Let $G=H_{1} times H_{2} dots times H_{n}$ if and only if $ ; forall g in G$, $g= h_{1}h_{2}ldots h_n$ where...
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $G=H_{1} times H_{2} dots times H_{n}$ if and only if $ ;
> forall g in G$, $g= h_{1}h_{2}ldots h_n$ where $h_{i} in H_{i}$ is
unique. Here, $H_{i}lhd G ; forall i$
I have proved this for the case when we have only $2$ normal groups, $(n=2)$ but I am finding it difficult to prove the general result. I feel like I am missing some important intermediate results.
group-theory direct-product
asked Nov 21 at 4:51
So Lo
62218
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $G=H_{1} times H_{2} dots times H_{n}$ if and only if $ ;
> forall g in G$, $g= h_{1}h_{2}ldots h_n$ where $h_{i} in H_{i}$ is
unique. Here, $H_{i}lhd G ; forall i$
I have proved this for the case when we have only $2$ normal groups, $(n=2)$ but I am finding it difficult to prove the general result. I feel like I am missing some important intermediate results.
group-theory direct-product
asked Nov 21 at 4:51
So Lo
62218
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $G=H_{1} times H_{2} dots times H_{n}$ if and only if $ ;
> forall g in G$, $g= h_{1}h_{2}ldots h_n$ where $h_{i} in H_{i}$ is
unique. Here, $H_{i}lhd G ; forall i$
I have proved this for the case when we have only $2$ normal groups, $(n=2)$ but I am finding it difficult to prove the general result. I feel like I am missing some important intermediate results.
group-theory direct-product
asked Nov 21 at 4:51
So Lo
62218
Let $G=H_{1} times H_{2} dots times H_{n}$ if and only if $ ;
> forall g in G$, $g= h_{1}h_{2}ldots h_n$ where $h_{i} in H_{i}$ is
unique. Here, $H_{i}lhd G ; forall i$
I have proved this for the case when we have only $2$ normal groups, $(n=2)$ but I am finding it difficult to prove the general result. I feel like I am missing some important intermediate results.
group-theory direct-product
group-theory direct-product
asked Nov 21 at 4:51
So Lo
62218
asked Nov 21 at 4:51
So Lo
62218
asked Nov 21 at 4:51
So Lo
62218
asked Nov 21 at 4:51
So Lo
62218
asked Nov 21 at 4:51
So Lo
62218
62218
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Hint: As you told you have done this for 2 normal subgroup then you can tackle other by mathematical induction.
Take base case for n=2 . which you had already proved
Assume this result for n such normal group direct product
then to prove for n+1 take assumed normal group as single piece normal subgroup and this problem reduces to 2 now
answered Nov 21 at 5:15
Shubham
1,3711518
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Hint: As you told you have done this for 2 normal subgroup then you can tackle other by mathematical induction.
Take base case for n=2 . which you had already proved
Assume this result for n such normal group direct product
then to prove for n+1 take assumed normal group as single piece normal subgroup and this problem reduces to 2 now
answered Nov 21 at 5:15
Shubham
1,3711518
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Hint: As you told you have done this for 2 normal subgroup then you can tackle other by mathematical induction.
Take base case for n=2 . which you had already proved
Assume this result for n such normal group direct product
then to prove for n+1 take assumed normal group as single piece normal subgroup and this problem reduces to 2 now
answered Nov 21 at 5:15
Shubham
1,3711518
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Hint: As you told you have done this for 2 normal subgroup then you can tackle other by mathematical induction.
Take base case for n=2 . which you had already proved
Assume this result for n such normal group direct product
then to prove for n+1 take assumed normal group as single piece normal subgroup and this problem reduces to 2 now
answered Nov 21 at 5:15
Shubham
1,3711518
Hint: As you told you have done this for 2 normal subgroup then you can tackle other by mathematical induction.
Take base case for n=2 . which you had already proved
Assume this result for n such normal group direct product
then to prove for n+1 take assumed normal group as single piece normal subgroup and this problem reduces to 2 now
answered Nov 21 at 5:15
Shubham
1,3711518
answered Nov 21 at 5:15
Shubham
1,3711518
answered Nov 21 at 5:15
Shubham
1,3711518
answered Nov 21 at 5:15
Shubham
1,3711518
1,3711518
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007275%2flet-g-h-1-times-h-2-dots-times-h-n-if-and-only-if-forall-g-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
