Notation for Higher Antiderivatives?












6












$begingroup$


Higher derivative are blessed with many notations.



For example $$ f',f'',...$$ or $$ frac {dy}{dx}, frac {d^2 y}{dx^2},...$$
I have not seen any notations for higher anti-derivatives.



For example, the higher anti-derivatives of $$f(x)=2x+5$$ are $$x^2+5x+c_1, frac {x^3}{3} +frac {5}{2} x^2 + c_1x +c_2,.....$$



Are there notations for higher anti-derivatives?






integration







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I find usually if this is coming up, the boundary conditions are somehow built into the problem, so notations like $int_0^x int_0^{x'} f(x'') dx'' dx'$ become suitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Ian he said antiderivatives not integrals.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting question. For the first few antiderivatives we just repeat the $int$ symbol. In fact, latex allows us to write conveniently up to four of them using the iiiint command, like so: $iiiint$. At a certain point, of course, this becomes impractical. You could write it this way: $underbrace{intintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}$. But I wonder if there is something more compact.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    @BenW Your last example becomes prettier if you still use the multiple integrals command: $iintcdotsint$ versus $intintcdotsint$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may like one of the conventions in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus#Fractional_integrals
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:35
















6












$begingroup$


Higher derivative are blessed with many notations.



For example $$ f',f'',...$$ or $$ frac {dy}{dx}, frac {d^2 y}{dx^2},...$$
I have not seen any notations for higher anti-derivatives.



For example, the higher anti-derivatives of $$f(x)=2x+5$$ are $$x^2+5x+c_1, frac {x^3}{3} +frac {5}{2} x^2 + c_1x +c_2,.....$$



Are there notations for higher anti-derivatives?






integration







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I find usually if this is coming up, the boundary conditions are somehow built into the problem, so notations like $int_0^x int_0^{x'} f(x'') dx'' dx'$ become suitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Ian he said antiderivatives not integrals.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting question. For the first few antiderivatives we just repeat the $int$ symbol. In fact, latex allows us to write conveniently up to four of them using the iiiint command, like so: $iiiint$. At a certain point, of course, this becomes impractical. You could write it this way: $underbrace{intintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}$. But I wonder if there is something more compact.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    @BenW Your last example becomes prettier if you still use the multiple integrals command: $iintcdotsint$ versus $intintcdotsint$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may like one of the conventions in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus#Fractional_integrals
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:35














6












6








6





$begingroup$


Higher derivative are blessed with many notations.



For example $$ f',f'',...$$ or $$ frac {dy}{dx}, frac {d^2 y}{dx^2},...$$
I have not seen any notations for higher anti-derivatives.



For example, the higher anti-derivatives of $$f(x)=2x+5$$ are $$x^2+5x+c_1, frac {x^3}{3} +frac {5}{2} x^2 + c_1x +c_2,.....$$



Are there notations for higher anti-derivatives?






integration







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Higher derivative are blessed with many notations.



For example $$ f',f'',...$$ or $$ frac {dy}{dx}, frac {d^2 y}{dx^2},...$$
I have not seen any notations for higher anti-derivatives.



For example, the higher anti-derivatives of $$f(x)=2x+5$$ are $$x^2+5x+c_1, frac {x^3}{3} +frac {5}{2} x^2 + c_1x +c_2,.....$$



Are there notations for higher anti-derivatives?






integration




integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 26 '18 at 19:40







Mohammad Riazi-Kermani

















asked Dec 26 '18 at 18:19









Mohammad Riazi-KermaniMohammad Riazi-Kermani

41.6k42061




41.6k42061








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I find usually if this is coming up, the boundary conditions are somehow built into the problem, so notations like $int_0^x int_0^{x'} f(x'') dx'' dx'$ become suitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Ian he said antiderivatives not integrals.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting question. For the first few antiderivatives we just repeat the $int$ symbol. In fact, latex allows us to write conveniently up to four of them using the iiiint command, like so: $iiiint$. At a certain point, of course, this becomes impractical. You could write it this way: $underbrace{intintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}$. But I wonder if there is something more compact.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    @BenW Your last example becomes prettier if you still use the multiple integrals command: $iintcdotsint$ versus $intintcdotsint$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may like one of the conventions in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus#Fractional_integrals
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:35














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I find usually if this is coming up, the boundary conditions are somehow built into the problem, so notations like $int_0^x int_0^{x'} f(x'') dx'' dx'$ become suitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Ian he said antiderivatives not integrals.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting question. For the first few antiderivatives we just repeat the $int$ symbol. In fact, latex allows us to write conveniently up to four of them using the iiiint command, like so: $iiiint$. At a certain point, of course, this becomes impractical. You could write it this way: $underbrace{intintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}$. But I wonder if there is something more compact.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    @BenW Your last example becomes prettier if you still use the multiple integrals command: $iintcdotsint$ versus $intintcdotsint$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may like one of the conventions in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus#Fractional_integrals
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:35








1




1




$begingroup$
I find usually if this is coming up, the boundary conditions are somehow built into the problem, so notations like $int_0^x int_0^{x'} f(x'') dx'' dx'$ become suitable.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 26 '18 at 18:21




$begingroup$
I find usually if this is coming up, the boundary conditions are somehow built into the problem, so notations like $int_0^x int_0^{x'} f(x'') dx'' dx'$ become suitable.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 26 '18 at 18:21












$begingroup$
@Ian he said antiderivatives not integrals.
$endgroup$
– Ben W
Dec 26 '18 at 18:22




$begingroup$
@Ian he said antiderivatives not integrals.
$endgroup$
– Ben W
Dec 26 '18 at 18:22




1




1




$begingroup$
Interesting question. For the first few antiderivatives we just repeat the $int$ symbol. In fact, latex allows us to write conveniently up to four of them using the iiiint command, like so: $iiiint$. At a certain point, of course, this becomes impractical. You could write it this way: $underbrace{intintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}$. But I wonder if there is something more compact.
$endgroup$
– Ben W
Dec 26 '18 at 18:26




$begingroup$
Interesting question. For the first few antiderivatives we just repeat the $int$ symbol. In fact, latex allows us to write conveniently up to four of them using the iiiint command, like so: $iiiint$. At a certain point, of course, this becomes impractical. You could write it this way: $underbrace{intintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}$. But I wonder if there is something more compact.
$endgroup$
– Ben W
Dec 26 '18 at 18:26












$begingroup$
@BenW Your last example becomes prettier if you still use the multiple integrals command: $iintcdotsint$ versus $intintcdotsint$.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 26 '18 at 19:20






$begingroup$
@BenW Your last example becomes prettier if you still use the multiple integrals command: $iintcdotsint$ versus $intintcdotsint$.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 26 '18 at 19:20






1




1




$begingroup$
You may like one of the conventions in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus#Fractional_integrals
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 26 '18 at 19:35




$begingroup$
You may like one of the conventions in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus#Fractional_integrals
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 26 '18 at 19:35










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Using Lagrange's notation as detailed in the link, $$underbrace{iintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}=f^{(-n)}(x)$$ Using Newton's notation as detailed in the link, $$underbrace{iintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}=overset{n}{overset{'}{y}}$$ although it "did not become widespread because of printing difficulties."






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053174%2fnotation-for-higher-antiderivatives%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Using Lagrange's notation as detailed in the link, $$underbrace{iintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}=f^{(-n)}(x)$$ Using Newton's notation as detailed in the link, $$underbrace{iintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}=overset{n}{overset{'}{y}}$$ although it "did not become widespread because of printing difficulties."






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Using Lagrange's notation as detailed in the link, $$underbrace{iintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}=f^{(-n)}(x)$$ Using Newton's notation as detailed in the link, $$underbrace{iintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}=overset{n}{overset{'}{y}}$$ although it "did not become widespread because of printing difficulties."






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Using Lagrange's notation as detailed in the link, $$underbrace{iintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}=f^{(-n)}(x)$$ Using Newton's notation as detailed in the link, $$underbrace{iintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}=overset{n}{overset{'}{y}}$$ although it "did not become widespread because of printing difficulties."






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Using Lagrange's notation as detailed in the link, $$underbrace{iintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}=f^{(-n)}(x)$$ Using Newton's notation as detailed in the link, $$underbrace{iintcdotsint}_{ntext{ times}}=overset{n}{overset{'}{y}}$$ although it "did not become widespread because of printing difficulties."







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 26 '18 at 19:24

























        answered Dec 26 '18 at 19:15









        TheSimpliFireTheSimpliFire

        12.7k62461




        12.7k62461






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053174%2fnotation-for-higher-antiderivatives%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            To store a contact into the json file from server.js file using a class in NodeJS

            Image
            0 I have created three files -contactPresentation.js, contactService.js, contacts.json. I will run the contactService.js file. And it will navigate to contactPresentation.js file that will only choose an option to either add or display a file. If add(), then add the data into add of service file.And the data will be added to the contacts.json file . And if display(), then display the display() of service file. And the display will take the data from contacts.json file. However, i know my code is flawed. Please correct it . I am also getting an error - this.contacts.push(new ContactService(userName, contactNumber, emailId)); ^ TypeError: Cannot read property 'push' of undefined at ContactService.add (e:NodeJSProjectcontactManager2contactService.js:57:23) at new C
            Read more

            Redirect URL with Chrome Remote Debugging Android Devices

            Image
            1 How can i redirect an URL with Chrome Remote Debugging Android Devices? like Requestly Chrome extension on desktop. google-chrome debugging url redirect testing share | improve this question edited Nov 24 '18 at 8:16 sachinjain024 14.7k 23 73 129 asked Nov 23 '18 at 16:09 Momen Momen 91 10
            Read more

            Dieringhausen

            Image
            Dieringhausen Stadt Gummersbach 50.982777777778 7.5316666666667 165 Koordinaten: 50° 58′ 58″  N , 7° 31′ 54″  O Höhe: 165  (160–245)  m Einwohner: 5055  (30. Jun. 2016) Postleitzahl: 51645 Vorwahl: 02261 Lage von Dieringhausen in Gummersbach Im Hohl ca. 1927–1930 Ansicht von Südwesten bei Bünghausen Dieringhausen (im örtlichen Dialekt Dierkesen ) ist ein Ortsteil von Gummersbach im Oberbergischen Kreis, Regierungsbezirk Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen (Deutschland). Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Geographie 2 Geschichte 3 Kultur 3.1 Sehenswürdigkeiten 3.2 Regelmäßige Veranstaltungen 4 Infrastruktur und Wirtschaft 4.1 Verkehr 4.1.1 Schienen- und Busverkehr 4.1.2 Straßen 4.2 Öffentliche Einrichtungen 4.2.1 Schulen und Bildungseinrichtungen 4.2.2 Kirchliche Einrichtungen 5 Persönlichkeiten 5.1 In Dieringhausen geboren 5.2 In Dieringhausen gelebt 6 Einzelnachweise 7
            Read more