Show that Closure of a set is equal to the union of the set and its boundary











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to show that a closure of a set is equal to the union of the set and its boundary.




Let $A$ be a subset of a metric space $(X, d)$.
Then show that $overline A = A cup partial A$




Where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ and $partial A$ is the boundary of $A$ and $A^o$ is the interior of $A$.



My attempt:



Let $a in overline A$. Then either $a in overline A$ $A^o$ or $a in A^o$.



$a in A^o$ part is trivial so I omit this part.



Suppose $a in overline A$ $A^o$



Since $overline A$ $A^o$ is the smallest closed set containing $A$ and all the interior points of $A$ removed, only the boundary points of $A$ are left. So $a in overline A$ $A^o$ = $partial A$ $subset A cup partial A$.



Hence $overline A subset A cup partial A$



Now suppose $a in A cup partial A$. Again $a in A$ part is trivial so I omit this part. So we consider $a in partial A$.
Then $a in partial A = overline A$ $A^o$. So $a in A cup (overline A$ $A^o)$ = $overline A$.



So $A cup partial A subset overline A$



Therefore, $overline A = A cup partial A$



Does this proof make sense?



Any comment / correction is appreciated










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I would like to comment, but please tell me first: which definition of boundary are you using?
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 21 at 11:58










  • @JoséCarlosSantos Def : A point $a in X$ is a boundary point of $A$ if $forall r > 0$, $B_r (a) cap A neq emptyset$ and $B_r (a) cap A^c neq emptyset$
    – TUC
    Nov 21 at 12:02















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to show that a closure of a set is equal to the union of the set and its boundary.




Let $A$ be a subset of a metric space $(X, d)$.
Then show that $overline A = A cup partial A$




Where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ and $partial A$ is the boundary of $A$ and $A^o$ is the interior of $A$.



My attempt:



Let $a in overline A$. Then either $a in overline A$ $A^o$ or $a in A^o$.



$a in A^o$ part is trivial so I omit this part.



Suppose $a in overline A$ $A^o$



Since $overline A$ $A^o$ is the smallest closed set containing $A$ and all the interior points of $A$ removed, only the boundary points of $A$ are left. So $a in overline A$ $A^o$ = $partial A$ $subset A cup partial A$.



Hence $overline A subset A cup partial A$



Now suppose $a in A cup partial A$. Again $a in A$ part is trivial so I omit this part. So we consider $a in partial A$.
Then $a in partial A = overline A$ $A^o$. So $a in A cup (overline A$ $A^o)$ = $overline A$.



So $A cup partial A subset overline A$



Therefore, $overline A = A cup partial A$



Does this proof make sense?



Any comment / correction is appreciated










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I would like to comment, but please tell me first: which definition of boundary are you using?
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 21 at 11:58










  • @JoséCarlosSantos Def : A point $a in X$ is a boundary point of $A$ if $forall r > 0$, $B_r (a) cap A neq emptyset$ and $B_r (a) cap A^c neq emptyset$
    – TUC
    Nov 21 at 12:02













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm trying to show that a closure of a set is equal to the union of the set and its boundary.




Let $A$ be a subset of a metric space $(X, d)$.
Then show that $overline A = A cup partial A$




Where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ and $partial A$ is the boundary of $A$ and $A^o$ is the interior of $A$.



My attempt:



Let $a in overline A$. Then either $a in overline A$ $A^o$ or $a in A^o$.



$a in A^o$ part is trivial so I omit this part.



Suppose $a in overline A$ $A^o$



Since $overline A$ $A^o$ is the smallest closed set containing $A$ and all the interior points of $A$ removed, only the boundary points of $A$ are left. So $a in overline A$ $A^o$ = $partial A$ $subset A cup partial A$.



Hence $overline A subset A cup partial A$



Now suppose $a in A cup partial A$. Again $a in A$ part is trivial so I omit this part. So we consider $a in partial A$.
Then $a in partial A = overline A$ $A^o$. So $a in A cup (overline A$ $A^o)$ = $overline A$.



So $A cup partial A subset overline A$



Therefore, $overline A = A cup partial A$



Does this proof make sense?



Any comment / correction is appreciated










share|cite|improve this question













I'm trying to show that a closure of a set is equal to the union of the set and its boundary.




Let $A$ be a subset of a metric space $(X, d)$.
Then show that $overline A = A cup partial A$




Where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ and $partial A$ is the boundary of $A$ and $A^o$ is the interior of $A$.



My attempt:



Let $a in overline A$. Then either $a in overline A$ $A^o$ or $a in A^o$.



$a in A^o$ part is trivial so I omit this part.



Suppose $a in overline A$ $A^o$



Since $overline A$ $A^o$ is the smallest closed set containing $A$ and all the interior points of $A$ removed, only the boundary points of $A$ are left. So $a in overline A$ $A^o$ = $partial A$ $subset A cup partial A$.



Hence $overline A subset A cup partial A$



Now suppose $a in A cup partial A$. Again $a in A$ part is trivial so I omit this part. So we consider $a in partial A$.
Then $a in partial A = overline A$ $A^o$. So $a in A cup (overline A$ $A^o)$ = $overline A$.



So $A cup partial A subset overline A$



Therefore, $overline A = A cup partial A$



Does this proof make sense?



Any comment / correction is appreciated







metric-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 21 at 11:54









TUC

505




505












  • I would like to comment, but please tell me first: which definition of boundary are you using?
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 21 at 11:58










  • @JoséCarlosSantos Def : A point $a in X$ is a boundary point of $A$ if $forall r > 0$, $B_r (a) cap A neq emptyset$ and $B_r (a) cap A^c neq emptyset$
    – TUC
    Nov 21 at 12:02


















  • I would like to comment, but please tell me first: which definition of boundary are you using?
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 21 at 11:58










  • @JoséCarlosSantos Def : A point $a in X$ is a boundary point of $A$ if $forall r > 0$, $B_r (a) cap A neq emptyset$ and $B_r (a) cap A^c neq emptyset$
    – TUC
    Nov 21 at 12:02
















I would like to comment, but please tell me first: which definition of boundary are you using?
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 21 at 11:58




I would like to comment, but please tell me first: which definition of boundary are you using?
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 21 at 11:58












@JoséCarlosSantos Def : A point $a in X$ is a boundary point of $A$ if $forall r > 0$, $B_r (a) cap A neq emptyset$ and $B_r (a) cap A^c neq emptyset$
– TUC
Nov 21 at 12:02




@JoséCarlosSantos Def : A point $a in X$ is a boundary point of $A$ if $forall r > 0$, $B_r (a) cap A neq emptyset$ and $B_r (a) cap A^c neq emptyset$
– TUC
Nov 21 at 12:02










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Let $xin overline{A}$. Let $xnotin A$. Thus $xin Xsetminus Aimplies xin overline{Xsetminus A}$. Thus $xin overline{A}cap overline{Xsetminus A}=partial A$.



Again by definition $Asubset overline{A}$ and $partial Asubset overline{A}$. Hence $Acup partial Asubset overline{A}$.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Your proof is correct, except that you asserted that $overline Asetminusmathring A$ is the smallest closed set containing $A$. No; that would be $overline A$.



    Besides, since you use twice the fact that $partial A=overline Asetminusmathring A$, I suggest that you prove this as a lemma first.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007627%2fshow-that-closure-of-a-set-is-equal-to-the-union-of-the-set-and-its-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Let $xin overline{A}$. Let $xnotin A$. Thus $xin Xsetminus Aimplies xin overline{Xsetminus A}$. Thus $xin overline{A}cap overline{Xsetminus A}=partial A$.



      Again by definition $Asubset overline{A}$ and $partial Asubset overline{A}$. Hence $Acup partial Asubset overline{A}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        Let $xin overline{A}$. Let $xnotin A$. Thus $xin Xsetminus Aimplies xin overline{Xsetminus A}$. Thus $xin overline{A}cap overline{Xsetminus A}=partial A$.



        Again by definition $Asubset overline{A}$ and $partial Asubset overline{A}$. Hence $Acup partial Asubset overline{A}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          Let $xin overline{A}$. Let $xnotin A$. Thus $xin Xsetminus Aimplies xin overline{Xsetminus A}$. Thus $xin overline{A}cap overline{Xsetminus A}=partial A$.



          Again by definition $Asubset overline{A}$ and $partial Asubset overline{A}$. Hence $Acup partial Asubset overline{A}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Let $xin overline{A}$. Let $xnotin A$. Thus $xin Xsetminus Aimplies xin overline{Xsetminus A}$. Thus $xin overline{A}cap overline{Xsetminus A}=partial A$.



          Again by definition $Asubset overline{A}$ and $partial Asubset overline{A}$. Hence $Acup partial Asubset overline{A}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 21 at 12:07









          Anupam

          2,3361823




          2,3361823






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Your proof is correct, except that you asserted that $overline Asetminusmathring A$ is the smallest closed set containing $A$. No; that would be $overline A$.



              Besides, since you use twice the fact that $partial A=overline Asetminusmathring A$, I suggest that you prove this as a lemma first.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Your proof is correct, except that you asserted that $overline Asetminusmathring A$ is the smallest closed set containing $A$. No; that would be $overline A$.



                Besides, since you use twice the fact that $partial A=overline Asetminusmathring A$, I suggest that you prove this as a lemma first.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Your proof is correct, except that you asserted that $overline Asetminusmathring A$ is the smallest closed set containing $A$. No; that would be $overline A$.



                  Besides, since you use twice the fact that $partial A=overline Asetminusmathring A$, I suggest that you prove this as a lemma first.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Your proof is correct, except that you asserted that $overline Asetminusmathring A$ is the smallest closed set containing $A$. No; that would be $overline A$.



                  Besides, since you use twice the fact that $partial A=overline Asetminusmathring A$, I suggest that you prove this as a lemma first.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 21 at 12:08









                  José Carlos Santos

                  141k19111207




                  141k19111207






























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded



















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007627%2fshow-that-closure-of-a-set-is-equal-to-the-union-of-the-set-and-its-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      To store a contact into the json file from server.js file using a class in NodeJS

                      Redirect URL with Chrome Remote Debugging Android Devices

                      Dieringhausen