Question on redefinition of an expectation












0














There is a probability space $(Omega,mathrm{B},P)$. Let $Y$ be a positive random variable with $E(Y)=1$. Define $P^*(A) = int_A Y,dP.$ Show that



a. $E^*(X)=E(XY)$ for any random variable $Xgeq 0$.



b. For any $Xgeq 0$ that $$ E^*(X|Z_1,cdots,Z_n) = frac{E(XY|Z_1,cdots,Z_n)}{E(Y|Z_1,cdots,Z_n)} $$ for any random variables $Z_1,cdots,Z_n$.



My attempt:



a. $E^*(X)=int_Omega X,dP^* = int_Omega X int_{dw}Y,dP = int_Omega XY,P(dw)$.



$E(XY)=int_Omega XY,P(dw)$.



This proves part a. My question: Why do we require $X$ to be non-negative? Please provide any hints if my approach has some flaws in it.



b. I was attempting to solve this using Question on conditional expectation like chain rule, but alas, this approach seems to be wrong.



So, any hints to solve this problem will be appreciated! Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question





























    0














    There is a probability space $(Omega,mathrm{B},P)$. Let $Y$ be a positive random variable with $E(Y)=1$. Define $P^*(A) = int_A Y,dP.$ Show that



    a. $E^*(X)=E(XY)$ for any random variable $Xgeq 0$.



    b. For any $Xgeq 0$ that $$ E^*(X|Z_1,cdots,Z_n) = frac{E(XY|Z_1,cdots,Z_n)}{E(Y|Z_1,cdots,Z_n)} $$ for any random variables $Z_1,cdots,Z_n$.



    My attempt:



    a. $E^*(X)=int_Omega X,dP^* = int_Omega X int_{dw}Y,dP = int_Omega XY,P(dw)$.



    $E(XY)=int_Omega XY,P(dw)$.



    This proves part a. My question: Why do we require $X$ to be non-negative? Please provide any hints if my approach has some flaws in it.



    b. I was attempting to solve this using Question on conditional expectation like chain rule, but alas, this approach seems to be wrong.



    So, any hints to solve this problem will be appreciated! Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0







      There is a probability space $(Omega,mathrm{B},P)$. Let $Y$ be a positive random variable with $E(Y)=1$. Define $P^*(A) = int_A Y,dP.$ Show that



      a. $E^*(X)=E(XY)$ for any random variable $Xgeq 0$.



      b. For any $Xgeq 0$ that $$ E^*(X|Z_1,cdots,Z_n) = frac{E(XY|Z_1,cdots,Z_n)}{E(Y|Z_1,cdots,Z_n)} $$ for any random variables $Z_1,cdots,Z_n$.



      My attempt:



      a. $E^*(X)=int_Omega X,dP^* = int_Omega X int_{dw}Y,dP = int_Omega XY,P(dw)$.



      $E(XY)=int_Omega XY,P(dw)$.



      This proves part a. My question: Why do we require $X$ to be non-negative? Please provide any hints if my approach has some flaws in it.



      b. I was attempting to solve this using Question on conditional expectation like chain rule, but alas, this approach seems to be wrong.



      So, any hints to solve this problem will be appreciated! Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question















      There is a probability space $(Omega,mathrm{B},P)$. Let $Y$ be a positive random variable with $E(Y)=1$. Define $P^*(A) = int_A Y,dP.$ Show that



      a. $E^*(X)=E(XY)$ for any random variable $Xgeq 0$.



      b. For any $Xgeq 0$ that $$ E^*(X|Z_1,cdots,Z_n) = frac{E(XY|Z_1,cdots,Z_n)}{E(Y|Z_1,cdots,Z_n)} $$ for any random variables $Z_1,cdots,Z_n$.



      My attempt:



      a. $E^*(X)=int_Omega X,dP^* = int_Omega X int_{dw}Y,dP = int_Omega XY,P(dw)$.



      $E(XY)=int_Omega XY,P(dw)$.



      This proves part a. My question: Why do we require $X$ to be non-negative? Please provide any hints if my approach has some flaws in it.



      b. I was attempting to solve this using Question on conditional expectation like chain rule, but alas, this approach seems to be wrong.



      So, any hints to solve this problem will be appreciated! Thanks in advance.







      measure-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 4 '18 at 2:33







      Lohith-kumar

















      asked Dec 4 '18 at 0:30









      Lohith-kumarLohith-kumar

      493111




      493111






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          a. Seems just flawed. For instance, what does $dw$ even mean? Try the following. Consider $mathscr{H}_+$ the set of random variables $X geq 0$ for which $mathbf{E}^*(X) = mathbf{E}(XY).$ Then $mathscr{H}_+$ contains all indicator functions of events (by definition), is a closed under addition, positive-scalars multiplication and closed under monotone limits. Hence, $mathscr{H}_+$ contains all non-negative random variables (for we recall if $X$ is such a random variable, then $X$ equals, a.s., a monotone limit of simple positive r.v.). Now, in regards as to why $X$ has to be non-negative, it is just for the expectations to exist. You could also ask $X$ to be bounded.



          b. Consider now the sigma algebra $mathscr{X}$ generated by $Z_1, ldots, Z_n.$ By definition, $mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)$ is any random variable, measurable with respect to $mathscr{X},$ for which the following relation holds: if $mathrm{E} in mathscr{X}$ then $$intlimits_{mathrm{E}} mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}^* = intlimits_{mathrm{E}} X dmathbf{P}^*.$$
          However, by virtue of a., we know that the right hand side above equals $intlimits_mathrm{E} XY dmathbf{P}$ which, in turn, equals $$intlimits_mathrm{E} mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P} = intlimits_mathrm{E} dfrac{mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)}{mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)} mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}.$$
          Apply the result of a. to the probability space $(Omega, mathscr{X}, mathbf{P})$ using $mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)$ in lieu of $Y$ (recall $mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)) = mathbf{E}(Y)=1$ and $mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) geq 0$) to get $$intlimits_{mathrm{E}} mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}^* = intlimits_mathrm{E} dfrac{mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)}{mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)} dmathbf{P}^{**},$$ where $mathbf{P}^{**}$ is the probability measure on $mathscr{X}$ such that $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A}) = intlimits_mathrm{A} mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}$; by definition of conditional expectation, $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P}^*(mathrm{A})$ for all $mathrm{A} in mathscr{X},$ that is $mathbf{P}^{**} = mathbf{P}^*.$ This substantiates b. Q.E.D.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for such an elegant proof idea! There is a typo at the end I believe. It should be $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P^*}(mathrm{A})$ right?
            – Lohith-kumar
            Dec 4 '18 at 1:40










          • Yes. Corrected, thanks.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 1:48










          • Is it possible for you to take a look at this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/3025024/… as well? Thanks!
            – Lohith-kumar
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:09










          • Yes, modify my argument here from a.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:23






          • 1




            I am actually not sure what you mean. I am sure, however, that the argument of a. here can be modified to prove that exercise.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:29











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024935%2fquestion-on-redefinition-of-an-expectation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          a. Seems just flawed. For instance, what does $dw$ even mean? Try the following. Consider $mathscr{H}_+$ the set of random variables $X geq 0$ for which $mathbf{E}^*(X) = mathbf{E}(XY).$ Then $mathscr{H}_+$ contains all indicator functions of events (by definition), is a closed under addition, positive-scalars multiplication and closed under monotone limits. Hence, $mathscr{H}_+$ contains all non-negative random variables (for we recall if $X$ is such a random variable, then $X$ equals, a.s., a monotone limit of simple positive r.v.). Now, in regards as to why $X$ has to be non-negative, it is just for the expectations to exist. You could also ask $X$ to be bounded.



          b. Consider now the sigma algebra $mathscr{X}$ generated by $Z_1, ldots, Z_n.$ By definition, $mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)$ is any random variable, measurable with respect to $mathscr{X},$ for which the following relation holds: if $mathrm{E} in mathscr{X}$ then $$intlimits_{mathrm{E}} mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}^* = intlimits_{mathrm{E}} X dmathbf{P}^*.$$
          However, by virtue of a., we know that the right hand side above equals $intlimits_mathrm{E} XY dmathbf{P}$ which, in turn, equals $$intlimits_mathrm{E} mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P} = intlimits_mathrm{E} dfrac{mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)}{mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)} mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}.$$
          Apply the result of a. to the probability space $(Omega, mathscr{X}, mathbf{P})$ using $mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)$ in lieu of $Y$ (recall $mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)) = mathbf{E}(Y)=1$ and $mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) geq 0$) to get $$intlimits_{mathrm{E}} mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}^* = intlimits_mathrm{E} dfrac{mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)}{mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)} dmathbf{P}^{**},$$ where $mathbf{P}^{**}$ is the probability measure on $mathscr{X}$ such that $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A}) = intlimits_mathrm{A} mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}$; by definition of conditional expectation, $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P}^*(mathrm{A})$ for all $mathrm{A} in mathscr{X},$ that is $mathbf{P}^{**} = mathbf{P}^*.$ This substantiates b. Q.E.D.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for such an elegant proof idea! There is a typo at the end I believe. It should be $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P^*}(mathrm{A})$ right?
            – Lohith-kumar
            Dec 4 '18 at 1:40










          • Yes. Corrected, thanks.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 1:48










          • Is it possible for you to take a look at this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/3025024/… as well? Thanks!
            – Lohith-kumar
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:09










          • Yes, modify my argument here from a.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:23






          • 1




            I am actually not sure what you mean. I am sure, however, that the argument of a. here can be modified to prove that exercise.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:29
















          1














          a. Seems just flawed. For instance, what does $dw$ even mean? Try the following. Consider $mathscr{H}_+$ the set of random variables $X geq 0$ for which $mathbf{E}^*(X) = mathbf{E}(XY).$ Then $mathscr{H}_+$ contains all indicator functions of events (by definition), is a closed under addition, positive-scalars multiplication and closed under monotone limits. Hence, $mathscr{H}_+$ contains all non-negative random variables (for we recall if $X$ is such a random variable, then $X$ equals, a.s., a monotone limit of simple positive r.v.). Now, in regards as to why $X$ has to be non-negative, it is just for the expectations to exist. You could also ask $X$ to be bounded.



          b. Consider now the sigma algebra $mathscr{X}$ generated by $Z_1, ldots, Z_n.$ By definition, $mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)$ is any random variable, measurable with respect to $mathscr{X},$ for which the following relation holds: if $mathrm{E} in mathscr{X}$ then $$intlimits_{mathrm{E}} mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}^* = intlimits_{mathrm{E}} X dmathbf{P}^*.$$
          However, by virtue of a., we know that the right hand side above equals $intlimits_mathrm{E} XY dmathbf{P}$ which, in turn, equals $$intlimits_mathrm{E} mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P} = intlimits_mathrm{E} dfrac{mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)}{mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)} mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}.$$
          Apply the result of a. to the probability space $(Omega, mathscr{X}, mathbf{P})$ using $mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)$ in lieu of $Y$ (recall $mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)) = mathbf{E}(Y)=1$ and $mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) geq 0$) to get $$intlimits_{mathrm{E}} mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}^* = intlimits_mathrm{E} dfrac{mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)}{mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)} dmathbf{P}^{**},$$ where $mathbf{P}^{**}$ is the probability measure on $mathscr{X}$ such that $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A}) = intlimits_mathrm{A} mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}$; by definition of conditional expectation, $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P}^*(mathrm{A})$ for all $mathrm{A} in mathscr{X},$ that is $mathbf{P}^{**} = mathbf{P}^*.$ This substantiates b. Q.E.D.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for such an elegant proof idea! There is a typo at the end I believe. It should be $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P^*}(mathrm{A})$ right?
            – Lohith-kumar
            Dec 4 '18 at 1:40










          • Yes. Corrected, thanks.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 1:48










          • Is it possible for you to take a look at this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/3025024/… as well? Thanks!
            – Lohith-kumar
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:09










          • Yes, modify my argument here from a.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:23






          • 1




            I am actually not sure what you mean. I am sure, however, that the argument of a. here can be modified to prove that exercise.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:29














          1












          1








          1






          a. Seems just flawed. For instance, what does $dw$ even mean? Try the following. Consider $mathscr{H}_+$ the set of random variables $X geq 0$ for which $mathbf{E}^*(X) = mathbf{E}(XY).$ Then $mathscr{H}_+$ contains all indicator functions of events (by definition), is a closed under addition, positive-scalars multiplication and closed under monotone limits. Hence, $mathscr{H}_+$ contains all non-negative random variables (for we recall if $X$ is such a random variable, then $X$ equals, a.s., a monotone limit of simple positive r.v.). Now, in regards as to why $X$ has to be non-negative, it is just for the expectations to exist. You could also ask $X$ to be bounded.



          b. Consider now the sigma algebra $mathscr{X}$ generated by $Z_1, ldots, Z_n.$ By definition, $mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)$ is any random variable, measurable with respect to $mathscr{X},$ for which the following relation holds: if $mathrm{E} in mathscr{X}$ then $$intlimits_{mathrm{E}} mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}^* = intlimits_{mathrm{E}} X dmathbf{P}^*.$$
          However, by virtue of a., we know that the right hand side above equals $intlimits_mathrm{E} XY dmathbf{P}$ which, in turn, equals $$intlimits_mathrm{E} mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P} = intlimits_mathrm{E} dfrac{mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)}{mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)} mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}.$$
          Apply the result of a. to the probability space $(Omega, mathscr{X}, mathbf{P})$ using $mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)$ in lieu of $Y$ (recall $mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)) = mathbf{E}(Y)=1$ and $mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) geq 0$) to get $$intlimits_{mathrm{E}} mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}^* = intlimits_mathrm{E} dfrac{mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)}{mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)} dmathbf{P}^{**},$$ where $mathbf{P}^{**}$ is the probability measure on $mathscr{X}$ such that $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A}) = intlimits_mathrm{A} mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}$; by definition of conditional expectation, $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P}^*(mathrm{A})$ for all $mathrm{A} in mathscr{X},$ that is $mathbf{P}^{**} = mathbf{P}^*.$ This substantiates b. Q.E.D.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          a. Seems just flawed. For instance, what does $dw$ even mean? Try the following. Consider $mathscr{H}_+$ the set of random variables $X geq 0$ for which $mathbf{E}^*(X) = mathbf{E}(XY).$ Then $mathscr{H}_+$ contains all indicator functions of events (by definition), is a closed under addition, positive-scalars multiplication and closed under monotone limits. Hence, $mathscr{H}_+$ contains all non-negative random variables (for we recall if $X$ is such a random variable, then $X$ equals, a.s., a monotone limit of simple positive r.v.). Now, in regards as to why $X$ has to be non-negative, it is just for the expectations to exist. You could also ask $X$ to be bounded.



          b. Consider now the sigma algebra $mathscr{X}$ generated by $Z_1, ldots, Z_n.$ By definition, $mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)$ is any random variable, measurable with respect to $mathscr{X},$ for which the following relation holds: if $mathrm{E} in mathscr{X}$ then $$intlimits_{mathrm{E}} mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}^* = intlimits_{mathrm{E}} X dmathbf{P}^*.$$
          However, by virtue of a., we know that the right hand side above equals $intlimits_mathrm{E} XY dmathbf{P}$ which, in turn, equals $$intlimits_mathrm{E} mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P} = intlimits_mathrm{E} dfrac{mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)}{mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)} mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}.$$
          Apply the result of a. to the probability space $(Omega, mathscr{X}, mathbf{P})$ using $mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)$ in lieu of $Y$ (recall $mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)) = mathbf{E}(Y)=1$ and $mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) geq 0$) to get $$intlimits_{mathrm{E}} mathbf{E}^*(X mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}^* = intlimits_mathrm{E} dfrac{mathbf{E}(XY mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)}{mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n)} dmathbf{P}^{**},$$ where $mathbf{P}^{**}$ is the probability measure on $mathscr{X}$ such that $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A}) = intlimits_mathrm{A} mathbf{E}(Y mid Z_1, ldots, Z_n) dmathbf{P}$; by definition of conditional expectation, $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P}^*(mathrm{A})$ for all $mathrm{A} in mathscr{X},$ that is $mathbf{P}^{**} = mathbf{P}^*.$ This substantiates b. Q.E.D.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 4 '18 at 1:48

























          answered Dec 4 '18 at 1:08









          Will M.Will M.

          2,442314




          2,442314












          • Thanks for such an elegant proof idea! There is a typo at the end I believe. It should be $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P^*}(mathrm{A})$ right?
            – Lohith-kumar
            Dec 4 '18 at 1:40










          • Yes. Corrected, thanks.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 1:48










          • Is it possible for you to take a look at this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/3025024/… as well? Thanks!
            – Lohith-kumar
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:09










          • Yes, modify my argument here from a.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:23






          • 1




            I am actually not sure what you mean. I am sure, however, that the argument of a. here can be modified to prove that exercise.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:29


















          • Thanks for such an elegant proof idea! There is a typo at the end I believe. It should be $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P^*}(mathrm{A})$ right?
            – Lohith-kumar
            Dec 4 '18 at 1:40










          • Yes. Corrected, thanks.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 1:48










          • Is it possible for you to take a look at this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/3025024/… as well? Thanks!
            – Lohith-kumar
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:09










          • Yes, modify my argument here from a.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:23






          • 1




            I am actually not sure what you mean. I am sure, however, that the argument of a. here can be modified to prove that exercise.
            – Will M.
            Dec 4 '18 at 2:29
















          Thanks for such an elegant proof idea! There is a typo at the end I believe. It should be $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P^*}(mathrm{A})$ right?
          – Lohith-kumar
          Dec 4 '18 at 1:40




          Thanks for such an elegant proof idea! There is a typo at the end I believe. It should be $mathbf{P}^{**}(mathrm{A})=mathbf{P^*}(mathrm{A})$ right?
          – Lohith-kumar
          Dec 4 '18 at 1:40












          Yes. Corrected, thanks.
          – Will M.
          Dec 4 '18 at 1:48




          Yes. Corrected, thanks.
          – Will M.
          Dec 4 '18 at 1:48












          Is it possible for you to take a look at this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/3025024/… as well? Thanks!
          – Lohith-kumar
          Dec 4 '18 at 2:09




          Is it possible for you to take a look at this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/3025024/… as well? Thanks!
          – Lohith-kumar
          Dec 4 '18 at 2:09












          Yes, modify my argument here from a.
          – Will M.
          Dec 4 '18 at 2:23




          Yes, modify my argument here from a.
          – Will M.
          Dec 4 '18 at 2:23




          1




          1




          I am actually not sure what you mean. I am sure, however, that the argument of a. here can be modified to prove that exercise.
          – Will M.
          Dec 4 '18 at 2:29




          I am actually not sure what you mean. I am sure, however, that the argument of a. here can be modified to prove that exercise.
          – Will M.
          Dec 4 '18 at 2:29


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024935%2fquestion-on-redefinition-of-an-expectation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen