Prove continuity by definition and epsilon-delta property. $g(x)=sqrt{2x+1} , x_0=-0.5$
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
By definition:
Suppose $lim x_n = x_0$ $lim f(x_n)$ = $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}$ = $sqrt{2[lim (x_n)] +1}$ = $sqrt{2x_0 +1}$ = $f(x_0)$
By epsilon-delta property:
Let $epsilon > 0$. We want $|f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$, while $|x-x_0|<delta$.
$|f(x)-f(x_0)|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2x_0+1}|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2(-0.5)+1}$=$sqrt{2x+1}<epsilon$
I think this is a good start (but correct me if it's not), but I am clueless as to what to do from here.
Just looking for tips and corrections if need be. Please do not solve for me.
proof-verification continuity proof-writing epsilon-delta
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
By definition:
Suppose $lim x_n = x_0$ $lim f(x_n)$ = $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}$ = $sqrt{2[lim (x_n)] +1}$ = $sqrt{2x_0 +1}$ = $f(x_0)$
By epsilon-delta property:
Let $epsilon > 0$. We want $|f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$, while $|x-x_0|<delta$.
$|f(x)-f(x_0)|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2x_0+1}|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2(-0.5)+1}$=$sqrt{2x+1}<epsilon$
I think this is a good start (but correct me if it's not), but I am clueless as to what to do from here.
Just looking for tips and corrections if need be. Please do not solve for me.
proof-verification continuity proof-writing epsilon-delta
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
By definition:
Suppose $lim x_n = x_0$ $lim f(x_n)$ = $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}$ = $sqrt{2[lim (x_n)] +1}$ = $sqrt{2x_0 +1}$ = $f(x_0)$
By epsilon-delta property:
Let $epsilon > 0$. We want $|f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$, while $|x-x_0|<delta$.
$|f(x)-f(x_0)|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2x_0+1}|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2(-0.5)+1}$=$sqrt{2x+1}<epsilon$
I think this is a good start (but correct me if it's not), but I am clueless as to what to do from here.
Just looking for tips and corrections if need be. Please do not solve for me.
proof-verification continuity proof-writing epsilon-delta
By definition:
Suppose $lim x_n = x_0$ $lim f(x_n)$ = $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}$ = $sqrt{2[lim (x_n)] +1}$ = $sqrt{2x_0 +1}$ = $f(x_0)$
By epsilon-delta property:
Let $epsilon > 0$. We want $|f(x) - f(x_0)| < epsilon$, while $|x-x_0|<delta$.
$|f(x)-f(x_0)|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2x_0+1}|$ = $|sqrt{2x+1}-sqrt{2(-0.5)+1}$=$sqrt{2x+1}<epsilon$
I think this is a good start (but correct me if it's not), but I am clueless as to what to do from here.
Just looking for tips and corrections if need be. Please do not solve for me.
proof-verification continuity proof-writing epsilon-delta
proof-verification continuity proof-writing epsilon-delta
asked Nov 20 at 20:52
Elizabeth Austin Griffith
173
173
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Well you’re trying to prove continuity, but at the same time you use continuity of square root when you write $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}=sqrt{2lim x_n +1}$
I don’t think it’s good
But the second proof when you use epsilon-delta seems to be more correct
All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
– Anton Zagrivin
Nov 20 at 21:06
So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
– Elizabeth Austin Griffith
Nov 20 at 21:15
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
For $epsilon-delta$ proofs it is often quite useful so set
$h = x-x_0$. In your case this is $h = x+frac{1}{2}$.- Note that $|x-x_0| < delta Leftrightarrow |h|<delta$.
Now, check what happens to $|g(x) - g(x_0)|$ while trying to isolate a useful expression in $h$.
In your case there is an additional contraint as the expression under the root should not be negative. So, you have $x geq -frac{1}{2} Leftrightarrow h geq 0$.
Now, you get
$$|sqrt{2x+1} - sqrt{2x_0+1}| stackrel{x = h-frac{1}{2}, sqrt{2x_0+1} = 0}{=} sqrt{2left(h-frac{1}{2} right)+1} = sqrt{2h} stackrel{!}{<} epsilon Rightarrow h < frac{epsilon^2}{2}$$
It follows immediately that $boxed{delta = frac{epsilon^2}{2}}$ does it because
$$sqrt{2h}< sqrt{2delta} = sqrt{2frac{epsilon^2}{2}}= epsilon$$
$$$$
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Well you’re trying to prove continuity, but at the same time you use continuity of square root when you write $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}=sqrt{2lim x_n +1}$
I don’t think it’s good
But the second proof when you use epsilon-delta seems to be more correct
All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
– Anton Zagrivin
Nov 20 at 21:06
So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
– Elizabeth Austin Griffith
Nov 20 at 21:15
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Well you’re trying to prove continuity, but at the same time you use continuity of square root when you write $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}=sqrt{2lim x_n +1}$
I don’t think it’s good
But the second proof when you use epsilon-delta seems to be more correct
All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
– Anton Zagrivin
Nov 20 at 21:06
So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
– Elizabeth Austin Griffith
Nov 20 at 21:15
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Well you’re trying to prove continuity, but at the same time you use continuity of square root when you write $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}=sqrt{2lim x_n +1}$
I don’t think it’s good
But the second proof when you use epsilon-delta seems to be more correct
Well you’re trying to prove continuity, but at the same time you use continuity of square root when you write $lim sqrt{2x_n+1}=sqrt{2lim x_n +1}$
I don’t think it’s good
But the second proof when you use epsilon-delta seems to be more correct
answered Nov 20 at 21:01
Anton Zagrivin
1257
1257
All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
– Anton Zagrivin
Nov 20 at 21:06
So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
– Elizabeth Austin Griffith
Nov 20 at 21:15
add a comment |
All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
– Anton Zagrivin
Nov 20 at 21:06
So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
– Elizabeth Austin Griffith
Nov 20 at 21:15
All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
– Anton Zagrivin
Nov 20 at 21:06
All you left to do is show that $sqrt{2x+1}<varepsilon$ when $x$ is close to $x_0=0.5$, but I think it’s quite clear
– Anton Zagrivin
Nov 20 at 21:06
So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
– Elizabeth Austin Griffith
Nov 20 at 21:15
So would I set my $delta$ to be $frac{epsilon^2 -1}{2}$ ?
– Elizabeth Austin Griffith
Nov 20 at 21:15
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
For $epsilon-delta$ proofs it is often quite useful so set
$h = x-x_0$. In your case this is $h = x+frac{1}{2}$.- Note that $|x-x_0| < delta Leftrightarrow |h|<delta$.
Now, check what happens to $|g(x) - g(x_0)|$ while trying to isolate a useful expression in $h$.
In your case there is an additional contraint as the expression under the root should not be negative. So, you have $x geq -frac{1}{2} Leftrightarrow h geq 0$.
Now, you get
$$|sqrt{2x+1} - sqrt{2x_0+1}| stackrel{x = h-frac{1}{2}, sqrt{2x_0+1} = 0}{=} sqrt{2left(h-frac{1}{2} right)+1} = sqrt{2h} stackrel{!}{<} epsilon Rightarrow h < frac{epsilon^2}{2}$$
It follows immediately that $boxed{delta = frac{epsilon^2}{2}}$ does it because
$$sqrt{2h}< sqrt{2delta} = sqrt{2frac{epsilon^2}{2}}= epsilon$$
$$$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
For $epsilon-delta$ proofs it is often quite useful so set
$h = x-x_0$. In your case this is $h = x+frac{1}{2}$.- Note that $|x-x_0| < delta Leftrightarrow |h|<delta$.
Now, check what happens to $|g(x) - g(x_0)|$ while trying to isolate a useful expression in $h$.
In your case there is an additional contraint as the expression under the root should not be negative. So, you have $x geq -frac{1}{2} Leftrightarrow h geq 0$.
Now, you get
$$|sqrt{2x+1} - sqrt{2x_0+1}| stackrel{x = h-frac{1}{2}, sqrt{2x_0+1} = 0}{=} sqrt{2left(h-frac{1}{2} right)+1} = sqrt{2h} stackrel{!}{<} epsilon Rightarrow h < frac{epsilon^2}{2}$$
It follows immediately that $boxed{delta = frac{epsilon^2}{2}}$ does it because
$$sqrt{2h}< sqrt{2delta} = sqrt{2frac{epsilon^2}{2}}= epsilon$$
$$$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
For $epsilon-delta$ proofs it is often quite useful so set
$h = x-x_0$. In your case this is $h = x+frac{1}{2}$.- Note that $|x-x_0| < delta Leftrightarrow |h|<delta$.
Now, check what happens to $|g(x) - g(x_0)|$ while trying to isolate a useful expression in $h$.
In your case there is an additional contraint as the expression under the root should not be negative. So, you have $x geq -frac{1}{2} Leftrightarrow h geq 0$.
Now, you get
$$|sqrt{2x+1} - sqrt{2x_0+1}| stackrel{x = h-frac{1}{2}, sqrt{2x_0+1} = 0}{=} sqrt{2left(h-frac{1}{2} right)+1} = sqrt{2h} stackrel{!}{<} epsilon Rightarrow h < frac{epsilon^2}{2}$$
It follows immediately that $boxed{delta = frac{epsilon^2}{2}}$ does it because
$$sqrt{2h}< sqrt{2delta} = sqrt{2frac{epsilon^2}{2}}= epsilon$$
$$$$
For $epsilon-delta$ proofs it is often quite useful so set
$h = x-x_0$. In your case this is $h = x+frac{1}{2}$.- Note that $|x-x_0| < delta Leftrightarrow |h|<delta$.
Now, check what happens to $|g(x) - g(x_0)|$ while trying to isolate a useful expression in $h$.
In your case there is an additional contraint as the expression under the root should not be negative. So, you have $x geq -frac{1}{2} Leftrightarrow h geq 0$.
Now, you get
$$|sqrt{2x+1} - sqrt{2x_0+1}| stackrel{x = h-frac{1}{2}, sqrt{2x_0+1} = 0}{=} sqrt{2left(h-frac{1}{2} right)+1} = sqrt{2h} stackrel{!}{<} epsilon Rightarrow h < frac{epsilon^2}{2}$$
It follows immediately that $boxed{delta = frac{epsilon^2}{2}}$ does it because
$$sqrt{2h}< sqrt{2delta} = sqrt{2frac{epsilon^2}{2}}= epsilon$$
$$$$
answered Nov 21 at 9:49
trancelocation
8,1611519
8,1611519
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006873%2fprove-continuity-by-definition-and-epsilon-delta-property-gx-sqrt2x1-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown