Name for this property closely related to subadditivity
A subadditive function is a function $f : A rightarrow B$ with the following property :
$$ forall x, y in A,~~~~~f(x+y) leq f(x) + f(y),$$
where both $A$ and $B$ are closed under addition.
I'm wondering if there is a name for the following closely related property :
$$ exists M > 0, forall x, y in A,~~~~~ f(x+y) leq MBig(f(x) + f(y)Big).$$
real-analysis reference-request terminology
asked Dec 3 '18 at 20:04
M.GM.G
2,2131134
add a comment |
A subadditive function is a function $f : A rightarrow B$ with the following property :
$$ forall x, y in A,~~~~~f(x+y) leq f(x) + f(y),$$
where both $A$ and $B$ are closed under addition.
I'm wondering if there is a name for the following closely related property :
$$ exists M > 0, forall x, y in A,~~~~~ f(x+y) leq MBig(f(x) + f(y)Big).$$
real-analysis reference-request terminology
asked Dec 3 '18 at 20:04
M.GM.G
2,2131134
2
This paper seems to discuss even more general versions of subadditivity.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:13
@MisterRiemann Very many thanks.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:14
Once I asked a question on terminology and I was told "What is wrong with coinage". Well, nothing, but I suffer from the impostor's syndrome and I would rather let coinage to native english speakers.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:16
3
While I agree with you on that one, I also agree with Gauss, who famously said: "What we need are notions, not notations". So as long as everyone can understand the notions that you talk about, you should not worry too much about the notation, i.e. terminology in this case.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:22
add a comment |
A subadditive function is a function $f : A rightarrow B$ with the following property :
$$ forall x, y in A,~~~~~f(x+y) leq f(x) + f(y),$$
where both $A$ and $B$ are closed under addition.
I'm wondering if there is a name for the following closely related property :
$$ exists M > 0, forall x, y in A,~~~~~ f(x+y) leq MBig(f(x) + f(y)Big).$$
real-analysis reference-request terminology
asked Dec 3 '18 at 20:04
M.GM.G
2,2131134
A subadditive function is a function $f : A rightarrow B$ with the following property :
$$ forall x, y in A,~~~~~f(x+y) leq f(x) + f(y),$$
where both $A$ and $B$ are closed under addition.
I'm wondering if there is a name for the following closely related property :
$$ exists M > 0, forall x, y in A,~~~~~ f(x+y) leq MBig(f(x) + f(y)Big).$$
real-analysis reference-request terminology
real-analysis reference-request terminology
asked Dec 3 '18 at 20:04
M.GM.G
2,2131134
asked Dec 3 '18 at 20:04
M.GM.G
2,2131134
edited Dec 3 '18 at 20:11
M.G
asked Dec 3 '18 at 20:04
M.GM.G
2,2131134
asked Dec 3 '18 at 20:04
M.GM.G
2,2131134
asked Dec 3 '18 at 20:04
M.GM.G
2,2131134
2,2131134
2
This paper seems to discuss even more general versions of subadditivity.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:13
@MisterRiemann Very many thanks.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:14
Once I asked a question on terminology and I was told "What is wrong with coinage". Well, nothing, but I suffer from the impostor's syndrome and I would rather let coinage to native english speakers.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:16
3
While I agree with you on that one, I also agree with Gauss, who famously said: "What we need are notions, not notations". So as long as everyone can understand the notions that you talk about, you should not worry too much about the notation, i.e. terminology in this case.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:22
add a comment |
2
This paper seems to discuss even more general versions of subadditivity.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:13
@MisterRiemann Very many thanks.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:14
Once I asked a question on terminology and I was told "What is wrong with coinage". Well, nothing, but I suffer from the impostor's syndrome and I would rather let coinage to native english speakers.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:16
3
While I agree with you on that one, I also agree with Gauss, who famously said: "What we need are notions, not notations". So as long as everyone can understand the notions that you talk about, you should not worry too much about the notation, i.e. terminology in this case.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:22
2
2
This paper seems to discuss even more general versions of subadditivity.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:13
This paper seems to discuss even more general versions of subadditivity.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:13
@MisterRiemann Very many thanks.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:14
@MisterRiemann Very many thanks.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:14
Once I asked a question on terminology and I was told "What is wrong with coinage". Well, nothing, but I suffer from the impostor's syndrome and I would rather let coinage to native english speakers.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:16
Once I asked a question on terminology and I was told "What is wrong with coinage". Well, nothing, but I suffer from the impostor's syndrome and I would rather let coinage to native english speakers.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:16
3
3
While I agree with you on that one, I also agree with Gauss, who famously said: "What we need are notions, not notations". So as long as everyone can understand the notions that you talk about, you should not worry too much about the notation, i.e. terminology in this case.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:22
While I agree with you on that one, I also agree with Gauss, who famously said: "What we need are notions, not notations". So as long as everyone can understand the notions that you talk about, you should not worry too much about the notation, i.e. terminology in this case.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:22
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024587%2fname-for-this-property-closely-related-to-subadditivity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024587%2fname-for-this-property-closely-related-to-subadditivity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
This paper seems to discuss even more general versions of subadditivity.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:13
@MisterRiemann Very many thanks.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:14
Once I asked a question on terminology and I was told "What is wrong with coinage". Well, nothing, but I suffer from the impostor's syndrome and I would rather let coinage to native english speakers.
– M.G
Dec 3 '18 at 20:16
3
While I agree with you on that one, I also agree with Gauss, who famously said: "What we need are notions, not notations". So as long as everyone can understand the notions that you talk about, you should not worry too much about the notation, i.e. terminology in this case.
– MisterRiemann
Dec 3 '18 at 20:22