For which rings $R$: If $p,q in R[x,y]$ satisfy $operatorname{Jac}(p,q)=0$, then $p=u(h)$ and $q=v(h)$, for...












0














Let $R$ be an arbitrary commutative $k$-algebra, where $k$ is a field of characteristic zero.



When $R$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, Nagata has proved the following nice result in Corollary 1.3 (which does not have a non-commutative analog, see this question):
"Assume that $p,q in R[x,y]$ satisfy $operatorname{Jac}(p,q)=0$. Then $p=u(h)$ and $q=v(h)$, for some $h in R[x,y]$, $u(T),v(T) in R[T]$".



It is known that it is possible to replace $R$ of Nagata's result by an arbitrary field or even by any normal integral domain of characteristic zero.




For which $R$'s Nagata's result is still valid?



What about any integral domain of characteristic zero, not necessarily normal?
What about an arbitrary affine $k$-algebra?




Notice that this question is relevant, but one has to be careful about the eqivalence of being algebraically dependent and having zero Jacobian, when replacing the base field by an arbitrary ring.



Thank you very much!










share|cite|improve this question





























    0














    Let $R$ be an arbitrary commutative $k$-algebra, where $k$ is a field of characteristic zero.



    When $R$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, Nagata has proved the following nice result in Corollary 1.3 (which does not have a non-commutative analog, see this question):
    "Assume that $p,q in R[x,y]$ satisfy $operatorname{Jac}(p,q)=0$. Then $p=u(h)$ and $q=v(h)$, for some $h in R[x,y]$, $u(T),v(T) in R[T]$".



    It is known that it is possible to replace $R$ of Nagata's result by an arbitrary field or even by any normal integral domain of characteristic zero.




    For which $R$'s Nagata's result is still valid?



    What about any integral domain of characteristic zero, not necessarily normal?
    What about an arbitrary affine $k$-algebra?




    Notice that this question is relevant, but one has to be careful about the eqivalence of being algebraically dependent and having zero Jacobian, when replacing the base field by an arbitrary ring.



    Thank you very much!










    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0







      Let $R$ be an arbitrary commutative $k$-algebra, where $k$ is a field of characteristic zero.



      When $R$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, Nagata has proved the following nice result in Corollary 1.3 (which does not have a non-commutative analog, see this question):
      "Assume that $p,q in R[x,y]$ satisfy $operatorname{Jac}(p,q)=0$. Then $p=u(h)$ and $q=v(h)$, for some $h in R[x,y]$, $u(T),v(T) in R[T]$".



      It is known that it is possible to replace $R$ of Nagata's result by an arbitrary field or even by any normal integral domain of characteristic zero.




      For which $R$'s Nagata's result is still valid?



      What about any integral domain of characteristic zero, not necessarily normal?
      What about an arbitrary affine $k$-algebra?




      Notice that this question is relevant, but one has to be careful about the eqivalence of being algebraically dependent and having zero Jacobian, when replacing the base field by an arbitrary ring.



      Thank you very much!










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $R$ be an arbitrary commutative $k$-algebra, where $k$ is a field of characteristic zero.



      When $R$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, Nagata has proved the following nice result in Corollary 1.3 (which does not have a non-commutative analog, see this question):
      "Assume that $p,q in R[x,y]$ satisfy $operatorname{Jac}(p,q)=0$. Then $p=u(h)$ and $q=v(h)$, for some $h in R[x,y]$, $u(T),v(T) in R[T]$".



      It is known that it is possible to replace $R$ of Nagata's result by an arbitrary field or even by any normal integral domain of characteristic zero.




      For which $R$'s Nagata's result is still valid?



      What about any integral domain of characteristic zero, not necessarily normal?
      What about an arbitrary affine $k$-algebra?




      Notice that this question is relevant, but one has to be careful about the eqivalence of being algebraically dependent and having zero Jacobian, when replacing the base field by an arbitrary ring.



      Thank you very much!







      algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 30 at 1:01

























      asked Nov 29 at 16:01









      user237522

      2,0891617




      2,0891617



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018827%2ffor-which-rings-r-if-p-q-in-rx-y-satisfy-operatornamejacp-q-0-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018827%2ffor-which-rings-r-if-p-q-in-rx-y-satisfy-operatornamejacp-q-0-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen