Need help with this sequence
up vote
-3
down vote
favorite
How to prove $u_n=b^n/n!$ is a null sequence for $b>0$?
sequences-and-series
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
favorite
How to prove $u_n=b^n/n!$ is a null sequence for $b>0$?
sequences-and-series
You are required to use MathJax
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:25
By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:36
At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:40
Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:44
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
favorite
up vote
-3
down vote
favorite
How to prove $u_n=b^n/n!$ is a null sequence for $b>0$?
sequences-and-series
How to prove $u_n=b^n/n!$ is a null sequence for $b>0$?
sequences-and-series
sequences-and-series
edited Nov 27 at 15:26
A. Pongrácz
5,218725
5,218725
asked Nov 27 at 15:24
Sourish Bhattacharya
6
6
You are required to use MathJax
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:25
By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:36
At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:40
Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:44
add a comment |
You are required to use MathJax
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:25
By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:36
At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:40
Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:44
You are required to use MathJax
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:25
You are required to use MathJax
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:25
By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:36
By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:36
At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:40
At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:40
Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:44
Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:44
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Hint: Note that
$$1+b+frac{b^2}{2!}+frac{b^3}{3!}+frac{b^4}{4!}+… = e^b$$
The series converges, so what does $frac{b^n}{n!}$ tend to as $n to infty$?
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Easiest way to do it is by noticing that
$$ sum frac{b^n}{n!} $$
converges as it can be done by the ratio test or just by the fact that it is $e^b$ and hence
$$ lim frac{b^n}{n!} =0 $$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Hint: let $k>b$ be any positive integer at least 10.
Then by trivial estimations, you can easily obtain for $ngeq k^2+k$ that $k^n/n!leq frac{k}{1}cdot frac{k}{2}cdot dots frac{k}{k}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2}cdot frac{k}{k^2+1}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2+k-1}cdot frac{k}{k^2+k} leq frac{k}{k^2+k}= frac{1}{k+1}$, which is a null sequence.
why do you do $k>b$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:38
I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:40
I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:57
It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 16:44
but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 18:06
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015905%2fneed-help-with-this-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Hint: Note that
$$1+b+frac{b^2}{2!}+frac{b^3}{3!}+frac{b^4}{4!}+… = e^b$$
The series converges, so what does $frac{b^n}{n!}$ tend to as $n to infty$?
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Hint: Note that
$$1+b+frac{b^2}{2!}+frac{b^3}{3!}+frac{b^4}{4!}+… = e^b$$
The series converges, so what does $frac{b^n}{n!}$ tend to as $n to infty$?
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Hint: Note that
$$1+b+frac{b^2}{2!}+frac{b^3}{3!}+frac{b^4}{4!}+… = e^b$$
The series converges, so what does $frac{b^n}{n!}$ tend to as $n to infty$?
Hint: Note that
$$1+b+frac{b^2}{2!}+frac{b^3}{3!}+frac{b^4}{4!}+… = e^b$$
The series converges, so what does $frac{b^n}{n!}$ tend to as $n to infty$?
answered Nov 27 at 15:39
KM101
3,945417
3,945417
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Easiest way to do it is by noticing that
$$ sum frac{b^n}{n!} $$
converges as it can be done by the ratio test or just by the fact that it is $e^b$ and hence
$$ lim frac{b^n}{n!} =0 $$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Easiest way to do it is by noticing that
$$ sum frac{b^n}{n!} $$
converges as it can be done by the ratio test or just by the fact that it is $e^b$ and hence
$$ lim frac{b^n}{n!} =0 $$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Easiest way to do it is by noticing that
$$ sum frac{b^n}{n!} $$
converges as it can be done by the ratio test or just by the fact that it is $e^b$ and hence
$$ lim frac{b^n}{n!} =0 $$
Easiest way to do it is by noticing that
$$ sum frac{b^n}{n!} $$
converges as it can be done by the ratio test or just by the fact that it is $e^b$ and hence
$$ lim frac{b^n}{n!} =0 $$
answered Nov 27 at 15:32
Neymar
385113
385113
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Hint: let $k>b$ be any positive integer at least 10.
Then by trivial estimations, you can easily obtain for $ngeq k^2+k$ that $k^n/n!leq frac{k}{1}cdot frac{k}{2}cdot dots frac{k}{k}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2}cdot frac{k}{k^2+1}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2+k-1}cdot frac{k}{k^2+k} leq frac{k}{k^2+k}= frac{1}{k+1}$, which is a null sequence.
why do you do $k>b$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:38
I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:40
I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:57
It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 16:44
but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 18:06
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
Hint: let $k>b$ be any positive integer at least 10.
Then by trivial estimations, you can easily obtain for $ngeq k^2+k$ that $k^n/n!leq frac{k}{1}cdot frac{k}{2}cdot dots frac{k}{k}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2}cdot frac{k}{k^2+1}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2+k-1}cdot frac{k}{k^2+k} leq frac{k}{k^2+k}= frac{1}{k+1}$, which is a null sequence.
why do you do $k>b$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:38
I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:40
I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:57
It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 16:44
but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 18:06
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Hint: let $k>b$ be any positive integer at least 10.
Then by trivial estimations, you can easily obtain for $ngeq k^2+k$ that $k^n/n!leq frac{k}{1}cdot frac{k}{2}cdot dots frac{k}{k}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2}cdot frac{k}{k^2+1}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2+k-1}cdot frac{k}{k^2+k} leq frac{k}{k^2+k}= frac{1}{k+1}$, which is a null sequence.
Hint: let $k>b$ be any positive integer at least 10.
Then by trivial estimations, you can easily obtain for $ngeq k^2+k$ that $k^n/n!leq frac{k}{1}cdot frac{k}{2}cdot dots frac{k}{k}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2}cdot frac{k}{k^2+1}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2+k-1}cdot frac{k}{k^2+k} leq frac{k}{k^2+k}= frac{1}{k+1}$, which is a null sequence.
edited Nov 27 at 18:17
answered Nov 27 at 15:33
A. Pongrácz
5,218725
5,218725
why do you do $k>b$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:38
I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:40
I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:57
It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 16:44
but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 18:06
|
show 1 more comment
why do you do $k>b$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:38
I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:40
I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:57
It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 16:44
but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 18:06
why do you do $k>b$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:38
why do you do $k>b$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:38
I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:40
I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:40
I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:57
I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 15:57
It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 16:44
It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 16:44
but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 18:06
but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
– Neymar
Nov 27 at 18:06
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015905%2fneed-help-with-this-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You are required to use MathJax
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:25
By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:36
At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:40
Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:44