Is my understanding of limit point compactness correct with respect to $[0,1]^{omega}$ with the uniform...












3












$begingroup$


The following is an exercise problem about limit point compactness from the book "Topology" by Munkres (2nd edition).




Exercise 1 in Section 28: Give $[0,1]^{omega}$ the uniform topology. Find an infinite subset of this space that has no limit point.




Here is a solution:




Let $d$ denote the uniform metric. Choose $c in (0,1]$. Let $A = { 0, c }^{omega} subset [0,1]^{omega}$. Note that if $a$ and $b$ are distinct points in $A$ then $d(a,b) = c$. For any $x in X$ the open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$, hence $B_d(x, c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$. It follows that $x$ is not a limit point of $A$.




I am confused about the following points:





  1. The open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$.` Why is equal here possible?

  2. Why not consider the points $x in A$ and $x in X land x notin A$ separately? After all, for any point $x in X land x notin A$, we have to show that there exists a neighborhood around $x$ which does not intersect $A$ (instead of just showing that the ball $B_d(x,c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$).




Is my understanding correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    The following is an exercise problem about limit point compactness from the book "Topology" by Munkres (2nd edition).




    Exercise 1 in Section 28: Give $[0,1]^{omega}$ the uniform topology. Find an infinite subset of this space that has no limit point.




    Here is a solution:




    Let $d$ denote the uniform metric. Choose $c in (0,1]$. Let $A = { 0, c }^{omega} subset [0,1]^{omega}$. Note that if $a$ and $b$ are distinct points in $A$ then $d(a,b) = c$. For any $x in X$ the open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$, hence $B_d(x, c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$. It follows that $x$ is not a limit point of $A$.




    I am confused about the following points:





    1. The open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$.` Why is equal here possible?

    2. Why not consider the points $x in A$ and $x in X land x notin A$ separately? After all, for any point $x in X land x notin A$, we have to show that there exists a neighborhood around $x$ which does not intersect $A$ (instead of just showing that the ball $B_d(x,c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$).




    Is my understanding correct?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      The following is an exercise problem about limit point compactness from the book "Topology" by Munkres (2nd edition).




      Exercise 1 in Section 28: Give $[0,1]^{omega}$ the uniform topology. Find an infinite subset of this space that has no limit point.




      Here is a solution:




      Let $d$ denote the uniform metric. Choose $c in (0,1]$. Let $A = { 0, c }^{omega} subset [0,1]^{omega}$. Note that if $a$ and $b$ are distinct points in $A$ then $d(a,b) = c$. For any $x in X$ the open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$, hence $B_d(x, c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$. It follows that $x$ is not a limit point of $A$.




      I am confused about the following points:





      1. The open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$.` Why is equal here possible?

      2. Why not consider the points $x in A$ and $x in X land x notin A$ separately? After all, for any point $x in X land x notin A$, we have to show that there exists a neighborhood around $x$ which does not intersect $A$ (instead of just showing that the ball $B_d(x,c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$).




      Is my understanding correct?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The following is an exercise problem about limit point compactness from the book "Topology" by Munkres (2nd edition).




      Exercise 1 in Section 28: Give $[0,1]^{omega}$ the uniform topology. Find an infinite subset of this space that has no limit point.




      Here is a solution:




      Let $d$ denote the uniform metric. Choose $c in (0,1]$. Let $A = { 0, c }^{omega} subset [0,1]^{omega}$. Note that if $a$ and $b$ are distinct points in $A$ then $d(a,b) = c$. For any $x in X$ the open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$, hence $B_d(x, c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$. It follows that $x$ is not a limit point of $A$.




      I am confused about the following points:





      1. The open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$.` Why is equal here possible?

      2. Why not consider the points $x in A$ and $x in X land x notin A$ separately? After all, for any point $x in X land x notin A$, we have to show that there exists a neighborhood around $x$ which does not intersect $A$ (instead of just showing that the ball $B_d(x,c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$).




      Is my understanding correct?







      general-topology proof-verification compactness






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 21 '18 at 14:36









      Saaqib Mahmood

      7,81842480




      7,81842480










      asked Feb 18 '14 at 14:49









      hengxinhengxin

      1,5881428




      1,5881428






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$


          1. An open ball $B_epsilon(x)$ has the diameter $sup{d(y,y')mid d(y,x)<ϵ,d(y',x)<ϵ}$. Since any such pair $y,y'$ has a distance $<2ϵ$ by the triangle equality, the $sup$ can be $2ϵ$

          2. Note that $[0,1]$ is Hausdorff, so $[0,1]^omega$ is Hausdorff, too. It follows that if some neighborhood of $xin X$ contains only finitely many points of $Asetminus{x}$, then there is some neighborhood of $x$ containing none of them.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f680900%2fis-my-understanding-of-limit-point-compactness-correct-with-respect-to-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$


            1. An open ball $B_epsilon(x)$ has the diameter $sup{d(y,y')mid d(y,x)<ϵ,d(y',x)<ϵ}$. Since any such pair $y,y'$ has a distance $<2ϵ$ by the triangle equality, the $sup$ can be $2ϵ$

            2. Note that $[0,1]$ is Hausdorff, so $[0,1]^omega$ is Hausdorff, too. It follows that if some neighborhood of $xin X$ contains only finitely many points of $Asetminus{x}$, then there is some neighborhood of $x$ containing none of them.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$


              1. An open ball $B_epsilon(x)$ has the diameter $sup{d(y,y')mid d(y,x)<ϵ,d(y',x)<ϵ}$. Since any such pair $y,y'$ has a distance $<2ϵ$ by the triangle equality, the $sup$ can be $2ϵ$

              2. Note that $[0,1]$ is Hausdorff, so $[0,1]^omega$ is Hausdorff, too. It follows that if some neighborhood of $xin X$ contains only finitely many points of $Asetminus{x}$, then there is some neighborhood of $x$ containing none of them.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$


                1. An open ball $B_epsilon(x)$ has the diameter $sup{d(y,y')mid d(y,x)<ϵ,d(y',x)<ϵ}$. Since any such pair $y,y'$ has a distance $<2ϵ$ by the triangle equality, the $sup$ can be $2ϵ$

                2. Note that $[0,1]$ is Hausdorff, so $[0,1]^omega$ is Hausdorff, too. It follows that if some neighborhood of $xin X$ contains only finitely many points of $Asetminus{x}$, then there is some neighborhood of $x$ containing none of them.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$




                1. An open ball $B_epsilon(x)$ has the diameter $sup{d(y,y')mid d(y,x)<ϵ,d(y',x)<ϵ}$. Since any such pair $y,y'$ has a distance $<2ϵ$ by the triangle equality, the $sup$ can be $2ϵ$

                2. Note that $[0,1]$ is Hausdorff, so $[0,1]^omega$ is Hausdorff, too. It follows that if some neighborhood of $xin X$ contains only finitely many points of $Asetminus{x}$, then there is some neighborhood of $x$ containing none of them.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Feb 18 '14 at 15:14









                Stefan HamckeStefan Hamcke

                21.8k42879




                21.8k42879






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f680900%2fis-my-understanding-of-limit-point-compactness-correct-with-respect-to-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen