Why do we use $Df$ rather than $f'$ for the derivative of a multivariable function?
$begingroup$
Is there any reason we use $Df$ for derivatives of multivariable functions but $f'$ derivatives of single variable functions despite having a definition that works for both:
$$Df(c) = f'(c) = L iff lim_{x to c} frac{f(x) - f(c) - L(x-c)}{||x-c||} = 0$$
derivatives notation math-history
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there any reason we use $Df$ for derivatives of multivariable functions but $f'$ derivatives of single variable functions despite having a definition that works for both:
$$Df(c) = f'(c) = L iff lim_{x to c} frac{f(x) - f(c) - L(x-c)}{||x-c||} = 0$$
derivatives notation math-history
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
$endgroup$
– Alfred Yerger
Dec 8 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
$endgroup$
– Stefan
Dec 8 '18 at 19:54
$begingroup$
The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
$endgroup$
– Dando18
Dec 8 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
$endgroup$
– AlexanderJ93
Dec 8 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there any reason we use $Df$ for derivatives of multivariable functions but $f'$ derivatives of single variable functions despite having a definition that works for both:
$$Df(c) = f'(c) = L iff lim_{x to c} frac{f(x) - f(c) - L(x-c)}{||x-c||} = 0$$
derivatives notation math-history
$endgroup$
Is there any reason we use $Df$ for derivatives of multivariable functions but $f'$ derivatives of single variable functions despite having a definition that works for both:
$$Df(c) = f'(c) = L iff lim_{x to c} frac{f(x) - f(c) - L(x-c)}{||x-c||} = 0$$
derivatives notation math-history
derivatives notation math-history
edited Dec 8 '18 at 20:04
Rodrigo de Azevedo
12.9k41856
12.9k41856
asked Dec 8 '18 at 19:50
StefanStefan
1886
1886
2
$begingroup$
You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
$endgroup$
– Alfred Yerger
Dec 8 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
$endgroup$
– Stefan
Dec 8 '18 at 19:54
$begingroup$
The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
$endgroup$
– Dando18
Dec 8 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
$endgroup$
– AlexanderJ93
Dec 8 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
$endgroup$
– Alfred Yerger
Dec 8 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
$endgroup$
– Stefan
Dec 8 '18 at 19:54
$begingroup$
The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
$endgroup$
– Dando18
Dec 8 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
$endgroup$
– AlexanderJ93
Dec 8 '18 at 20:14
2
2
$begingroup$
You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
$endgroup$
– Alfred Yerger
Dec 8 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
$endgroup$
– Alfred Yerger
Dec 8 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
$endgroup$
– Stefan
Dec 8 '18 at 19:54
$begingroup$
I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
$endgroup$
– Stefan
Dec 8 '18 at 19:54
$begingroup$
The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
$endgroup$
– Dando18
Dec 8 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
$endgroup$
– Dando18
Dec 8 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
$endgroup$
– AlexanderJ93
Dec 8 '18 at 20:14
$begingroup$
I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
$endgroup$
– AlexanderJ93
Dec 8 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031556%2fwhy-do-we-use-df-rather-than-f-for-the-derivative-of-a-multivariable-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031556%2fwhy-do-we-use-df-rather-than-f-for-the-derivative-of-a-multivariable-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
$endgroup$
– Alfred Yerger
Dec 8 '18 at 19:52
$begingroup$
I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
$endgroup$
– Stefan
Dec 8 '18 at 19:54
$begingroup$
The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
$endgroup$
– Dando18
Dec 8 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
$endgroup$
– AlexanderJ93
Dec 8 '18 at 20:14