Proving that the derivative operator on $L^p(0,1)$ has a closed graph












0












$begingroup$


Let $Tx(t) = x'(t)$ on $L_p(0,1)$, and let the domain of $T$ be only the absolutely continuous functions on $[0,1]$ whose derivatives are in $L^p(0,1)$. I need to show that this operator has a closed graph. Naturally, by the closed graph theorem, it would be sufficient to show that $T$ is a continuous operator. This seems like a standard exercise, but I can't seem to be able to do it. I don't make much progress with the definition of continuity. Is it best to try and show that $T$ is bounded?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $Tx(t) = x'(t)$ on $L_p(0,1)$, and let the domain of $T$ be only the absolutely continuous functions on $[0,1]$ whose derivatives are in $L^p(0,1)$. I need to show that this operator has a closed graph. Naturally, by the closed graph theorem, it would be sufficient to show that $T$ is a continuous operator. This seems like a standard exercise, but I can't seem to be able to do it. I don't make much progress with the definition of continuity. Is it best to try and show that $T$ is bounded?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $Tx(t) = x'(t)$ on $L_p(0,1)$, and let the domain of $T$ be only the absolutely continuous functions on $[0,1]$ whose derivatives are in $L^p(0,1)$. I need to show that this operator has a closed graph. Naturally, by the closed graph theorem, it would be sufficient to show that $T$ is a continuous operator. This seems like a standard exercise, but I can't seem to be able to do it. I don't make much progress with the definition of continuity. Is it best to try and show that $T$ is bounded?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $Tx(t) = x'(t)$ on $L_p(0,1)$, and let the domain of $T$ be only the absolutely continuous functions on $[0,1]$ whose derivatives are in $L^p(0,1)$. I need to show that this operator has a closed graph. Naturally, by the closed graph theorem, it would be sufficient to show that $T$ is a continuous operator. This seems like a standard exercise, but I can't seem to be able to do it. I don't make much progress with the definition of continuity. Is it best to try and show that $T$ is bounded?







      real-analysis functional-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 7 '18 at 3:49









      Andrews

      3831317




      3831317










      asked Dec 7 '18 at 3:31









      Wyatt GregoryWyatt Gregory

      706




      706






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I suppose you are taking $p>1$. Suppose $x_n to x$ in $L^{p}$ and $x_n' to y$ in $L^{p}$. We have to show that $x$ is absolutely continuous, $x' in L^{p}$ and $y=x'$. By absolute continuity we have $x_n(t)=x_n(0)+int_0^{t} x_n'(s) , ds$ $,,, (1)$. Let $n_k$ be a subseqeunce of the integers such that $x_{n_k}$ converges almost everywhere to $x$. Since convergence in $L^{p}$ implies convergence in $L^{1}$ we get $x(t)=a+int_0^{t} y(s), ds$ for some constant $a$. [In (1) LHS converges and the second term on RHS converges. Hence the first term must converge]. Since $y$ is integrable this last equation implies that $x$ is absolutely continuous [more precisely it can be modified on a null set to make it absolutely continuous] and $x'=y$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Maybe I’m missing something, how can the derivative be bounded (given that, e.g., $ exp(i k x)$ are in the domain) ?
            $endgroup$
            – lcv
            Dec 7 '18 at 18:12










          • $begingroup$
            $T$ is not a bounded operator. Unbounded operators can have closed graph.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:21










          • $begingroup$
            Absolutely. The OP misuses the closed graph theorem as the operator is not defined on the whole space.
            $endgroup$
            – lcv
            Dec 8 '18 at 2:14











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029426%2fproving-that-the-derivative-operator-on-lp0-1-has-a-closed-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          I suppose you are taking $p>1$. Suppose $x_n to x$ in $L^{p}$ and $x_n' to y$ in $L^{p}$. We have to show that $x$ is absolutely continuous, $x' in L^{p}$ and $y=x'$. By absolute continuity we have $x_n(t)=x_n(0)+int_0^{t} x_n'(s) , ds$ $,,, (1)$. Let $n_k$ be a subseqeunce of the integers such that $x_{n_k}$ converges almost everywhere to $x$. Since convergence in $L^{p}$ implies convergence in $L^{1}$ we get $x(t)=a+int_0^{t} y(s), ds$ for some constant $a$. [In (1) LHS converges and the second term on RHS converges. Hence the first term must converge]. Since $y$ is integrable this last equation implies that $x$ is absolutely continuous [more precisely it can be modified on a null set to make it absolutely continuous] and $x'=y$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Maybe I’m missing something, how can the derivative be bounded (given that, e.g., $ exp(i k x)$ are in the domain) ?
            $endgroup$
            – lcv
            Dec 7 '18 at 18:12










          • $begingroup$
            $T$ is not a bounded operator. Unbounded operators can have closed graph.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:21










          • $begingroup$
            Absolutely. The OP misuses the closed graph theorem as the operator is not defined on the whole space.
            $endgroup$
            – lcv
            Dec 8 '18 at 2:14
















          0












          $begingroup$

          I suppose you are taking $p>1$. Suppose $x_n to x$ in $L^{p}$ and $x_n' to y$ in $L^{p}$. We have to show that $x$ is absolutely continuous, $x' in L^{p}$ and $y=x'$. By absolute continuity we have $x_n(t)=x_n(0)+int_0^{t} x_n'(s) , ds$ $,,, (1)$. Let $n_k$ be a subseqeunce of the integers such that $x_{n_k}$ converges almost everywhere to $x$. Since convergence in $L^{p}$ implies convergence in $L^{1}$ we get $x(t)=a+int_0^{t} y(s), ds$ for some constant $a$. [In (1) LHS converges and the second term on RHS converges. Hence the first term must converge]. Since $y$ is integrable this last equation implies that $x$ is absolutely continuous [more precisely it can be modified on a null set to make it absolutely continuous] and $x'=y$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Maybe I’m missing something, how can the derivative be bounded (given that, e.g., $ exp(i k x)$ are in the domain) ?
            $endgroup$
            – lcv
            Dec 7 '18 at 18:12










          • $begingroup$
            $T$ is not a bounded operator. Unbounded operators can have closed graph.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:21










          • $begingroup$
            Absolutely. The OP misuses the closed graph theorem as the operator is not defined on the whole space.
            $endgroup$
            – lcv
            Dec 8 '18 at 2:14














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          I suppose you are taking $p>1$. Suppose $x_n to x$ in $L^{p}$ and $x_n' to y$ in $L^{p}$. We have to show that $x$ is absolutely continuous, $x' in L^{p}$ and $y=x'$. By absolute continuity we have $x_n(t)=x_n(0)+int_0^{t} x_n'(s) , ds$ $,,, (1)$. Let $n_k$ be a subseqeunce of the integers such that $x_{n_k}$ converges almost everywhere to $x$. Since convergence in $L^{p}$ implies convergence in $L^{1}$ we get $x(t)=a+int_0^{t} y(s), ds$ for some constant $a$. [In (1) LHS converges and the second term on RHS converges. Hence the first term must converge]. Since $y$ is integrable this last equation implies that $x$ is absolutely continuous [more precisely it can be modified on a null set to make it absolutely continuous] and $x'=y$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I suppose you are taking $p>1$. Suppose $x_n to x$ in $L^{p}$ and $x_n' to y$ in $L^{p}$. We have to show that $x$ is absolutely continuous, $x' in L^{p}$ and $y=x'$. By absolute continuity we have $x_n(t)=x_n(0)+int_0^{t} x_n'(s) , ds$ $,,, (1)$. Let $n_k$ be a subseqeunce of the integers such that $x_{n_k}$ converges almost everywhere to $x$. Since convergence in $L^{p}$ implies convergence in $L^{1}$ we get $x(t)=a+int_0^{t} y(s), ds$ for some constant $a$. [In (1) LHS converges and the second term on RHS converges. Hence the first term must converge]. Since $y$ is integrable this last equation implies that $x$ is absolutely continuous [more precisely it can be modified on a null set to make it absolutely continuous] and $x'=y$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 7 '18 at 5:55









          Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

          54.4k32055




          54.4k32055












          • $begingroup$
            Maybe I’m missing something, how can the derivative be bounded (given that, e.g., $ exp(i k x)$ are in the domain) ?
            $endgroup$
            – lcv
            Dec 7 '18 at 18:12










          • $begingroup$
            $T$ is not a bounded operator. Unbounded operators can have closed graph.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:21










          • $begingroup$
            Absolutely. The OP misuses the closed graph theorem as the operator is not defined on the whole space.
            $endgroup$
            – lcv
            Dec 8 '18 at 2:14


















          • $begingroup$
            Maybe I’m missing something, how can the derivative be bounded (given that, e.g., $ exp(i k x)$ are in the domain) ?
            $endgroup$
            – lcv
            Dec 7 '18 at 18:12










          • $begingroup$
            $T$ is not a bounded operator. Unbounded operators can have closed graph.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:21










          • $begingroup$
            Absolutely. The OP misuses the closed graph theorem as the operator is not defined on the whole space.
            $endgroup$
            – lcv
            Dec 8 '18 at 2:14
















          $begingroup$
          Maybe I’m missing something, how can the derivative be bounded (given that, e.g., $ exp(i k x)$ are in the domain) ?
          $endgroup$
          – lcv
          Dec 7 '18 at 18:12




          $begingroup$
          Maybe I’m missing something, how can the derivative be bounded (given that, e.g., $ exp(i k x)$ are in the domain) ?
          $endgroup$
          – lcv
          Dec 7 '18 at 18:12












          $begingroup$
          $T$ is not a bounded operator. Unbounded operators can have closed graph.
          $endgroup$
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:21




          $begingroup$
          $T$ is not a bounded operator. Unbounded operators can have closed graph.
          $endgroup$
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:21












          $begingroup$
          Absolutely. The OP misuses the closed graph theorem as the operator is not defined on the whole space.
          $endgroup$
          – lcv
          Dec 8 '18 at 2:14




          $begingroup$
          Absolutely. The OP misuses the closed graph theorem as the operator is not defined on the whole space.
          $endgroup$
          – lcv
          Dec 8 '18 at 2:14


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029426%2fproving-that-the-derivative-operator-on-lp0-1-has-a-closed-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen