Solution for Linear Transformation question seems wrong.
$begingroup$
I'm studying with a Linear Algebra book which presents the following question:
Be $A:Erightarrow F$ a linear transformation. If the vectors $Av_1,ldots,Av_n in F$ are LI, then prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n in E$ are also linear.
Below is the official solution:
Assume $c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_n=0$. Applying $A$ (which is linear), yields $c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0$. Since $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$ are LI, then $c_1=c_2=ldots=c_n=0$. Thus, $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are LI.
It seems to me that this solution does not take me anywhere. It already assumed a LI set $v_1,ldots,v_n$ and applied $A$ to it, to conclude that the same set is LI. But what if $A$ is singular?
I think it's more reasonable to linearly combine $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$:
$$
c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0
$$
Thus,
$$
Aleft(c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_nright)=0
$$
And then to conclude that, iff $A$ is nonsingular, then $v_1,ldots,v_n$ is LI. Otherwise, we can't be sure.
Am I missing something?
Thanks in advance.
linear-algebra linear-transformations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm studying with a Linear Algebra book which presents the following question:
Be $A:Erightarrow F$ a linear transformation. If the vectors $Av_1,ldots,Av_n in F$ are LI, then prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n in E$ are also linear.
Below is the official solution:
Assume $c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_n=0$. Applying $A$ (which is linear), yields $c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0$. Since $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$ are LI, then $c_1=c_2=ldots=c_n=0$. Thus, $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are LI.
It seems to me that this solution does not take me anywhere. It already assumed a LI set $v_1,ldots,v_n$ and applied $A$ to it, to conclude that the same set is LI. But what if $A$ is singular?
I think it's more reasonable to linearly combine $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$:
$$
c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0
$$
Thus,
$$
Aleft(c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_nright)=0
$$
And then to conclude that, iff $A$ is nonsingular, then $v_1,ldots,v_n$ is LI. Otherwise, we can't be sure.
Am I missing something?
Thanks in advance.
linear-algebra linear-transformations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Dec 10 '18 at 12:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm studying with a Linear Algebra book which presents the following question:
Be $A:Erightarrow F$ a linear transformation. If the vectors $Av_1,ldots,Av_n in F$ are LI, then prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n in E$ are also linear.
Below is the official solution:
Assume $c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_n=0$. Applying $A$ (which is linear), yields $c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0$. Since $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$ are LI, then $c_1=c_2=ldots=c_n=0$. Thus, $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are LI.
It seems to me that this solution does not take me anywhere. It already assumed a LI set $v_1,ldots,v_n$ and applied $A$ to it, to conclude that the same set is LI. But what if $A$ is singular?
I think it's more reasonable to linearly combine $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$:
$$
c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0
$$
Thus,
$$
Aleft(c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_nright)=0
$$
And then to conclude that, iff $A$ is nonsingular, then $v_1,ldots,v_n$ is LI. Otherwise, we can't be sure.
Am I missing something?
Thanks in advance.
linear-algebra linear-transformations
$endgroup$
I'm studying with a Linear Algebra book which presents the following question:
Be $A:Erightarrow F$ a linear transformation. If the vectors $Av_1,ldots,Av_n in F$ are LI, then prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n in E$ are also linear.
Below is the official solution:
Assume $c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_n=0$. Applying $A$ (which is linear), yields $c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0$. Since $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$ are LI, then $c_1=c_2=ldots=c_n=0$. Thus, $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are LI.
It seems to me that this solution does not take me anywhere. It already assumed a LI set $v_1,ldots,v_n$ and applied $A$ to it, to conclude that the same set is LI. But what if $A$ is singular?
I think it's more reasonable to linearly combine $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$:
$$
c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0
$$
Thus,
$$
Aleft(c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_nright)=0
$$
And then to conclude that, iff $A$ is nonsingular, then $v_1,ldots,v_n$ is LI. Otherwise, we can't be sure.
Am I missing something?
Thanks in advance.
linear-algebra linear-transformations
linear-algebra linear-transformations
asked Dec 10 '18 at 12:50
César PachecoCésar Pacheco
81
81
$begingroup$
How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Dec 10 '18 at 12:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Dec 10 '18 at 12:56
$begingroup$
How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Dec 10 '18 at 12:56
$begingroup$
How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Dec 10 '18 at 12:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We want to check if $v_i$ are linearly independent, hence we form the equation that we use to check linearly independence.
$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i v_i = 0$$
At this moment, I still do not know if all the $c_i$ must be $0$.
Now, let's multiply by $A$.
$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i (Av_i) = 0$$
Now, I know that all the $c_i$'s are zero since we are told that ${Av_1, ldots, Av_n}$ is linearly independent. Hence ${ v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is linearly independent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– César Pacheco
Dec 10 '18 at 13:16
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033877%2fsolution-for-linear-transformation-question-seems-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We want to check if $v_i$ are linearly independent, hence we form the equation that we use to check linearly independence.
$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i v_i = 0$$
At this moment, I still do not know if all the $c_i$ must be $0$.
Now, let's multiply by $A$.
$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i (Av_i) = 0$$
Now, I know that all the $c_i$'s are zero since we are told that ${Av_1, ldots, Av_n}$ is linearly independent. Hence ${ v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is linearly independent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– César Pacheco
Dec 10 '18 at 13:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We want to check if $v_i$ are linearly independent, hence we form the equation that we use to check linearly independence.
$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i v_i = 0$$
At this moment, I still do not know if all the $c_i$ must be $0$.
Now, let's multiply by $A$.
$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i (Av_i) = 0$$
Now, I know that all the $c_i$'s are zero since we are told that ${Av_1, ldots, Av_n}$ is linearly independent. Hence ${ v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is linearly independent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– César Pacheco
Dec 10 '18 at 13:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We want to check if $v_i$ are linearly independent, hence we form the equation that we use to check linearly independence.
$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i v_i = 0$$
At this moment, I still do not know if all the $c_i$ must be $0$.
Now, let's multiply by $A$.
$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i (Av_i) = 0$$
Now, I know that all the $c_i$'s are zero since we are told that ${Av_1, ldots, Av_n}$ is linearly independent. Hence ${ v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is linearly independent.
$endgroup$
We want to check if $v_i$ are linearly independent, hence we form the equation that we use to check linearly independence.
$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i v_i = 0$$
At this moment, I still do not know if all the $c_i$ must be $0$.
Now, let's multiply by $A$.
$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i (Av_i) = 0$$
Now, I know that all the $c_i$'s are zero since we are told that ${Av_1, ldots, Av_n}$ is linearly independent. Hence ${ v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is linearly independent.
answered Dec 10 '18 at 12:58
Siong Thye GohSiong Thye Goh
101k1466117
101k1466117
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– César Pacheco
Dec 10 '18 at 13:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– César Pacheco
Dec 10 '18 at 13:16
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– César Pacheco
Dec 10 '18 at 13:16
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– César Pacheco
Dec 10 '18 at 13:16
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033877%2fsolution-for-linear-transformation-question-seems-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Dec 10 '18 at 12:56