If $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[1,4]$ and uniformly continuous on $[2,5]$ is $f$ uniformly continuous on...











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












If $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[1,4]$ and uniformly continuous on $[2,5]$ is $f$ uniformly continuous on $[1,5]$?



I know that the answer is that it is true, but I am interested as to why my proof is incorrect. What I did was:



Since



$exists delta_1 s.t. |x-y|<delta_1 to |f(x)-f(y)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$ for $x,y in [1,2]$ and $exists delta_2 s.t. |x-y|<delta_2 to |f(x)-f(y)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$ for $x,y in [2,5]$



Then set $delta_3 = min{delta_1,delta_2}$
and you get (by triangle inequality)



$|f(x)-f(y)|=|f(x)-f(3)+f(3)-f(y)|leq |f(x)-f(3)| + |f(y)-f(3)|leqfrac{epsilon}{2}+frac{epsilon}{2}=epsilon$



as long as $|x-y|<delta_3$
What's wrong with this proof and how can I fix it?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • What does $3$ have to do with it? In general $|f(x) - f(3)|$ and $|f(y) - f(3)|$ are not small.
    – Robert Israel
    Nov 20 at 20:27












  • @RobertIsrael because 3 is in both intervals, so we know that there exists a delta that makes $|f(x)-f(3)|<epsilon$, right?
    – Riley H
    Nov 20 at 20:31










  • Would there be any other changes if you used continuity at 2? @hamam_Abdallah
    – Riley H
    Nov 20 at 20:32






  • 2




    Here is a bizarre proof: If $f$ is continuous on $[1,4]$ and on $[2,5]$, then it is continuous on $[1,5]$ by the pasting lemma. Then, being continuous on a compact set, it is uniformly continuous.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Nov 20 at 20:35






  • 1




    For the standard proof, let $delta_1, delta_2$ be as in your setting and let $delta = min{delta_1, delta_2, 2}$. If $x,yin[1,5]$ satisfy $|x-y|<delta$, argue that either $x,yin[1,4]$ or $x,yin[2,5]$ holds, so that the defining property of $delta_i$'s kicks in.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Nov 20 at 20:39

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












If $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[1,4]$ and uniformly continuous on $[2,5]$ is $f$ uniformly continuous on $[1,5]$?



I know that the answer is that it is true, but I am interested as to why my proof is incorrect. What I did was:



Since



$exists delta_1 s.t. |x-y|<delta_1 to |f(x)-f(y)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$ for $x,y in [1,2]$ and $exists delta_2 s.t. |x-y|<delta_2 to |f(x)-f(y)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$ for $x,y in [2,5]$



Then set $delta_3 = min{delta_1,delta_2}$
and you get (by triangle inequality)



$|f(x)-f(y)|=|f(x)-f(3)+f(3)-f(y)|leq |f(x)-f(3)| + |f(y)-f(3)|leqfrac{epsilon}{2}+frac{epsilon}{2}=epsilon$



as long as $|x-y|<delta_3$
What's wrong with this proof and how can I fix it?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • What does $3$ have to do with it? In general $|f(x) - f(3)|$ and $|f(y) - f(3)|$ are not small.
    – Robert Israel
    Nov 20 at 20:27












  • @RobertIsrael because 3 is in both intervals, so we know that there exists a delta that makes $|f(x)-f(3)|<epsilon$, right?
    – Riley H
    Nov 20 at 20:31










  • Would there be any other changes if you used continuity at 2? @hamam_Abdallah
    – Riley H
    Nov 20 at 20:32






  • 2




    Here is a bizarre proof: If $f$ is continuous on $[1,4]$ and on $[2,5]$, then it is continuous on $[1,5]$ by the pasting lemma. Then, being continuous on a compact set, it is uniformly continuous.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Nov 20 at 20:35






  • 1




    For the standard proof, let $delta_1, delta_2$ be as in your setting and let $delta = min{delta_1, delta_2, 2}$. If $x,yin[1,5]$ satisfy $|x-y|<delta$, argue that either $x,yin[1,4]$ or $x,yin[2,5]$ holds, so that the defining property of $delta_i$'s kicks in.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Nov 20 at 20:39















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





If $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[1,4]$ and uniformly continuous on $[2,5]$ is $f$ uniformly continuous on $[1,5]$?



I know that the answer is that it is true, but I am interested as to why my proof is incorrect. What I did was:



Since



$exists delta_1 s.t. |x-y|<delta_1 to |f(x)-f(y)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$ for $x,y in [1,2]$ and $exists delta_2 s.t. |x-y|<delta_2 to |f(x)-f(y)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$ for $x,y in [2,5]$



Then set $delta_3 = min{delta_1,delta_2}$
and you get (by triangle inequality)



$|f(x)-f(y)|=|f(x)-f(3)+f(3)-f(y)|leq |f(x)-f(3)| + |f(y)-f(3)|leqfrac{epsilon}{2}+frac{epsilon}{2}=epsilon$



as long as $|x-y|<delta_3$
What's wrong with this proof and how can I fix it?










share|cite|improve this question













If $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[1,4]$ and uniformly continuous on $[2,5]$ is $f$ uniformly continuous on $[1,5]$?



I know that the answer is that it is true, but I am interested as to why my proof is incorrect. What I did was:



Since



$exists delta_1 s.t. |x-y|<delta_1 to |f(x)-f(y)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$ for $x,y in [1,2]$ and $exists delta_2 s.t. |x-y|<delta_2 to |f(x)-f(y)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$ for $x,y in [2,5]$



Then set $delta_3 = min{delta_1,delta_2}$
and you get (by triangle inequality)



$|f(x)-f(y)|=|f(x)-f(3)+f(3)-f(y)|leq |f(x)-f(3)| + |f(y)-f(3)|leqfrac{epsilon}{2}+frac{epsilon}{2}=epsilon$



as long as $|x-y|<delta_3$
What's wrong with this proof and how can I fix it?







real-analysis proof-verification epsilon-delta






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 20 at 20:24









Riley H

594




594












  • What does $3$ have to do with it? In general $|f(x) - f(3)|$ and $|f(y) - f(3)|$ are not small.
    – Robert Israel
    Nov 20 at 20:27












  • @RobertIsrael because 3 is in both intervals, so we know that there exists a delta that makes $|f(x)-f(3)|<epsilon$, right?
    – Riley H
    Nov 20 at 20:31










  • Would there be any other changes if you used continuity at 2? @hamam_Abdallah
    – Riley H
    Nov 20 at 20:32






  • 2




    Here is a bizarre proof: If $f$ is continuous on $[1,4]$ and on $[2,5]$, then it is continuous on $[1,5]$ by the pasting lemma. Then, being continuous on a compact set, it is uniformly continuous.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Nov 20 at 20:35






  • 1




    For the standard proof, let $delta_1, delta_2$ be as in your setting and let $delta = min{delta_1, delta_2, 2}$. If $x,yin[1,5]$ satisfy $|x-y|<delta$, argue that either $x,yin[1,4]$ or $x,yin[2,5]$ holds, so that the defining property of $delta_i$'s kicks in.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Nov 20 at 20:39




















  • What does $3$ have to do with it? In general $|f(x) - f(3)|$ and $|f(y) - f(3)|$ are not small.
    – Robert Israel
    Nov 20 at 20:27












  • @RobertIsrael because 3 is in both intervals, so we know that there exists a delta that makes $|f(x)-f(3)|<epsilon$, right?
    – Riley H
    Nov 20 at 20:31










  • Would there be any other changes if you used continuity at 2? @hamam_Abdallah
    – Riley H
    Nov 20 at 20:32






  • 2




    Here is a bizarre proof: If $f$ is continuous on $[1,4]$ and on $[2,5]$, then it is continuous on $[1,5]$ by the pasting lemma. Then, being continuous on a compact set, it is uniformly continuous.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Nov 20 at 20:35






  • 1




    For the standard proof, let $delta_1, delta_2$ be as in your setting and let $delta = min{delta_1, delta_2, 2}$. If $x,yin[1,5]$ satisfy $|x-y|<delta$, argue that either $x,yin[1,4]$ or $x,yin[2,5]$ holds, so that the defining property of $delta_i$'s kicks in.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Nov 20 at 20:39


















What does $3$ have to do with it? In general $|f(x) - f(3)|$ and $|f(y) - f(3)|$ are not small.
– Robert Israel
Nov 20 at 20:27






What does $3$ have to do with it? In general $|f(x) - f(3)|$ and $|f(y) - f(3)|$ are not small.
– Robert Israel
Nov 20 at 20:27














@RobertIsrael because 3 is in both intervals, so we know that there exists a delta that makes $|f(x)-f(3)|<epsilon$, right?
– Riley H
Nov 20 at 20:31




@RobertIsrael because 3 is in both intervals, so we know that there exists a delta that makes $|f(x)-f(3)|<epsilon$, right?
– Riley H
Nov 20 at 20:31












Would there be any other changes if you used continuity at 2? @hamam_Abdallah
– Riley H
Nov 20 at 20:32




Would there be any other changes if you used continuity at 2? @hamam_Abdallah
– Riley H
Nov 20 at 20:32




2




2




Here is a bizarre proof: If $f$ is continuous on $[1,4]$ and on $[2,5]$, then it is continuous on $[1,5]$ by the pasting lemma. Then, being continuous on a compact set, it is uniformly continuous.
– Sangchul Lee
Nov 20 at 20:35




Here is a bizarre proof: If $f$ is continuous on $[1,4]$ and on $[2,5]$, then it is continuous on $[1,5]$ by the pasting lemma. Then, being continuous on a compact set, it is uniformly continuous.
– Sangchul Lee
Nov 20 at 20:35




1




1




For the standard proof, let $delta_1, delta_2$ be as in your setting and let $delta = min{delta_1, delta_2, 2}$. If $x,yin[1,5]$ satisfy $|x-y|<delta$, argue that either $x,yin[1,4]$ or $x,yin[2,5]$ holds, so that the defining property of $delta_i$'s kicks in.
– Sangchul Lee
Nov 20 at 20:39






For the standard proof, let $delta_1, delta_2$ be as in your setting and let $delta = min{delta_1, delta_2, 2}$. If $x,yin[1,5]$ satisfy $|x-y|<delta$, argue that either $x,yin[1,4]$ or $x,yin[2,5]$ holds, so that the defining property of $delta_i$'s kicks in.
– Sangchul Lee
Nov 20 at 20:39












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










hint



The uniform continuity at $[1,4]$ gives $delta_1$



the UC at $[4,5]$ will give $delta_2$.



the continuity at $x=4$ gives $delta_3$ such that



$$|x-4|<delta_3 implies |f(x)-f(4)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$$



Take $delta=min(delta_i,i=1,2,3).$



If $xin[1,4]$ and $yin[4,5]$ are such $|x-y|<delta$ then



$|x-4|<delta_3$ and $|y-4|<delta_3$



thus



$$|f(x)-f(y)|=$$
$$=|f(x)-f(4)+f(4)-f(y)|<epsilon$$






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006848%2fif-f-is-uniformly-continuous-on-1-4-and-uniformly-continuous-on-2-5-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    hint



    The uniform continuity at $[1,4]$ gives $delta_1$



    the UC at $[4,5]$ will give $delta_2$.



    the continuity at $x=4$ gives $delta_3$ such that



    $$|x-4|<delta_3 implies |f(x)-f(4)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$$



    Take $delta=min(delta_i,i=1,2,3).$



    If $xin[1,4]$ and $yin[4,5]$ are such $|x-y|<delta$ then



    $|x-4|<delta_3$ and $|y-4|<delta_3$



    thus



    $$|f(x)-f(y)|=$$
    $$=|f(x)-f(4)+f(4)-f(y)|<epsilon$$






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      hint



      The uniform continuity at $[1,4]$ gives $delta_1$



      the UC at $[4,5]$ will give $delta_2$.



      the continuity at $x=4$ gives $delta_3$ such that



      $$|x-4|<delta_3 implies |f(x)-f(4)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$$



      Take $delta=min(delta_i,i=1,2,3).$



      If $xin[1,4]$ and $yin[4,5]$ are such $|x-y|<delta$ then



      $|x-4|<delta_3$ and $|y-4|<delta_3$



      thus



      $$|f(x)-f(y)|=$$
      $$=|f(x)-f(4)+f(4)-f(y)|<epsilon$$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted






        hint



        The uniform continuity at $[1,4]$ gives $delta_1$



        the UC at $[4,5]$ will give $delta_2$.



        the continuity at $x=4$ gives $delta_3$ such that



        $$|x-4|<delta_3 implies |f(x)-f(4)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$$



        Take $delta=min(delta_i,i=1,2,3).$



        If $xin[1,4]$ and $yin[4,5]$ are such $|x-y|<delta$ then



        $|x-4|<delta_3$ and $|y-4|<delta_3$



        thus



        $$|f(x)-f(y)|=$$
        $$=|f(x)-f(4)+f(4)-f(y)|<epsilon$$






        share|cite|improve this answer














        hint



        The uniform continuity at $[1,4]$ gives $delta_1$



        the UC at $[4,5]$ will give $delta_2$.



        the continuity at $x=4$ gives $delta_3$ such that



        $$|x-4|<delta_3 implies |f(x)-f(4)|<frac{epsilon}{2}$$



        Take $delta=min(delta_i,i=1,2,3).$



        If $xin[1,4]$ and $yin[4,5]$ are such $|x-y|<delta$ then



        $|x-4|<delta_3$ and $|y-4|<delta_3$



        thus



        $$|f(x)-f(y)|=$$
        $$=|f(x)-f(4)+f(4)-f(y)|<epsilon$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 20 at 20:44

























        answered Nov 20 at 20:39









        hamam_Abdallah

        36.7k21533




        36.7k21533






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006848%2fif-f-is-uniformly-continuous-on-1-4-and-uniformly-continuous-on-2-5-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen