$X^*$ with $weak^*$-topology is first category in itself when $X$ is infinite dimensional Fréchet space











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am reading Rudin's Functional Analysis and stuck at the problem in exercise 11 on page 87 : Let $X$ be infinite dimensional Fréchet space , then $X^*$ with it's $weak^*$-topology is of first category in itself. Here is my attempt.



Consider the a basic open set at origin corresponding to ${x_1,...,x_n}subseteq X$ of $weak^*$-topology on $X^*$ given by ${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}$. Now let $yin X$ and consider a particular $weak^*$ nbd ${x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ which contains a basic nbd i.e. for some $x_1,x_2,...,x_nin X$ and $epsilon>0$ we have $${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}subseteq {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}.$$ Now this implies that if $z^*in X^*$ and $|z^*(x_i)|=0, forall x_i$ with $i=1,2,...,n$ then $tz^* in {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ for each $t$ in scalar field $Bbb K$ and this implies $|tz^*(y)|<1, forall tin Bbb Kimplies z^*=0$. Now for $xin X$ defining $f_x:X^*rightarrow Bbb K$ by $f_x(Lambda)=Lambda(x), forall Lambda in X^*$ we have $$ker(f_y)supseteq bigcap_{i=1}^n ker(f_{x_i})$$ so that $f_y$ can be written as linear combination of $f_{x_i},i=1,2,...,n$ and this implies $y$ can be written as linear combination of $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$.



Any suggestion or solution will help me . Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I am reading Rudin's Functional Analysis and stuck at the problem in exercise 11 on page 87 : Let $X$ be infinite dimensional Fréchet space , then $X^*$ with it's $weak^*$-topology is of first category in itself. Here is my attempt.



    Consider the a basic open set at origin corresponding to ${x_1,...,x_n}subseteq X$ of $weak^*$-topology on $X^*$ given by ${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}$. Now let $yin X$ and consider a particular $weak^*$ nbd ${x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ which contains a basic nbd i.e. for some $x_1,x_2,...,x_nin X$ and $epsilon>0$ we have $${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}subseteq {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}.$$ Now this implies that if $z^*in X^*$ and $|z^*(x_i)|=0, forall x_i$ with $i=1,2,...,n$ then $tz^* in {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ for each $t$ in scalar field $Bbb K$ and this implies $|tz^*(y)|<1, forall tin Bbb Kimplies z^*=0$. Now for $xin X$ defining $f_x:X^*rightarrow Bbb K$ by $f_x(Lambda)=Lambda(x), forall Lambda in X^*$ we have $$ker(f_y)supseteq bigcap_{i=1}^n ker(f_{x_i})$$ so that $f_y$ can be written as linear combination of $f_{x_i},i=1,2,...,n$ and this implies $y$ can be written as linear combination of $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$.



    Any suggestion or solution will help me . Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I am reading Rudin's Functional Analysis and stuck at the problem in exercise 11 on page 87 : Let $X$ be infinite dimensional Fréchet space , then $X^*$ with it's $weak^*$-topology is of first category in itself. Here is my attempt.



      Consider the a basic open set at origin corresponding to ${x_1,...,x_n}subseteq X$ of $weak^*$-topology on $X^*$ given by ${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}$. Now let $yin X$ and consider a particular $weak^*$ nbd ${x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ which contains a basic nbd i.e. for some $x_1,x_2,...,x_nin X$ and $epsilon>0$ we have $${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}subseteq {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}.$$ Now this implies that if $z^*in X^*$ and $|z^*(x_i)|=0, forall x_i$ with $i=1,2,...,n$ then $tz^* in {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ for each $t$ in scalar field $Bbb K$ and this implies $|tz^*(y)|<1, forall tin Bbb Kimplies z^*=0$. Now for $xin X$ defining $f_x:X^*rightarrow Bbb K$ by $f_x(Lambda)=Lambda(x), forall Lambda in X^*$ we have $$ker(f_y)supseteq bigcap_{i=1}^n ker(f_{x_i})$$ so that $f_y$ can be written as linear combination of $f_{x_i},i=1,2,...,n$ and this implies $y$ can be written as linear combination of $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$.



      Any suggestion or solution will help me . Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I am reading Rudin's Functional Analysis and stuck at the problem in exercise 11 on page 87 : Let $X$ be infinite dimensional Fréchet space , then $X^*$ with it's $weak^*$-topology is of first category in itself. Here is my attempt.



      Consider the a basic open set at origin corresponding to ${x_1,...,x_n}subseteq X$ of $weak^*$-topology on $X^*$ given by ${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}$. Now let $yin X$ and consider a particular $weak^*$ nbd ${x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ which contains a basic nbd i.e. for some $x_1,x_2,...,x_nin X$ and $epsilon>0$ we have $${x^*in X^* : |x^*(x_i)|<epsilon, forall i=1,2,..,n}subseteq {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}.$$ Now this implies that if $z^*in X^*$ and $|z^*(x_i)|=0, forall x_i$ with $i=1,2,...,n$ then $tz^* in {x^*in X^*: |x^*(y)|<1}$ for each $t$ in scalar field $Bbb K$ and this implies $|tz^*(y)|<1, forall tin Bbb Kimplies z^*=0$. Now for $xin X$ defining $f_x:X^*rightarrow Bbb K$ by $f_x(Lambda)=Lambda(x), forall Lambda in X^*$ we have $$ker(f_y)supseteq bigcap_{i=1}^n ker(f_{x_i})$$ so that $f_y$ can be written as linear combination of $f_{x_i},i=1,2,...,n$ and this implies $y$ can be written as linear combination of $x_1,x_2,...,x_n$.



      Any suggestion or solution will help me . Thanks in advance.







      general-topology functional-analysis operator-theory baire-category weak-topology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 at 20:24









      UserD

      1036




      1036






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Take a decreasing basic sequence of $0$-neighbourhoods $U_n$ in $X$ (i.e., every $0$-neighbourhood contains some $U_n$, such a sequence exists because $X$ is metrizable). The polars $U_n^circ$ are weak$^*$-closed with $X^*=bigcup_{ninmathbb N} U_n^circ$. By your description of the basic weak$^*$ open sets in $X^*$ it is clear that the interior of each $U_n^circ$ is empty. (A different argument would use Alaoglu's theorem: If $U_n^circ$ had interior points it would be a compact $0$-neighbourhood in $X^*$, and any topological vector space with a compact $0$-neighbourhood is finite dimensional.)






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006849%2fx-with-weak-topology-is-first-category-in-itself-when-x-is-infinite-di%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            Take a decreasing basic sequence of $0$-neighbourhoods $U_n$ in $X$ (i.e., every $0$-neighbourhood contains some $U_n$, such a sequence exists because $X$ is metrizable). The polars $U_n^circ$ are weak$^*$-closed with $X^*=bigcup_{ninmathbb N} U_n^circ$. By your description of the basic weak$^*$ open sets in $X^*$ it is clear that the interior of each $U_n^circ$ is empty. (A different argument would use Alaoglu's theorem: If $U_n^circ$ had interior points it would be a compact $0$-neighbourhood in $X^*$, and any topological vector space with a compact $0$-neighbourhood is finite dimensional.)






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              Take a decreasing basic sequence of $0$-neighbourhoods $U_n$ in $X$ (i.e., every $0$-neighbourhood contains some $U_n$, such a sequence exists because $X$ is metrizable). The polars $U_n^circ$ are weak$^*$-closed with $X^*=bigcup_{ninmathbb N} U_n^circ$. By your description of the basic weak$^*$ open sets in $X^*$ it is clear that the interior of each $U_n^circ$ is empty. (A different argument would use Alaoglu's theorem: If $U_n^circ$ had interior points it would be a compact $0$-neighbourhood in $X^*$, and any topological vector space with a compact $0$-neighbourhood is finite dimensional.)






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                Take a decreasing basic sequence of $0$-neighbourhoods $U_n$ in $X$ (i.e., every $0$-neighbourhood contains some $U_n$, such a sequence exists because $X$ is metrizable). The polars $U_n^circ$ are weak$^*$-closed with $X^*=bigcup_{ninmathbb N} U_n^circ$. By your description of the basic weak$^*$ open sets in $X^*$ it is clear that the interior of each $U_n^circ$ is empty. (A different argument would use Alaoglu's theorem: If $U_n^circ$ had interior points it would be a compact $0$-neighbourhood in $X^*$, and any topological vector space with a compact $0$-neighbourhood is finite dimensional.)






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Take a decreasing basic sequence of $0$-neighbourhoods $U_n$ in $X$ (i.e., every $0$-neighbourhood contains some $U_n$, such a sequence exists because $X$ is metrizable). The polars $U_n^circ$ are weak$^*$-closed with $X^*=bigcup_{ninmathbb N} U_n^circ$. By your description of the basic weak$^*$ open sets in $X^*$ it is clear that the interior of each $U_n^circ$ is empty. (A different argument would use Alaoglu's theorem: If $U_n^circ$ had interior points it would be a compact $0$-neighbourhood in $X^*$, and any topological vector space with a compact $0$-neighbourhood is finite dimensional.)







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 21 at 8:40









                Jochen

                6,615922




                6,615922






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006849%2fx-with-weak-topology-is-first-category-in-itself-when-x-is-infinite-di%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen