Prove continuity by definition and epsilon-delta property. $g(x)=sqrt{2x+1} , x_0=-0.5$











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












By definition:



Suppose $lim x_n = x_0$ $lim f(x_n)$ = $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}$ = $sqrt{2[lim (x_n)] +1}$ = $sqrt{2x_0 +1}$ = $f(x_0)$



By epsilon-delta property:



Let $epsilon > 0$. We want $|f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$, while $|x-x_0|<delta$.



$|f(x)-f(x_0)|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2x_0+1}|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2(-0.5)+1}$=$sqrt{2x+1}<epsilon$



I think this is a good start (but correct me if it's not), but I am clueless as to what to do from here.



Just looking for tips and corrections if need be. Please do not solve for me.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    By definition:



    Suppose $lim x_n = x_0$ $lim f(x_n)$ = $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}$ = $sqrt{2[lim (x_n)] +1}$ = $sqrt{2x_0 +1}$ = $f(x_0)$



    By epsilon-delta property:



    Let $epsilon > 0$. We want $|f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$, while $|x-x_0|<delta$.



    $|f(x)-f(x_0)|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2x_0+1}|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2(-0.5)+1}$=$sqrt{2x+1}<epsilon$



    I think this is a good start (but correct me if it's not), but I am clueless as to what to do from here.



    Just looking for tips and corrections if need be. Please do not solve for me.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      By definition:



      Suppose $lim x_n = x_0$ $lim f(x_n)$ = $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}$ = $sqrt{2[lim (x_n)] +1}$ = $sqrt{2x_0 +1}$ = $f(x_0)$



      By epsilon-delta property:



      Let $epsilon > 0$. We want $|f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$, while $|x-x_0|<delta$.



      $|f(x)-f(x_0)|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2x_0+1}|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2(-0.5)+1}$=$sqrt{2x+1}<epsilon$



      I think this is a good start (but correct me if it's not), but I am clueless as to what to do from here.



      Just looking for tips and corrections if need be. Please do not solve for me.










      share|cite|improve this question













      By definition:



      Suppose $lim x_n = x_0$ $lim f(x_n)$ = $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}$ = $sqrt{2[lim (x_n)] +1}$ = $sqrt{2x_0 +1}$ = $f(x_0)$



      By epsilon-delta property:



      Let $epsilon > 0$. We want $|f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$, while $|x-x_0|<delta$.



      $|f(x)-f(x_0)|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2x_0+1}|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2(-0.5)+1}$=$sqrt{2x+1}<epsilon$



      I think this is a good start (but correct me if it's not), but I am clueless as to what to do from here.



      Just looking for tips and corrections if need be. Please do not solve for me.







      proof-verification continuity proof-writing epsilon-delta






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 at 20:52









      Elizabeth Austin Griffith

      173




      173






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Well you’re trying to prove continuity, but at the same time you use continuity of square root when you write $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}=sqrt{2lim x_n +1}$



          I don’t think it’s good



          But the second proof when you use epsilon-delta seems to be more correct






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
            – Anton Zagrivin
            Nov 20 at 21:06










          • So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
            – Elizabeth Austin Griffith
            Nov 20 at 21:15


















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          For $epsilon-delta$ proofs it is often quite useful so set





          • $h = x-x_0$. In your case this is $h = x+frac{1}{2}$.

          • Note that $|x-x_0| < delta Leftrightarrow |h|<delta$.


          Now, check what happens to $|g(x) - g(x_0)|$ while trying to isolate a useful expression in $h$.



          In your case there is an additional contraint as the expression under the root should not be negative. So, you have $x geq -frac{1}{2} Leftrightarrow h geq 0$.



          Now, you get
          $$|sqrt{2x+1} - sqrt{2x_0+1}| stackrel{x = h-frac{1}{2}, sqrt{2x_0+1} = 0}{=} sqrt{2left(h-frac{1}{2} right)+1} = sqrt{2h} stackrel{!}{<} epsilon Rightarrow h < frac{epsilon^2}{2}$$



          It follows immediately that $boxed{delta = frac{epsilon^2}{2}}$ does it because
          $$sqrt{2h}< sqrt{2delta} = sqrt{2frac{epsilon^2}{2}}= epsilon$$
          $$$$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006873%2fprove-continuity-by-definition-and-epsilon-delta-property-gx-sqrt2x1-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Well you’re trying to prove continuity, but at the same time you use continuity of square root when you write $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}=sqrt{2lim x_n +1}$



            I don’t think it’s good



            But the second proof when you use epsilon-delta seems to be more correct






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
              – Anton Zagrivin
              Nov 20 at 21:06










            • So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
              – Elizabeth Austin Griffith
              Nov 20 at 21:15















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Well you’re trying to prove continuity, but at the same time you use continuity of square root when you write $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}=sqrt{2lim x_n +1}$



            I don’t think it’s good



            But the second proof when you use epsilon-delta seems to be more correct






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
              – Anton Zagrivin
              Nov 20 at 21:06










            • So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
              – Elizabeth Austin Griffith
              Nov 20 at 21:15













            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Well you’re trying to prove continuity, but at the same time you use continuity of square root when you write $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}=sqrt{2lim x_n +1}$



            I don’t think it’s good



            But the second proof when you use epsilon-delta seems to be more correct






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Well you’re trying to prove continuity, but at the same time you use continuity of square root when you write $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}=sqrt{2lim x_n +1}$



            I don’t think it’s good



            But the second proof when you use epsilon-delta seems to be more correct







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 20 at 21:01









            Anton Zagrivin

            1257




            1257












            • All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
              – Anton Zagrivin
              Nov 20 at 21:06










            • So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
              – Elizabeth Austin Griffith
              Nov 20 at 21:15


















            • All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
              – Anton Zagrivin
              Nov 20 at 21:06










            • So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
              – Elizabeth Austin Griffith
              Nov 20 at 21:15
















            All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
            – Anton Zagrivin
            Nov 20 at 21:06




            All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
            – Anton Zagrivin
            Nov 20 at 21:06












            So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
            – Elizabeth Austin Griffith
            Nov 20 at 21:15




            So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
            – Elizabeth Austin Griffith
            Nov 20 at 21:15










            up vote
            0
            down vote













            For $epsilon-delta$ proofs it is often quite useful so set





            • $h = x-x_0$. In your case this is $h = x+frac{1}{2}$.

            • Note that $|x-x_0| < delta Leftrightarrow |h|<delta$.


            Now, check what happens to $|g(x) - g(x_0)|$ while trying to isolate a useful expression in $h$.



            In your case there is an additional contraint as the expression under the root should not be negative. So, you have $x geq -frac{1}{2} Leftrightarrow h geq 0$.



            Now, you get
            $$|sqrt{2x+1} - sqrt{2x_0+1}| stackrel{x = h-frac{1}{2}, sqrt{2x_0+1} = 0}{=} sqrt{2left(h-frac{1}{2} right)+1} = sqrt{2h} stackrel{!}{<} epsilon Rightarrow h < frac{epsilon^2}{2}$$



            It follows immediately that $boxed{delta = frac{epsilon^2}{2}}$ does it because
            $$sqrt{2h}< sqrt{2delta} = sqrt{2frac{epsilon^2}{2}}= epsilon$$
            $$$$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              For $epsilon-delta$ proofs it is often quite useful so set





              • $h = x-x_0$. In your case this is $h = x+frac{1}{2}$.

              • Note that $|x-x_0| < delta Leftrightarrow |h|<delta$.


              Now, check what happens to $|g(x) - g(x_0)|$ while trying to isolate a useful expression in $h$.



              In your case there is an additional contraint as the expression under the root should not be negative. So, you have $x geq -frac{1}{2} Leftrightarrow h geq 0$.



              Now, you get
              $$|sqrt{2x+1} - sqrt{2x_0+1}| stackrel{x = h-frac{1}{2}, sqrt{2x_0+1} = 0}{=} sqrt{2left(h-frac{1}{2} right)+1} = sqrt{2h} stackrel{!}{<} epsilon Rightarrow h < frac{epsilon^2}{2}$$



              It follows immediately that $boxed{delta = frac{epsilon^2}{2}}$ does it because
              $$sqrt{2h}< sqrt{2delta} = sqrt{2frac{epsilon^2}{2}}= epsilon$$
              $$$$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                For $epsilon-delta$ proofs it is often quite useful so set





                • $h = x-x_0$. In your case this is $h = x+frac{1}{2}$.

                • Note that $|x-x_0| < delta Leftrightarrow |h|<delta$.


                Now, check what happens to $|g(x) - g(x_0)|$ while trying to isolate a useful expression in $h$.



                In your case there is an additional contraint as the expression under the root should not be negative. So, you have $x geq -frac{1}{2} Leftrightarrow h geq 0$.



                Now, you get
                $$|sqrt{2x+1} - sqrt{2x_0+1}| stackrel{x = h-frac{1}{2}, sqrt{2x_0+1} = 0}{=} sqrt{2left(h-frac{1}{2} right)+1} = sqrt{2h} stackrel{!}{<} epsilon Rightarrow h < frac{epsilon^2}{2}$$



                It follows immediately that $boxed{delta = frac{epsilon^2}{2}}$ does it because
                $$sqrt{2h}< sqrt{2delta} = sqrt{2frac{epsilon^2}{2}}= epsilon$$
                $$$$






                share|cite|improve this answer












                For $epsilon-delta$ proofs it is often quite useful so set





                • $h = x-x_0$. In your case this is $h = x+frac{1}{2}$.

                • Note that $|x-x_0| < delta Leftrightarrow |h|<delta$.


                Now, check what happens to $|g(x) - g(x_0)|$ while trying to isolate a useful expression in $h$.



                In your case there is an additional contraint as the expression under the root should not be negative. So, you have $x geq -frac{1}{2} Leftrightarrow h geq 0$.



                Now, you get
                $$|sqrt{2x+1} - sqrt{2x_0+1}| stackrel{x = h-frac{1}{2}, sqrt{2x_0+1} = 0}{=} sqrt{2left(h-frac{1}{2} right)+1} = sqrt{2h} stackrel{!}{<} epsilon Rightarrow h < frac{epsilon^2}{2}$$



                It follows immediately that $boxed{delta = frac{epsilon^2}{2}}$ does it because
                $$sqrt{2h}< sqrt{2delta} = sqrt{2frac{epsilon^2}{2}}= epsilon$$
                $$$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 21 at 9:49









                trancelocation

                8,1611519




                8,1611519






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006873%2fprove-continuity-by-definition-and-epsilon-delta-property-gx-sqrt2x1-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen