$X^*$ with $weak^*$-topology is first category in itself when $X$ is infinite dimensional Fréchet space
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am reading Rudin's Functional Analysis and stuck at the problem in exercise 11 on page 87 : Let $X$ be infinite dimensional Fréchet space , then $X^*$ with it's $weak^*$-topology is of first category in itself. Here is my attempt.
Consider the a basic open set at origin corresponding to ${x_1,...,x_n}subseteq X$ of $weak^*$-topology on $X^*$ given by ${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}$. Now let $yin X$ and consider a particular $weak^*$ nbd ${x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ which contains a basic nbd i.e. for some $x_1,x_2,...,x_nin X$ and $epsilon>0$ we have $${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}subseteq {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}.$$ Now this implies that if $z^*in X^*$ and $|z^*(x_i)|=0, forall x_i$ with $i=1,2,...,n$ then $tz^* in {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ for each $t$ in scalar field $Bbb K$ and this implies $|tz^*(y)|<1, forall tin Bbb Kimplies z^*=0$. Now for $xin X$ defining $f_x:X^*rightarrow Bbb K$ by $f_x(Lambda)=Lambda(x), forall Lambda in X^*$ we have $$ker(f_y)supseteq bigcap_{i=1}^n ker(f_{x_i})$$ so that $f_y$ can be written as linear combination of $f_{x_i},i=1,2,...,n$ and this implies $y$ can be written as linear combination of $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$.
Any suggestion or solution will help me . Thanks in advance.
general-topology functional-analysis operator-theory baire-category weak-topology
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am reading Rudin's Functional Analysis and stuck at the problem in exercise 11 on page 87 : Let $X$ be infinite dimensional Fréchet space , then $X^*$ with it's $weak^*$-topology is of first category in itself. Here is my attempt.
Consider the a basic open set at origin corresponding to ${x_1,...,x_n}subseteq X$ of $weak^*$-topology on $X^*$ given by ${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}$. Now let $yin X$ and consider a particular $weak^*$ nbd ${x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ which contains a basic nbd i.e. for some $x_1,x_2,...,x_nin X$ and $epsilon>0$ we have $${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}subseteq {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}.$$ Now this implies that if $z^*in X^*$ and $|z^*(x_i)|=0, forall x_i$ with $i=1,2,...,n$ then $tz^* in {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ for each $t$ in scalar field $Bbb K$ and this implies $|tz^*(y)|<1, forall tin Bbb Kimplies z^*=0$. Now for $xin X$ defining $f_x:X^*rightarrow Bbb K$ by $f_x(Lambda)=Lambda(x), forall Lambda in X^*$ we have $$ker(f_y)supseteq bigcap_{i=1}^n ker(f_{x_i})$$ so that $f_y$ can be written as linear combination of $f_{x_i},i=1,2,...,n$ and this implies $y$ can be written as linear combination of $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$.
Any suggestion or solution will help me . Thanks in advance.
general-topology functional-analysis operator-theory baire-category weak-topology
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am reading Rudin's Functional Analysis and stuck at the problem in exercise 11 on page 87 : Let $X$ be infinite dimensional Fréchet space , then $X^*$ with it's $weak^*$-topology is of first category in itself. Here is my attempt.
Consider the a basic open set at origin corresponding to ${x_1,...,x_n}subseteq X$ of $weak^*$-topology on $X^*$ given by ${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}$. Now let $yin X$ and consider a particular $weak^*$ nbd ${x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ which contains a basic nbd i.e. for some $x_1,x_2,...,x_nin X$ and $epsilon>0$ we have $${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}subseteq {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}.$$ Now this implies that if $z^*in X^*$ and $|z^*(x_i)|=0, forall x_i$ with $i=1,2,...,n$ then $tz^* in {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ for each $t$ in scalar field $Bbb K$ and this implies $|tz^*(y)|<1, forall tin Bbb Kimplies z^*=0$. Now for $xin X$ defining $f_x:X^*rightarrow Bbb K$ by $f_x(Lambda)=Lambda(x), forall Lambda in X^*$ we have $$ker(f_y)supseteq bigcap_{i=1}^n ker(f_{x_i})$$ so that $f_y$ can be written as linear combination of $f_{x_i},i=1,2,...,n$ and this implies $y$ can be written as linear combination of $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$.
Any suggestion or solution will help me . Thanks in advance.
general-topology functional-analysis operator-theory baire-category weak-topology
I am reading Rudin's Functional Analysis and stuck at the problem in exercise 11 on page 87 : Let $X$ be infinite dimensional Fréchet space , then $X^*$ with it's $weak^*$-topology is of first category in itself. Here is my attempt.
Consider the a basic open set at origin corresponding to ${x_1,...,x_n}subseteq X$ of $weak^*$-topology on $X^*$ given by ${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}$. Now let $yin X$ and consider a particular $weak^*$ nbd ${x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ which contains a basic nbd i.e. for some $x_1,x_2,...,x_nin X$ and $epsilon>0$ we have $${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}subseteq {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}.$$ Now this implies that if $z^*in X^*$ and $|z^*(x_i)|=0, forall x_i$ with $i=1,2,...,n$ then $tz^* in {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ for each $t$ in scalar field $Bbb K$ and this implies $|tz^*(y)|<1, forall tin Bbb Kimplies z^*=0$. Now for $xin X$ defining $f_x:X^*rightarrow Bbb K$ by $f_x(Lambda)=Lambda(x), forall Lambda in X^*$ we have $$ker(f_y)supseteq bigcap_{i=1}^n ker(f_{x_i})$$ so that $f_y$ can be written as linear combination of $f_{x_i},i=1,2,...,n$ and this implies $y$ can be written as linear combination of $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$.
Any suggestion or solution will help me . Thanks in advance.
general-topology functional-analysis operator-theory baire-category weak-topology
general-topology functional-analysis operator-theory baire-category weak-topology
asked Nov 20 at 20:24
UserD
1036
1036
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Take a decreasing basic sequence of $0$-neighbourhoods $U_n$ in $X$ (i.e., every $0$-neighbourhood contains some $U_n$, such a sequence exists because $X$ is metrizable). The polars $U_n^circ$ are weak$^*$-closed with $X^*=bigcup_{ninmathbb N} U_n^circ$. By your description of the basic weak$^*$ open sets in $X^*$ it is clear that the interior of each $U_n^circ$ is empty. (A different argument would use Alaoglu's theorem: If $U_n^circ$ had interior points it would be a compact $0$-neighbourhood in $X^*$, and any topological vector space with a compact $0$-neighbourhood is finite dimensional.)
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Take a decreasing basic sequence of $0$-neighbourhoods $U_n$ in $X$ (i.e., every $0$-neighbourhood contains some $U_n$, such a sequence exists because $X$ is metrizable). The polars $U_n^circ$ are weak$^*$-closed with $X^*=bigcup_{ninmathbb N} U_n^circ$. By your description of the basic weak$^*$ open sets in $X^*$ it is clear that the interior of each $U_n^circ$ is empty. (A different argument would use Alaoglu's theorem: If $U_n^circ$ had interior points it would be a compact $0$-neighbourhood in $X^*$, and any topological vector space with a compact $0$-neighbourhood is finite dimensional.)
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Take a decreasing basic sequence of $0$-neighbourhoods $U_n$ in $X$ (i.e., every $0$-neighbourhood contains some $U_n$, such a sequence exists because $X$ is metrizable). The polars $U_n^circ$ are weak$^*$-closed with $X^*=bigcup_{ninmathbb N} U_n^circ$. By your description of the basic weak$^*$ open sets in $X^*$ it is clear that the interior of each $U_n^circ$ is empty. (A different argument would use Alaoglu's theorem: If $U_n^circ$ had interior points it would be a compact $0$-neighbourhood in $X^*$, and any topological vector space with a compact $0$-neighbourhood is finite dimensional.)
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Take a decreasing basic sequence of $0$-neighbourhoods $U_n$ in $X$ (i.e., every $0$-neighbourhood contains some $U_n$, such a sequence exists because $X$ is metrizable). The polars $U_n^circ$ are weak$^*$-closed with $X^*=bigcup_{ninmathbb N} U_n^circ$. By your description of the basic weak$^*$ open sets in $X^*$ it is clear that the interior of each $U_n^circ$ is empty. (A different argument would use Alaoglu's theorem: If $U_n^circ$ had interior points it would be a compact $0$-neighbourhood in $X^*$, and any topological vector space with a compact $0$-neighbourhood is finite dimensional.)
Take a decreasing basic sequence of $0$-neighbourhoods $U_n$ in $X$ (i.e., every $0$-neighbourhood contains some $U_n$, such a sequence exists because $X$ is metrizable). The polars $U_n^circ$ are weak$^*$-closed with $X^*=bigcup_{ninmathbb N} U_n^circ$. By your description of the basic weak$^*$ open sets in $X^*$ it is clear that the interior of each $U_n^circ$ is empty. (A different argument would use Alaoglu's theorem: If $U_n^circ$ had interior points it would be a compact $0$-neighbourhood in $X^*$, and any topological vector space with a compact $0$-neighbourhood is finite dimensional.)
answered Nov 21 at 8:40
Jochen
6,615922
6,615922
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006849%2fx-with-weak-topology-is-first-category-in-itself-when-x-is-infinite-di%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown