If $X times X$ is normal, then is $X times X times X$ normal?
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I am looking at some topological dimension theory for product spaces, and in trying to construct a certain type of counterexample it's become relevant to consider the question in the title above. I am interested in finding a normal space $X$ whose products with itself is eventually non-normal, but not immediately.
It's not actually important for my application that it happens in three steps as opposed to more. An alternative question would be: Is there a normal space $X$ with $X times X = Y$ normal, but $Y times Y$ is not normal?
The original problem is here:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/315657/if-textdimx-times-x-2-textdimx-does-textdimxn-n-textdim
Thanks for any help!
As mentioned in a comment below, if we assume that $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space and that $X times X times X$ is completely normal, then $X$ is metrizable. Thus it stands to reason that a compact counterexample may be harder (if not impossible) to construct. The author in the linked paper wonders aloud if the complete normality of $X times X$ is sufficient for the metrizability of $X$, so it may also be advisable to avoid cases where $X times X$ is completely normal.
general-topology examples-counterexamples dimension-theory separation-axioms product-space
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I am looking at some topological dimension theory for product spaces, and in trying to construct a certain type of counterexample it's become relevant to consider the question in the title above. I am interested in finding a normal space $X$ whose products with itself is eventually non-normal, but not immediately.
It's not actually important for my application that it happens in three steps as opposed to more. An alternative question would be: Is there a normal space $X$ with $X times X = Y$ normal, but $Y times Y$ is not normal?
The original problem is here:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/315657/if-textdimx-times-x-2-textdimx-does-textdimxn-n-textdim
Thanks for any help!
As mentioned in a comment below, if we assume that $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space and that $X times X times X$ is completely normal, then $X$ is metrizable. Thus it stands to reason that a compact counterexample may be harder (if not impossible) to construct. The author in the linked paper wonders aloud if the complete normality of $X times X$ is sufficient for the metrizability of $X$, so it may also be advisable to avoid cases where $X times X$ is completely normal.
general-topology examples-counterexamples dimension-theory separation-axioms product-space
1
This is not an answer, but somehow related: math.stackexchange.com/q/2872102
– Paul Frost
Nov 21 at 8:57
Interesting result, I will mention it in an edit.
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:00
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I am looking at some topological dimension theory for product spaces, and in trying to construct a certain type of counterexample it's become relevant to consider the question in the title above. I am interested in finding a normal space $X$ whose products with itself is eventually non-normal, but not immediately.
It's not actually important for my application that it happens in three steps as opposed to more. An alternative question would be: Is there a normal space $X$ with $X times X = Y$ normal, but $Y times Y$ is not normal?
The original problem is here:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/315657/if-textdimx-times-x-2-textdimx-does-textdimxn-n-textdim
Thanks for any help!
As mentioned in a comment below, if we assume that $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space and that $X times X times X$ is completely normal, then $X$ is metrizable. Thus it stands to reason that a compact counterexample may be harder (if not impossible) to construct. The author in the linked paper wonders aloud if the complete normality of $X times X$ is sufficient for the metrizability of $X$, so it may also be advisable to avoid cases where $X times X$ is completely normal.
general-topology examples-counterexamples dimension-theory separation-axioms product-space
I am looking at some topological dimension theory for product spaces, and in trying to construct a certain type of counterexample it's become relevant to consider the question in the title above. I am interested in finding a normal space $X$ whose products with itself is eventually non-normal, but not immediately.
It's not actually important for my application that it happens in three steps as opposed to more. An alternative question would be: Is there a normal space $X$ with $X times X = Y$ normal, but $Y times Y$ is not normal?
The original problem is here:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/315657/if-textdimx-times-x-2-textdimx-does-textdimxn-n-textdim
Thanks for any help!
As mentioned in a comment below, if we assume that $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space and that $X times X times X$ is completely normal, then $X$ is metrizable. Thus it stands to reason that a compact counterexample may be harder (if not impossible) to construct. The author in the linked paper wonders aloud if the complete normality of $X times X$ is sufficient for the metrizability of $X$, so it may also be advisable to avoid cases where $X times X$ is completely normal.
general-topology examples-counterexamples dimension-theory separation-axioms product-space
general-topology examples-counterexamples dimension-theory separation-axioms product-space
edited Nov 21 at 10:04
asked Nov 21 at 5:36
John Samples
1,081516
1,081516
1
This is not an answer, but somehow related: math.stackexchange.com/q/2872102
– Paul Frost
Nov 21 at 8:57
Interesting result, I will mention it in an edit.
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:00
add a comment |
1
This is not an answer, but somehow related: math.stackexchange.com/q/2872102
– Paul Frost
Nov 21 at 8:57
Interesting result, I will mention it in an edit.
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:00
1
1
This is not an answer, but somehow related: math.stackexchange.com/q/2872102
– Paul Frost
Nov 21 at 8:57
This is not an answer, but somehow related: math.stackexchange.com/q/2872102
– Paul Frost
Nov 21 at 8:57
Interesting result, I will mention it in an edit.
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:00
Interesting result, I will mention it in an edit.
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:00
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
A construction can be found in (or weaned from)
Przymusinski, Teodor C., Normality and paracompactness in finite and countable Cartesian products, Fundam. Math. 105, 87-104 (1980). ZBL0438.54021.
wherein the following remarkable result is proved:
Theorem 1. For every $k$ and $m$ such that $1 leq k leq m leq omega$ there exists a separable and first coutnable space $X = X(k,m)$ such that
$X^n$ is paracompact (Lindelöf, subparacompact) if and only if $n < k$,
$X^n$ is normal (collectionwise normal) if and only if $n < m$.
In particular, we can construct a (normal) space such that the failure of normality of its powers happens first at any prescribed finite power.
Wow, what a result!
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:06
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
A construction can be found in (or weaned from)
Przymusinski, Teodor C., Normality and paracompactness in finite and countable Cartesian products, Fundam. Math. 105, 87-104 (1980). ZBL0438.54021.
wherein the following remarkable result is proved:
Theorem 1. For every $k$ and $m$ such that $1 leq k leq m leq omega$ there exists a separable and first coutnable space $X = X(k,m)$ such that
$X^n$ is paracompact (Lindelöf, subparacompact) if and only if $n < k$,
$X^n$ is normal (collectionwise normal) if and only if $n < m$.
In particular, we can construct a (normal) space such that the failure of normality of its powers happens first at any prescribed finite power.
Wow, what a result!
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:06
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
A construction can be found in (or weaned from)
Przymusinski, Teodor C., Normality and paracompactness in finite and countable Cartesian products, Fundam. Math. 105, 87-104 (1980). ZBL0438.54021.
wherein the following remarkable result is proved:
Theorem 1. For every $k$ and $m$ such that $1 leq k leq m leq omega$ there exists a separable and first coutnable space $X = X(k,m)$ such that
$X^n$ is paracompact (Lindelöf, subparacompact) if and only if $n < k$,
$X^n$ is normal (collectionwise normal) if and only if $n < m$.
In particular, we can construct a (normal) space such that the failure of normality of its powers happens first at any prescribed finite power.
Wow, what a result!
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:06
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
A construction can be found in (or weaned from)
Przymusinski, Teodor C., Normality and paracompactness in finite and countable Cartesian products, Fundam. Math. 105, 87-104 (1980). ZBL0438.54021.
wherein the following remarkable result is proved:
Theorem 1. For every $k$ and $m$ such that $1 leq k leq m leq omega$ there exists a separable and first coutnable space $X = X(k,m)$ such that
$X^n$ is paracompact (Lindelöf, subparacompact) if and only if $n < k$,
$X^n$ is normal (collectionwise normal) if and only if $n < m$.
In particular, we can construct a (normal) space such that the failure of normality of its powers happens first at any prescribed finite power.
A construction can be found in (or weaned from)
Przymusinski, Teodor C., Normality and paracompactness in finite and countable Cartesian products, Fundam. Math. 105, 87-104 (1980). ZBL0438.54021.
wherein the following remarkable result is proved:
Theorem 1. For every $k$ and $m$ such that $1 leq k leq m leq omega$ there exists a separable and first coutnable space $X = X(k,m)$ such that
$X^n$ is paracompact (Lindelöf, subparacompact) if and only if $n < k$,
$X^n$ is normal (collectionwise normal) if and only if $n < m$.
In particular, we can construct a (normal) space such that the failure of normality of its powers happens first at any prescribed finite power.
answered Nov 21 at 9:53
1-3-7-Trimethylxanthine
4,388927
4,388927
Wow, what a result!
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:06
add a comment |
Wow, what a result!
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:06
Wow, what a result!
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:06
Wow, what a result!
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:06
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007308%2fif-x-times-x-is-normal-then-is-x-times-x-times-x-normal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
This is not an answer, but somehow related: math.stackexchange.com/q/2872102
– Paul Frost
Nov 21 at 8:57
Interesting result, I will mention it in an edit.
– John Samples
Nov 21 at 10:00