Can a function be neither convex nor concave everywhere?
$begingroup$
For a simpliest example, define continuous $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ to be locally convex in neighborhood $Usubsetmathbb R$ if ${y>f(x)|xin U}$ is a convex set.
$f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ to be locally concave in $Usubsetmathbb R$ if ${y<f(x)|xin U}$ is a convex set.
Say $f$ is neither convex nor concave everywhere if $f$ is neither locally concave nor convex in all neighborhood set $Usubsetmathbb R$ and $|U|>3$. Is it possible? (I guess yes)
Say $f$ is neither convex nor concave everywhere if $f$ is neither locally concave nor convex in all measure non zero neighborhood set $Usubsetmathbb R$. Is it possible? (I guess no)
real-analysis functions continuity convex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a simpliest example, define continuous $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ to be locally convex in neighborhood $Usubsetmathbb R$ if ${y>f(x)|xin U}$ is a convex set.
$f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ to be locally concave in $Usubsetmathbb R$ if ${y<f(x)|xin U}$ is a convex set.
Say $f$ is neither convex nor concave everywhere if $f$ is neither locally concave nor convex in all neighborhood set $Usubsetmathbb R$ and $|U|>3$. Is it possible? (I guess yes)
Say $f$ is neither convex nor concave everywhere if $f$ is neither locally concave nor convex in all measure non zero neighborhood set $Usubsetmathbb R$. Is it possible? (I guess no)
real-analysis functions continuity convex-analysis
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yes in both cases. Take a look at this for an idea.
$endgroup$
– metamorphy
Dec 20 '18 at 10:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a simpliest example, define continuous $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ to be locally convex in neighborhood $Usubsetmathbb R$ if ${y>f(x)|xin U}$ is a convex set.
$f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ to be locally concave in $Usubsetmathbb R$ if ${y<f(x)|xin U}$ is a convex set.
Say $f$ is neither convex nor concave everywhere if $f$ is neither locally concave nor convex in all neighborhood set $Usubsetmathbb R$ and $|U|>3$. Is it possible? (I guess yes)
Say $f$ is neither convex nor concave everywhere if $f$ is neither locally concave nor convex in all measure non zero neighborhood set $Usubsetmathbb R$. Is it possible? (I guess no)
real-analysis functions continuity convex-analysis
$endgroup$
For a simpliest example, define continuous $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ to be locally convex in neighborhood $Usubsetmathbb R$ if ${y>f(x)|xin U}$ is a convex set.
$f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$ to be locally concave in $Usubsetmathbb R$ if ${y<f(x)|xin U}$ is a convex set.
Say $f$ is neither convex nor concave everywhere if $f$ is neither locally concave nor convex in all neighborhood set $Usubsetmathbb R$ and $|U|>3$. Is it possible? (I guess yes)
Say $f$ is neither convex nor concave everywhere if $f$ is neither locally concave nor convex in all measure non zero neighborhood set $Usubsetmathbb R$. Is it possible? (I guess no)
real-analysis functions continuity convex-analysis
real-analysis functions continuity convex-analysis
edited Dec 26 '18 at 20:29
High GPA
asked Dec 20 '18 at 10:36
High GPAHigh GPA
899420
899420
1
$begingroup$
Yes in both cases. Take a look at this for an idea.
$endgroup$
– metamorphy
Dec 20 '18 at 10:50
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Yes in both cases. Take a look at this for an idea.
$endgroup$
– metamorphy
Dec 20 '18 at 10:50
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes in both cases. Take a look at this for an idea.
$endgroup$
– metamorphy
Dec 20 '18 at 10:50
$begingroup$
Yes in both cases. Take a look at this for an idea.
$endgroup$
– metamorphy
Dec 20 '18 at 10:50
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Weierstrass function provides an example of a function that is continuous but not convex or concave in any open neighborhood.
The reason being that it has infinitely fine oscillation everywhere (since it is a fractal). It is defined by the infinite series
$$
f(x):=sum_{n=0}^infty a^n cos(b^n pi x)
$$
where $a,bin Bbb R$ satisfy certain assumptions. You can read more about it in the wikipedia link I provided.
To see why this function has such properties, we recall that if $f$ is convex/concave, then it is (locally) Lipschitz. However, Rademacher's theorem says that a Lipschitz continuous function is differentiable almost everywhere, which contradicts the fact that our $f$ is nowhere differentiable.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047391%2fcan-a-function-be-neither-convex-nor-concave-everywhere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Weierstrass function provides an example of a function that is continuous but not convex or concave in any open neighborhood.
The reason being that it has infinitely fine oscillation everywhere (since it is a fractal). It is defined by the infinite series
$$
f(x):=sum_{n=0}^infty a^n cos(b^n pi x)
$$
where $a,bin Bbb R$ satisfy certain assumptions. You can read more about it in the wikipedia link I provided.
To see why this function has such properties, we recall that if $f$ is convex/concave, then it is (locally) Lipschitz. However, Rademacher's theorem says that a Lipschitz continuous function is differentiable almost everywhere, which contradicts the fact that our $f$ is nowhere differentiable.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Weierstrass function provides an example of a function that is continuous but not convex or concave in any open neighborhood.
The reason being that it has infinitely fine oscillation everywhere (since it is a fractal). It is defined by the infinite series
$$
f(x):=sum_{n=0}^infty a^n cos(b^n pi x)
$$
where $a,bin Bbb R$ satisfy certain assumptions. You can read more about it in the wikipedia link I provided.
To see why this function has such properties, we recall that if $f$ is convex/concave, then it is (locally) Lipschitz. However, Rademacher's theorem says that a Lipschitz continuous function is differentiable almost everywhere, which contradicts the fact that our $f$ is nowhere differentiable.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Weierstrass function provides an example of a function that is continuous but not convex or concave in any open neighborhood.
The reason being that it has infinitely fine oscillation everywhere (since it is a fractal). It is defined by the infinite series
$$
f(x):=sum_{n=0}^infty a^n cos(b^n pi x)
$$
where $a,bin Bbb R$ satisfy certain assumptions. You can read more about it in the wikipedia link I provided.
To see why this function has such properties, we recall that if $f$ is convex/concave, then it is (locally) Lipschitz. However, Rademacher's theorem says that a Lipschitz continuous function is differentiable almost everywhere, which contradicts the fact that our $f$ is nowhere differentiable.
$endgroup$
The Weierstrass function provides an example of a function that is continuous but not convex or concave in any open neighborhood.
The reason being that it has infinitely fine oscillation everywhere (since it is a fractal). It is defined by the infinite series
$$
f(x):=sum_{n=0}^infty a^n cos(b^n pi x)
$$
where $a,bin Bbb R$ satisfy certain assumptions. You can read more about it in the wikipedia link I provided.
To see why this function has such properties, we recall that if $f$ is convex/concave, then it is (locally) Lipschitz. However, Rademacher's theorem says that a Lipschitz continuous function is differentiable almost everywhere, which contradicts the fact that our $f$ is nowhere differentiable.
edited Dec 20 '18 at 15:20
answered Dec 20 '18 at 10:57
BigbearZzzBigbearZzz
8,80421652
8,80421652
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047391%2fcan-a-function-be-neither-convex-nor-concave-everywhere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Yes in both cases. Take a look at this for an idea.
$endgroup$
– metamorphy
Dec 20 '18 at 10:50