The Picard-Lindelöf theorem on Wikipedia












0












$begingroup$


On the Wikipedia entry of Picard-Lindelöf theorem for the local existence and uniqueness of ODE's, there is a section on the optimization of the solution's interval.



There is a lemma used in this section which says
$$
|| Gamma^m varphi_1 - Gamma^m varphi_2 || leq dfrac{L^m alpha^m}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||
$$
Please see the article for the definition of symbols above.



I can not get the $m!$ term in the denominator and believe that the lemma is wrong. Am I right?






ordinary-differential-equations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There is also a proof given in the section you cite. Have you read it? Where do you disagree?
    $endgroup$
    – martini
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:03










  • $begingroup$
    m! term should not appear in the denominator.
    $endgroup$
    – pitonist
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think one should replace the claim $$ |Gamma^m phi_1 - Gamma^m phi_2 | le frac{ L^m alpha^m}{m!}|phi_1-phi_2| $$ by $$ |Gamma^m phi_1(s) - Gamma^m phi_2(s) | le frac{ L^m}{m!}(s-t_0)^m|phi_1-phi_2| quad forall sin(t_0,t_0+a). $$ Very sloppy proof there.
    $endgroup$
    – daw
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:20
















0












$begingroup$


On the Wikipedia entry of Picard-Lindelöf theorem for the local existence and uniqueness of ODE's, there is a section on the optimization of the solution's interval.



There is a lemma used in this section which says
$$
|| Gamma^m varphi_1 - Gamma^m varphi_2 || leq dfrac{L^m alpha^m}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||
$$
Please see the article for the definition of symbols above.



I can not get the $m!$ term in the denominator and believe that the lemma is wrong. Am I right?






ordinary-differential-equations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There is also a proof given in the section you cite. Have you read it? Where do you disagree?
    $endgroup$
    – martini
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:03










  • $begingroup$
    m! term should not appear in the denominator.
    $endgroup$
    – pitonist
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think one should replace the claim $$ |Gamma^m phi_1 - Gamma^m phi_2 | le frac{ L^m alpha^m}{m!}|phi_1-phi_2| $$ by $$ |Gamma^m phi_1(s) - Gamma^m phi_2(s) | le frac{ L^m}{m!}(s-t_0)^m|phi_1-phi_2| quad forall sin(t_0,t_0+a). $$ Very sloppy proof there.
    $endgroup$
    – daw
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:20














0












0








0





$begingroup$


On the Wikipedia entry of Picard-Lindelöf theorem for the local existence and uniqueness of ODE's, there is a section on the optimization of the solution's interval.



There is a lemma used in this section which says
$$
|| Gamma^m varphi_1 - Gamma^m varphi_2 || leq dfrac{L^m alpha^m}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||
$$
Please see the article for the definition of symbols above.



I can not get the $m!$ term in the denominator and believe that the lemma is wrong. Am I right?






ordinary-differential-equations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




On the Wikipedia entry of Picard-Lindelöf theorem for the local existence and uniqueness of ODE's, there is a section on the optimization of the solution's interval.



There is a lemma used in this section which says
$$
|| Gamma^m varphi_1 - Gamma^m varphi_2 || leq dfrac{L^m alpha^m}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||
$$
Please see the article for the definition of symbols above.



I can not get the $m!$ term in the denominator and believe that the lemma is wrong. Am I right?






ordinary-differential-equations




ordinary-differential-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 30 '15 at 11:49









Jyrki Lahtonen

110k13171386




110k13171386










asked Jul 15 '14 at 9:56









pitonistpitonist

7918




7918












  • $begingroup$
    There is also a proof given in the section you cite. Have you read it? Where do you disagree?
    $endgroup$
    – martini
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:03










  • $begingroup$
    m! term should not appear in the denominator.
    $endgroup$
    – pitonist
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think one should replace the claim $$ |Gamma^m phi_1 - Gamma^m phi_2 | le frac{ L^m alpha^m}{m!}|phi_1-phi_2| $$ by $$ |Gamma^m phi_1(s) - Gamma^m phi_2(s) | le frac{ L^m}{m!}(s-t_0)^m|phi_1-phi_2| quad forall sin(t_0,t_0+a). $$ Very sloppy proof there.
    $endgroup$
    – daw
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:20


















  • $begingroup$
    There is also a proof given in the section you cite. Have you read it? Where do you disagree?
    $endgroup$
    – martini
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:03










  • $begingroup$
    m! term should not appear in the denominator.
    $endgroup$
    – pitonist
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think one should replace the claim $$ |Gamma^m phi_1 - Gamma^m phi_2 | le frac{ L^m alpha^m}{m!}|phi_1-phi_2| $$ by $$ |Gamma^m phi_1(s) - Gamma^m phi_2(s) | le frac{ L^m}{m!}(s-t_0)^m|phi_1-phi_2| quad forall sin(t_0,t_0+a). $$ Very sloppy proof there.
    $endgroup$
    – daw
    Jul 15 '14 at 10:20
















$begingroup$
There is also a proof given in the section you cite. Have you read it? Where do you disagree?
$endgroup$
– martini
Jul 15 '14 at 10:03




$begingroup$
There is also a proof given in the section you cite. Have you read it? Where do you disagree?
$endgroup$
– martini
Jul 15 '14 at 10:03












$begingroup$
m! term should not appear in the denominator.
$endgroup$
– pitonist
Jul 15 '14 at 10:07




$begingroup$
m! term should not appear in the denominator.
$endgroup$
– pitonist
Jul 15 '14 at 10:07




1




1




$begingroup$
I think one should replace the claim $$ |Gamma^m phi_1 - Gamma^m phi_2 | le frac{ L^m alpha^m}{m!}|phi_1-phi_2| $$ by $$ |Gamma^m phi_1(s) - Gamma^m phi_2(s) | le frac{ L^m}{m!}(s-t_0)^m|phi_1-phi_2| quad forall sin(t_0,t_0+a). $$ Very sloppy proof there.
$endgroup$
– daw
Jul 15 '14 at 10:20




$begingroup$
I think one should replace the claim $$ |Gamma^m phi_1 - Gamma^m phi_2 | le frac{ L^m alpha^m}{m!}|phi_1-phi_2| $$ by $$ |Gamma^m phi_1(s) - Gamma^m phi_2(s) | le frac{ L^m}{m!}(s-t_0)^m|phi_1-phi_2| quad forall sin(t_0,t_0+a). $$ Very sloppy proof there.
$endgroup$
– daw
Jul 15 '14 at 10:20










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

First, let's prove this:
$$
|| Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m} |t-t_0|^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
$$



With $m = 1$, is trivial. If the induction hypothesis is:



$$|| Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m-1} |t-t_0|^{m-1}}{(m-1)!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
$$



Then $forall t in I_a$:



begin{align}
|| Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || = left|left| GammaGamma^{m-1} varphi_1(t) - Gamma Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(t) right|right| &= left|left| int_{t_0}^{t} fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) ds right|right| \
&leq left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
end{align}
But $f$ is Lipschitz in $I_a times B_b$ in the second variable with $L$ as Lipschitz constant. Then:



begin{align}
left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
&leq
L left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) - Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right|right| ds right| \
end{align}



And by induction hypothesis:



begin{align}
left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
&leq
L left| int_{t_0}^{t} dfrac{L^{m-1} |s-t_0|^{m-1}}{(m-1)!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || ds right| \
&leq
dfrac{L^m}{(m-1)!} left| int_{t_0}^{t} |s-t_0|^{m-1} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || ds right| \
&leq
frac{L^m|t-t_0|^m}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || \
end{align}
Then the previous proposition is right, now:
begin{align}
|| Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m} |t-t_0|^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
end{align}
Then:
begin{align}
textrm{sup} left{ || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || : t in I_a right} &leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a \
|| Gamma^{m} varphi_1 - Gamma^{m} varphi_2 || &leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f867801%2fthe-picard-lindel%25c3%25b6f-theorem-on-wikipedia%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    First, let's prove this:
    $$
    || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m} |t-t_0|^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
    $$



    With $m = 1$, is trivial. If the induction hypothesis is:



    $$|| Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m-1} |t-t_0|^{m-1}}{(m-1)!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
    $$



    Then $forall t in I_a$:



    begin{align}
    || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || = left|left| GammaGamma^{m-1} varphi_1(t) - Gamma Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(t) right|right| &= left|left| int_{t_0}^{t} fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) ds right|right| \
    &leq left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
    end{align}
    But $f$ is Lipschitz in $I_a times B_b$ in the second variable with $L$ as Lipschitz constant. Then:



    begin{align}
    left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
    &leq
    L left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) - Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right|right| ds right| \
    end{align}



    And by induction hypothesis:



    begin{align}
    left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
    &leq
    L left| int_{t_0}^{t} dfrac{L^{m-1} |s-t_0|^{m-1}}{(m-1)!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || ds right| \
    &leq
    dfrac{L^m}{(m-1)!} left| int_{t_0}^{t} |s-t_0|^{m-1} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || ds right| \
    &leq
    frac{L^m|t-t_0|^m}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || \
    end{align}
    Then the previous proposition is right, now:
    begin{align}
    || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m} |t-t_0|^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
    end{align}
    Then:
    begin{align}
    textrm{sup} left{ || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || : t in I_a right} &leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a \
    || Gamma^{m} varphi_1 - Gamma^{m} varphi_2 || &leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||
    end{align}






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      First, let's prove this:
      $$
      || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m} |t-t_0|^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
      $$



      With $m = 1$, is trivial. If the induction hypothesis is:



      $$|| Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m-1} |t-t_0|^{m-1}}{(m-1)!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
      $$



      Then $forall t in I_a$:



      begin{align}
      || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || = left|left| GammaGamma^{m-1} varphi_1(t) - Gamma Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(t) right|right| &= left|left| int_{t_0}^{t} fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) ds right|right| \
      &leq left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
      end{align}
      But $f$ is Lipschitz in $I_a times B_b$ in the second variable with $L$ as Lipschitz constant. Then:



      begin{align}
      left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
      &leq
      L left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) - Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right|right| ds right| \
      end{align}



      And by induction hypothesis:



      begin{align}
      left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
      &leq
      L left| int_{t_0}^{t} dfrac{L^{m-1} |s-t_0|^{m-1}}{(m-1)!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || ds right| \
      &leq
      dfrac{L^m}{(m-1)!} left| int_{t_0}^{t} |s-t_0|^{m-1} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || ds right| \
      &leq
      frac{L^m|t-t_0|^m}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || \
      end{align}
      Then the previous proposition is right, now:
      begin{align}
      || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m} |t-t_0|^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
      end{align}
      Then:
      begin{align}
      textrm{sup} left{ || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || : t in I_a right} &leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a \
      || Gamma^{m} varphi_1 - Gamma^{m} varphi_2 || &leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||
      end{align}






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        First, let's prove this:
        $$
        || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m} |t-t_0|^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
        $$



        With $m = 1$, is trivial. If the induction hypothesis is:



        $$|| Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m-1} |t-t_0|^{m-1}}{(m-1)!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
        $$



        Then $forall t in I_a$:



        begin{align}
        || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || = left|left| GammaGamma^{m-1} varphi_1(t) - Gamma Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(t) right|right| &= left|left| int_{t_0}^{t} fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) ds right|right| \
        &leq left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
        end{align}
        But $f$ is Lipschitz in $I_a times B_b$ in the second variable with $L$ as Lipschitz constant. Then:



        begin{align}
        left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
        &leq
        L left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) - Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right|right| ds right| \
        end{align}



        And by induction hypothesis:



        begin{align}
        left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
        &leq
        L left| int_{t_0}^{t} dfrac{L^{m-1} |s-t_0|^{m-1}}{(m-1)!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || ds right| \
        &leq
        dfrac{L^m}{(m-1)!} left| int_{t_0}^{t} |s-t_0|^{m-1} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || ds right| \
        &leq
        frac{L^m|t-t_0|^m}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || \
        end{align}
        Then the previous proposition is right, now:
        begin{align}
        || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m} |t-t_0|^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
        end{align}
        Then:
        begin{align}
        textrm{sup} left{ || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || : t in I_a right} &leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a \
        || Gamma^{m} varphi_1 - Gamma^{m} varphi_2 || &leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||
        end{align}






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        First, let's prove this:
        $$
        || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m} |t-t_0|^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
        $$



        With $m = 1$, is trivial. If the induction hypothesis is:



        $$|| Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m-1} |t-t_0|^{m-1}}{(m-1)!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
        $$



        Then $forall t in I_a$:



        begin{align}
        || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || = left|left| GammaGamma^{m-1} varphi_1(t) - Gamma Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(t) right|right| &= left|left| int_{t_0}^{t} fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) ds right|right| \
        &leq left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
        end{align}
        But $f$ is Lipschitz in $I_a times B_b$ in the second variable with $L$ as Lipschitz constant. Then:



        begin{align}
        left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
        &leq
        L left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) - Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right|right| ds right| \
        end{align}



        And by induction hypothesis:



        begin{align}
        left| int_{t_0}^{t} left|left| fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_1(s) right) - fleft(s,Gamma^{m-1} varphi_2(s) right) right|right| ds right|
        &leq
        L left| int_{t_0}^{t} dfrac{L^{m-1} |s-t_0|^{m-1}}{(m-1)!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || ds right| \
        &leq
        dfrac{L^m}{(m-1)!} left| int_{t_0}^{t} |s-t_0|^{m-1} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || ds right| \
        &leq
        frac{L^m|t-t_0|^m}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || \
        end{align}
        Then the previous proposition is right, now:
        begin{align}
        || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || leq dfrac{L^{m} |t-t_0|^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 || leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a
        end{align}
        Then:
        begin{align}
        textrm{sup} left{ || Gamma^{m} varphi_1(t) - Gamma^{m} varphi_2(t) || : t in I_a right} &leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||, forall t in I_a \
        || Gamma^{m} varphi_1 - Gamma^{m} varphi_2 || &leq dfrac{L^{m} a^{m}}{m!} ||varphi_1 - varphi_2 ||
        end{align}







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 30 '18 at 7:31









        El boritoEl borito

        666216




        666216






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f867801%2fthe-picard-lindel%25c3%25b6f-theorem-on-wikipedia%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            To store a contact into the json file from server.js file using a class in NodeJS

            Image
            0 I have created three files -contactPresentation.js, contactService.js, contacts.json. I will run the contactService.js file. And it will navigate to contactPresentation.js file that will only choose an option to either add or display a file. If add(), then add the data into add of service file.And the data will be added to the contacts.json file . And if display(), then display the display() of service file. And the display will take the data from contacts.json file. However, i know my code is flawed. Please correct it . I am also getting an error - this.contacts.push(new ContactService(userName, contactNumber, emailId)); ^ TypeError: Cannot read property 'push' of undefined at ContactService.add (e:NodeJSProjectcontactManager2contactService.js:57:23) at new C
            Read more

            Redirect URL with Chrome Remote Debugging Android Devices

            Image
            1 How can i redirect an URL with Chrome Remote Debugging Android Devices? like Requestly Chrome extension on desktop. google-chrome debugging url redirect testing share | improve this question edited Nov 24 '18 at 8:16 sachinjain024 14.7k 23 73 129 asked Nov 23 '18 at 16:09 Momen Momen 91 10
            Read more

            Dieringhausen

            Image
            Dieringhausen Stadt Gummersbach 50.982777777778 7.5316666666667 165 Koordinaten: 50° 58′ 58″  N , 7° 31′ 54″  O Höhe: 165  (160–245)  m Einwohner: 5055  (30. Jun. 2016) Postleitzahl: 51645 Vorwahl: 02261 Lage von Dieringhausen in Gummersbach Im Hohl ca. 1927–1930 Ansicht von Südwesten bei Bünghausen Dieringhausen (im örtlichen Dialekt Dierkesen ) ist ein Ortsteil von Gummersbach im Oberbergischen Kreis, Regierungsbezirk Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen (Deutschland). Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Geographie 2 Geschichte 3 Kultur 3.1 Sehenswürdigkeiten 3.2 Regelmäßige Veranstaltungen 4 Infrastruktur und Wirtschaft 4.1 Verkehr 4.1.1 Schienen- und Busverkehr 4.1.2 Straßen 4.2 Öffentliche Einrichtungen 4.2.1 Schulen und Bildungseinrichtungen 4.2.2 Kirchliche Einrichtungen 5 Persönlichkeiten 5.1 In Dieringhausen geboren 5.2 In Dieringhausen gelebt 6 Einzelnachweise 7
            Read more