A variation on Dixmier's counterexample concerning centralizers in $A_1$
I have asked this question in MO, but have not received any comments/answers, so now I ask it here:
This question asks the following: "Suppose $k$ is a field of characteristic zero and $P$ and $Q$ are commuting elements of the first Weyl algebra. Is it true that $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials in some third element $H$?"
It was answered in the negative (the counterexample seems to be due to Dixmier and Makar-Limanov).
Now replace the field of characteristic zero $k$ by a non-normal integral domain of characteristic zero $R$, for example $R=mathbb{C}[t^2,t^3]$.
Is it possible to adjust $P$ and $Q$ to some $tilde{P}$ and $tilde{Q}$ satisfying the following three conditions:
(i) $[tilde{P},tilde{Q}]=0$.
(ii) $tilde{P}$ and $tilde{Q}$ are not polynomials in some third element $H$.
(iii) $tilde{P}$ has a 'Dixmier mate', namely, there exists $B$ in the first Weyl algebra over $R$ such that $[tilde{P},B]=1$.
Remarks:
(1) The analogous question in $R[x,y]$ can be found here.
(2) In contrast, in $k[x,y]$, it is true that if $operatorname{Jac}(p,q)=0$, then $p=u(h)$ and $q=v(h)$, for some $h in k[x,y]$, $u(T),v(T) in k[T]$; see, for example, Corollary 1.3 in Nagata's paper ($k$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero) or this question ($k$ is an arbitrary field).
$k$ can be replaced by any normal integral domain of characteristic zero, see this answer.
Any hints and comments are welcome!
ring-theory noncommutative-algebra
add a comment |
I have asked this question in MO, but have not received any comments/answers, so now I ask it here:
This question asks the following: "Suppose $k$ is a field of characteristic zero and $P$ and $Q$ are commuting elements of the first Weyl algebra. Is it true that $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials in some third element $H$?"
It was answered in the negative (the counterexample seems to be due to Dixmier and Makar-Limanov).
Now replace the field of characteristic zero $k$ by a non-normal integral domain of characteristic zero $R$, for example $R=mathbb{C}[t^2,t^3]$.
Is it possible to adjust $P$ and $Q$ to some $tilde{P}$ and $tilde{Q}$ satisfying the following three conditions:
(i) $[tilde{P},tilde{Q}]=0$.
(ii) $tilde{P}$ and $tilde{Q}$ are not polynomials in some third element $H$.
(iii) $tilde{P}$ has a 'Dixmier mate', namely, there exists $B$ in the first Weyl algebra over $R$ such that $[tilde{P},B]=1$.
Remarks:
(1) The analogous question in $R[x,y]$ can be found here.
(2) In contrast, in $k[x,y]$, it is true that if $operatorname{Jac}(p,q)=0$, then $p=u(h)$ and $q=v(h)$, for some $h in k[x,y]$, $u(T),v(T) in k[T]$; see, for example, Corollary 1.3 in Nagata's paper ($k$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero) or this question ($k$ is an arbitrary field).
$k$ can be replaced by any normal integral domain of characteristic zero, see this answer.
Any hints and comments are welcome!
ring-theory noncommutative-algebra
add a comment |
I have asked this question in MO, but have not received any comments/answers, so now I ask it here:
This question asks the following: "Suppose $k$ is a field of characteristic zero and $P$ and $Q$ are commuting elements of the first Weyl algebra. Is it true that $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials in some third element $H$?"
It was answered in the negative (the counterexample seems to be due to Dixmier and Makar-Limanov).
Now replace the field of characteristic zero $k$ by a non-normal integral domain of characteristic zero $R$, for example $R=mathbb{C}[t^2,t^3]$.
Is it possible to adjust $P$ and $Q$ to some $tilde{P}$ and $tilde{Q}$ satisfying the following three conditions:
(i) $[tilde{P},tilde{Q}]=0$.
(ii) $tilde{P}$ and $tilde{Q}$ are not polynomials in some third element $H$.
(iii) $tilde{P}$ has a 'Dixmier mate', namely, there exists $B$ in the first Weyl algebra over $R$ such that $[tilde{P},B]=1$.
Remarks:
(1) The analogous question in $R[x,y]$ can be found here.
(2) In contrast, in $k[x,y]$, it is true that if $operatorname{Jac}(p,q)=0$, then $p=u(h)$ and $q=v(h)$, for some $h in k[x,y]$, $u(T),v(T) in k[T]$; see, for example, Corollary 1.3 in Nagata's paper ($k$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero) or this question ($k$ is an arbitrary field).
$k$ can be replaced by any normal integral domain of characteristic zero, see this answer.
Any hints and comments are welcome!
ring-theory noncommutative-algebra
I have asked this question in MO, but have not received any comments/answers, so now I ask it here:
This question asks the following: "Suppose $k$ is a field of characteristic zero and $P$ and $Q$ are commuting elements of the first Weyl algebra. Is it true that $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials in some third element $H$?"
It was answered in the negative (the counterexample seems to be due to Dixmier and Makar-Limanov).
Now replace the field of characteristic zero $k$ by a non-normal integral domain of characteristic zero $R$, for example $R=mathbb{C}[t^2,t^3]$.
Is it possible to adjust $P$ and $Q$ to some $tilde{P}$ and $tilde{Q}$ satisfying the following three conditions:
(i) $[tilde{P},tilde{Q}]=0$.
(ii) $tilde{P}$ and $tilde{Q}$ are not polynomials in some third element $H$.
(iii) $tilde{P}$ has a 'Dixmier mate', namely, there exists $B$ in the first Weyl algebra over $R$ such that $[tilde{P},B]=1$.
Remarks:
(1) The analogous question in $R[x,y]$ can be found here.
(2) In contrast, in $k[x,y]$, it is true that if $operatorname{Jac}(p,q)=0$, then $p=u(h)$ and $q=v(h)$, for some $h in k[x,y]$, $u(T),v(T) in k[T]$; see, for example, Corollary 1.3 in Nagata's paper ($k$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero) or this question ($k$ is an arbitrary field).
$k$ can be replaced by any normal integral domain of characteristic zero, see this answer.
Any hints and comments are welcome!
ring-theory noncommutative-algebra
ring-theory noncommutative-algebra
edited Nov 29 at 15:28
asked Nov 29 at 15:12
user237522
2,0871617
2,0871617
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018747%2fa-variation-on-dixmiers-counterexample-concerning-centralizers-in-a-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018747%2fa-variation-on-dixmiers-counterexample-concerning-centralizers-in-a-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown