How to find the free fall time of a particle starting at rest at a distance R from a mass M.












0












$begingroup$


This is in-fact a physics question but seems as how I only want to know how to treat it mathematically I thought I would ask it here(Note: this is not a homework question, I'm just studying for an exam that's in a few days):



I want to show that the free fall time ($t_{ff}$) for a body starting at rest from a radius R ,to land on a body of mass M is $t_{ff}^2=tfrac{pi^2}{8}(tfrac{R^3}{GM})$.



Here's what I've done so far :



Using conservation of energy $E=tfrac{1}{2}mv^2-tfrac{GMm}{r}$ we know that this is conserved , so the change in kinetic enrgy is equal to the difference in potential energy $Rightarrow tfrac{1}{2}mv^2=tfrac{1}{2}mtfrac{dr}{dt}=tfrac{Gmm}{r}-tfrac{GMm}{R}Rightarrow tfrac{dr}{dt}=-sqrt{2GM(tfrac{1}{r}-tfrac{1}{R})}$



So now we have a first order seperable ode



$Rightarrow -int^R_0(2GM(tfrac{1}{r}-tfrac{1}{R}))^{tfrac{-1}{2}}dr=int dt$



Here is my problem:



I can't figure out how to solve the integral on the right I tried substitution but it didn't work, any suggestions anyone ?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is your body with mass $M$ a black hole? In that case, you need to account for relativistic effects. Otherwise, what is the radius?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Jan 7 at 3:14
















0












$begingroup$


This is in-fact a physics question but seems as how I only want to know how to treat it mathematically I thought I would ask it here(Note: this is not a homework question, I'm just studying for an exam that's in a few days):



I want to show that the free fall time ($t_{ff}$) for a body starting at rest from a radius R ,to land on a body of mass M is $t_{ff}^2=tfrac{pi^2}{8}(tfrac{R^3}{GM})$.



Here's what I've done so far :



Using conservation of energy $E=tfrac{1}{2}mv^2-tfrac{GMm}{r}$ we know that this is conserved , so the change in kinetic enrgy is equal to the difference in potential energy $Rightarrow tfrac{1}{2}mv^2=tfrac{1}{2}mtfrac{dr}{dt}=tfrac{Gmm}{r}-tfrac{GMm}{R}Rightarrow tfrac{dr}{dt}=-sqrt{2GM(tfrac{1}{r}-tfrac{1}{R})}$



So now we have a first order seperable ode



$Rightarrow -int^R_0(2GM(tfrac{1}{r}-tfrac{1}{R}))^{tfrac{-1}{2}}dr=int dt$



Here is my problem:



I can't figure out how to solve the integral on the right I tried substitution but it didn't work, any suggestions anyone ?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is your body with mass $M$ a black hole? In that case, you need to account for relativistic effects. Otherwise, what is the radius?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Jan 7 at 3:14














0












0








0





$begingroup$


This is in-fact a physics question but seems as how I only want to know how to treat it mathematically I thought I would ask it here(Note: this is not a homework question, I'm just studying for an exam that's in a few days):



I want to show that the free fall time ($t_{ff}$) for a body starting at rest from a radius R ,to land on a body of mass M is $t_{ff}^2=tfrac{pi^2}{8}(tfrac{R^3}{GM})$.



Here's what I've done so far :



Using conservation of energy $E=tfrac{1}{2}mv^2-tfrac{GMm}{r}$ we know that this is conserved , so the change in kinetic enrgy is equal to the difference in potential energy $Rightarrow tfrac{1}{2}mv^2=tfrac{1}{2}mtfrac{dr}{dt}=tfrac{Gmm}{r}-tfrac{GMm}{R}Rightarrow tfrac{dr}{dt}=-sqrt{2GM(tfrac{1}{r}-tfrac{1}{R})}$



So now we have a first order seperable ode



$Rightarrow -int^R_0(2GM(tfrac{1}{r}-tfrac{1}{R}))^{tfrac{-1}{2}}dr=int dt$



Here is my problem:



I can't figure out how to solve the integral on the right I tried substitution but it didn't work, any suggestions anyone ?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




This is in-fact a physics question but seems as how I only want to know how to treat it mathematically I thought I would ask it here(Note: this is not a homework question, I'm just studying for an exam that's in a few days):



I want to show that the free fall time ($t_{ff}$) for a body starting at rest from a radius R ,to land on a body of mass M is $t_{ff}^2=tfrac{pi^2}{8}(tfrac{R^3}{GM})$.



Here's what I've done so far :



Using conservation of energy $E=tfrac{1}{2}mv^2-tfrac{GMm}{r}$ we know that this is conserved , so the change in kinetic enrgy is equal to the difference in potential energy $Rightarrow tfrac{1}{2}mv^2=tfrac{1}{2}mtfrac{dr}{dt}=tfrac{Gmm}{r}-tfrac{GMm}{R}Rightarrow tfrac{dr}{dt}=-sqrt{2GM(tfrac{1}{r}-tfrac{1}{R})}$



So now we have a first order seperable ode



$Rightarrow -int^R_0(2GM(tfrac{1}{r}-tfrac{1}{R}))^{tfrac{-1}{2}}dr=int dt$



Here is my problem:



I can't figure out how to solve the integral on the right I tried substitution but it didn't work, any suggestions anyone ?







ordinary-differential-equations physics mathematical-physics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 6 at 23:33









can'tcauchycan'tcauchy

1,022417




1,022417












  • $begingroup$
    Is your body with mass $M$ a black hole? In that case, you need to account for relativistic effects. Otherwise, what is the radius?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Jan 7 at 3:14


















  • $begingroup$
    Is your body with mass $M$ a black hole? In that case, you need to account for relativistic effects. Otherwise, what is the radius?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Jan 7 at 3:14
















$begingroup$
Is your body with mass $M$ a black hole? In that case, you need to account for relativistic effects. Otherwise, what is the radius?
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Jan 7 at 3:14




$begingroup$
Is your body with mass $M$ a black hole? In that case, you need to account for relativistic effects. Otherwise, what is the radius?
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Jan 7 at 3:14










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

$require{begingroup}begingrouprenewcommand{dd}[1]{,mathrm{d}#1}$The desired answer clearly is meant for a practice in classical mechanics without relativistic effects.



Presumably the OP wants to see his/her method comes to fruition so this answer continues the approach in the question post. There exists analysis that some might deem more physical and nice (see this answer or that).





First of all, your original expression is off by a negative sign. It is true that $r$ decreases along time $t = 0$ to $t = t_{ff}$ so the derivative is negative (taking the minus square root). Accordingly, the integration limit should start at $r = R$ at $t = 0$ and ends at $r = 0$ at $t = t_{ff}$. Hence the negative sign cancels and we have an integration of positive square root from $r = 0$ to $R$.



$$int dd{t} = frac1{ sqrt{2GM} }int^R_0 left( frac1r - frac1R right)^{frac{-1}2} dd{r} = sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int^R_0 left( frac{R}r - 1 right)^{frac{-1}2} dd{r} $$
Upon seeing "something minus one" in the square root, one should think of $sec^2theta$ for the very useful $sec^2theta - 1 = tan^2theta$.



To have $frac{R}r = sec^2theta$ one considers the change of variable $theta equiv arccos bigl(sqrt{ frac{r}R } bigr)$, a well-defined one-to-one mapping where the lower integration limit $r = 0$ becomes $theta = frac{pi}2$ and at upper $r = R$ it is $theta = 0$.
begin{align}
frac{R}r = sec^2theta & implies frac{-R}{r^2} dd{r} = 2 sectheta cdot secthetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies frac{-1}R bigl( frac{R}r bigr) ^2 dd{r} = 2 sec^2thetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies frac{-1}R sec^4theta dd{r} = 2 sec^2thetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies dd{r} = -2R cos^2thetatantheta dd{theta}
end{align}

Meanwhile, the integrand $sqrt{ frac{R}r - 1} = tantheta$ is the positive root by definition. Putting things together:
begin{align}
t_{ff} = int_{t = 0}^{t_{ff} } dd{t} &= sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int^R_0 frac1{ sqrt{ frac{R}r - 1} } dd{r} \
&= sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = frac{pi}2 }^0 frac1{tantheta} (-2R)cos^2 theta tantheta dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } 2cos^2theta dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } bigl( cos(2theta) + 1 bigr) dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} } frac{ sin(2theta) + 2theta }2Bigg|_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } \
& = R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} } frac{ pi }2
end{align}

Squaring this elapsed-time $t_{ff}$ yields the desired expression of $t_{ff}^2$ seen in the question post.$endgroup$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    wow ! thank you for your great answer :)
    $endgroup$
    – can'tcauchy
    Jan 8 at 16:19












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064518%2fhow-to-find-the-free-fall-time-of-a-particle-starting-at-rest-at-a-distance-r-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

$require{begingroup}begingrouprenewcommand{dd}[1]{,mathrm{d}#1}$The desired answer clearly is meant for a practice in classical mechanics without relativistic effects.



Presumably the OP wants to see his/her method comes to fruition so this answer continues the approach in the question post. There exists analysis that some might deem more physical and nice (see this answer or that).





First of all, your original expression is off by a negative sign. It is true that $r$ decreases along time $t = 0$ to $t = t_{ff}$ so the derivative is negative (taking the minus square root). Accordingly, the integration limit should start at $r = R$ at $t = 0$ and ends at $r = 0$ at $t = t_{ff}$. Hence the negative sign cancels and we have an integration of positive square root from $r = 0$ to $R$.



$$int dd{t} = frac1{ sqrt{2GM} }int^R_0 left( frac1r - frac1R right)^{frac{-1}2} dd{r} = sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int^R_0 left( frac{R}r - 1 right)^{frac{-1}2} dd{r} $$
Upon seeing "something minus one" in the square root, one should think of $sec^2theta$ for the very useful $sec^2theta - 1 = tan^2theta$.



To have $frac{R}r = sec^2theta$ one considers the change of variable $theta equiv arccos bigl(sqrt{ frac{r}R } bigr)$, a well-defined one-to-one mapping where the lower integration limit $r = 0$ becomes $theta = frac{pi}2$ and at upper $r = R$ it is $theta = 0$.
begin{align}
frac{R}r = sec^2theta & implies frac{-R}{r^2} dd{r} = 2 sectheta cdot secthetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies frac{-1}R bigl( frac{R}r bigr) ^2 dd{r} = 2 sec^2thetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies frac{-1}R sec^4theta dd{r} = 2 sec^2thetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies dd{r} = -2R cos^2thetatantheta dd{theta}
end{align}

Meanwhile, the integrand $sqrt{ frac{R}r - 1} = tantheta$ is the positive root by definition. Putting things together:
begin{align}
t_{ff} = int_{t = 0}^{t_{ff} } dd{t} &= sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int^R_0 frac1{ sqrt{ frac{R}r - 1} } dd{r} \
&= sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = frac{pi}2 }^0 frac1{tantheta} (-2R)cos^2 theta tantheta dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } 2cos^2theta dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } bigl( cos(2theta) + 1 bigr) dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} } frac{ sin(2theta) + 2theta }2Bigg|_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } \
& = R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} } frac{ pi }2
end{align}

Squaring this elapsed-time $t_{ff}$ yields the desired expression of $t_{ff}^2$ seen in the question post.$endgroup$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    wow ! thank you for your great answer :)
    $endgroup$
    – can'tcauchy
    Jan 8 at 16:19
















1












$begingroup$

$require{begingroup}begingrouprenewcommand{dd}[1]{,mathrm{d}#1}$The desired answer clearly is meant for a practice in classical mechanics without relativistic effects.



Presumably the OP wants to see his/her method comes to fruition so this answer continues the approach in the question post. There exists analysis that some might deem more physical and nice (see this answer or that).





First of all, your original expression is off by a negative sign. It is true that $r$ decreases along time $t = 0$ to $t = t_{ff}$ so the derivative is negative (taking the minus square root). Accordingly, the integration limit should start at $r = R$ at $t = 0$ and ends at $r = 0$ at $t = t_{ff}$. Hence the negative sign cancels and we have an integration of positive square root from $r = 0$ to $R$.



$$int dd{t} = frac1{ sqrt{2GM} }int^R_0 left( frac1r - frac1R right)^{frac{-1}2} dd{r} = sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int^R_0 left( frac{R}r - 1 right)^{frac{-1}2} dd{r} $$
Upon seeing "something minus one" in the square root, one should think of $sec^2theta$ for the very useful $sec^2theta - 1 = tan^2theta$.



To have $frac{R}r = sec^2theta$ one considers the change of variable $theta equiv arccos bigl(sqrt{ frac{r}R } bigr)$, a well-defined one-to-one mapping where the lower integration limit $r = 0$ becomes $theta = frac{pi}2$ and at upper $r = R$ it is $theta = 0$.
begin{align}
frac{R}r = sec^2theta & implies frac{-R}{r^2} dd{r} = 2 sectheta cdot secthetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies frac{-1}R bigl( frac{R}r bigr) ^2 dd{r} = 2 sec^2thetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies frac{-1}R sec^4theta dd{r} = 2 sec^2thetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies dd{r} = -2R cos^2thetatantheta dd{theta}
end{align}

Meanwhile, the integrand $sqrt{ frac{R}r - 1} = tantheta$ is the positive root by definition. Putting things together:
begin{align}
t_{ff} = int_{t = 0}^{t_{ff} } dd{t} &= sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int^R_0 frac1{ sqrt{ frac{R}r - 1} } dd{r} \
&= sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = frac{pi}2 }^0 frac1{tantheta} (-2R)cos^2 theta tantheta dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } 2cos^2theta dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } bigl( cos(2theta) + 1 bigr) dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} } frac{ sin(2theta) + 2theta }2Bigg|_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } \
& = R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} } frac{ pi }2
end{align}

Squaring this elapsed-time $t_{ff}$ yields the desired expression of $t_{ff}^2$ seen in the question post.$endgroup$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    wow ! thank you for your great answer :)
    $endgroup$
    – can'tcauchy
    Jan 8 at 16:19














1












1








1





$begingroup$

$require{begingroup}begingrouprenewcommand{dd}[1]{,mathrm{d}#1}$The desired answer clearly is meant for a practice in classical mechanics without relativistic effects.



Presumably the OP wants to see his/her method comes to fruition so this answer continues the approach in the question post. There exists analysis that some might deem more physical and nice (see this answer or that).





First of all, your original expression is off by a negative sign. It is true that $r$ decreases along time $t = 0$ to $t = t_{ff}$ so the derivative is negative (taking the minus square root). Accordingly, the integration limit should start at $r = R$ at $t = 0$ and ends at $r = 0$ at $t = t_{ff}$. Hence the negative sign cancels and we have an integration of positive square root from $r = 0$ to $R$.



$$int dd{t} = frac1{ sqrt{2GM} }int^R_0 left( frac1r - frac1R right)^{frac{-1}2} dd{r} = sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int^R_0 left( frac{R}r - 1 right)^{frac{-1}2} dd{r} $$
Upon seeing "something minus one" in the square root, one should think of $sec^2theta$ for the very useful $sec^2theta - 1 = tan^2theta$.



To have $frac{R}r = sec^2theta$ one considers the change of variable $theta equiv arccos bigl(sqrt{ frac{r}R } bigr)$, a well-defined one-to-one mapping where the lower integration limit $r = 0$ becomes $theta = frac{pi}2$ and at upper $r = R$ it is $theta = 0$.
begin{align}
frac{R}r = sec^2theta & implies frac{-R}{r^2} dd{r} = 2 sectheta cdot secthetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies frac{-1}R bigl( frac{R}r bigr) ^2 dd{r} = 2 sec^2thetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies frac{-1}R sec^4theta dd{r} = 2 sec^2thetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies dd{r} = -2R cos^2thetatantheta dd{theta}
end{align}

Meanwhile, the integrand $sqrt{ frac{R}r - 1} = tantheta$ is the positive root by definition. Putting things together:
begin{align}
t_{ff} = int_{t = 0}^{t_{ff} } dd{t} &= sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int^R_0 frac1{ sqrt{ frac{R}r - 1} } dd{r} \
&= sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = frac{pi}2 }^0 frac1{tantheta} (-2R)cos^2 theta tantheta dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } 2cos^2theta dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } bigl( cos(2theta) + 1 bigr) dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} } frac{ sin(2theta) + 2theta }2Bigg|_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } \
& = R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} } frac{ pi }2
end{align}

Squaring this elapsed-time $t_{ff}$ yields the desired expression of $t_{ff}^2$ seen in the question post.$endgroup$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



$require{begingroup}begingrouprenewcommand{dd}[1]{,mathrm{d}#1}$The desired answer clearly is meant for a practice in classical mechanics without relativistic effects.



Presumably the OP wants to see his/her method comes to fruition so this answer continues the approach in the question post. There exists analysis that some might deem more physical and nice (see this answer or that).





First of all, your original expression is off by a negative sign. It is true that $r$ decreases along time $t = 0$ to $t = t_{ff}$ so the derivative is negative (taking the minus square root). Accordingly, the integration limit should start at $r = R$ at $t = 0$ and ends at $r = 0$ at $t = t_{ff}$. Hence the negative sign cancels and we have an integration of positive square root from $r = 0$ to $R$.



$$int dd{t} = frac1{ sqrt{2GM} }int^R_0 left( frac1r - frac1R right)^{frac{-1}2} dd{r} = sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int^R_0 left( frac{R}r - 1 right)^{frac{-1}2} dd{r} $$
Upon seeing "something minus one" in the square root, one should think of $sec^2theta$ for the very useful $sec^2theta - 1 = tan^2theta$.



To have $frac{R}r = sec^2theta$ one considers the change of variable $theta equiv arccos bigl(sqrt{ frac{r}R } bigr)$, a well-defined one-to-one mapping where the lower integration limit $r = 0$ becomes $theta = frac{pi}2$ and at upper $r = R$ it is $theta = 0$.
begin{align}
frac{R}r = sec^2theta & implies frac{-R}{r^2} dd{r} = 2 sectheta cdot secthetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies frac{-1}R bigl( frac{R}r bigr) ^2 dd{r} = 2 sec^2thetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies frac{-1}R sec^4theta dd{r} = 2 sec^2thetatantheta dd{theta} \
&implies dd{r} = -2R cos^2thetatantheta dd{theta}
end{align}

Meanwhile, the integrand $sqrt{ frac{R}r - 1} = tantheta$ is the positive root by definition. Putting things together:
begin{align}
t_{ff} = int_{t = 0}^{t_{ff} } dd{t} &= sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int^R_0 frac1{ sqrt{ frac{R}r - 1} } dd{r} \
&= sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = frac{pi}2 }^0 frac1{tantheta} (-2R)cos^2 theta tantheta dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } 2cos^2theta dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} }int_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } bigl( cos(2theta) + 1 bigr) dd{theta} \
&= R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} } frac{ sin(2theta) + 2theta }2Bigg|_{theta = 0}^{ frac{pi}2 } \
& = R sqrt{frac{R}{2GM} } frac{ pi }2
end{align}

Squaring this elapsed-time $t_{ff}$ yields the desired expression of $t_{ff}^2$ seen in the question post.$endgroup$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 7 at 8:02

























answered Jan 7 at 3:41









Lee David Chung LinLee David Chung Lin

4,50341342




4,50341342












  • $begingroup$
    wow ! thank you for your great answer :)
    $endgroup$
    – can'tcauchy
    Jan 8 at 16:19


















  • $begingroup$
    wow ! thank you for your great answer :)
    $endgroup$
    – can'tcauchy
    Jan 8 at 16:19
















$begingroup$
wow ! thank you for your great answer :)
$endgroup$
– can'tcauchy
Jan 8 at 16:19




$begingroup$
wow ! thank you for your great answer :)
$endgroup$
– can'tcauchy
Jan 8 at 16:19


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064518%2fhow-to-find-the-free-fall-time-of-a-particle-starting-at-rest-at-a-distance-r-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Tonle Sap (See)

I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft