Connect two random users from Database
I’m trying to create an app where I need to match two random users from my Firebase Database. The problem I have is that I‘m not sure how to connect every user of the database to random pairs:
As far as I thought the user might press a button to signal that he‘s ready, so a child of his UID like 'searching' turns from false to true. By receiving a DataSnapshot the user can see if another user is searching too. Then I thought of turning the 'searching' state to false for both users and create a new UniqueID to connect them.
But like that it‘s thought pretty short, I think and would cause some problems. Can anyone give me a hint on how to organize that searching process?
firebase firebase-realtime-database
edited Nov 25 '18 at 15:18
Frank van Puffelen
240k29384411
asked Nov 25 '18 at 11:40
user9582784user9582784
355
|
show 2 more comments
I’m trying to create an app where I need to match two random users from my Firebase Database. The problem I have is that I‘m not sure how to connect every user of the database to random pairs:
As far as I thought the user might press a button to signal that he‘s ready, so a child of his UID like 'searching' turns from false to true. By receiving a DataSnapshot the user can see if another user is searching too. Then I thought of turning the 'searching' state to false for both users and create a new UniqueID to connect them.
But like that it‘s thought pretty short, I think and would cause some problems. Can anyone give me a hint on how to organize that searching process?
firebase firebase-realtime-database
edited Nov 25 '18 at 15:18
Frank van Puffelen
240k29384411
asked Nov 25 '18 at 11:40
user9582784user9582784
355
Hey @user9582784 if my answer helped you solve your problem, then do mark it as correct by clicking on tick mark V type button next to to it, and upvote it. This helps future readers of this question and I'd appreciate that too. Cheers! :)
– PradyumanDixit
Nov 27 '18 at 3:47
Yeah, I won‘t forget it, I didn‘t have enough time to spend it on that, so I‘m still checking if everything works for me, then I‘ll immediately mark it as correct! :)
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 10:12
Isn‘t it possible that two user get a snapshot at the same time and may randomly choose the same other user? I guess it‘s a quite low danger, but is there a way to avoid that?
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 20:33
In the algorithm I have told you in the answer, we follow just one thing, we find people who are searching and then just randomly get a number, from the number ofid'swe have. In random numbers, there's a possibility that two people may choose one another, but that's what it is, and nothing I think, can be done about it, also random should mean, not in our hands to control and it is that.
– PradyumanDixit
Nov 28 '18 at 4:06
Okay, that sounds right. So do you think that case would be negligible?
– user9582784
Nov 28 '18 at 19:24
|
show 2 more comments
I’m trying to create an app where I need to match two random users from my Firebase Database. The problem I have is that I‘m not sure how to connect every user of the database to random pairs:
As far as I thought the user might press a button to signal that he‘s ready, so a child of his UID like 'searching' turns from false to true. By receiving a DataSnapshot the user can see if another user is searching too. Then I thought of turning the 'searching' state to false for both users and create a new UniqueID to connect them.
But like that it‘s thought pretty short, I think and would cause some problems. Can anyone give me a hint on how to organize that searching process?
firebase firebase-realtime-database
edited Nov 25 '18 at 15:18
Frank van Puffelen
240k29384411
asked Nov 25 '18 at 11:40
user9582784user9582784
355
I’m trying to create an app where I need to match two random users from my Firebase Database. The problem I have is that I‘m not sure how to connect every user of the database to random pairs:
As far as I thought the user might press a button to signal that he‘s ready, so a child of his UID like 'searching' turns from false to true. By receiving a DataSnapshot the user can see if another user is searching too. Then I thought of turning the 'searching' state to false for both users and create a new UniqueID to connect them.
But like that it‘s thought pretty short, I think and would cause some problems. Can anyone give me a hint on how to organize that searching process?
firebase firebase-realtime-database
firebase firebase-realtime-database
edited Nov 25 '18 at 15:18
Frank van Puffelen
240k29384411
asked Nov 25 '18 at 11:40
user9582784user9582784
355
edited Nov 25 '18 at 15:18
Frank van Puffelen
240k29384411
asked Nov 25 '18 at 11:40
user9582784user9582784
355
edited Nov 25 '18 at 15:18
Frank van Puffelen
240k29384411
edited Nov 25 '18 at 15:18
Frank van Puffelen
240k29384411
edited Nov 25 '18 at 15:18
Frank van Puffelen
240k29384411
240k29384411
asked Nov 25 '18 at 11:40
user9582784user9582784
355
asked Nov 25 '18 at 11:40
user9582784user9582784
355
asked Nov 25 '18 at 11:40
user9582784user9582784
355
355
Hey @user9582784 if my answer helped you solve your problem, then do mark it as correct by clicking on tick mark V type button next to to it, and upvote it. This helps future readers of this question and I'd appreciate that too. Cheers! :)
– PradyumanDixit
Nov 27 '18 at 3:47
Yeah, I won‘t forget it, I didn‘t have enough time to spend it on that, so I‘m still checking if everything works for me, then I‘ll immediately mark it as correct! :)
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 10:12
Isn‘t it possible that two user get a snapshot at the same time and may randomly choose the same other user? I guess it‘s a quite low danger, but is there a way to avoid that?
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 20:33
In the algorithm I have told you in the answer, we follow just one thing, we find people who are searching and then just randomly get a number, from the number ofid'swe have. In random numbers, there's a possibility that two people may choose one another, but that's what it is, and nothing I think, can be done about it, also random should mean, not in our hands to control and it is that.
– PradyumanDixit
Nov 28 '18 at 4:06
Okay, that sounds right. So do you think that case would be negligible?
– user9582784
Nov 28 '18 at 19:24
|
show 2 more comments
Hey @user9582784 if my answer helped you solve your problem, then do mark it as correct by clicking on tick mark V type button next to to it, and upvote it. This helps future readers of this question and I'd appreciate that too. Cheers! :)
– PradyumanDixit
Nov 27 '18 at 3:47
Yeah, I won‘t forget it, I didn‘t have enough time to spend it on that, so I‘m still checking if everything works for me, then I‘ll immediately mark it as correct! :)
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 10:12
Isn‘t it possible that two user get a snapshot at the same time and may randomly choose the same other user? I guess it‘s a quite low danger, but is there a way to avoid that?
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 20:33
In the algorithm I have told you in the answer, we follow just one thing, we find people who are searching and then just randomly get a number, from the number ofid'swe have. In random numbers, there's a possibility that two people may choose one another, but that's what it is, and nothing I think, can be done about it, also random should mean, not in our hands to control and it is that.
– PradyumanDixit
Nov 28 '18 at 4:06
Okay, that sounds right. So do you think that case would be negligible?
– user9582784
Nov 28 '18 at 19:24
Hey @user9582784 if my answer helped you solve your problem, then do mark it as correct by clicking on tick mark V type button next to to it, and upvote it. This helps future readers of this question and I'd appreciate that too. Cheers! :)
– PradyumanDixit
Nov 27 '18 at 3:47
Hey @user9582784 if my answer helped you solve your problem, then do mark it as correct by clicking on tick mark V type button next to to it, and upvote it. This helps future readers of this question and I'd appreciate that too. Cheers! :)
– PradyumanDixit
Nov 27 '18 at 3:47
Yeah, I won‘t forget it, I didn‘t have enough time to spend it on that, so I‘m still checking if everything works for me, then I‘ll immediately mark it as correct! :)
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 10:12
Yeah, I won‘t forget it, I didn‘t have enough time to spend it on that, so I‘m still checking if everything works for me, then I‘ll immediately mark it as correct! :)
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 10:12
Isn‘t it possible that two user get a snapshot at the same time and may randomly choose the same other user? I guess it‘s a quite low danger, but is there a way to avoid that?
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 20:33
Isn‘t it possible that two user get a snapshot at the same time and may randomly choose the same other user? I guess it‘s a quite low danger, but is there a way to avoid that?
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 20:33
In the algorithm I have told you in the answer, we follow just one thing, we find people who are searching and then just randomly get a number, from the number of
id's we have. In random numbers, there's a possibility that two people may choose one another, but that's what it is, and nothing I think, can be done about it, also random should mean, not in our hands to control and it is that.– PradyumanDixit
Nov 28 '18 at 4:06
In the algorithm I have told you in the answer, we follow just one thing, we find people who are searching and then just randomly get a number, from the number of
id's we have. In random numbers, there's a possibility that two people may choose one another, but that's what it is, and nothing I think, can be done about it, also random should mean, not in our hands to control and it is that.– PradyumanDixit
Nov 28 '18 at 4:06
Okay, that sounds right. So do you think that case would be negligible?
– user9582784
Nov 28 '18 at 19:24
Okay, that sounds right. So do you think that case would be negligible?
– user9582784
Nov 28 '18 at 19:24
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Actually using a special node like searching and setting it to true and false will be a good idea.
You can use orderByChild() to order all the users with searching node set to true and get the uid of any of those users.
To make the process random you could make a call to users, take the ids given back to you, and pick one at random with a basic random number.
If after making a call to users you have 10 user ids in an array you would want to get a random number between 0-9 and then make a call to firebase with the userId.
I don't believe Firebase has any built in code for this. So this would be the best thing you can do to achieve this feature in your app.
To give a basic idea, your database structure should look something like this:
--rootNode
|
|
-- uid1
| |
| - searching
| - other Fields
|
-- uid2
.
.
.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 11:48
PradyumanDixitPradyumanDixit
2,1872820
Okay, thank you very much so far! I‘m gonna try it like this and let you know if it worked for me :)
– user9582784
Nov 25 '18 at 12:57
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53467067%2fconnect-two-random-users-from-database%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Actually using a special node like searching and setting it to true and false will be a good idea.
You can use orderByChild() to order all the users with searching node set to true and get the uid of any of those users.
To make the process random you could make a call to users, take the ids given back to you, and pick one at random with a basic random number.
If after making a call to users you have 10 user ids in an array you would want to get a random number between 0-9 and then make a call to firebase with the userId.
I don't believe Firebase has any built in code for this. So this would be the best thing you can do to achieve this feature in your app.
To give a basic idea, your database structure should look something like this:
--rootNode
|
|
-- uid1
| |
| - searching
| - other Fields
|
-- uid2
.
.
.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 11:48
PradyumanDixitPradyumanDixit
2,1872820
Okay, thank you very much so far! I‘m gonna try it like this and let you know if it worked for me :)
– user9582784
Nov 25 '18 at 12:57
add a comment |
Actually using a special node like searching and setting it to true and false will be a good idea.
You can use orderByChild() to order all the users with searching node set to true and get the uid of any of those users.
To make the process random you could make a call to users, take the ids given back to you, and pick one at random with a basic random number.
If after making a call to users you have 10 user ids in an array you would want to get a random number between 0-9 and then make a call to firebase with the userId.
I don't believe Firebase has any built in code for this. So this would be the best thing you can do to achieve this feature in your app.
To give a basic idea, your database structure should look something like this:
--rootNode
|
|
-- uid1
| |
| - searching
| - other Fields
|
-- uid2
.
.
.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 11:48
PradyumanDixitPradyumanDixit
2,1872820
Okay, thank you very much so far! I‘m gonna try it like this and let you know if it worked for me :)
– user9582784
Nov 25 '18 at 12:57
add a comment |
Actually using a special node like searching and setting it to true and false will be a good idea.
You can use orderByChild() to order all the users with searching node set to true and get the uid of any of those users.
To make the process random you could make a call to users, take the ids given back to you, and pick one at random with a basic random number.
If after making a call to users you have 10 user ids in an array you would want to get a random number between 0-9 and then make a call to firebase with the userId.
I don't believe Firebase has any built in code for this. So this would be the best thing you can do to achieve this feature in your app.
To give a basic idea, your database structure should look something like this:
--rootNode
|
|
-- uid1
| |
| - searching
| - other Fields
|
-- uid2
.
.
.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 11:48
PradyumanDixitPradyumanDixit
2,1872820
Actually using a special node like searching and setting it to true and false will be a good idea.
You can use orderByChild() to order all the users with searching node set to true and get the uid of any of those users.
To make the process random you could make a call to users, take the ids given back to you, and pick one at random with a basic random number.
If after making a call to users you have 10 user ids in an array you would want to get a random number between 0-9 and then make a call to firebase with the userId.
I don't believe Firebase has any built in code for this. So this would be the best thing you can do to achieve this feature in your app.
To give a basic idea, your database structure should look something like this:
--rootNode
|
|
-- uid1
| |
| - searching
| - other Fields
|
-- uid2
.
.
.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 11:48
PradyumanDixitPradyumanDixit
2,1872820
answered Nov 25 '18 at 11:48
PradyumanDixitPradyumanDixit
2,1872820
answered Nov 25 '18 at 11:48
PradyumanDixitPradyumanDixit
2,1872820
answered Nov 25 '18 at 11:48
PradyumanDixitPradyumanDixit
2,1872820
2,1872820
Okay, thank you very much so far! I‘m gonna try it like this and let you know if it worked for me :)
– user9582784
Nov 25 '18 at 12:57
add a comment |
Okay, thank you very much so far! I‘m gonna try it like this and let you know if it worked for me :)
– user9582784
Nov 25 '18 at 12:57
Okay, thank you very much so far! I‘m gonna try it like this and let you know if it worked for me :)
– user9582784
Nov 25 '18 at 12:57
Okay, thank you very much so far! I‘m gonna try it like this and let you know if it worked for me :)
– user9582784
Nov 25 '18 at 12:57
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53467067%2fconnect-two-random-users-from-database%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Hey @user9582784 if my answer helped you solve your problem, then do mark it as correct by clicking on tick mark V type button next to to it, and upvote it. This helps future readers of this question and I'd appreciate that too. Cheers! :)
– PradyumanDixit
Nov 27 '18 at 3:47
Yeah, I won‘t forget it, I didn‘t have enough time to spend it on that, so I‘m still checking if everything works for me, then I‘ll immediately mark it as correct! :)
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 10:12
Isn‘t it possible that two user get a snapshot at the same time and may randomly choose the same other user? I guess it‘s a quite low danger, but is there a way to avoid that?
– user9582784
Nov 27 '18 at 20:33
In the algorithm I have told you in the answer, we follow just one thing, we find people who are searching and then just randomly get a number, from the number of
id'swe have. In random numbers, there's a possibility that two people may choose one another, but that's what it is, and nothing I think, can be done about it, also random should mean, not in our hands to control and it is that.– PradyumanDixit
Nov 28 '18 at 4:06
Okay, that sounds right. So do you think that case would be negligible?
– user9582784
Nov 28 '18 at 19:24