Fourier and Mellin transforms of Hilbert Transform
I am reading Hilbert transform recently and meet two questions. The book I am reading is Debnath and Bhatta "Integral Transforms and Their Applications".
If we define the Hilbert transform on the real line is, for $x in mathbb{R}$,
$$H_x{f(t)}=frac{1}{pi}PVint_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt=lim_{epsilon rightarrow 0}left(int_{-infty}^{t-epsilon} +int_{t+epsilon}^inftyright)frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt,$$
where PV stands for the Cauchy principal value. Then the Fourier transform of the Hilbert transform, which can be considered as a convolution, is
$$F_k{H_x{f(t)}}=i sgn(k) F_k{f(t)},$$
where $i^2=-1$, $sgn(x)=begin{cases}
1, x>0,\
-1,x<0
end{cases}$
and $F_k{f(t)}=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}int_0^infty e^{-ikt}f(t)dt $, since $F_k{sqrt{frac{2}{pi}}left(-frac{1}{x}right)}=i sgn(k)$.
The first question, Eq.(9.4.3), if we let a complex variable $z=x+i y$, then why
$$F_k{H_z{f(t)}}=2 i e^{-ky} H(k) F_k{f(t)},$$
where $H(k)=frac{1}{2}(1+sgn(k))$. Which variable are we transforming here, $xrightarrow k$ or $zrightarrow k$?
The second question appears in the Mellin transform of the Hilbert transform. There is an integral I do not know how to solve it:
$$PVint_0^inftyfrac{x^{p-1}}{t-x}dx=pi Cot(pi p).$$
I understand we need to separate the integral or use the residue theorem to get rid of the singularity. But I cannot go further.
Thanks in advance.
fourier-transform integral-transforms mellin-transform
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:06
gouwangzhangdonggouwangzhangdong
638
add a comment |
I am reading Hilbert transform recently and meet two questions. The book I am reading is Debnath and Bhatta "Integral Transforms and Their Applications".
If we define the Hilbert transform on the real line is, for $x in mathbb{R}$,
$$H_x{f(t)}=frac{1}{pi}PVint_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt=lim_{epsilon rightarrow 0}left(int_{-infty}^{t-epsilon} +int_{t+epsilon}^inftyright)frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt,$$
where PV stands for the Cauchy principal value. Then the Fourier transform of the Hilbert transform, which can be considered as a convolution, is
$$F_k{H_x{f(t)}}=i sgn(k) F_k{f(t)},$$
where $i^2=-1$, $sgn(x)=begin{cases}
1, x>0,\
-1,x<0
end{cases}$
and $F_k{f(t)}=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}int_0^infty e^{-ikt}f(t)dt $, since $F_k{sqrt{frac{2}{pi}}left(-frac{1}{x}right)}=i sgn(k)$.
The first question, Eq.(9.4.3), if we let a complex variable $z=x+i y$, then why
$$F_k{H_z{f(t)}}=2 i e^{-ky} H(k) F_k{f(t)},$$
where $H(k)=frac{1}{2}(1+sgn(k))$. Which variable are we transforming here, $xrightarrow k$ or $zrightarrow k$?
The second question appears in the Mellin transform of the Hilbert transform. There is an integral I do not know how to solve it:
$$PVint_0^inftyfrac{x^{p-1}}{t-x}dx=pi Cot(pi p).$$
I understand we need to separate the integral or use the residue theorem to get rid of the singularity. But I cannot go further.
Thanks in advance.
fourier-transform integral-transforms mellin-transform
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:06
gouwangzhangdonggouwangzhangdong
638
For $Im(z) > 0$ let $h(z) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-z}dt$. If $f in L^1$ then for every $y$, $h(.+iy) in L^1$ and $h$ is complex analytic. Then $H(y,xi)=int_{-infty}^infty h(x+iy) e^{-2i pi xi (x+iy)} dx$ doesn't depend on $y > 0$. Proof : $H(y,xi)$ is complex analytic in $y$ and it doesn't depend on $Im(y)$, thus it is constant and it doesn't depend on $y$. Do the same with $h$ defined for $Im(z) < 0$ and conclude with $pv. frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt = frac12 lim_{y to 0} h(x+iy)+h(x-iy)$.
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:38
Sorry for my stupidness. How is your comment related to my questions?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:47
That's what you asked, the Fourier transform of $h(z+.)$
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:49
I still do not understand. So how can I use your comments to get Eq.(9.4.3)?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:55
add a comment |
I am reading Hilbert transform recently and meet two questions. The book I am reading is Debnath and Bhatta "Integral Transforms and Their Applications".
If we define the Hilbert transform on the real line is, for $x in mathbb{R}$,
$$H_x{f(t)}=frac{1}{pi}PVint_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt=lim_{epsilon rightarrow 0}left(int_{-infty}^{t-epsilon} +int_{t+epsilon}^inftyright)frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt,$$
where PV stands for the Cauchy principal value. Then the Fourier transform of the Hilbert transform, which can be considered as a convolution, is
$$F_k{H_x{f(t)}}=i sgn(k) F_k{f(t)},$$
where $i^2=-1$, $sgn(x)=begin{cases}
1, x>0,\
-1,x<0
end{cases}$
and $F_k{f(t)}=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}int_0^infty e^{-ikt}f(t)dt $, since $F_k{sqrt{frac{2}{pi}}left(-frac{1}{x}right)}=i sgn(k)$.
The first question, Eq.(9.4.3), if we let a complex variable $z=x+i y$, then why
$$F_k{H_z{f(t)}}=2 i e^{-ky} H(k) F_k{f(t)},$$
where $H(k)=frac{1}{2}(1+sgn(k))$. Which variable are we transforming here, $xrightarrow k$ or $zrightarrow k$?
The second question appears in the Mellin transform of the Hilbert transform. There is an integral I do not know how to solve it:
$$PVint_0^inftyfrac{x^{p-1}}{t-x}dx=pi Cot(pi p).$$
I understand we need to separate the integral or use the residue theorem to get rid of the singularity. But I cannot go further.
Thanks in advance.
fourier-transform integral-transforms mellin-transform
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:06
gouwangzhangdonggouwangzhangdong
638
I am reading Hilbert transform recently and meet two questions. The book I am reading is Debnath and Bhatta "Integral Transforms and Their Applications".
If we define the Hilbert transform on the real line is, for $x in mathbb{R}$,
$$H_x{f(t)}=frac{1}{pi}PVint_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt=lim_{epsilon rightarrow 0}left(int_{-infty}^{t-epsilon} +int_{t+epsilon}^inftyright)frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt,$$
where PV stands for the Cauchy principal value. Then the Fourier transform of the Hilbert transform, which can be considered as a convolution, is
$$F_k{H_x{f(t)}}=i sgn(k) F_k{f(t)},$$
where $i^2=-1$, $sgn(x)=begin{cases}
1, x>0,\
-1,x<0
end{cases}$
and $F_k{f(t)}=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}int_0^infty e^{-ikt}f(t)dt $, since $F_k{sqrt{frac{2}{pi}}left(-frac{1}{x}right)}=i sgn(k)$.
The first question, Eq.(9.4.3), if we let a complex variable $z=x+i y$, then why
$$F_k{H_z{f(t)}}=2 i e^{-ky} H(k) F_k{f(t)},$$
where $H(k)=frac{1}{2}(1+sgn(k))$. Which variable are we transforming here, $xrightarrow k$ or $zrightarrow k$?
The second question appears in the Mellin transform of the Hilbert transform. There is an integral I do not know how to solve it:
$$PVint_0^inftyfrac{x^{p-1}}{t-x}dx=pi Cot(pi p).$$
I understand we need to separate the integral or use the residue theorem to get rid of the singularity. But I cannot go further.
Thanks in advance.
fourier-transform integral-transforms mellin-transform
fourier-transform integral-transforms mellin-transform
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:06
gouwangzhangdonggouwangzhangdong
638
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:06
gouwangzhangdonggouwangzhangdong
638
edited Dec 15 '18 at 4:25
gouwangzhangdong
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:06
gouwangzhangdonggouwangzhangdong
638
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:06
gouwangzhangdonggouwangzhangdong
638
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:06
gouwangzhangdonggouwangzhangdong
638
638
For $Im(z) > 0$ let $h(z) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-z}dt$. If $f in L^1$ then for every $y$, $h(.+iy) in L^1$ and $h$ is complex analytic. Then $H(y,xi)=int_{-infty}^infty h(x+iy) e^{-2i pi xi (x+iy)} dx$ doesn't depend on $y > 0$. Proof : $H(y,xi)$ is complex analytic in $y$ and it doesn't depend on $Im(y)$, thus it is constant and it doesn't depend on $y$. Do the same with $h$ defined for $Im(z) < 0$ and conclude with $pv. frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt = frac12 lim_{y to 0} h(x+iy)+h(x-iy)$.
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:38
Sorry for my stupidness. How is your comment related to my questions?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:47
That's what you asked, the Fourier transform of $h(z+.)$
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:49
I still do not understand. So how can I use your comments to get Eq.(9.4.3)?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:55
add a comment |
For $Im(z) > 0$ let $h(z) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-z}dt$. If $f in L^1$ then for every $y$, $h(.+iy) in L^1$ and $h$ is complex analytic. Then $H(y,xi)=int_{-infty}^infty h(x+iy) e^{-2i pi xi (x+iy)} dx$ doesn't depend on $y > 0$. Proof : $H(y,xi)$ is complex analytic in $y$ and it doesn't depend on $Im(y)$, thus it is constant and it doesn't depend on $y$. Do the same with $h$ defined for $Im(z) < 0$ and conclude with $pv. frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt = frac12 lim_{y to 0} h(x+iy)+h(x-iy)$.
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:38
Sorry for my stupidness. How is your comment related to my questions?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:47
That's what you asked, the Fourier transform of $h(z+.)$
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:49
I still do not understand. So how can I use your comments to get Eq.(9.4.3)?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:55
For $Im(z) > 0$ let $h(z) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-z}dt$. If $f in L^1$ then for every $y$, $h(.+iy) in L^1$ and $h$ is complex analytic. Then $H(y,xi)=int_{-infty}^infty h(x+iy) e^{-2i pi xi (x+iy)} dx$ doesn't depend on $y > 0$. Proof : $H(y,xi)$ is complex analytic in $y$ and it doesn't depend on $Im(y)$, thus it is constant and it doesn't depend on $y$. Do the same with $h$ defined for $Im(z) < 0$ and conclude with $pv. frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt = frac12 lim_{y to 0} h(x+iy)+h(x-iy)$.
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:38
For $Im(z) > 0$ let $h(z) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-z}dt$. If $f in L^1$ then for every $y$, $h(.+iy) in L^1$ and $h$ is complex analytic. Then $H(y,xi)=int_{-infty}^infty h(x+iy) e^{-2i pi xi (x+iy)} dx$ doesn't depend on $y > 0$. Proof : $H(y,xi)$ is complex analytic in $y$ and it doesn't depend on $Im(y)$, thus it is constant and it doesn't depend on $y$. Do the same with $h$ defined for $Im(z) < 0$ and conclude with $pv. frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt = frac12 lim_{y to 0} h(x+iy)+h(x-iy)$.
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:38
Sorry for my stupidness. How is your comment related to my questions?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:47
Sorry for my stupidness. How is your comment related to my questions?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:47
That's what you asked, the Fourier transform of $h(z+.)$
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:49
That's what you asked, the Fourier transform of $h(z+.)$
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:49
I still do not understand. So how can I use your comments to get Eq.(9.4.3)?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:55
I still do not understand. So how can I use your comments to get Eq.(9.4.3)?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:55
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025030%2ffourier-and-mellin-transforms-of-hilbert-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025030%2ffourier-and-mellin-transforms-of-hilbert-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
For $Im(z) > 0$ let $h(z) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-z}dt$. If $f in L^1$ then for every $y$, $h(.+iy) in L^1$ and $h$ is complex analytic. Then $H(y,xi)=int_{-infty}^infty h(x+iy) e^{-2i pi xi (x+iy)} dx$ doesn't depend on $y > 0$. Proof : $H(y,xi)$ is complex analytic in $y$ and it doesn't depend on $Im(y)$, thus it is constant and it doesn't depend on $y$. Do the same with $h$ defined for $Im(z) < 0$ and conclude with $pv. frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{f(t)}{t-x}dt = frac12 lim_{y to 0} h(x+iy)+h(x-iy)$.
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:38
Sorry for my stupidness. How is your comment related to my questions?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:47
That's what you asked, the Fourier transform of $h(z+.)$
– reuns
Dec 4 '18 at 2:49
I still do not understand. So how can I use your comments to get Eq.(9.4.3)?
– gouwangzhangdong
Dec 4 '18 at 2:55