Is my understanding of limit point compactness correct with respect to $[0,1]^{omega}$ with the uniform...
$begingroup$
The following is an exercise problem about limit point compactness from the book "Topology" by Munkres (2nd edition).
Exercise 1 in Section 28: Give $[0,1]^{omega}$ the uniform topology. Find an infinite subset of this space that has no limit point.
Here is a solution:
Let $d$ denote the uniform metric. Choose $c in (0,1]$. Let $A = { 0, c }^{omega} subset [0,1]^{omega}$. Note that if $a$ and $b$ are distinct points in $A$ then $d(a,b) = c$. For any $x in X$ the open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$, hence $B_d(x, c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$. It follows that $x$ is not a limit point of $A$.
I am confused about the following points:
- The open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$.` Why is equal here possible?
- Why not consider the points $x in A$ and $x in X land x notin A$ separately? After all, for any point $x in X land x notin A$, we have to show that there exists a neighborhood around $x$ which does not intersect $A$ (instead of just showing that the ball $B_d(x,c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$).
Is my understanding correct?
general-topology proof-verification compactness
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following is an exercise problem about limit point compactness from the book "Topology" by Munkres (2nd edition).
Exercise 1 in Section 28: Give $[0,1]^{omega}$ the uniform topology. Find an infinite subset of this space that has no limit point.
Here is a solution:
Let $d$ denote the uniform metric. Choose $c in (0,1]$. Let $A = { 0, c }^{omega} subset [0,1]^{omega}$. Note that if $a$ and $b$ are distinct points in $A$ then $d(a,b) = c$. For any $x in X$ the open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$, hence $B_d(x, c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$. It follows that $x$ is not a limit point of $A$.
I am confused about the following points:
- The open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$.` Why is equal here possible?
- Why not consider the points $x in A$ and $x in X land x notin A$ separately? After all, for any point $x in X land x notin A$, we have to show that there exists a neighborhood around $x$ which does not intersect $A$ (instead of just showing that the ball $B_d(x,c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$).
Is my understanding correct?
general-topology proof-verification compactness
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following is an exercise problem about limit point compactness from the book "Topology" by Munkres (2nd edition).
Exercise 1 in Section 28: Give $[0,1]^{omega}$ the uniform topology. Find an infinite subset of this space that has no limit point.
Here is a solution:
Let $d$ denote the uniform metric. Choose $c in (0,1]$. Let $A = { 0, c }^{omega} subset [0,1]^{omega}$. Note that if $a$ and $b$ are distinct points in $A$ then $d(a,b) = c$. For any $x in X$ the open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$, hence $B_d(x, c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$. It follows that $x$ is not a limit point of $A$.
I am confused about the following points:
- The open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$.` Why is equal here possible?
- Why not consider the points $x in A$ and $x in X land x notin A$ separately? After all, for any point $x in X land x notin A$, we have to show that there exists a neighborhood around $x$ which does not intersect $A$ (instead of just showing that the ball $B_d(x,c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$).
Is my understanding correct?
general-topology proof-verification compactness
$endgroup$
The following is an exercise problem about limit point compactness from the book "Topology" by Munkres (2nd edition).
Exercise 1 in Section 28: Give $[0,1]^{omega}$ the uniform topology. Find an infinite subset of this space that has no limit point.
Here is a solution:
Let $d$ denote the uniform metric. Choose $c in (0,1]$. Let $A = { 0, c }^{omega} subset [0,1]^{omega}$. Note that if $a$ and $b$ are distinct points in $A$ then $d(a,b) = c$. For any $x in X$ the open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$, hence $B_d(x, c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$. It follows that $x$ is not a limit point of $A$.
I am confused about the following points:
- The open ball $B_d(x, c/3)$ has diameter less than or equal $2c/3$.` Why is equal here possible?
- Why not consider the points $x in A$ and $x in X land x notin A$ separately? After all, for any point $x in X land x notin A$, we have to show that there exists a neighborhood around $x$ which does not intersect $A$ (instead of just showing that the ball $B_d(x,c/3)$ cannot contain more than one point of $A$).
Is my understanding correct?
general-topology proof-verification compactness
general-topology proof-verification compactness
edited Dec 21 '18 at 14:36
Saaqib Mahmood
7,81842480
7,81842480
asked Feb 18 '14 at 14:49
hengxinhengxin
1,5881428
1,5881428
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
- An open ball $B_epsilon(x)$ has the diameter $sup{d(y,y')mid d(y,x)<ϵ,d(y',x)<ϵ}$. Since any such pair $y,y'$ has a distance $<2ϵ$ by the triangle equality, the $sup$ can be $2ϵ$
- Note that $[0,1]$ is Hausdorff, so $[0,1]^omega$ is Hausdorff, too. It follows that if some neighborhood of $xin X$ contains only finitely many points of $Asetminus{x}$, then there is some neighborhood of $x$ containing none of them.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f680900%2fis-my-understanding-of-limit-point-compactness-correct-with-respect-to-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
- An open ball $B_epsilon(x)$ has the diameter $sup{d(y,y')mid d(y,x)<ϵ,d(y',x)<ϵ}$. Since any such pair $y,y'$ has a distance $<2ϵ$ by the triangle equality, the $sup$ can be $2ϵ$
- Note that $[0,1]$ is Hausdorff, so $[0,1]^omega$ is Hausdorff, too. It follows that if some neighborhood of $xin X$ contains only finitely many points of $Asetminus{x}$, then there is some neighborhood of $x$ containing none of them.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
- An open ball $B_epsilon(x)$ has the diameter $sup{d(y,y')mid d(y,x)<ϵ,d(y',x)<ϵ}$. Since any such pair $y,y'$ has a distance $<2ϵ$ by the triangle equality, the $sup$ can be $2ϵ$
- Note that $[0,1]$ is Hausdorff, so $[0,1]^omega$ is Hausdorff, too. It follows that if some neighborhood of $xin X$ contains only finitely many points of $Asetminus{x}$, then there is some neighborhood of $x$ containing none of them.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
- An open ball $B_epsilon(x)$ has the diameter $sup{d(y,y')mid d(y,x)<ϵ,d(y',x)<ϵ}$. Since any such pair $y,y'$ has a distance $<2ϵ$ by the triangle equality, the $sup$ can be $2ϵ$
- Note that $[0,1]$ is Hausdorff, so $[0,1]^omega$ is Hausdorff, too. It follows that if some neighborhood of $xin X$ contains only finitely many points of $Asetminus{x}$, then there is some neighborhood of $x$ containing none of them.
$endgroup$
- An open ball $B_epsilon(x)$ has the diameter $sup{d(y,y')mid d(y,x)<ϵ,d(y',x)<ϵ}$. Since any such pair $y,y'$ has a distance $<2ϵ$ by the triangle equality, the $sup$ can be $2ϵ$
- Note that $[0,1]$ is Hausdorff, so $[0,1]^omega$ is Hausdorff, too. It follows that if some neighborhood of $xin X$ contains only finitely many points of $Asetminus{x}$, then there is some neighborhood of $x$ containing none of them.
answered Feb 18 '14 at 15:14
Stefan HamckeStefan Hamcke
21.8k42879
21.8k42879
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f680900%2fis-my-understanding-of-limit-point-compactness-correct-with-respect-to-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown