hive partitioned and unpartitioned tables runtime and cpu time





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1















I currently have a table below



create table flights(Year int, Month int, dayOfMonth int, dayOfWeek 
int, depTime int, CRSDepTime int, arrTime int, CRSArrTime int,
uniqueCarrier string, flightNum int, tailNum int, actualElapsedTime
int, CRSElapsedTime int, airTime int, arrDelay int, depDelay int,
origin string, dest string, distance int, taxiIn int, taxiOut int,
cancelled int, cancellationCode string, diverted int, carrierDelay
int, weatherDelay int, NASDelay int, securityDelay int,
lateAircraftDelay int) row format delimited fields terminated by ',';


and, I partitioned this table using month column, and comparing the CPU time and total time taken. I can see that CPU time decreased dramatically on partitioned table compared to unpartitioned table. However, for the total time taken, both are the same.



note : I am using the database that has 22 years of all flights in the past. so the amount of data is huge.



I want to know why CPU time decreased and total time are still same.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    for which query?

    – Gaurang Shah
    Nov 27 '18 at 1:27


















1















I currently have a table below



create table flights(Year int, Month int, dayOfMonth int, dayOfWeek 
int, depTime int, CRSDepTime int, arrTime int, CRSArrTime int,
uniqueCarrier string, flightNum int, tailNum int, actualElapsedTime
int, CRSElapsedTime int, airTime int, arrDelay int, depDelay int,
origin string, dest string, distance int, taxiIn int, taxiOut int,
cancelled int, cancellationCode string, diverted int, carrierDelay
int, weatherDelay int, NASDelay int, securityDelay int,
lateAircraftDelay int) row format delimited fields terminated by ',';


and, I partitioned this table using month column, and comparing the CPU time and total time taken. I can see that CPU time decreased dramatically on partitioned table compared to unpartitioned table. However, for the total time taken, both are the same.



note : I am using the database that has 22 years of all flights in the past. so the amount of data is huge.



I want to know why CPU time decreased and total time are still same.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    for which query?

    – Gaurang Shah
    Nov 27 '18 at 1:27














1












1








1








I currently have a table below



create table flights(Year int, Month int, dayOfMonth int, dayOfWeek 
int, depTime int, CRSDepTime int, arrTime int, CRSArrTime int,
uniqueCarrier string, flightNum int, tailNum int, actualElapsedTime
int, CRSElapsedTime int, airTime int, arrDelay int, depDelay int,
origin string, dest string, distance int, taxiIn int, taxiOut int,
cancelled int, cancellationCode string, diverted int, carrierDelay
int, weatherDelay int, NASDelay int, securityDelay int,
lateAircraftDelay int) row format delimited fields terminated by ',';


and, I partitioned this table using month column, and comparing the CPU time and total time taken. I can see that CPU time decreased dramatically on partitioned table compared to unpartitioned table. However, for the total time taken, both are the same.



note : I am using the database that has 22 years of all flights in the past. so the amount of data is huge.



I want to know why CPU time decreased and total time are still same.










share|improve this question














I currently have a table below



create table flights(Year int, Month int, dayOfMonth int, dayOfWeek 
int, depTime int, CRSDepTime int, arrTime int, CRSArrTime int,
uniqueCarrier string, flightNum int, tailNum int, actualElapsedTime
int, CRSElapsedTime int, airTime int, arrDelay int, depDelay int,
origin string, dest string, distance int, taxiIn int, taxiOut int,
cancelled int, cancellationCode string, diverted int, carrierDelay
int, weatherDelay int, NASDelay int, securityDelay int,
lateAircraftDelay int) row format delimited fields terminated by ',';


and, I partitioned this table using month column, and comparing the CPU time and total time taken. I can see that CPU time decreased dramatically on partitioned table compared to unpartitioned table. However, for the total time taken, both are the same.



note : I am using the database that has 22 years of all flights in the past. so the amount of data is huge.



I want to know why CPU time decreased and total time are still same.







mysql database hive partition






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 27 '18 at 1:22









Geongu Aiden ParkGeongu Aiden Park

1916




1916








  • 1





    for which query?

    – Gaurang Shah
    Nov 27 '18 at 1:27














  • 1





    for which query?

    – Gaurang Shah
    Nov 27 '18 at 1:27








1




1





for which query?

– Gaurang Shah
Nov 27 '18 at 1:27





for which query?

– Gaurang Shah
Nov 27 '18 at 1:27












0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53491460%2fhive-partitioned-and-unpartitioned-tables-runtime-and-cpu-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53491460%2fhive-partitioned-and-unpartitioned-tables-runtime-and-cpu-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen