Uniform Cauchy and convergence clarification.
$begingroup$
I have a doubt in the definition of uniform Cauchy sequence of functions in the domain $A$.
We say that the sequence $(f_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ is uniformly Cauchy when for any positive $epsilon$ we have a $n_1inmathbb{N}$ such that $forall n,minmathbb{N}$ with $n,m>n_1$, $forall xin A$ it has $|f_n(x)-f_m(x)|<epsilon$.
My doubt is whether it is possible to use to different values from the domain in this definition. That is "... $forall x,yin A, |f_n(x)-f_m(y)|<epsilon$ "..
Furthermore I have the same problem for uniform convergence too.
real-analysis uniform-convergence
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a doubt in the definition of uniform Cauchy sequence of functions in the domain $A$.
We say that the sequence $(f_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ is uniformly Cauchy when for any positive $epsilon$ we have a $n_1inmathbb{N}$ such that $forall n,minmathbb{N}$ with $n,m>n_1$, $forall xin A$ it has $|f_n(x)-f_m(x)|<epsilon$.
My doubt is whether it is possible to use to different values from the domain in this definition. That is "... $forall x,yin A, |f_n(x)-f_m(y)|<epsilon$ "..
Furthermore I have the same problem for uniform convergence too.
real-analysis uniform-convergence
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a doubt in the definition of uniform Cauchy sequence of functions in the domain $A$.
We say that the sequence $(f_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ is uniformly Cauchy when for any positive $epsilon$ we have a $n_1inmathbb{N}$ such that $forall n,minmathbb{N}$ with $n,m>n_1$, $forall xin A$ it has $|f_n(x)-f_m(x)|<epsilon$.
My doubt is whether it is possible to use to different values from the domain in this definition. That is "... $forall x,yin A, |f_n(x)-f_m(y)|<epsilon$ "..
Furthermore I have the same problem for uniform convergence too.
real-analysis uniform-convergence
$endgroup$
I have a doubt in the definition of uniform Cauchy sequence of functions in the domain $A$.
We say that the sequence $(f_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ is uniformly Cauchy when for any positive $epsilon$ we have a $n_1inmathbb{N}$ such that $forall n,minmathbb{N}$ with $n,m>n_1$, $forall xin A$ it has $|f_n(x)-f_m(x)|<epsilon$.
My doubt is whether it is possible to use to different values from the domain in this definition. That is "... $forall x,yin A, |f_n(x)-f_m(y)|<epsilon$ "..
Furthermore I have the same problem for uniform convergence too.
real-analysis uniform-convergence
real-analysis uniform-convergence
asked Jan 2 at 20:34
DD90DD90
2648
2648
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider $f_n(x)=x$, $|f_n(0)-f_m(1)|=1$ but the sequence of functions converges uniformly since it is constant $f_n(x)$ so in the definition of uniformly convergence, $x$ is fixed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its a good example
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 2 at 20:41
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059943%2funiform-cauchy-and-convergence-clarification%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider $f_n(x)=x$, $|f_n(0)-f_m(1)|=1$ but the sequence of functions converges uniformly since it is constant $f_n(x)$ so in the definition of uniformly convergence, $x$ is fixed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its a good example
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 2 at 20:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider $f_n(x)=x$, $|f_n(0)-f_m(1)|=1$ but the sequence of functions converges uniformly since it is constant $f_n(x)$ so in the definition of uniformly convergence, $x$ is fixed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its a good example
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 2 at 20:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider $f_n(x)=x$, $|f_n(0)-f_m(1)|=1$ but the sequence of functions converges uniformly since it is constant $f_n(x)$ so in the definition of uniformly convergence, $x$ is fixed.
$endgroup$
Consider $f_n(x)=x$, $|f_n(0)-f_m(1)|=1$ but the sequence of functions converges uniformly since it is constant $f_n(x)$ so in the definition of uniformly convergence, $x$ is fixed.
answered Jan 2 at 20:36
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
60.1k11446
60.1k11446
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its a good example
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 2 at 20:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its a good example
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 2 at 20:41
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its a good example
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 2 at 20:41
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Its a good example
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 2 at 20:41
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059943%2funiform-cauchy-and-convergence-clarification%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
