Cycle double cover conjecture for complete graphs?
$begingroup$
The cycle double cover conjecture states that for every bridgeless finite $G$ there is a collection of cycles $mathcal{C}$ in $G$ such that every edges on $G$ occurs in precisely two of the cycles in $mathcal{C}$. Is the cycle double cover conjecture known for complete graphs?
I would actually be interested in knowing about stronger results pertaining to the various stronger versions of the double cover conjecture - for example does every complete graph admit a strong embedding into some orientable surface (i.e. every face is a cycle in the graph)? Can we take it to be 5-face colorable?
I am also interested in the same question for complete bipartite graphs. References would be welcome!
graph-theory reference-request topological-graph-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The cycle double cover conjecture states that for every bridgeless finite $G$ there is a collection of cycles $mathcal{C}$ in $G$ such that every edges on $G$ occurs in precisely two of the cycles in $mathcal{C}$. Is the cycle double cover conjecture known for complete graphs?
I would actually be interested in knowing about stronger results pertaining to the various stronger versions of the double cover conjecture - for example does every complete graph admit a strong embedding into some orientable surface (i.e. every face is a cycle in the graph)? Can we take it to be 5-face colorable?
I am also interested in the same question for complete bipartite graphs. References would be welcome!
graph-theory reference-request topological-graph-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The cycle double cover conjecture states that for every bridgeless finite $G$ there is a collection of cycles $mathcal{C}$ in $G$ such that every edges on $G$ occurs in precisely two of the cycles in $mathcal{C}$. Is the cycle double cover conjecture known for complete graphs?
I would actually be interested in knowing about stronger results pertaining to the various stronger versions of the double cover conjecture - for example does every complete graph admit a strong embedding into some orientable surface (i.e. every face is a cycle in the graph)? Can we take it to be 5-face colorable?
I am also interested in the same question for complete bipartite graphs. References would be welcome!
graph-theory reference-request topological-graph-theory
$endgroup$
The cycle double cover conjecture states that for every bridgeless finite $G$ there is a collection of cycles $mathcal{C}$ in $G$ such that every edges on $G$ occurs in precisely two of the cycles in $mathcal{C}$. Is the cycle double cover conjecture known for complete graphs?
I would actually be interested in knowing about stronger results pertaining to the various stronger versions of the double cover conjecture - for example does every complete graph admit a strong embedding into some orientable surface (i.e. every face is a cycle in the graph)? Can we take it to be 5-face colorable?
I am also interested in the same question for complete bipartite graphs. References would be welcome!
graph-theory reference-request topological-graph-theory
graph-theory reference-request topological-graph-theory
asked Jan 8 at 3:14
user101010user101010
1,972516
1,972516
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A complete graph with an odd number of vertices has a single cycle cover: Arrange the vertices in a regular polygon and consider each possible length of diagonals separately. Now just take each of those cycles twice.
If you have an even number of vertices, then set one of them aside and split the rest of the graph into cycles as above. Then take one of the resulting outer cycles and disassemble it into single edges; let each of those edges make a triangle with the vertex you set aside. This again gives a cycle double cover.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065766%2fcycle-double-cover-conjecture-for-complete-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A complete graph with an odd number of vertices has a single cycle cover: Arrange the vertices in a regular polygon and consider each possible length of diagonals separately. Now just take each of those cycles twice.
If you have an even number of vertices, then set one of them aside and split the rest of the graph into cycles as above. Then take one of the resulting outer cycles and disassemble it into single edges; let each of those edges make a triangle with the vertex you set aside. This again gives a cycle double cover.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A complete graph with an odd number of vertices has a single cycle cover: Arrange the vertices in a regular polygon and consider each possible length of diagonals separately. Now just take each of those cycles twice.
If you have an even number of vertices, then set one of them aside and split the rest of the graph into cycles as above. Then take one of the resulting outer cycles and disassemble it into single edges; let each of those edges make a triangle with the vertex you set aside. This again gives a cycle double cover.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A complete graph with an odd number of vertices has a single cycle cover: Arrange the vertices in a regular polygon and consider each possible length of diagonals separately. Now just take each of those cycles twice.
If you have an even number of vertices, then set one of them aside and split the rest of the graph into cycles as above. Then take one of the resulting outer cycles and disassemble it into single edges; let each of those edges make a triangle with the vertex you set aside. This again gives a cycle double cover.
$endgroup$
A complete graph with an odd number of vertices has a single cycle cover: Arrange the vertices in a regular polygon and consider each possible length of diagonals separately. Now just take each of those cycles twice.
If you have an even number of vertices, then set one of them aside and split the rest of the graph into cycles as above. Then take one of the resulting outer cycles and disassemble it into single edges; let each of those edges make a triangle with the vertex you set aside. This again gives a cycle double cover.
answered Jan 8 at 3:30
Henning MakholmHenning Makholm
244k17312556
244k17312556
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065766%2fcycle-double-cover-conjecture-for-complete-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown