Correct approach to initialize an asynchronous JMS Listener and let it run infinitely











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I use the following application to connect to my oracle database, register a queue listener and wait for enqueued messages:



package sample;

import javax.jms.JMSException;
import javax.jms.MessageConsumer;
import javax.jms.Queue;
import javax.jms.QueueConnection;
import javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory;
import javax.jms.QueueSession;
import javax.jms.Session;

import oracle.jms.AQjmsFactory;
import oracle.jms.AQjmsSession;

public class MyThread extends Thread {

private static final String QUEUE_NAME = "MY_QUEUE";
private static final String QUEUE_USER = "myuser";
private static final String QUEUE_PW = "mypassword";
private boolean running;

public MyThread() {
this.running = true;
}

public static void main(String args) {
MyThread mt = new MyThread();
mt.start();
}

private QueueConnection getQueueConnection() throws JMSException {
QueueConnectionFactory QFac = AQjmsFactory.getQueueConnectionFactory("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", "orcl", 1521, "thin");
QueueConnection QCon = QFac.createQueueConnection(QUEUE_USER, QUEUE_PW);
return QCon;
}

@Override
public void interrupt() {
this.running = false;
super.interrupt();
}

@Override
public void run() {
try {
QueueConnection queueConnection = getQueueConnection();
QueueSession queueSession = queueConnection.createQueueSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
Queue queue = ((AQjmsSession) queueSession).getQueue(QUEUE_USER, QUEUE_NAME);

while (running) {
System.out.println("Starting...");

queueConnection.start();
MessageConsumer mq = ((AQjmsSession) queueSession).createReceiver(queue);
MyListener listener = new MyListener();
mq.setMessageListener(listener);

System.out.println("... Done, now sleep a bit and redo");

try {
Thread.sleep(5000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}

System.out.println("Closing Application");
queueSession.close();
queueConnection.close();

} catch (JMSException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}


Once a message got enqueued the onMessage function will append a message into a textfiles content:



package sample;

import java.io.BufferedWriter;
import java.io.FileWriter;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.PrintWriter;

import javax.jms.Message;
import javax.jms.MessageListener;

public class MyListener implements MessageListener{

@Override
public void onMessage(Message arg0) {
try {
PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter("C:/temp/output/messages.txt", true)));
out.println("New Message arrived");
out.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}


On runtime my console output looks like this:




Starting...

... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

Starting...

... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

Starting...

... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

Starting...

... Done, now sleep a bit an redo




If there where any enqueues the file will contain the new messages.

So: I can dequeue Events and the onMessage event will be triggered with this code.



Now to my question: I'm pretty sure waiting 5 seconds to register the Listener again (and call queueConnection.start() to receive the onMessage calls) is not the correct approach. But if I don't do this there won't be any onMessage events (File stays empty).



What is the correct approach to start listening to a queue infinitely without a fixed Thread.sleep() call and without the need to register the listener again even if there weren't any events?



Additional Information



Database: Oracle 11g2

Java Runtime: 1.6

Maven Dependencies:




  • oracle-jdbc (11.2.0.4.0)

  • xdb (1.0)

  • aqapi (1.3)

  • jmscommon (1.3.1_02)










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I use the following application to connect to my oracle database, register a queue listener and wait for enqueued messages:



    package sample;

    import javax.jms.JMSException;
    import javax.jms.MessageConsumer;
    import javax.jms.Queue;
    import javax.jms.QueueConnection;
    import javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory;
    import javax.jms.QueueSession;
    import javax.jms.Session;

    import oracle.jms.AQjmsFactory;
    import oracle.jms.AQjmsSession;

    public class MyThread extends Thread {

    private static final String QUEUE_NAME = "MY_QUEUE";
    private static final String QUEUE_USER = "myuser";
    private static final String QUEUE_PW = "mypassword";
    private boolean running;

    public MyThread() {
    this.running = true;
    }

    public static void main(String args) {
    MyThread mt = new MyThread();
    mt.start();
    }

    private QueueConnection getQueueConnection() throws JMSException {
    QueueConnectionFactory QFac = AQjmsFactory.getQueueConnectionFactory("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", "orcl", 1521, "thin");
    QueueConnection QCon = QFac.createQueueConnection(QUEUE_USER, QUEUE_PW);
    return QCon;
    }

    @Override
    public void interrupt() {
    this.running = false;
    super.interrupt();
    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
    try {
    QueueConnection queueConnection = getQueueConnection();
    QueueSession queueSession = queueConnection.createQueueSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
    Queue queue = ((AQjmsSession) queueSession).getQueue(QUEUE_USER, QUEUE_NAME);

    while (running) {
    System.out.println("Starting...");

    queueConnection.start();
    MessageConsumer mq = ((AQjmsSession) queueSession).createReceiver(queue);
    MyListener listener = new MyListener();
    mq.setMessageListener(listener);

    System.out.println("... Done, now sleep a bit and redo");

    try {
    Thread.sleep(5000);
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
    }
    }

    System.out.println("Closing Application");
    queueSession.close();
    queueConnection.close();

    } catch (JMSException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
    }
    }
    }


    Once a message got enqueued the onMessage function will append a message into a textfiles content:



    package sample;

    import java.io.BufferedWriter;
    import java.io.FileWriter;
    import java.io.IOException;
    import java.io.PrintWriter;

    import javax.jms.Message;
    import javax.jms.MessageListener;

    public class MyListener implements MessageListener{

    @Override
    public void onMessage(Message arg0) {
    try {
    PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter("C:/temp/output/messages.txt", true)));
    out.println("New Message arrived");
    out.close();
    } catch (IOException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
    }
    }
    }


    On runtime my console output looks like this:




    Starting...

    ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

    Starting...

    ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

    Starting...

    ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

    Starting...

    ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo




    If there where any enqueues the file will contain the new messages.

    So: I can dequeue Events and the onMessage event will be triggered with this code.



    Now to my question: I'm pretty sure waiting 5 seconds to register the Listener again (and call queueConnection.start() to receive the onMessage calls) is not the correct approach. But if I don't do this there won't be any onMessage events (File stays empty).



    What is the correct approach to start listening to a queue infinitely without a fixed Thread.sleep() call and without the need to register the listener again even if there weren't any events?



    Additional Information



    Database: Oracle 11g2

    Java Runtime: 1.6

    Maven Dependencies:




    • oracle-jdbc (11.2.0.4.0)

    • xdb (1.0)

    • aqapi (1.3)

    • jmscommon (1.3.1_02)










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I use the following application to connect to my oracle database, register a queue listener and wait for enqueued messages:



      package sample;

      import javax.jms.JMSException;
      import javax.jms.MessageConsumer;
      import javax.jms.Queue;
      import javax.jms.QueueConnection;
      import javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory;
      import javax.jms.QueueSession;
      import javax.jms.Session;

      import oracle.jms.AQjmsFactory;
      import oracle.jms.AQjmsSession;

      public class MyThread extends Thread {

      private static final String QUEUE_NAME = "MY_QUEUE";
      private static final String QUEUE_USER = "myuser";
      private static final String QUEUE_PW = "mypassword";
      private boolean running;

      public MyThread() {
      this.running = true;
      }

      public static void main(String args) {
      MyThread mt = new MyThread();
      mt.start();
      }

      private QueueConnection getQueueConnection() throws JMSException {
      QueueConnectionFactory QFac = AQjmsFactory.getQueueConnectionFactory("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", "orcl", 1521, "thin");
      QueueConnection QCon = QFac.createQueueConnection(QUEUE_USER, QUEUE_PW);
      return QCon;
      }

      @Override
      public void interrupt() {
      this.running = false;
      super.interrupt();
      }

      @Override
      public void run() {
      try {
      QueueConnection queueConnection = getQueueConnection();
      QueueSession queueSession = queueConnection.createQueueSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
      Queue queue = ((AQjmsSession) queueSession).getQueue(QUEUE_USER, QUEUE_NAME);

      while (running) {
      System.out.println("Starting...");

      queueConnection.start();
      MessageConsumer mq = ((AQjmsSession) queueSession).createReceiver(queue);
      MyListener listener = new MyListener();
      mq.setMessageListener(listener);

      System.out.println("... Done, now sleep a bit and redo");

      try {
      Thread.sleep(5000);
      } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      e.printStackTrace();
      }
      }

      System.out.println("Closing Application");
      queueSession.close();
      queueConnection.close();

      } catch (JMSException e) {
      e.printStackTrace();
      }
      }
      }


      Once a message got enqueued the onMessage function will append a message into a textfiles content:



      package sample;

      import java.io.BufferedWriter;
      import java.io.FileWriter;
      import java.io.IOException;
      import java.io.PrintWriter;

      import javax.jms.Message;
      import javax.jms.MessageListener;

      public class MyListener implements MessageListener{

      @Override
      public void onMessage(Message arg0) {
      try {
      PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter("C:/temp/output/messages.txt", true)));
      out.println("New Message arrived");
      out.close();
      } catch (IOException e) {
      e.printStackTrace();
      }
      }
      }


      On runtime my console output looks like this:




      Starting...

      ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

      Starting...

      ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

      Starting...

      ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

      Starting...

      ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo




      If there where any enqueues the file will contain the new messages.

      So: I can dequeue Events and the onMessage event will be triggered with this code.



      Now to my question: I'm pretty sure waiting 5 seconds to register the Listener again (and call queueConnection.start() to receive the onMessage calls) is not the correct approach. But if I don't do this there won't be any onMessage events (File stays empty).



      What is the correct approach to start listening to a queue infinitely without a fixed Thread.sleep() call and without the need to register the listener again even if there weren't any events?



      Additional Information



      Database: Oracle 11g2

      Java Runtime: 1.6

      Maven Dependencies:




      • oracle-jdbc (11.2.0.4.0)

      • xdb (1.0)

      • aqapi (1.3)

      • jmscommon (1.3.1_02)










      share|improve this question













      I use the following application to connect to my oracle database, register a queue listener and wait for enqueued messages:



      package sample;

      import javax.jms.JMSException;
      import javax.jms.MessageConsumer;
      import javax.jms.Queue;
      import javax.jms.QueueConnection;
      import javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory;
      import javax.jms.QueueSession;
      import javax.jms.Session;

      import oracle.jms.AQjmsFactory;
      import oracle.jms.AQjmsSession;

      public class MyThread extends Thread {

      private static final String QUEUE_NAME = "MY_QUEUE";
      private static final String QUEUE_USER = "myuser";
      private static final String QUEUE_PW = "mypassword";
      private boolean running;

      public MyThread() {
      this.running = true;
      }

      public static void main(String args) {
      MyThread mt = new MyThread();
      mt.start();
      }

      private QueueConnection getQueueConnection() throws JMSException {
      QueueConnectionFactory QFac = AQjmsFactory.getQueueConnectionFactory("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", "orcl", 1521, "thin");
      QueueConnection QCon = QFac.createQueueConnection(QUEUE_USER, QUEUE_PW);
      return QCon;
      }

      @Override
      public void interrupt() {
      this.running = false;
      super.interrupt();
      }

      @Override
      public void run() {
      try {
      QueueConnection queueConnection = getQueueConnection();
      QueueSession queueSession = queueConnection.createQueueSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
      Queue queue = ((AQjmsSession) queueSession).getQueue(QUEUE_USER, QUEUE_NAME);

      while (running) {
      System.out.println("Starting...");

      queueConnection.start();
      MessageConsumer mq = ((AQjmsSession) queueSession).createReceiver(queue);
      MyListener listener = new MyListener();
      mq.setMessageListener(listener);

      System.out.println("... Done, now sleep a bit and redo");

      try {
      Thread.sleep(5000);
      } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      e.printStackTrace();
      }
      }

      System.out.println("Closing Application");
      queueSession.close();
      queueConnection.close();

      } catch (JMSException e) {
      e.printStackTrace();
      }
      }
      }


      Once a message got enqueued the onMessage function will append a message into a textfiles content:



      package sample;

      import java.io.BufferedWriter;
      import java.io.FileWriter;
      import java.io.IOException;
      import java.io.PrintWriter;

      import javax.jms.Message;
      import javax.jms.MessageListener;

      public class MyListener implements MessageListener{

      @Override
      public void onMessage(Message arg0) {
      try {
      PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter("C:/temp/output/messages.txt", true)));
      out.println("New Message arrived");
      out.close();
      } catch (IOException e) {
      e.printStackTrace();
      }
      }
      }


      On runtime my console output looks like this:




      Starting...

      ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

      Starting...

      ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

      Starting...

      ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo

      Starting...

      ... Done, now sleep a bit an redo




      If there where any enqueues the file will contain the new messages.

      So: I can dequeue Events and the onMessage event will be triggered with this code.



      Now to my question: I'm pretty sure waiting 5 seconds to register the Listener again (and call queueConnection.start() to receive the onMessage calls) is not the correct approach. But if I don't do this there won't be any onMessage events (File stays empty).



      What is the correct approach to start listening to a queue infinitely without a fixed Thread.sleep() call and without the need to register the listener again even if there weren't any events?



      Additional Information



      Database: Oracle 11g2

      Java Runtime: 1.6

      Maven Dependencies:




      • oracle-jdbc (11.2.0.4.0)

      • xdb (1.0)

      • aqapi (1.3)

      • jmscommon (1.3.1_02)







      oracle asynchronous queue jms listener






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 16:01









      Lolan

      34




      34
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          There's no reason to run a thread to create a JMS consumer and set its message listener. The whole point of a JMS message listener is to receive message asynchronously (functionality which you appear to be trying to duplicate for some reason).



          You simply need to create the JMS consumer and set the message listener and then ensure the consumer isn't closed. Depending on how the application is written it is sometimes necessary to have a while loop to make sure the program doesn't terminate and therefore close the consumer. Your thread isn't doing that. It's letting the consumer fall out of scope after waiting for messages for 5 seconds which means that it will be garbage collected and I expect for most JMS implementations that means it will be closed. It could be worse than that, though. By not explicitly closing the consumer and just letting it fall out of scope you could be leaking consumers which would eventually bog down your message broker. This is not only sloppy programming, but potentially problematic for other users trying to consume messages.






          share|improve this answer























          • Which command closes my consumer after 5 seconds? Is it because I create a new one after 5 seconds? How do I avoid closing my consumer? Do you have any other hints on how I should change my application to work how I want it to work? Thank you for your time!
            – Lolan
            Nov 19 at 20:01












          • I updated my answer to clarify what happens after the 5 second sleep(). In my opinion your "application" needs to be completely rewritten to use the JMS API as it was designed to be used (e.g. eliminate the Thread implementation, only create a single consumer, etc.).
            – Justin Bertram
            Nov 19 at 20:33










          • Thank you. I tried to do just that in the past and faced the problem that I did not receive any onMessage notification while the application ran. See "Main Application: Listener" in this question. I also put a while loop right after the queueConnection.start(); to check if the consumer was still available and it was. I just didn't get any notification.
            – Lolan
            Nov 20 at 7:32












          • I just provided an answer on that question. That code suffered from a similar problem as the code from this question.
            – Justin Bertram
            Nov 20 at 16:26










          • You provided the details on why my code is not working as intended in this case (Consumer gets closed + garbage collected) so I will accept your answer as the solution. I updated the question mentioned in my previous comment to represent the current state of my code.
            – Lolan
            Nov 21 at 8:16











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53378450%2fcorrect-approach-to-initialize-an-asynchronous-jms-listener-and-let-it-run-infin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          There's no reason to run a thread to create a JMS consumer and set its message listener. The whole point of a JMS message listener is to receive message asynchronously (functionality which you appear to be trying to duplicate for some reason).



          You simply need to create the JMS consumer and set the message listener and then ensure the consumer isn't closed. Depending on how the application is written it is sometimes necessary to have a while loop to make sure the program doesn't terminate and therefore close the consumer. Your thread isn't doing that. It's letting the consumer fall out of scope after waiting for messages for 5 seconds which means that it will be garbage collected and I expect for most JMS implementations that means it will be closed. It could be worse than that, though. By not explicitly closing the consumer and just letting it fall out of scope you could be leaking consumers which would eventually bog down your message broker. This is not only sloppy programming, but potentially problematic for other users trying to consume messages.






          share|improve this answer























          • Which command closes my consumer after 5 seconds? Is it because I create a new one after 5 seconds? How do I avoid closing my consumer? Do you have any other hints on how I should change my application to work how I want it to work? Thank you for your time!
            – Lolan
            Nov 19 at 20:01












          • I updated my answer to clarify what happens after the 5 second sleep(). In my opinion your "application" needs to be completely rewritten to use the JMS API as it was designed to be used (e.g. eliminate the Thread implementation, only create a single consumer, etc.).
            – Justin Bertram
            Nov 19 at 20:33










          • Thank you. I tried to do just that in the past and faced the problem that I did not receive any onMessage notification while the application ran. See "Main Application: Listener" in this question. I also put a while loop right after the queueConnection.start(); to check if the consumer was still available and it was. I just didn't get any notification.
            – Lolan
            Nov 20 at 7:32












          • I just provided an answer on that question. That code suffered from a similar problem as the code from this question.
            – Justin Bertram
            Nov 20 at 16:26










          • You provided the details on why my code is not working as intended in this case (Consumer gets closed + garbage collected) so I will accept your answer as the solution. I updated the question mentioned in my previous comment to represent the current state of my code.
            – Lolan
            Nov 21 at 8:16















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          There's no reason to run a thread to create a JMS consumer and set its message listener. The whole point of a JMS message listener is to receive message asynchronously (functionality which you appear to be trying to duplicate for some reason).



          You simply need to create the JMS consumer and set the message listener and then ensure the consumer isn't closed. Depending on how the application is written it is sometimes necessary to have a while loop to make sure the program doesn't terminate and therefore close the consumer. Your thread isn't doing that. It's letting the consumer fall out of scope after waiting for messages for 5 seconds which means that it will be garbage collected and I expect for most JMS implementations that means it will be closed. It could be worse than that, though. By not explicitly closing the consumer and just letting it fall out of scope you could be leaking consumers which would eventually bog down your message broker. This is not only sloppy programming, but potentially problematic for other users trying to consume messages.






          share|improve this answer























          • Which command closes my consumer after 5 seconds? Is it because I create a new one after 5 seconds? How do I avoid closing my consumer? Do you have any other hints on how I should change my application to work how I want it to work? Thank you for your time!
            – Lolan
            Nov 19 at 20:01












          • I updated my answer to clarify what happens after the 5 second sleep(). In my opinion your "application" needs to be completely rewritten to use the JMS API as it was designed to be used (e.g. eliminate the Thread implementation, only create a single consumer, etc.).
            – Justin Bertram
            Nov 19 at 20:33










          • Thank you. I tried to do just that in the past and faced the problem that I did not receive any onMessage notification while the application ran. See "Main Application: Listener" in this question. I also put a while loop right after the queueConnection.start(); to check if the consumer was still available and it was. I just didn't get any notification.
            – Lolan
            Nov 20 at 7:32












          • I just provided an answer on that question. That code suffered from a similar problem as the code from this question.
            – Justin Bertram
            Nov 20 at 16:26










          • You provided the details on why my code is not working as intended in this case (Consumer gets closed + garbage collected) so I will accept your answer as the solution. I updated the question mentioned in my previous comment to represent the current state of my code.
            – Lolan
            Nov 21 at 8:16













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          There's no reason to run a thread to create a JMS consumer and set its message listener. The whole point of a JMS message listener is to receive message asynchronously (functionality which you appear to be trying to duplicate for some reason).



          You simply need to create the JMS consumer and set the message listener and then ensure the consumer isn't closed. Depending on how the application is written it is sometimes necessary to have a while loop to make sure the program doesn't terminate and therefore close the consumer. Your thread isn't doing that. It's letting the consumer fall out of scope after waiting for messages for 5 seconds which means that it will be garbage collected and I expect for most JMS implementations that means it will be closed. It could be worse than that, though. By not explicitly closing the consumer and just letting it fall out of scope you could be leaking consumers which would eventually bog down your message broker. This is not only sloppy programming, but potentially problematic for other users trying to consume messages.






          share|improve this answer














          There's no reason to run a thread to create a JMS consumer and set its message listener. The whole point of a JMS message listener is to receive message asynchronously (functionality which you appear to be trying to duplicate for some reason).



          You simply need to create the JMS consumer and set the message listener and then ensure the consumer isn't closed. Depending on how the application is written it is sometimes necessary to have a while loop to make sure the program doesn't terminate and therefore close the consumer. Your thread isn't doing that. It's letting the consumer fall out of scope after waiting for messages for 5 seconds which means that it will be garbage collected and I expect for most JMS implementations that means it will be closed. It could be worse than that, though. By not explicitly closing the consumer and just letting it fall out of scope you could be leaking consumers which would eventually bog down your message broker. This is not only sloppy programming, but potentially problematic for other users trying to consume messages.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 19 at 20:30

























          answered Nov 19 at 18:20









          Justin Bertram

          2,4731315




          2,4731315












          • Which command closes my consumer after 5 seconds? Is it because I create a new one after 5 seconds? How do I avoid closing my consumer? Do you have any other hints on how I should change my application to work how I want it to work? Thank you for your time!
            – Lolan
            Nov 19 at 20:01












          • I updated my answer to clarify what happens after the 5 second sleep(). In my opinion your "application" needs to be completely rewritten to use the JMS API as it was designed to be used (e.g. eliminate the Thread implementation, only create a single consumer, etc.).
            – Justin Bertram
            Nov 19 at 20:33










          • Thank you. I tried to do just that in the past and faced the problem that I did not receive any onMessage notification while the application ran. See "Main Application: Listener" in this question. I also put a while loop right after the queueConnection.start(); to check if the consumer was still available and it was. I just didn't get any notification.
            – Lolan
            Nov 20 at 7:32












          • I just provided an answer on that question. That code suffered from a similar problem as the code from this question.
            – Justin Bertram
            Nov 20 at 16:26










          • You provided the details on why my code is not working as intended in this case (Consumer gets closed + garbage collected) so I will accept your answer as the solution. I updated the question mentioned in my previous comment to represent the current state of my code.
            – Lolan
            Nov 21 at 8:16


















          • Which command closes my consumer after 5 seconds? Is it because I create a new one after 5 seconds? How do I avoid closing my consumer? Do you have any other hints on how I should change my application to work how I want it to work? Thank you for your time!
            – Lolan
            Nov 19 at 20:01












          • I updated my answer to clarify what happens after the 5 second sleep(). In my opinion your "application" needs to be completely rewritten to use the JMS API as it was designed to be used (e.g. eliminate the Thread implementation, only create a single consumer, etc.).
            – Justin Bertram
            Nov 19 at 20:33










          • Thank you. I tried to do just that in the past and faced the problem that I did not receive any onMessage notification while the application ran. See "Main Application: Listener" in this question. I also put a while loop right after the queueConnection.start(); to check if the consumer was still available and it was. I just didn't get any notification.
            – Lolan
            Nov 20 at 7:32












          • I just provided an answer on that question. That code suffered from a similar problem as the code from this question.
            – Justin Bertram
            Nov 20 at 16:26










          • You provided the details on why my code is not working as intended in this case (Consumer gets closed + garbage collected) so I will accept your answer as the solution. I updated the question mentioned in my previous comment to represent the current state of my code.
            – Lolan
            Nov 21 at 8:16
















          Which command closes my consumer after 5 seconds? Is it because I create a new one after 5 seconds? How do I avoid closing my consumer? Do you have any other hints on how I should change my application to work how I want it to work? Thank you for your time!
          – Lolan
          Nov 19 at 20:01






          Which command closes my consumer after 5 seconds? Is it because I create a new one after 5 seconds? How do I avoid closing my consumer? Do you have any other hints on how I should change my application to work how I want it to work? Thank you for your time!
          – Lolan
          Nov 19 at 20:01














          I updated my answer to clarify what happens after the 5 second sleep(). In my opinion your "application" needs to be completely rewritten to use the JMS API as it was designed to be used (e.g. eliminate the Thread implementation, only create a single consumer, etc.).
          – Justin Bertram
          Nov 19 at 20:33




          I updated my answer to clarify what happens after the 5 second sleep(). In my opinion your "application" needs to be completely rewritten to use the JMS API as it was designed to be used (e.g. eliminate the Thread implementation, only create a single consumer, etc.).
          – Justin Bertram
          Nov 19 at 20:33












          Thank you. I tried to do just that in the past and faced the problem that I did not receive any onMessage notification while the application ran. See "Main Application: Listener" in this question. I also put a while loop right after the queueConnection.start(); to check if the consumer was still available and it was. I just didn't get any notification.
          – Lolan
          Nov 20 at 7:32






          Thank you. I tried to do just that in the past and faced the problem that I did not receive any onMessage notification while the application ran. See "Main Application: Listener" in this question. I also put a while loop right after the queueConnection.start(); to check if the consumer was still available and it was. I just didn't get any notification.
          – Lolan
          Nov 20 at 7:32














          I just provided an answer on that question. That code suffered from a similar problem as the code from this question.
          – Justin Bertram
          Nov 20 at 16:26




          I just provided an answer on that question. That code suffered from a similar problem as the code from this question.
          – Justin Bertram
          Nov 20 at 16:26












          You provided the details on why my code is not working as intended in this case (Consumer gets closed + garbage collected) so I will accept your answer as the solution. I updated the question mentioned in my previous comment to represent the current state of my code.
          – Lolan
          Nov 21 at 8:16




          You provided the details on why my code is not working as intended in this case (Consumer gets closed + garbage collected) so I will accept your answer as the solution. I updated the question mentioned in my previous comment to represent the current state of my code.
          – Lolan
          Nov 21 at 8:16


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53378450%2fcorrect-approach-to-initialize-an-asynchronous-jms-listener-and-let-it-run-infin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen