Aligning formula problem
5
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
y ={}& frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
end{document}
How to align the plus sign with fraction? Thanks.
math-mode equations align amsmath
edited Dec 10 '18 at 9:44
David Carlisle
487k4111271872
asked Dec 10 '18 at 9:10
AugustAugust
283
add a comment |
5
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
y ={}& frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
end{document}
How to align the plus sign with fraction? Thanks.
math-mode equations align amsmath
edited Dec 10 '18 at 9:44
David Carlisle
487k4111271872
asked Dec 10 '18 at 9:10
AugustAugust
283
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use ofleft...rightand use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the+is easy.
– daleif
Dec 10 '18 at 9:18
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:23
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to typeint +in this combination?
– marmot
Dec 10 '18 at 10:09
add a comment |
5
5
5
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
y ={}& frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
end{document}
How to align the plus sign with fraction? Thanks.
math-mode equations align amsmath
edited Dec 10 '18 at 9:44
David Carlisle
487k4111271872
asked Dec 10 '18 at 9:10
AugustAugust
283
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
y ={}& frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
end{document}
How to align the plus sign with fraction? Thanks.
math-mode equations align amsmath
math-mode equations align amsmath
edited Dec 10 '18 at 9:44
David Carlisle
487k4111271872
asked Dec 10 '18 at 9:10
AugustAugust
283
edited Dec 10 '18 at 9:44
David Carlisle
487k4111271872
asked Dec 10 '18 at 9:10
AugustAugust
283
edited Dec 10 '18 at 9:44
David Carlisle
487k4111271872
edited Dec 10 '18 at 9:44
David Carlisle
487k4111271872
edited Dec 10 '18 at 9:44
David Carlisle
487k4111271872
487k4111271872
asked Dec 10 '18 at 9:10
AugustAugust
283
asked Dec 10 '18 at 9:10
AugustAugust
283
asked Dec 10 '18 at 9:10
AugustAugust
283
283
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use ofleft...rightand use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the+is easy.
– daleif
Dec 10 '18 at 9:18
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:23
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to typeint +in this combination?
– marmot
Dec 10 '18 at 10:09
add a comment |
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use ofleft...rightand use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the+is easy.
– daleif
Dec 10 '18 at 9:18
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:23
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to typeint +in this combination?
– marmot
Dec 10 '18 at 10:09
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use of
left...right and use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the + is easy.– daleif
Dec 10 '18 at 9:18
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use of
left...right and use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the + is easy.– daleif
Dec 10 '18 at 9:18
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:23
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:23
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to type
int + in this combination?– marmot
Dec 10 '18 at 10:09
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to type
int + in this combination?– marmot
Dec 10 '18 at 10:09
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
4
Alignment is not really necessary and multline might do the job. If you feel that alignment is important, here are three proposals.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following aligns the + with the fraction
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
but with a slight offset; with the following the
offset is removed
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
However, I'd align with the integral sign
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y = frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace &!int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
end{document}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 10:00
egregegreg
716k8619023189
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:17
@August As you were doing, withvphantom.
– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 11:48
Does “mspace{-medmuskip}” similar to “!”, add some negative offset? I have used “!” achieve the same result, it’s manual method.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:02
@August!addsmspace{-thinmuskip}, but amedmuskipis added in front of a binary operation symbol and it is larger thanthinmuskip.
– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 14:03
Your method is also worked, thank you very much.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:10
add a comment |
3
try
begin{align*}
y &= frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&phantom{=} left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:25
HerbertHerbert
273k24412725
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:39
add a comment |
3
You do not require alignment here (which is why you are needing phantom etc to hide the alignment point) you just have a line that needs to be broken (so I assume you have a narrow text width) something like:
documentclass[twocolumn,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
y =frac{1}{n!} Bigllbrace int + f(a) \
{} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C Bigrrbrace
end{multline*}
end{document}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:49
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
487k4111271872
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:13
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually usingBigl(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline
– David Carlisle
Dec 10 '18 at 12:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f464093%2faligning-formula-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
4
Alignment is not really necessary and multline might do the job. If you feel that alignment is important, here are three proposals.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following aligns the + with the fraction
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
but with a slight offset; with the following the
offset is removed
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
However, I'd align with the integral sign
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y = frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace &!int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
end{document}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 10:00
egregegreg
716k8619023189
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:17
@August As you were doing, withvphantom.
– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 11:48
Does “mspace{-medmuskip}” similar to “!”, add some negative offset? I have used “!” achieve the same result, it’s manual method.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:02
@August!addsmspace{-thinmuskip}, but amedmuskipis added in front of a binary operation symbol and it is larger thanthinmuskip.
– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 14:03
Your method is also worked, thank you very much.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:10
add a comment |
4
Alignment is not really necessary and multline might do the job. If you feel that alignment is important, here are three proposals.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following aligns the + with the fraction
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
but with a slight offset; with the following the
offset is removed
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
However, I'd align with the integral sign
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y = frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace &!int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
end{document}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 10:00
egregegreg
716k8619023189
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:17
@August As you were doing, withvphantom.
– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 11:48
Does “mspace{-medmuskip}” similar to “!”, add some negative offset? I have used “!” achieve the same result, it’s manual method.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:02
@August!addsmspace{-thinmuskip}, but amedmuskipis added in front of a binary operation symbol and it is larger thanthinmuskip.
– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 14:03
Your method is also worked, thank you very much.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:10
add a comment |
4
4
4
Alignment is not really necessary and multline might do the job. If you feel that alignment is important, here are three proposals.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following aligns the + with the fraction
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
but with a slight offset; with the following the
offset is removed
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
However, I'd align with the integral sign
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y = frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace &!int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
end{document}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 10:00
egregegreg
716k8619023189
Alignment is not really necessary and multline might do the job. If you feel that alignment is important, here are three proposals.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following aligns the + with the fraction
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
but with a slight offset; with the following the
offset is removed
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y ={} & frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
However, I'd align with the integral sign
begin{equation*}
begin{split}
y = frac{1}{n!} biggllbrace &!int + f(a) \
& {mspace{-medmuskip}} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C biggrrbrace
end{split}
end{equation*}
end{document}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 10:00
egregegreg
716k8619023189
answered Dec 10 '18 at 10:00
egregegreg
716k8619023189
answered Dec 10 '18 at 10:00
egregegreg
716k8619023189
answered Dec 10 '18 at 10:00
egregegreg
716k8619023189
716k8619023189
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:17
@August As you were doing, withvphantom.
– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 11:48
Does “mspace{-medmuskip}” similar to “!”, add some negative offset? I have used “!” achieve the same result, it’s manual method.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:02
@August!addsmspace{-thinmuskip}, but amedmuskipis added in front of a binary operation symbol and it is larger thanthinmuskip.
– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 14:03
Your method is also worked, thank you very much.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:10
add a comment |
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:17
@August As you were doing, withvphantom.
– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 11:48
Does “mspace{-medmuskip}” similar to “!”, add some negative offset? I have used “!” achieve the same result, it’s manual method.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:02
@August!addsmspace{-thinmuskip}, but amedmuskipis added in front of a binary operation symbol and it is larger thanthinmuskip.
– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 14:03
Your method is also worked, thank you very much.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:10
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:17
Thank you. If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:17
@August As you were doing, with
vphantom.– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 11:48
@August As you were doing, with
vphantom.– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 11:48
Does “mspace{-medmuskip}” similar to “!”, add some negative offset? I have used “!” achieve the same result, it’s manual method.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:02
Does “mspace{-medmuskip}” similar to “!”, add some negative offset? I have used “!” achieve the same result, it’s manual method.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:02
@August
! adds mspace{-thinmuskip}, but a medmuskip is added in front of a binary operation symbol and it is larger than thinmuskip.– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 14:03
@August
! adds mspace{-thinmuskip}, but a medmuskip is added in front of a binary operation symbol and it is larger than thinmuskip.– egreg
Dec 10 '18 at 14:03
Your method is also worked, thank you very much.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:10
Your method is also worked, thank you very much.
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 14:10
add a comment |
3
try
begin{align*}
y &= frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&phantom{=} left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:25
HerbertHerbert
273k24412725
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:39
add a comment |
3
try
begin{align*}
y &= frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&phantom{=} left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:25
HerbertHerbert
273k24412725
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:39
add a comment |
3
3
3
try
begin{align*}
y &= frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&phantom{=} left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:25
HerbertHerbert
273k24412725
try
begin{align*}
y &= frac{1}{n!} leftlbrace int + f(a) right. \
&phantom{=} left. vphantom{int} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C rightrbrace
end{align*}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:25
HerbertHerbert
273k24412725
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:25
HerbertHerbert
273k24412725
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:25
HerbertHerbert
273k24412725
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:25
HerbertHerbert
273k24412725
273k24412725
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:39
add a comment |
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:39
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:39
Thank you. The plus sign wasn’t aligning with fraction .
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:39
add a comment |
3
You do not require alignment here (which is why you are needing phantom etc to hide the alignment point) you just have a line that needs to be broken (so I assume you have a narrow text width) something like:
documentclass[twocolumn,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
y =frac{1}{n!} Bigllbrace int + f(a) \
{} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C Bigrrbrace
end{multline*}
end{document}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:49
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
487k4111271872
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:13
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually usingBigl(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline
– David Carlisle
Dec 10 '18 at 12:28
add a comment |
3
You do not require alignment here (which is why you are needing phantom etc to hide the alignment point) you just have a line that needs to be broken (so I assume you have a narrow text width) something like:
documentclass[twocolumn,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
y =frac{1}{n!} Bigllbrace int + f(a) \
{} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C Bigrrbrace
end{multline*}
end{document}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:49
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
487k4111271872
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:13
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually usingBigl(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline
– David Carlisle
Dec 10 '18 at 12:28
add a comment |
3
3
3
You do not require alignment here (which is why you are needing phantom etc to hide the alignment point) you just have a line that needs to be broken (so I assume you have a narrow text width) something like:
documentclass[twocolumn,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
y =frac{1}{n!} Bigllbrace int + f(a) \
{} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C Bigrrbrace
end{multline*}
end{document}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:49
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
487k4111271872
You do not require alignment here (which is why you are needing phantom etc to hide the alignment point) you just have a line that needs to be broken (so I assume you have a narrow text width) something like:
documentclass[twocolumn,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
y =frac{1}{n!} Bigllbrace int + f(a) \
{} + [h(u)+phi(x)] + C Bigrrbrace
end{multline*}
end{document}
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:49
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
487k4111271872
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:49
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
487k4111271872
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:49
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
487k4111271872
answered Dec 10 '18 at 9:49
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
487k4111271872
487k4111271872
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:13
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually usingBigl(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline
– David Carlisle
Dec 10 '18 at 12:28
add a comment |
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:13
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually usingBigl(for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline
– David Carlisle
Dec 10 '18 at 12:28
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:13
Thank you. I use vphantom to keep same sized big left/right brace.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 10:13
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually using
Bigl (for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline– David Carlisle
Dec 10 '18 at 12:28
you can still use left . with the vphantom if you wish (but usually using
Bigl (for some fixed name size is better) that change is separate from teh suggestion to change align to multline– David Carlisle
Dec 10 '18 at 12:28
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f464093%2faligning-formula-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
(1) welcome, (2) as always on this site please provide a full minimal example, then it is a lot easier for other to test your code. (3) Drop the use of
left...rightand use the manual ones instead (bigBigbiggBigg), then the alignment can be placed inside the construction and aligning on the+is easy.– daleif
Dec 10 '18 at 9:18
Thank you.If I must use the left/right pair, how to modify the code?
– August
Dec 10 '18 at 9:23
Sorry to ask so naively, but are you sure you want to type
int +in this combination?– marmot
Dec 10 '18 at 10:09