Boundary conditions and decomposition on spherical harmonics












0












$begingroup$


Say I have a function $f(x,y,z)$ satisfying some Laplace-type equation on a domain. This domain is an hemisphere with boundary defined by $x=0$ in Cartesian coordinates. I impose either Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions on the plane $x=0$. Now I want to switch to spherical coordinates $(r,theta,varphi)$, where $0<theta<pi$ and normally $0levarphile2pi$.



First, am I allowed to defined the boundary $x=0$ by $varphi=0,pi$, so that $0levarphilepi$ in spherical coordinates?



Assuming so, next I want to expand my function $f(r,theta,varphi)$ on angular modes such that
begin{equation}
f(r,theta,varphi)=sum_{lm}u_{lm}(theta,varphi),f_{lm}(r),,
end{equation}

where $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)$ are related to the spherical harmonics. However, I still want to impose some boundary conditions at $varphi=0,pi$.



For Dirichlet boundary conditions at $varphi=0,pi$, then my guess would be to use only the "sine" part of the real spherical harmonics, that is $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)=sqrt{2}(-1)^m,{rm Im}[Y_{l|m|}]$, with $-lle m<0$, while for Neumann I would use the "cosine" part, i.e. $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)=sqrt{2}(-1)^m,{rm Re}[Y_{lm}]$, with $0le m<l$.



Is that correct? If so, does that carry through to higher dimensions? If not, what should be done instead to specify such boundary conditions?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Say I have a function $f(x,y,z)$ satisfying some Laplace-type equation on a domain. This domain is an hemisphere with boundary defined by $x=0$ in Cartesian coordinates. I impose either Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions on the plane $x=0$. Now I want to switch to spherical coordinates $(r,theta,varphi)$, where $0<theta<pi$ and normally $0levarphile2pi$.



    First, am I allowed to defined the boundary $x=0$ by $varphi=0,pi$, so that $0levarphilepi$ in spherical coordinates?



    Assuming so, next I want to expand my function $f(r,theta,varphi)$ on angular modes such that
    begin{equation}
    f(r,theta,varphi)=sum_{lm}u_{lm}(theta,varphi),f_{lm}(r),,
    end{equation}

    where $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)$ are related to the spherical harmonics. However, I still want to impose some boundary conditions at $varphi=0,pi$.



    For Dirichlet boundary conditions at $varphi=0,pi$, then my guess would be to use only the "sine" part of the real spherical harmonics, that is $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)=sqrt{2}(-1)^m,{rm Im}[Y_{l|m|}]$, with $-lle m<0$, while for Neumann I would use the "cosine" part, i.e. $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)=sqrt{2}(-1)^m,{rm Re}[Y_{lm}]$, with $0le m<l$.



    Is that correct? If so, does that carry through to higher dimensions? If not, what should be done instead to specify such boundary conditions?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Say I have a function $f(x,y,z)$ satisfying some Laplace-type equation on a domain. This domain is an hemisphere with boundary defined by $x=0$ in Cartesian coordinates. I impose either Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions on the plane $x=0$. Now I want to switch to spherical coordinates $(r,theta,varphi)$, where $0<theta<pi$ and normally $0levarphile2pi$.



      First, am I allowed to defined the boundary $x=0$ by $varphi=0,pi$, so that $0levarphilepi$ in spherical coordinates?



      Assuming so, next I want to expand my function $f(r,theta,varphi)$ on angular modes such that
      begin{equation}
      f(r,theta,varphi)=sum_{lm}u_{lm}(theta,varphi),f_{lm}(r),,
      end{equation}

      where $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)$ are related to the spherical harmonics. However, I still want to impose some boundary conditions at $varphi=0,pi$.



      For Dirichlet boundary conditions at $varphi=0,pi$, then my guess would be to use only the "sine" part of the real spherical harmonics, that is $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)=sqrt{2}(-1)^m,{rm Im}[Y_{l|m|}]$, with $-lle m<0$, while for Neumann I would use the "cosine" part, i.e. $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)=sqrt{2}(-1)^m,{rm Re}[Y_{lm}]$, with $0le m<l$.



      Is that correct? If so, does that carry through to higher dimensions? If not, what should be done instead to specify such boundary conditions?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Say I have a function $f(x,y,z)$ satisfying some Laplace-type equation on a domain. This domain is an hemisphere with boundary defined by $x=0$ in Cartesian coordinates. I impose either Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions on the plane $x=0$. Now I want to switch to spherical coordinates $(r,theta,varphi)$, where $0<theta<pi$ and normally $0levarphile2pi$.



      First, am I allowed to defined the boundary $x=0$ by $varphi=0,pi$, so that $0levarphilepi$ in spherical coordinates?



      Assuming so, next I want to expand my function $f(r,theta,varphi)$ on angular modes such that
      begin{equation}
      f(r,theta,varphi)=sum_{lm}u_{lm}(theta,varphi),f_{lm}(r),,
      end{equation}

      where $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)$ are related to the spherical harmonics. However, I still want to impose some boundary conditions at $varphi=0,pi$.



      For Dirichlet boundary conditions at $varphi=0,pi$, then my guess would be to use only the "sine" part of the real spherical harmonics, that is $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)=sqrt{2}(-1)^m,{rm Im}[Y_{l|m|}]$, with $-lle m<0$, while for Neumann I would use the "cosine" part, i.e. $u_{lm}(theta,varphi)=sqrt{2}(-1)^m,{rm Re}[Y_{lm}]$, with $0le m<l$.



      Is that correct? If so, does that carry through to higher dimensions? If not, what should be done instead to specify such boundary conditions?







      boundary-value-problem spherical-harmonics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 10 '18 at 12:00









      KaioKaio

      112




      112






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033819%2fboundary-conditions-and-decomposition-on-spherical-harmonics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033819%2fboundary-conditions-and-decomposition-on-spherical-harmonics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen