got it. Thanks for the test. The algorithm should not actually look at longest increasing subsequence, it should calculate increasing subsequence with maximum sum of heights. I updated my answer and also the code. It should work now.
– SomeDude
Nov 27 '18 at 15:22
I'm sorry but how is your answer connected with my question? I understand why we sort boxes. I do not understand what recursion does, because of two params
prevBoxIndex
and currBoxIndex
. I can not understand the idea behind what recursion calls return.– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:34
I'm sorry but how is your answer connected with my question? I understand why we sort boxes. I do not understand what recursion does, because of two params
prevBoxIndex
and currBoxIndex
. I can not understand the idea behind what recursion calls return.– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:34
@NoNameQA I don't think the code with recursion is the correct code, for example :
int heightNextBox = getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
why would you compute the height with next box before computnig height with current box?– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 22:37
@NoNameQA I don't think the code with recursion is the correct code, for example :
int heightNextBox = getHighestTower(currBoxIndex, nextBoxIndex, boxes);
why would you compute the height with next box before computnig height with current box?– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 22:37
The code works perfectly. It is not mine. And I don't understand why it works. And this what I'm trying to find out. If you scroll code to the end you will see that it sorts boxes before start do the recursion calls.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:39
The code works perfectly. It is not mine. And I don't understand why it works. And this what I'm trying to find out. If you scroll code to the end you will see that it sorts boxes before start do the recursion calls.
– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:39
Your code works incorrectly for the following input:
{ {7, 3, 8}, {9, 3, 7}, {8, 2, 6}, {6, 4, 4}, {5, 3, 3}, {4, 2, 2} }
– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 9:39
Your code works incorrectly for the following input:
{ {7, 3, 8}, {9, 3, 7}, {8, 2, 6}, {6, 4, 4}, {5, 3, 3}, {4, 2, 2} }
– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 9:39
@NoNameQA Got it. Thanks for the test. The algorithm should not actually look at longest increasing subsequence, it should calculate increasing subsequence with maximum sum of heights. I updated my answer and also the code. It should work now.
– SomeDude
Nov 27 '18 at 15:22
@NoNameQA Got it. Thanks for the test. The algorithm should not actually look at longest increasing subsequence, it should calculate increasing subsequence with maximum sum of heights. I updated my answer and also the code. It should work now.
– SomeDude
Nov 27 '18 at 15:22
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53488279%2ftower-of-the-boxes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
prevBoxIndex
is the index of the box on top of the stack (that box is needed by thecanPlaceOnTop
method).currBoxIndex
is the index of a box which may or may not be added to the stack. This is basically a depth-first search.– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 21:42
Why is not the output 11 ? I see the following output is valid :
{4,5,4} -> {3,3,3} -> {2,2,3} -> {1,1,1}
? Is it a requirement that all dimensions should be strictly larger to define "bigger" ?– SomeDude
Nov 26 '18 at 21:43
@user3386109 could you explain in more details why we need
prevBoxIndex
?– No Name QA
Nov 26 '18 at 22:35
For example,
prevBoxIndex
is 100, andcurrBoxIndex
is 101. Then the function will check if box 101 can be placed on box 100. If it can, the first recursive call isgetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
. The second recursive call isgetHighestTower(100,102,boxes)
. In other words, the first call uses box 101. The second call skips box 101, and finds the best height starting with an attempt to put box 102 on top of box 100.– user3386109
Nov 26 '18 at 22:57
@user3386109 Thank you!. According to your comment recursive calls work in the following manner: The
getHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower usingh1 = boxes[101] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. And thegetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
call calculates the highest possible tower usingh2 = boxes[100] + boxes[102] + ... + the lowest box
. If it's true, then why we add height of box[101] to result of thegetHighestTower(101,102,boxes)
if it already calculated by recursion?– No Name QA
Nov 27 '18 at 8:04