Need help with this sequence











up vote
-3
down vote

favorite












How to prove $u_n=b^n/n!$ is a null sequence for $b>0$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You are required to use MathJax
    – Akash Roy
    Nov 27 at 15:25










  • By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Nov 27 at 15:36










  • At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
    – Akash Roy
    Nov 27 at 15:40












  • Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Nov 27 at 15:44















up vote
-3
down vote

favorite












How to prove $u_n=b^n/n!$ is a null sequence for $b>0$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You are required to use MathJax
    – Akash Roy
    Nov 27 at 15:25










  • By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Nov 27 at 15:36










  • At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
    – Akash Roy
    Nov 27 at 15:40












  • Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Nov 27 at 15:44













up vote
-3
down vote

favorite









up vote
-3
down vote

favorite











How to prove $u_n=b^n/n!$ is a null sequence for $b>0$?










share|cite|improve this question















How to prove $u_n=b^n/n!$ is a null sequence for $b>0$?







sequences-and-series






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 27 at 15:26









A. Pongrácz

5,218725




5,218725










asked Nov 27 at 15:24









Sourish Bhattacharya

6




6












  • You are required to use MathJax
    – Akash Roy
    Nov 27 at 15:25










  • By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Nov 27 at 15:36










  • At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
    – Akash Roy
    Nov 27 at 15:40












  • Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Nov 27 at 15:44


















  • You are required to use MathJax
    – Akash Roy
    Nov 27 at 15:25










  • By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Nov 27 at 15:36










  • At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
    – Akash Roy
    Nov 27 at 15:40












  • Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Nov 27 at 15:44
















You are required to use MathJax
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:25




You are required to use MathJax
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:25












By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:36




By the way, the downvotes are coming becaue you didn't show any of your own efforts. Usually I also downvote or vote to close for this reason, but I think it is acceptable in this particular case not to show substantial work: the solution hinges on one very technical idea, without which it is hard to see how to start. But I also understand why people downvote or close such questions.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:36












At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:40






At least if he had described the question well, the downvotes would not have come. The problem with the question lies in its presentation. However now it is okay.
– Akash Roy
Nov 27 at 15:40














Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:44




Akash Roy: sure, but maybe we should also be more patient about that. The author of the post is a new contributor, and maybe (s)he is unexperienced in discussing mathematics, or could have difficulties speaking English.
– A. Pongrácz
Nov 27 at 15:44










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Hint: Note that



$$1+b+frac{b^2}{2!}+frac{b^3}{3!}+frac{b^4}{4!}+… = e^b$$



The series converges, so what does $frac{b^n}{n!}$ tend to as $n to infty$?






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Easiest way to do it is by noticing that



    $$ sum frac{b^n}{n!} $$



    converges as it can be done by the ratio test or just by the fact that it is $e^b$ and hence



    $$ lim frac{b^n}{n!} =0 $$






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Hint: let $k>b$ be any positive integer at least 10.
      Then by trivial estimations, you can easily obtain for $ngeq k^2+k$ that $k^n/n!leq frac{k}{1}cdot frac{k}{2}cdot dots frac{k}{k}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2}cdot frac{k}{k^2+1}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2+k-1}cdot frac{k}{k^2+k} leq frac{k}{k^2+k}= frac{1}{k+1}$, which is a null sequence.






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • why do you do $k>b$?
        – Neymar
        Nov 27 at 15:38










      • I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
        – A. Pongrácz
        Nov 27 at 15:40










      • I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
        – Neymar
        Nov 27 at 15:57












      • It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
        – A. Pongrácz
        Nov 27 at 16:44












      • but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
        – Neymar
        Nov 27 at 18:06











      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015905%2fneed-help-with-this-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Hint: Note that



      $$1+b+frac{b^2}{2!}+frac{b^3}{3!}+frac{b^4}{4!}+… = e^b$$



      The series converges, so what does $frac{b^n}{n!}$ tend to as $n to infty$?






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        Hint: Note that



        $$1+b+frac{b^2}{2!}+frac{b^3}{3!}+frac{b^4}{4!}+… = e^b$$



        The series converges, so what does $frac{b^n}{n!}$ tend to as $n to infty$?






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          Hint: Note that



          $$1+b+frac{b^2}{2!}+frac{b^3}{3!}+frac{b^4}{4!}+… = e^b$$



          The series converges, so what does $frac{b^n}{n!}$ tend to as $n to infty$?






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Hint: Note that



          $$1+b+frac{b^2}{2!}+frac{b^3}{3!}+frac{b^4}{4!}+… = e^b$$



          The series converges, so what does $frac{b^n}{n!}$ tend to as $n to infty$?







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 27 at 15:39









          KM101

          3,945417




          3,945417






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Easiest way to do it is by noticing that



              $$ sum frac{b^n}{n!} $$



              converges as it can be done by the ratio test or just by the fact that it is $e^b$ and hence



              $$ lim frac{b^n}{n!} =0 $$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Easiest way to do it is by noticing that



                $$ sum frac{b^n}{n!} $$



                converges as it can be done by the ratio test or just by the fact that it is $e^b$ and hence



                $$ lim frac{b^n}{n!} =0 $$






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Easiest way to do it is by noticing that



                  $$ sum frac{b^n}{n!} $$



                  converges as it can be done by the ratio test or just by the fact that it is $e^b$ and hence



                  $$ lim frac{b^n}{n!} =0 $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Easiest way to do it is by noticing that



                  $$ sum frac{b^n}{n!} $$



                  converges as it can be done by the ratio test or just by the fact that it is $e^b$ and hence



                  $$ lim frac{b^n}{n!} =0 $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 27 at 15:32









                  Neymar

                  385113




                  385113






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Hint: let $k>b$ be any positive integer at least 10.
                      Then by trivial estimations, you can easily obtain for $ngeq k^2+k$ that $k^n/n!leq frac{k}{1}cdot frac{k}{2}cdot dots frac{k}{k}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2}cdot frac{k}{k^2+1}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2+k-1}cdot frac{k}{k^2+k} leq frac{k}{k^2+k}= frac{1}{k+1}$, which is a null sequence.






                      share|cite|improve this answer























                      • why do you do $k>b$?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 15:38










                      • I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
                        – A. Pongrácz
                        Nov 27 at 15:40










                      • I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 15:57












                      • It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
                        – A. Pongrácz
                        Nov 27 at 16:44












                      • but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 18:06















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Hint: let $k>b$ be any positive integer at least 10.
                      Then by trivial estimations, you can easily obtain for $ngeq k^2+k$ that $k^n/n!leq frac{k}{1}cdot frac{k}{2}cdot dots frac{k}{k}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2}cdot frac{k}{k^2+1}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2+k-1}cdot frac{k}{k^2+k} leq frac{k}{k^2+k}= frac{1}{k+1}$, which is a null sequence.






                      share|cite|improve this answer























                      • why do you do $k>b$?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 15:38










                      • I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
                        – A. Pongrácz
                        Nov 27 at 15:40










                      • I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 15:57












                      • It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
                        – A. Pongrácz
                        Nov 27 at 16:44












                      • but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 18:06













                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote









                      Hint: let $k>b$ be any positive integer at least 10.
                      Then by trivial estimations, you can easily obtain for $ngeq k^2+k$ that $k^n/n!leq frac{k}{1}cdot frac{k}{2}cdot dots frac{k}{k}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2}cdot frac{k}{k^2+1}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2+k-1}cdot frac{k}{k^2+k} leq frac{k}{k^2+k}= frac{1}{k+1}$, which is a null sequence.






                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      Hint: let $k>b$ be any positive integer at least 10.
                      Then by trivial estimations, you can easily obtain for $ngeq k^2+k$ that $k^n/n!leq frac{k}{1}cdot frac{k}{2}cdot dots frac{k}{k}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2}cdot frac{k}{k^2+1}cdot dots frac{k}{k^2+k-1}cdot frac{k}{k^2+k} leq frac{k}{k^2+k}= frac{1}{k+1}$, which is a null sequence.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Nov 27 at 18:17

























                      answered Nov 27 at 15:33









                      A. Pongrácz

                      5,218725




                      5,218725












                      • why do you do $k>b$?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 15:38










                      • I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
                        – A. Pongrácz
                        Nov 27 at 15:40










                      • I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 15:57












                      • It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
                        – A. Pongrácz
                        Nov 27 at 16:44












                      • but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 18:06


















                      • why do you do $k>b$?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 15:38










                      • I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
                        – A. Pongrácz
                        Nov 27 at 15:40










                      • I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 15:57












                      • It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
                        – A. Pongrácz
                        Nov 27 at 16:44












                      • but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
                        – Neymar
                        Nov 27 at 18:06
















                      why do you do $k>b$?
                      – Neymar
                      Nov 27 at 15:38




                      why do you do $k>b$?
                      – Neymar
                      Nov 27 at 15:38












                      I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
                      – A. Pongrácz
                      Nov 27 at 15:40




                      I want the first $k$ fractions in the product be different from the last $k+1$ ($k$ at least 10 surely guarantees this). It is also easier to refer to these fractions if the base is an integer.
                      – A. Pongrácz
                      Nov 27 at 15:40












                      I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
                      – Neymar
                      Nov 27 at 15:57






                      I really dont understand this method at all. Its very hard. also why you make $n=k^2+k$?
                      – Neymar
                      Nov 27 at 15:57














                      It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
                      – A. Pongrácz
                      Nov 27 at 16:44






                      It is much simpler that the other suggestions in the sense that it is completely elementary. All the fractions $k/k^2, ldots, k/(k^2+k-1)$ are at most $1/k$, so they cancel out the first $k$ fractions. In the middle, every fraction is at most $1$. Hence, the product is at most $k/(k^2+k)$. You need $k^2$ to make the estimations completly trivial.
                      – A. Pongrácz
                      Nov 27 at 16:44














                      but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
                      – Neymar
                      Nov 27 at 18:06




                      but my question is how you come up with $n=k^2+k$. Why are you allowed to do this?
                      – Neymar
                      Nov 27 at 18:06


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015905%2fneed-help-with-this-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Wiesbaden

                      Marschland

                      Dieringhausen