Find “prime polynomials” for a user's given prime, bounds, and degree












8












$begingroup$


Very amateur programmer and first-time poster here.



The program I wrote asks the user for a prime number, a lower and upper bound, and a degree (all of these are integers). I want to generate a list of polynomials, represented by its coefficients (see example). Each polynomial $P(x)$ satisfies the following conditions:




  1. $P(x) + p$ is prime for $1 le x le p - 2$ (where $x$ is an integer), and $P(0) = 0$.


  2. Each coefficient is an integer and is confined by the user's bounds inclusively (i.e., the coefficient may equal a bound but may not be less/greater than it).


  3. The highest degree a polynomial can have is the user's given degree. (The user may choose to include just polynomials with this degree or polynomials with lower degrees in the final list).



The program then finds each polynomial with these conditions and prints a list of primes that it generates.



Example:



Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: 11 

Enter the lower bound: -3

Enter the higher bound: 3

Enter the degree of the polynomial: 3

Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: n

possible combos (including constant func):
215

################################################

poly generating finished

[[11, -2, 0, 2]]

List of primes that [11, -2, 0, 2] generates:
[11, 11, 23, 59, 131, 251, 431, 683, 1019, 1451]

There are 1 good polynomials for 11 with bounds -3 to 3 inclusive up to degree 3


Here, $[11, -2, 0, 2]$ represents $p=11$ with the polynomial $- 2x + 2x^3$.



The general idea is that we start with a polynomial where every coefficient is the lower bound, check if the polynomial is a "good" or "prime" polynomial (satisfies the first condition), and add it to the list of prime polynomials if it is. Repeat with the next polynomial (list of numbers) until every combination has been exhausted.



from math import sqrt; from itertools import count, islice
import itertools
from itertools import product


#is n prime?
def isPrime(n):
#https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4114167/checking-if-a-number-is-a-prime-number-in-python
return n > 1 and all(n%i for i in islice(count(2), int(sqrt(n)-1)))

#find P(x) using the polyList to represent the polynomial
def findSingleValue(polyList, x):

#https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18093509/how-can-i-create-functions-that-handle-polynomials
return sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



#is the polynomial prime for x <= p - 1?
def isPolyPrime(polyList, prime):
#polyValue = 0
for x in range(prime - 1):
polyValue = sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))
if not isPrime(polyValue):
return False

return True

#generate the next combo, given the previous combo
def genCombo(combo, LB, HB):
deg = len(combo)
combo = list(combo)
index = deg - 1
while index >= 0:
if combo[index] < HB:
combo[index] += 1
index = -1
elif combo[index] == HB:
combo[index] = LB
index -= 1
combo = tuple(combo)
return combo



#main function
def verifyPrime():

prime = int(input("Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: "))
LB = int(input("Enter the lower bound: "))
HB = int(input("Enter the higher bound: "))
deg = int(input("Enter the degree of the polynomial: "))
lowDegPoly= input("Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: ")

allCombosNum = (abs(HB - LB))**deg - 1



#creates list of all possible tuples that represent a poly


print("possible combos (including constant func): ")
print(allCombosNum)

goodPolyList =

combo = ()

#create the first combo - this is used as the basis to generate more combos
for x in range(deg):
combo += (LB,)



for x in range(allCombosNum):
polyList =
polyList.append(prime)
for coef in combo:
polyList.append(coef)
#now has a list of the prime and coefs; p + a1*x + a2*x^2 + ...
isGoodPoly = isPolyPrime(polyList, prime)
if isGoodPoly and not(lowDegPoly == "n" and combo[deg - 1] == 0):
goodPolyList.append(polyList)


#personal usage: keeps track of how many more combos it needs to go through
numLeft = allCombosNum - x
if (numLeft % 100000) == 0:
print(numLeft)


#create the next combo
combo = genCombo(combo, LB, HB)


print("################################################")
print("poly generating finished")
print()
print(goodPolyList)

#bonus stuff

#goes over items in the goodPolyList and shows what primes each generates

for item in goodPolyList:

primeList =
for x in range(prime - 1):
primeList.append(findSingleValue(item, x))
print()
print("List of primes that" , item, "generates: ")
print(primeList)

print()

print("There are" , len(goodPolyList) , "good polynomials for", prime ,
"with bounds" , LB , " to" , HB, "inclusive up to degree" , deg)

verifyPrime()

verifyPrime()


(As you see I've used a couple snippets of code from stackoverflow. Admittedly this is for simplicity's sake as I don't quite understand them.)



I am mostly concerned with speed since I intend to go through a very high amount of polynomials. However, since I am still very new at this, any feedback is appreciated, particularly in keeping code clean, comments/variable names -- basic stuff (but again, any feedback is fine). If it matters, this code will be for my personal use and not for any school assignment/project.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How does P(x) = 11 - 2x + 2x^3 satisfy the P(0) = 0 requirement?
    $endgroup$
    – 200_success
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:46










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I suppose I wasn't very clear on that. -2x + 2x^3 is P(x) and 11 is the prime p.
    $endgroup$
    – Gizmo
    Dec 12 '18 at 22:42
















8












$begingroup$


Very amateur programmer and first-time poster here.



The program I wrote asks the user for a prime number, a lower and upper bound, and a degree (all of these are integers). I want to generate a list of polynomials, represented by its coefficients (see example). Each polynomial $P(x)$ satisfies the following conditions:




  1. $P(x) + p$ is prime for $1 le x le p - 2$ (where $x$ is an integer), and $P(0) = 0$.


  2. Each coefficient is an integer and is confined by the user's bounds inclusively (i.e., the coefficient may equal a bound but may not be less/greater than it).


  3. The highest degree a polynomial can have is the user's given degree. (The user may choose to include just polynomials with this degree or polynomials with lower degrees in the final list).



The program then finds each polynomial with these conditions and prints a list of primes that it generates.



Example:



Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: 11 

Enter the lower bound: -3

Enter the higher bound: 3

Enter the degree of the polynomial: 3

Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: n

possible combos (including constant func):
215

################################################

poly generating finished

[[11, -2, 0, 2]]

List of primes that [11, -2, 0, 2] generates:
[11, 11, 23, 59, 131, 251, 431, 683, 1019, 1451]

There are 1 good polynomials for 11 with bounds -3 to 3 inclusive up to degree 3


Here, $[11, -2, 0, 2]$ represents $p=11$ with the polynomial $- 2x + 2x^3$.



The general idea is that we start with a polynomial where every coefficient is the lower bound, check if the polynomial is a "good" or "prime" polynomial (satisfies the first condition), and add it to the list of prime polynomials if it is. Repeat with the next polynomial (list of numbers) until every combination has been exhausted.



from math import sqrt; from itertools import count, islice
import itertools
from itertools import product


#is n prime?
def isPrime(n):
#https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4114167/checking-if-a-number-is-a-prime-number-in-python
return n > 1 and all(n%i for i in islice(count(2), int(sqrt(n)-1)))

#find P(x) using the polyList to represent the polynomial
def findSingleValue(polyList, x):

#https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18093509/how-can-i-create-functions-that-handle-polynomials
return sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



#is the polynomial prime for x <= p - 1?
def isPolyPrime(polyList, prime):
#polyValue = 0
for x in range(prime - 1):
polyValue = sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))
if not isPrime(polyValue):
return False

return True

#generate the next combo, given the previous combo
def genCombo(combo, LB, HB):
deg = len(combo)
combo = list(combo)
index = deg - 1
while index >= 0:
if combo[index] < HB:
combo[index] += 1
index = -1
elif combo[index] == HB:
combo[index] = LB
index -= 1
combo = tuple(combo)
return combo



#main function
def verifyPrime():

prime = int(input("Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: "))
LB = int(input("Enter the lower bound: "))
HB = int(input("Enter the higher bound: "))
deg = int(input("Enter the degree of the polynomial: "))
lowDegPoly= input("Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: ")

allCombosNum = (abs(HB - LB))**deg - 1



#creates list of all possible tuples that represent a poly


print("possible combos (including constant func): ")
print(allCombosNum)

goodPolyList =

combo = ()

#create the first combo - this is used as the basis to generate more combos
for x in range(deg):
combo += (LB,)



for x in range(allCombosNum):
polyList =
polyList.append(prime)
for coef in combo:
polyList.append(coef)
#now has a list of the prime and coefs; p + a1*x + a2*x^2 + ...
isGoodPoly = isPolyPrime(polyList, prime)
if isGoodPoly and not(lowDegPoly == "n" and combo[deg - 1] == 0):
goodPolyList.append(polyList)


#personal usage: keeps track of how many more combos it needs to go through
numLeft = allCombosNum - x
if (numLeft % 100000) == 0:
print(numLeft)


#create the next combo
combo = genCombo(combo, LB, HB)


print("################################################")
print("poly generating finished")
print()
print(goodPolyList)

#bonus stuff

#goes over items in the goodPolyList and shows what primes each generates

for item in goodPolyList:

primeList =
for x in range(prime - 1):
primeList.append(findSingleValue(item, x))
print()
print("List of primes that" , item, "generates: ")
print(primeList)

print()

print("There are" , len(goodPolyList) , "good polynomials for", prime ,
"with bounds" , LB , " to" , HB, "inclusive up to degree" , deg)

verifyPrime()

verifyPrime()


(As you see I've used a couple snippets of code from stackoverflow. Admittedly this is for simplicity's sake as I don't quite understand them.)



I am mostly concerned with speed since I intend to go through a very high amount of polynomials. However, since I am still very new at this, any feedback is appreciated, particularly in keeping code clean, comments/variable names -- basic stuff (but again, any feedback is fine). If it matters, this code will be for my personal use and not for any school assignment/project.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How does P(x) = 11 - 2x + 2x^3 satisfy the P(0) = 0 requirement?
    $endgroup$
    – 200_success
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:46










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I suppose I wasn't very clear on that. -2x + 2x^3 is P(x) and 11 is the prime p.
    $endgroup$
    – Gizmo
    Dec 12 '18 at 22:42














8












8








8


1



$begingroup$


Very amateur programmer and first-time poster here.



The program I wrote asks the user for a prime number, a lower and upper bound, and a degree (all of these are integers). I want to generate a list of polynomials, represented by its coefficients (see example). Each polynomial $P(x)$ satisfies the following conditions:




  1. $P(x) + p$ is prime for $1 le x le p - 2$ (where $x$ is an integer), and $P(0) = 0$.


  2. Each coefficient is an integer and is confined by the user's bounds inclusively (i.e., the coefficient may equal a bound but may not be less/greater than it).


  3. The highest degree a polynomial can have is the user's given degree. (The user may choose to include just polynomials with this degree or polynomials with lower degrees in the final list).



The program then finds each polynomial with these conditions and prints a list of primes that it generates.



Example:



Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: 11 

Enter the lower bound: -3

Enter the higher bound: 3

Enter the degree of the polynomial: 3

Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: n

possible combos (including constant func):
215

################################################

poly generating finished

[[11, -2, 0, 2]]

List of primes that [11, -2, 0, 2] generates:
[11, 11, 23, 59, 131, 251, 431, 683, 1019, 1451]

There are 1 good polynomials for 11 with bounds -3 to 3 inclusive up to degree 3


Here, $[11, -2, 0, 2]$ represents $p=11$ with the polynomial $- 2x + 2x^3$.



The general idea is that we start with a polynomial where every coefficient is the lower bound, check if the polynomial is a "good" or "prime" polynomial (satisfies the first condition), and add it to the list of prime polynomials if it is. Repeat with the next polynomial (list of numbers) until every combination has been exhausted.



from math import sqrt; from itertools import count, islice
import itertools
from itertools import product


#is n prime?
def isPrime(n):
#https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4114167/checking-if-a-number-is-a-prime-number-in-python
return n > 1 and all(n%i for i in islice(count(2), int(sqrt(n)-1)))

#find P(x) using the polyList to represent the polynomial
def findSingleValue(polyList, x):

#https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18093509/how-can-i-create-functions-that-handle-polynomials
return sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



#is the polynomial prime for x <= p - 1?
def isPolyPrime(polyList, prime):
#polyValue = 0
for x in range(prime - 1):
polyValue = sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))
if not isPrime(polyValue):
return False

return True

#generate the next combo, given the previous combo
def genCombo(combo, LB, HB):
deg = len(combo)
combo = list(combo)
index = deg - 1
while index >= 0:
if combo[index] < HB:
combo[index] += 1
index = -1
elif combo[index] == HB:
combo[index] = LB
index -= 1
combo = tuple(combo)
return combo



#main function
def verifyPrime():

prime = int(input("Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: "))
LB = int(input("Enter the lower bound: "))
HB = int(input("Enter the higher bound: "))
deg = int(input("Enter the degree of the polynomial: "))
lowDegPoly= input("Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: ")

allCombosNum = (abs(HB - LB))**deg - 1



#creates list of all possible tuples that represent a poly


print("possible combos (including constant func): ")
print(allCombosNum)

goodPolyList =

combo = ()

#create the first combo - this is used as the basis to generate more combos
for x in range(deg):
combo += (LB,)



for x in range(allCombosNum):
polyList =
polyList.append(prime)
for coef in combo:
polyList.append(coef)
#now has a list of the prime and coefs; p + a1*x + a2*x^2 + ...
isGoodPoly = isPolyPrime(polyList, prime)
if isGoodPoly and not(lowDegPoly == "n" and combo[deg - 1] == 0):
goodPolyList.append(polyList)


#personal usage: keeps track of how many more combos it needs to go through
numLeft = allCombosNum - x
if (numLeft % 100000) == 0:
print(numLeft)


#create the next combo
combo = genCombo(combo, LB, HB)


print("################################################")
print("poly generating finished")
print()
print(goodPolyList)

#bonus stuff

#goes over items in the goodPolyList and shows what primes each generates

for item in goodPolyList:

primeList =
for x in range(prime - 1):
primeList.append(findSingleValue(item, x))
print()
print("List of primes that" , item, "generates: ")
print(primeList)

print()

print("There are" , len(goodPolyList) , "good polynomials for", prime ,
"with bounds" , LB , " to" , HB, "inclusive up to degree" , deg)

verifyPrime()

verifyPrime()


(As you see I've used a couple snippets of code from stackoverflow. Admittedly this is for simplicity's sake as I don't quite understand them.)



I am mostly concerned with speed since I intend to go through a very high amount of polynomials. However, since I am still very new at this, any feedback is appreciated, particularly in keeping code clean, comments/variable names -- basic stuff (but again, any feedback is fine). If it matters, this code will be for my personal use and not for any school assignment/project.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Very amateur programmer and first-time poster here.



The program I wrote asks the user for a prime number, a lower and upper bound, and a degree (all of these are integers). I want to generate a list of polynomials, represented by its coefficients (see example). Each polynomial $P(x)$ satisfies the following conditions:




  1. $P(x) + p$ is prime for $1 le x le p - 2$ (where $x$ is an integer), and $P(0) = 0$.


  2. Each coefficient is an integer and is confined by the user's bounds inclusively (i.e., the coefficient may equal a bound but may not be less/greater than it).


  3. The highest degree a polynomial can have is the user's given degree. (The user may choose to include just polynomials with this degree or polynomials with lower degrees in the final list).



The program then finds each polynomial with these conditions and prints a list of primes that it generates.



Example:



Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: 11 

Enter the lower bound: -3

Enter the higher bound: 3

Enter the degree of the polynomial: 3

Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: n

possible combos (including constant func):
215

################################################

poly generating finished

[[11, -2, 0, 2]]

List of primes that [11, -2, 0, 2] generates:
[11, 11, 23, 59, 131, 251, 431, 683, 1019, 1451]

There are 1 good polynomials for 11 with bounds -3 to 3 inclusive up to degree 3


Here, $[11, -2, 0, 2]$ represents $p=11$ with the polynomial $- 2x + 2x^3$.



The general idea is that we start with a polynomial where every coefficient is the lower bound, check if the polynomial is a "good" or "prime" polynomial (satisfies the first condition), and add it to the list of prime polynomials if it is. Repeat with the next polynomial (list of numbers) until every combination has been exhausted.



from math import sqrt; from itertools import count, islice
import itertools
from itertools import product


#is n prime?
def isPrime(n):
#https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4114167/checking-if-a-number-is-a-prime-number-in-python
return n > 1 and all(n%i for i in islice(count(2), int(sqrt(n)-1)))

#find P(x) using the polyList to represent the polynomial
def findSingleValue(polyList, x):

#https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18093509/how-can-i-create-functions-that-handle-polynomials
return sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



#is the polynomial prime for x <= p - 1?
def isPolyPrime(polyList, prime):
#polyValue = 0
for x in range(prime - 1):
polyValue = sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))
if not isPrime(polyValue):
return False

return True

#generate the next combo, given the previous combo
def genCombo(combo, LB, HB):
deg = len(combo)
combo = list(combo)
index = deg - 1
while index >= 0:
if combo[index] < HB:
combo[index] += 1
index = -1
elif combo[index] == HB:
combo[index] = LB
index -= 1
combo = tuple(combo)
return combo



#main function
def verifyPrime():

prime = int(input("Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: "))
LB = int(input("Enter the lower bound: "))
HB = int(input("Enter the higher bound: "))
deg = int(input("Enter the degree of the polynomial: "))
lowDegPoly= input("Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: ")

allCombosNum = (abs(HB - LB))**deg - 1



#creates list of all possible tuples that represent a poly


print("possible combos (including constant func): ")
print(allCombosNum)

goodPolyList =

combo = ()

#create the first combo - this is used as the basis to generate more combos
for x in range(deg):
combo += (LB,)



for x in range(allCombosNum):
polyList =
polyList.append(prime)
for coef in combo:
polyList.append(coef)
#now has a list of the prime and coefs; p + a1*x + a2*x^2 + ...
isGoodPoly = isPolyPrime(polyList, prime)
if isGoodPoly and not(lowDegPoly == "n" and combo[deg - 1] == 0):
goodPolyList.append(polyList)


#personal usage: keeps track of how many more combos it needs to go through
numLeft = allCombosNum - x
if (numLeft % 100000) == 0:
print(numLeft)


#create the next combo
combo = genCombo(combo, LB, HB)


print("################################################")
print("poly generating finished")
print()
print(goodPolyList)

#bonus stuff

#goes over items in the goodPolyList and shows what primes each generates

for item in goodPolyList:

primeList =
for x in range(prime - 1):
primeList.append(findSingleValue(item, x))
print()
print("List of primes that" , item, "generates: ")
print(primeList)

print()

print("There are" , len(goodPolyList) , "good polynomials for", prime ,
"with bounds" , LB , " to" , HB, "inclusive up to degree" , deg)

verifyPrime()

verifyPrime()


(As you see I've used a couple snippets of code from stackoverflow. Admittedly this is for simplicity's sake as I don't quite understand them.)



I am mostly concerned with speed since I intend to go through a very high amount of polynomials. However, since I am still very new at this, any feedback is appreciated, particularly in keeping code clean, comments/variable names -- basic stuff (but again, any feedback is fine). If it matters, this code will be for my personal use and not for any school assignment/project.







python beginner time-limit-exceeded primes mathematics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 12 '18 at 23:22









200_success

129k15153415




129k15153415










asked Dec 12 '18 at 6:28









GizmoGizmo

1433




1433












  • $begingroup$
    How does P(x) = 11 - 2x + 2x^3 satisfy the P(0) = 0 requirement?
    $endgroup$
    – 200_success
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:46










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I suppose I wasn't very clear on that. -2x + 2x^3 is P(x) and 11 is the prime p.
    $endgroup$
    – Gizmo
    Dec 12 '18 at 22:42


















  • $begingroup$
    How does P(x) = 11 - 2x + 2x^3 satisfy the P(0) = 0 requirement?
    $endgroup$
    – 200_success
    Dec 12 '18 at 14:46










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I suppose I wasn't very clear on that. -2x + 2x^3 is P(x) and 11 is the prime p.
    $endgroup$
    – Gizmo
    Dec 12 '18 at 22:42
















$begingroup$
How does P(x) = 11 - 2x + 2x^3 satisfy the P(0) = 0 requirement?
$endgroup$
– 200_success
Dec 12 '18 at 14:46




$begingroup$
How does P(x) = 11 - 2x + 2x^3 satisfy the P(0) = 0 requirement?
$endgroup$
– 200_success
Dec 12 '18 at 14:46












$begingroup$
Sorry, I suppose I wasn't very clear on that. -2x + 2x^3 is P(x) and 11 is the prime p.
$endgroup$
– Gizmo
Dec 12 '18 at 22:42




$begingroup$
Sorry, I suppose I wasn't very clear on that. -2x + 2x^3 is P(x) and 11 is the prime p.
$endgroup$
– Gizmo
Dec 12 '18 at 22:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Firstly, on documentation: the standard term for the object you're searching for is prime-generating polynomial. "Prime polynomial" is often used as a synonym for "irreducible polynomial", and while there is a relationship between reducibility and generation of primes it's best to use standard terms in documentation where possible.






from math import sqrt; from itertools import count, islice
import itertools
from itertools import product



This looks a bit untidy. It's not very Pythonic to put multiple statements on a line separated by ;. The import itertools is unnecessary, because you explicitly import all of the itertools methods that you use. The two from itertools import statements can be combined into one.






#is n prime?
def isPrime(n):
#https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4114167/checking-if-a-number-is-a-prime-number-in-python
return n > 1 and all(n%i for i in islice(count(2), int(sqrt(n)-1)))



This is a reasonable way to check a single number for primality if the number isn't too large, but since you're checking lots of numbers and you mention this as a performance concern, I would suggest that you think about building a sieve of Eratosphenes for smallish numbers (up to say 10 million or 100 million) and using probabilistic primality testing for numbers larger than that. Perhaps BPSW.






#find P(x) using the polyList to represent the polynomial
def findSingleValue(polyList, x):

#https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18093509/how-can-i-create-functions-that-handle-polynomials
return sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



The name suggests a search, but it's actually an evaluation. I'd call it something like evalPoly(coeffs, x). The evaluation can be made more efficient using Horner's method, which can be written as a reduce call.



It would be worth adding a docstring to document the order of the coefficients: constant term first (a_0, ..., a_n) or last (a_n, ..., a_0).






#is the polynomial prime for x <= p - 1?
def isPolyPrime(polyList, prime):
#polyValue = 0
for x in range(prime - 1):
polyValue = sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



Why is this duplicating the contents of findSingleValue rather than calling it?




        if not isPrime(polyValue):
return False

return True



Why not use all(...)?






#generate the next combo, given the previous combo
def genCombo(combo, LB, HB):
deg = len(combo)
combo = list(combo)
index = deg - 1
while index >= 0:
if combo[index] < HB:
combo[index] += 1
index = -1
elif combo[index] == HB:
combo[index] = LB
index -= 1
combo = tuple(combo)
return combo



I'd half expect permtools to have a built-in method for this. Alternatively it can be done with (untested code) itertools.product(range(LB, HB+1), deg).






#main function
def verifyPrime():

prime = int(input("Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: "))
LB = int(input("Enter the lower bound: "))
HB = int(input("Enter the higher bound: "))
deg = int(input("Enter the degree of the polynomial: "))
lowDegPoly= input("Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: ")



This could use a refactor: one method to do the work, and then the main method just does the I/O.






    allCombosNum = (abs(HB - LB))**deg - 1



I think this has an out-by-one error.






    combo = ()

#create the first combo - this is used as the basis to generate more combos
for x in range(deg):
combo += (LB,)



My suggestion above would make this unnecessary, but... tuple(repeat(LB, deg))?






        polyList = 
polyList.append(prime)
for coef in combo:
polyList.append(coef)



I think this is polyList = [prime] + list(combo)






        #now has a list of the prime and coefs; p + a1*x + a2*x^2 + ...
isGoodPoly = isPolyPrime(polyList, prime)
if isGoodPoly and not(lowDegPoly == "n" and combo[deg - 1] == 0):
goodPolyList.append(polyList)



There's a potential performance improvement here. If lowDegPoly == "n" then it's more efficient to avoid generating and testing polynomials of lower degree.






        primeList = 
for x in range(prime - 1):
primeList.append(findSingleValue(item, x))



primeList = [findSingleValue(item, x) for x in range(prime - 1)]






    verifyPrime()

verifyPrime()



That recursive call is rather inelegant, and the direct invocation of the main method is not considered best practice. It would be better to replace these lines with



if __name__ == "__main__":
while True:
verifyPrime()





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "196"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209498%2ffind-prime-polynomials-for-a-users-given-prime-bounds-and-degree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    Firstly, on documentation: the standard term for the object you're searching for is prime-generating polynomial. "Prime polynomial" is often used as a synonym for "irreducible polynomial", and while there is a relationship between reducibility and generation of primes it's best to use standard terms in documentation where possible.






    from math import sqrt; from itertools import count, islice
    import itertools
    from itertools import product



    This looks a bit untidy. It's not very Pythonic to put multiple statements on a line separated by ;. The import itertools is unnecessary, because you explicitly import all of the itertools methods that you use. The two from itertools import statements can be combined into one.






    #is n prime?
    def isPrime(n):
    #https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4114167/checking-if-a-number-is-a-prime-number-in-python
    return n > 1 and all(n%i for i in islice(count(2), int(sqrt(n)-1)))



    This is a reasonable way to check a single number for primality if the number isn't too large, but since you're checking lots of numbers and you mention this as a performance concern, I would suggest that you think about building a sieve of Eratosphenes for smallish numbers (up to say 10 million or 100 million) and using probabilistic primality testing for numbers larger than that. Perhaps BPSW.






    #find P(x) using the polyList to represent the polynomial
    def findSingleValue(polyList, x):

    #https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18093509/how-can-i-create-functions-that-handle-polynomials
    return sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



    The name suggests a search, but it's actually an evaluation. I'd call it something like evalPoly(coeffs, x). The evaluation can be made more efficient using Horner's method, which can be written as a reduce call.



    It would be worth adding a docstring to document the order of the coefficients: constant term first (a_0, ..., a_n) or last (a_n, ..., a_0).






    #is the polynomial prime for x <= p - 1?
    def isPolyPrime(polyList, prime):
    #polyValue = 0
    for x in range(prime - 1):
    polyValue = sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



    Why is this duplicating the contents of findSingleValue rather than calling it?




            if not isPrime(polyValue):
    return False

    return True



    Why not use all(...)?






    #generate the next combo, given the previous combo
    def genCombo(combo, LB, HB):
    deg = len(combo)
    combo = list(combo)
    index = deg - 1
    while index >= 0:
    if combo[index] < HB:
    combo[index] += 1
    index = -1
    elif combo[index] == HB:
    combo[index] = LB
    index -= 1
    combo = tuple(combo)
    return combo



    I'd half expect permtools to have a built-in method for this. Alternatively it can be done with (untested code) itertools.product(range(LB, HB+1), deg).






    #main function
    def verifyPrime():

    prime = int(input("Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: "))
    LB = int(input("Enter the lower bound: "))
    HB = int(input("Enter the higher bound: "))
    deg = int(input("Enter the degree of the polynomial: "))
    lowDegPoly= input("Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: ")



    This could use a refactor: one method to do the work, and then the main method just does the I/O.






        allCombosNum = (abs(HB - LB))**deg - 1



    I think this has an out-by-one error.






        combo = ()

    #create the first combo - this is used as the basis to generate more combos
    for x in range(deg):
    combo += (LB,)



    My suggestion above would make this unnecessary, but... tuple(repeat(LB, deg))?






            polyList = 
    polyList.append(prime)
    for coef in combo:
    polyList.append(coef)



    I think this is polyList = [prime] + list(combo)






            #now has a list of the prime and coefs; p + a1*x + a2*x^2 + ...
    isGoodPoly = isPolyPrime(polyList, prime)
    if isGoodPoly and not(lowDegPoly == "n" and combo[deg - 1] == 0):
    goodPolyList.append(polyList)



    There's a potential performance improvement here. If lowDegPoly == "n" then it's more efficient to avoid generating and testing polynomials of lower degree.






            primeList = 
    for x in range(prime - 1):
    primeList.append(findSingleValue(item, x))



    primeList = [findSingleValue(item, x) for x in range(prime - 1)]






        verifyPrime()

    verifyPrime()



    That recursive call is rather inelegant, and the direct invocation of the main method is not considered best practice. It would be better to replace these lines with



    if __name__ == "__main__":
    while True:
    verifyPrime()





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      7












      $begingroup$

      Firstly, on documentation: the standard term for the object you're searching for is prime-generating polynomial. "Prime polynomial" is often used as a synonym for "irreducible polynomial", and while there is a relationship between reducibility and generation of primes it's best to use standard terms in documentation where possible.






      from math import sqrt; from itertools import count, islice
      import itertools
      from itertools import product



      This looks a bit untidy. It's not very Pythonic to put multiple statements on a line separated by ;. The import itertools is unnecessary, because you explicitly import all of the itertools methods that you use. The two from itertools import statements can be combined into one.






      #is n prime?
      def isPrime(n):
      #https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4114167/checking-if-a-number-is-a-prime-number-in-python
      return n > 1 and all(n%i for i in islice(count(2), int(sqrt(n)-1)))



      This is a reasonable way to check a single number for primality if the number isn't too large, but since you're checking lots of numbers and you mention this as a performance concern, I would suggest that you think about building a sieve of Eratosphenes for smallish numbers (up to say 10 million or 100 million) and using probabilistic primality testing for numbers larger than that. Perhaps BPSW.






      #find P(x) using the polyList to represent the polynomial
      def findSingleValue(polyList, x):

      #https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18093509/how-can-i-create-functions-that-handle-polynomials
      return sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



      The name suggests a search, but it's actually an evaluation. I'd call it something like evalPoly(coeffs, x). The evaluation can be made more efficient using Horner's method, which can be written as a reduce call.



      It would be worth adding a docstring to document the order of the coefficients: constant term first (a_0, ..., a_n) or last (a_n, ..., a_0).






      #is the polynomial prime for x <= p - 1?
      def isPolyPrime(polyList, prime):
      #polyValue = 0
      for x in range(prime - 1):
      polyValue = sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



      Why is this duplicating the contents of findSingleValue rather than calling it?




              if not isPrime(polyValue):
      return False

      return True



      Why not use all(...)?






      #generate the next combo, given the previous combo
      def genCombo(combo, LB, HB):
      deg = len(combo)
      combo = list(combo)
      index = deg - 1
      while index >= 0:
      if combo[index] < HB:
      combo[index] += 1
      index = -1
      elif combo[index] == HB:
      combo[index] = LB
      index -= 1
      combo = tuple(combo)
      return combo



      I'd half expect permtools to have a built-in method for this. Alternatively it can be done with (untested code) itertools.product(range(LB, HB+1), deg).






      #main function
      def verifyPrime():

      prime = int(input("Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: "))
      LB = int(input("Enter the lower bound: "))
      HB = int(input("Enter the higher bound: "))
      deg = int(input("Enter the degree of the polynomial: "))
      lowDegPoly= input("Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: ")



      This could use a refactor: one method to do the work, and then the main method just does the I/O.






          allCombosNum = (abs(HB - LB))**deg - 1



      I think this has an out-by-one error.






          combo = ()

      #create the first combo - this is used as the basis to generate more combos
      for x in range(deg):
      combo += (LB,)



      My suggestion above would make this unnecessary, but... tuple(repeat(LB, deg))?






              polyList = 
      polyList.append(prime)
      for coef in combo:
      polyList.append(coef)



      I think this is polyList = [prime] + list(combo)






              #now has a list of the prime and coefs; p + a1*x + a2*x^2 + ...
      isGoodPoly = isPolyPrime(polyList, prime)
      if isGoodPoly and not(lowDegPoly == "n" and combo[deg - 1] == 0):
      goodPolyList.append(polyList)



      There's a potential performance improvement here. If lowDegPoly == "n" then it's more efficient to avoid generating and testing polynomials of lower degree.






              primeList = 
      for x in range(prime - 1):
      primeList.append(findSingleValue(item, x))



      primeList = [findSingleValue(item, x) for x in range(prime - 1)]






          verifyPrime()

      verifyPrime()



      That recursive call is rather inelegant, and the direct invocation of the main method is not considered best practice. It would be better to replace these lines with



      if __name__ == "__main__":
      while True:
      verifyPrime()





      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        Firstly, on documentation: the standard term for the object you're searching for is prime-generating polynomial. "Prime polynomial" is often used as a synonym for "irreducible polynomial", and while there is a relationship between reducibility and generation of primes it's best to use standard terms in documentation where possible.






        from math import sqrt; from itertools import count, islice
        import itertools
        from itertools import product



        This looks a bit untidy. It's not very Pythonic to put multiple statements on a line separated by ;. The import itertools is unnecessary, because you explicitly import all of the itertools methods that you use. The two from itertools import statements can be combined into one.






        #is n prime?
        def isPrime(n):
        #https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4114167/checking-if-a-number-is-a-prime-number-in-python
        return n > 1 and all(n%i for i in islice(count(2), int(sqrt(n)-1)))



        This is a reasonable way to check a single number for primality if the number isn't too large, but since you're checking lots of numbers and you mention this as a performance concern, I would suggest that you think about building a sieve of Eratosphenes for smallish numbers (up to say 10 million or 100 million) and using probabilistic primality testing for numbers larger than that. Perhaps BPSW.






        #find P(x) using the polyList to represent the polynomial
        def findSingleValue(polyList, x):

        #https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18093509/how-can-i-create-functions-that-handle-polynomials
        return sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



        The name suggests a search, but it's actually an evaluation. I'd call it something like evalPoly(coeffs, x). The evaluation can be made more efficient using Horner's method, which can be written as a reduce call.



        It would be worth adding a docstring to document the order of the coefficients: constant term first (a_0, ..., a_n) or last (a_n, ..., a_0).






        #is the polynomial prime for x <= p - 1?
        def isPolyPrime(polyList, prime):
        #polyValue = 0
        for x in range(prime - 1):
        polyValue = sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



        Why is this duplicating the contents of findSingleValue rather than calling it?




                if not isPrime(polyValue):
        return False

        return True



        Why not use all(...)?






        #generate the next combo, given the previous combo
        def genCombo(combo, LB, HB):
        deg = len(combo)
        combo = list(combo)
        index = deg - 1
        while index >= 0:
        if combo[index] < HB:
        combo[index] += 1
        index = -1
        elif combo[index] == HB:
        combo[index] = LB
        index -= 1
        combo = tuple(combo)
        return combo



        I'd half expect permtools to have a built-in method for this. Alternatively it can be done with (untested code) itertools.product(range(LB, HB+1), deg).






        #main function
        def verifyPrime():

        prime = int(input("Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: "))
        LB = int(input("Enter the lower bound: "))
        HB = int(input("Enter the higher bound: "))
        deg = int(input("Enter the degree of the polynomial: "))
        lowDegPoly= input("Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: ")



        This could use a refactor: one method to do the work, and then the main method just does the I/O.






            allCombosNum = (abs(HB - LB))**deg - 1



        I think this has an out-by-one error.






            combo = ()

        #create the first combo - this is used as the basis to generate more combos
        for x in range(deg):
        combo += (LB,)



        My suggestion above would make this unnecessary, but... tuple(repeat(LB, deg))?






                polyList = 
        polyList.append(prime)
        for coef in combo:
        polyList.append(coef)



        I think this is polyList = [prime] + list(combo)






                #now has a list of the prime and coefs; p + a1*x + a2*x^2 + ...
        isGoodPoly = isPolyPrime(polyList, prime)
        if isGoodPoly and not(lowDegPoly == "n" and combo[deg - 1] == 0):
        goodPolyList.append(polyList)



        There's a potential performance improvement here. If lowDegPoly == "n" then it's more efficient to avoid generating and testing polynomials of lower degree.






                primeList = 
        for x in range(prime - 1):
        primeList.append(findSingleValue(item, x))



        primeList = [findSingleValue(item, x) for x in range(prime - 1)]






            verifyPrime()

        verifyPrime()



        That recursive call is rather inelegant, and the direct invocation of the main method is not considered best practice. It would be better to replace these lines with



        if __name__ == "__main__":
        while True:
        verifyPrime()





        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Firstly, on documentation: the standard term for the object you're searching for is prime-generating polynomial. "Prime polynomial" is often used as a synonym for "irreducible polynomial", and while there is a relationship between reducibility and generation of primes it's best to use standard terms in documentation where possible.






        from math import sqrt; from itertools import count, islice
        import itertools
        from itertools import product



        This looks a bit untidy. It's not very Pythonic to put multiple statements on a line separated by ;. The import itertools is unnecessary, because you explicitly import all of the itertools methods that you use. The two from itertools import statements can be combined into one.






        #is n prime?
        def isPrime(n):
        #https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4114167/checking-if-a-number-is-a-prime-number-in-python
        return n > 1 and all(n%i for i in islice(count(2), int(sqrt(n)-1)))



        This is a reasonable way to check a single number for primality if the number isn't too large, but since you're checking lots of numbers and you mention this as a performance concern, I would suggest that you think about building a sieve of Eratosphenes for smallish numbers (up to say 10 million or 100 million) and using probabilistic primality testing for numbers larger than that. Perhaps BPSW.






        #find P(x) using the polyList to represent the polynomial
        def findSingleValue(polyList, x):

        #https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18093509/how-can-i-create-functions-that-handle-polynomials
        return sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



        The name suggests a search, but it's actually an evaluation. I'd call it something like evalPoly(coeffs, x). The evaluation can be made more efficient using Horner's method, which can be written as a reduce call.



        It would be worth adding a docstring to document the order of the coefficients: constant term first (a_0, ..., a_n) or last (a_n, ..., a_0).






        #is the polynomial prime for x <= p - 1?
        def isPolyPrime(polyList, prime):
        #polyValue = 0
        for x in range(prime - 1):
        polyValue = sum((a*x**i for i,a in enumerate(polyList)))



        Why is this duplicating the contents of findSingleValue rather than calling it?




                if not isPrime(polyValue):
        return False

        return True



        Why not use all(...)?






        #generate the next combo, given the previous combo
        def genCombo(combo, LB, HB):
        deg = len(combo)
        combo = list(combo)
        index = deg - 1
        while index >= 0:
        if combo[index] < HB:
        combo[index] += 1
        index = -1
        elif combo[index] == HB:
        combo[index] = LB
        index -= 1
        combo = tuple(combo)
        return combo



        I'd half expect permtools to have a built-in method for this. Alternatively it can be done with (untested code) itertools.product(range(LB, HB+1), deg).






        #main function
        def verifyPrime():

        prime = int(input("Enter the prime number you want to find a poly for: "))
        LB = int(input("Enter the lower bound: "))
        HB = int(input("Enter the higher bound: "))
        deg = int(input("Enter the degree of the polynomial: "))
        lowDegPoly= input("Press n if you do not want to include lower degree polynomials: ")



        This could use a refactor: one method to do the work, and then the main method just does the I/O.






            allCombosNum = (abs(HB - LB))**deg - 1



        I think this has an out-by-one error.






            combo = ()

        #create the first combo - this is used as the basis to generate more combos
        for x in range(deg):
        combo += (LB,)



        My suggestion above would make this unnecessary, but... tuple(repeat(LB, deg))?






                polyList = 
        polyList.append(prime)
        for coef in combo:
        polyList.append(coef)



        I think this is polyList = [prime] + list(combo)






                #now has a list of the prime and coefs; p + a1*x + a2*x^2 + ...
        isGoodPoly = isPolyPrime(polyList, prime)
        if isGoodPoly and not(lowDegPoly == "n" and combo[deg - 1] == 0):
        goodPolyList.append(polyList)



        There's a potential performance improvement here. If lowDegPoly == "n" then it's more efficient to avoid generating and testing polynomials of lower degree.






                primeList = 
        for x in range(prime - 1):
        primeList.append(findSingleValue(item, x))



        primeList = [findSingleValue(item, x) for x in range(prime - 1)]






            verifyPrime()

        verifyPrime()



        That recursive call is rather inelegant, and the direct invocation of the main method is not considered best practice. It would be better to replace these lines with



        if __name__ == "__main__":
        while True:
        verifyPrime()






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 12 '18 at 9:07









        Peter TaylorPeter Taylor

        16.2k2860




        16.2k2860






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209498%2ffind-prime-polynomials-for-a-users-given-prime-bounds-and-degree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen