Number of branch points for a projection to $Bbb{CP}^1$
Based on a helpful response to my previous post which offered advice on how to split the image of a map into affine and non-affine components, I've come up with a solution to the following problem. However the solutions provided by the TA indicate that there are in fact 9 branching points (my solution gives exactly 4).
I would be very grateful if someone could point out where I've made my mistake?
The problem
Given a projective curve C defined by
$$Z^2Y^2 = X^4 + Y^4 + Z^4$$
Consider the holomorphic map$$
f: [X:Y:Z] mapsto [X:Y] = mathbb{CP}^1
$$
What are the branching points of f?
My solution
For $[X:Y] in mathbb{CP}^1$, let $[U:V]:=[X:Y] $. First we consider the preimage of the affine component ${[U:V] | U = 1 }$. We have that:
$$
f^{-1} ( [1:V] ) = C cap [1:Y:Z]
$$
Which gives us the corresponding affine curve:
$$
z^2y^2 - 1 - y^4 - z^4 = 0
$$
Rewriting, we have:
$$
(-1)(z^2)^2 + (y^2)(z^2) + (- y^4 - 1) = 0
$$
Which gives us coefficients $ a = -1, b=y^2, c = -y^4 - 1$ for the quadratic formula:
$${z^2=frac{-y^2pmsqrt{-3y^4 -4}}{-2}}$$
Writing $sqrt[4]{-1} = omega_i $ for a 4th root of negative unity, we then have four branching points
$$y in { omega_1, omega_2, omega_3, omega_4 }$$ each with brancing index 4.
Finally, consider the preimage of the non-affine component:
$$f^{-1} ( [0:V] ) = C cap [0:Y:Z] $$
which gives the corresponding curve
$$z^2y^2 - y^4 - z^4 = 0.$$
Now, since $[0:0:0] notin mathbb{CP}^2$, it follows that $y=z=0$ is not a solution, and we can therefore scale the co-ordinates $[0:Y:Z]$ to $[0:1:Z]$ by multiplication by some nonzero factor. This then gives us:
$$ z^4 -1 -z^2 = 0$$
Which clearly has four distinct roots $z_1, z_2, z_3, z_4$ , with:
$$ f(z_i) = [0:V] = infty $$
It follows that the preimage of $infty$ contains four points, each with ramification index 1 and therefore it is not a branching point. Since there are no more possible candidates for branching points, we are done.
algebraic-geometry algebraic-curves riemann-surfaces
add a comment |
Based on a helpful response to my previous post which offered advice on how to split the image of a map into affine and non-affine components, I've come up with a solution to the following problem. However the solutions provided by the TA indicate that there are in fact 9 branching points (my solution gives exactly 4).
I would be very grateful if someone could point out where I've made my mistake?
The problem
Given a projective curve C defined by
$$Z^2Y^2 = X^4 + Y^4 + Z^4$$
Consider the holomorphic map$$
f: [X:Y:Z] mapsto [X:Y] = mathbb{CP}^1
$$
What are the branching points of f?
My solution
For $[X:Y] in mathbb{CP}^1$, let $[U:V]:=[X:Y] $. First we consider the preimage of the affine component ${[U:V] | U = 1 }$. We have that:
$$
f^{-1} ( [1:V] ) = C cap [1:Y:Z]
$$
Which gives us the corresponding affine curve:
$$
z^2y^2 - 1 - y^4 - z^4 = 0
$$
Rewriting, we have:
$$
(-1)(z^2)^2 + (y^2)(z^2) + (- y^4 - 1) = 0
$$
Which gives us coefficients $ a = -1, b=y^2, c = -y^4 - 1$ for the quadratic formula:
$${z^2=frac{-y^2pmsqrt{-3y^4 -4}}{-2}}$$
Writing $sqrt[4]{-1} = omega_i $ for a 4th root of negative unity, we then have four branching points
$$y in { omega_1, omega_2, omega_3, omega_4 }$$ each with brancing index 4.
Finally, consider the preimage of the non-affine component:
$$f^{-1} ( [0:V] ) = C cap [0:Y:Z] $$
which gives the corresponding curve
$$z^2y^2 - y^4 - z^4 = 0.$$
Now, since $[0:0:0] notin mathbb{CP}^2$, it follows that $y=z=0$ is not a solution, and we can therefore scale the co-ordinates $[0:Y:Z]$ to $[0:1:Z]$ by multiplication by some nonzero factor. This then gives us:
$$ z^4 -1 -z^2 = 0$$
Which clearly has four distinct roots $z_1, z_2, z_3, z_4$ , with:
$$ f(z_i) = [0:V] = infty $$
It follows that the preimage of $infty$ contains four points, each with ramification index 1 and therefore it is not a branching point. Since there are no more possible candidates for branching points, we are done.
algebraic-geometry algebraic-curves riemann-surfaces
Hmm are you sure the answer is not 8? Anyway when you had $z^2 = frac{y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4 -4}}{2}$, you want to consider $y$ such that $-3y^4-4 = 0$ (so you get 4 $y$'s), and also $y$ such that $y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4-4} = 0$ (which also gives you 4 $y$'s). This gives 8 branch points, but I think this is what you should expect from Riemann-Hurwitz..
– loch
Nov 29 at 17:29
This looks useful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1511153/…
– André 3000
Nov 29 at 19:15
@loch yes thankyou, I see where my mistake is now. It seems like the solution given to us by the TA was also incorrect, which has contributed to my confusion!
– b_dobres
Nov 29 at 21:55
add a comment |
Based on a helpful response to my previous post which offered advice on how to split the image of a map into affine and non-affine components, I've come up with a solution to the following problem. However the solutions provided by the TA indicate that there are in fact 9 branching points (my solution gives exactly 4).
I would be very grateful if someone could point out where I've made my mistake?
The problem
Given a projective curve C defined by
$$Z^2Y^2 = X^4 + Y^4 + Z^4$$
Consider the holomorphic map$$
f: [X:Y:Z] mapsto [X:Y] = mathbb{CP}^1
$$
What are the branching points of f?
My solution
For $[X:Y] in mathbb{CP}^1$, let $[U:V]:=[X:Y] $. First we consider the preimage of the affine component ${[U:V] | U = 1 }$. We have that:
$$
f^{-1} ( [1:V] ) = C cap [1:Y:Z]
$$
Which gives us the corresponding affine curve:
$$
z^2y^2 - 1 - y^4 - z^4 = 0
$$
Rewriting, we have:
$$
(-1)(z^2)^2 + (y^2)(z^2) + (- y^4 - 1) = 0
$$
Which gives us coefficients $ a = -1, b=y^2, c = -y^4 - 1$ for the quadratic formula:
$${z^2=frac{-y^2pmsqrt{-3y^4 -4}}{-2}}$$
Writing $sqrt[4]{-1} = omega_i $ for a 4th root of negative unity, we then have four branching points
$$y in { omega_1, omega_2, omega_3, omega_4 }$$ each with brancing index 4.
Finally, consider the preimage of the non-affine component:
$$f^{-1} ( [0:V] ) = C cap [0:Y:Z] $$
which gives the corresponding curve
$$z^2y^2 - y^4 - z^4 = 0.$$
Now, since $[0:0:0] notin mathbb{CP}^2$, it follows that $y=z=0$ is not a solution, and we can therefore scale the co-ordinates $[0:Y:Z]$ to $[0:1:Z]$ by multiplication by some nonzero factor. This then gives us:
$$ z^4 -1 -z^2 = 0$$
Which clearly has four distinct roots $z_1, z_2, z_3, z_4$ , with:
$$ f(z_i) = [0:V] = infty $$
It follows that the preimage of $infty$ contains four points, each with ramification index 1 and therefore it is not a branching point. Since there are no more possible candidates for branching points, we are done.
algebraic-geometry algebraic-curves riemann-surfaces
Based on a helpful response to my previous post which offered advice on how to split the image of a map into affine and non-affine components, I've come up with a solution to the following problem. However the solutions provided by the TA indicate that there are in fact 9 branching points (my solution gives exactly 4).
I would be very grateful if someone could point out where I've made my mistake?
The problem
Given a projective curve C defined by
$$Z^2Y^2 = X^4 + Y^4 + Z^4$$
Consider the holomorphic map$$
f: [X:Y:Z] mapsto [X:Y] = mathbb{CP}^1
$$
What are the branching points of f?
My solution
For $[X:Y] in mathbb{CP}^1$, let $[U:V]:=[X:Y] $. First we consider the preimage of the affine component ${[U:V] | U = 1 }$. We have that:
$$
f^{-1} ( [1:V] ) = C cap [1:Y:Z]
$$
Which gives us the corresponding affine curve:
$$
z^2y^2 - 1 - y^4 - z^4 = 0
$$
Rewriting, we have:
$$
(-1)(z^2)^2 + (y^2)(z^2) + (- y^4 - 1) = 0
$$
Which gives us coefficients $ a = -1, b=y^2, c = -y^4 - 1$ for the quadratic formula:
$${z^2=frac{-y^2pmsqrt{-3y^4 -4}}{-2}}$$
Writing $sqrt[4]{-1} = omega_i $ for a 4th root of negative unity, we then have four branching points
$$y in { omega_1, omega_2, omega_3, omega_4 }$$ each with brancing index 4.
Finally, consider the preimage of the non-affine component:
$$f^{-1} ( [0:V] ) = C cap [0:Y:Z] $$
which gives the corresponding curve
$$z^2y^2 - y^4 - z^4 = 0.$$
Now, since $[0:0:0] notin mathbb{CP}^2$, it follows that $y=z=0$ is not a solution, and we can therefore scale the co-ordinates $[0:Y:Z]$ to $[0:1:Z]$ by multiplication by some nonzero factor. This then gives us:
$$ z^4 -1 -z^2 = 0$$
Which clearly has four distinct roots $z_1, z_2, z_3, z_4$ , with:
$$ f(z_i) = [0:V] = infty $$
It follows that the preimage of $infty$ contains four points, each with ramification index 1 and therefore it is not a branching point. Since there are no more possible candidates for branching points, we are done.
algebraic-geometry algebraic-curves riemann-surfaces
algebraic-geometry algebraic-curves riemann-surfaces
edited Nov 29 at 15:22
asked Nov 29 at 14:32
b_dobres
133
133
Hmm are you sure the answer is not 8? Anyway when you had $z^2 = frac{y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4 -4}}{2}$, you want to consider $y$ such that $-3y^4-4 = 0$ (so you get 4 $y$'s), and also $y$ such that $y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4-4} = 0$ (which also gives you 4 $y$'s). This gives 8 branch points, but I think this is what you should expect from Riemann-Hurwitz..
– loch
Nov 29 at 17:29
This looks useful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1511153/…
– André 3000
Nov 29 at 19:15
@loch yes thankyou, I see where my mistake is now. It seems like the solution given to us by the TA was also incorrect, which has contributed to my confusion!
– b_dobres
Nov 29 at 21:55
add a comment |
Hmm are you sure the answer is not 8? Anyway when you had $z^2 = frac{y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4 -4}}{2}$, you want to consider $y$ such that $-3y^4-4 = 0$ (so you get 4 $y$'s), and also $y$ such that $y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4-4} = 0$ (which also gives you 4 $y$'s). This gives 8 branch points, but I think this is what you should expect from Riemann-Hurwitz..
– loch
Nov 29 at 17:29
This looks useful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1511153/…
– André 3000
Nov 29 at 19:15
@loch yes thankyou, I see where my mistake is now. It seems like the solution given to us by the TA was also incorrect, which has contributed to my confusion!
– b_dobres
Nov 29 at 21:55
Hmm are you sure the answer is not 8? Anyway when you had $z^2 = frac{y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4 -4}}{2}$, you want to consider $y$ such that $-3y^4-4 = 0$ (so you get 4 $y$'s), and also $y$ such that $y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4-4} = 0$ (which also gives you 4 $y$'s). This gives 8 branch points, but I think this is what you should expect from Riemann-Hurwitz..
– loch
Nov 29 at 17:29
Hmm are you sure the answer is not 8? Anyway when you had $z^2 = frac{y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4 -4}}{2}$, you want to consider $y$ such that $-3y^4-4 = 0$ (so you get 4 $y$'s), and also $y$ such that $y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4-4} = 0$ (which also gives you 4 $y$'s). This gives 8 branch points, but I think this is what you should expect from Riemann-Hurwitz..
– loch
Nov 29 at 17:29
This looks useful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1511153/…
– André 3000
Nov 29 at 19:15
This looks useful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1511153/…
– André 3000
Nov 29 at 19:15
@loch yes thankyou, I see where my mistake is now. It seems like the solution given to us by the TA was also incorrect, which has contributed to my confusion!
– b_dobres
Nov 29 at 21:55
@loch yes thankyou, I see where my mistake is now. It seems like the solution given to us by the TA was also incorrect, which has contributed to my confusion!
– b_dobres
Nov 29 at 21:55
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018697%2fnumber-of-branch-points-for-a-projection-to-bbbcp1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018697%2fnumber-of-branch-points-for-a-projection-to-bbbcp1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Hmm are you sure the answer is not 8? Anyway when you had $z^2 = frac{y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4 -4}}{2}$, you want to consider $y$ such that $-3y^4-4 = 0$ (so you get 4 $y$'s), and also $y$ such that $y^2 pm sqrt{-3y^4-4} = 0$ (which also gives you 4 $y$'s). This gives 8 branch points, but I think this is what you should expect from Riemann-Hurwitz..
– loch
Nov 29 at 17:29
This looks useful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1511153/…
– André 3000
Nov 29 at 19:15
@loch yes thankyou, I see where my mistake is now. It seems like the solution given to us by the TA was also incorrect, which has contributed to my confusion!
– b_dobres
Nov 29 at 21:55