Order of indices using index notation












0














I'm trying to solve a problem in Lagrangian mechanics involving index notation. I'm wondering if the expression
$$ A_{ij}dot{q^i}q^j = A_{ji}dot{q^j}q^i $$
is true. Our professor skipped over this notation convention and I think the problem is made much easier if it is true.



Thanks in advance for any help.










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    I'm trying to solve a problem in Lagrangian mechanics involving index notation. I'm wondering if the expression
    $$ A_{ij}dot{q^i}q^j = A_{ji}dot{q^j}q^i $$
    is true. Our professor skipped over this notation convention and I think the problem is made much easier if it is true.



    Thanks in advance for any help.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I'm trying to solve a problem in Lagrangian mechanics involving index notation. I'm wondering if the expression
      $$ A_{ij}dot{q^i}q^j = A_{ji}dot{q^j}q^i $$
      is true. Our professor skipped over this notation convention and I think the problem is made much easier if it is true.



      Thanks in advance for any help.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I'm trying to solve a problem in Lagrangian mechanics involving index notation. I'm wondering if the expression
      $$ A_{ij}dot{q^i}q^j = A_{ji}dot{q^j}q^i $$
      is true. Our professor skipped over this notation convention and I think the problem is made much easier if it is true.



      Thanks in advance for any help.







      classical-mechanics index-notation






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 29 at 15:12









      Aaron Fitzpatrick

      31




      31






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          If you have trouble thinking about this sort of thing, take it in stages:



          $$A_{ij}dot{q}^iq^j=A_{kl}dot{q}^kq^l=A_{ji}dot{q}^jq^i,$$where at the first equals I impose $i,,jmapsto k,,l$ while at the second I impose $k,,lmapsto j,,i$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Cool thank you! Now that you say it it seems nearly obvious. I think the fact that it's assumed we should already be familiar with the convention despite having never seen it before has caught me off-guard.
            – Aaron Fitzpatrick
            Nov 29 at 15:18



















          1














          Yes, it is the same. Indices don't carry any meaning, they are just labels. As an example



          $$
          sum_i a_i b^i = sum_p a_p b^p
          $$



          or in Einstein's notation



          $$
          a_i b^i = a_p b^p
          $$



          So, coming back to your example



          $$
          A_{ij}dot{q}^i q^j = A_{m n}dot{q}^m q^n = A_{j i}dot{q}^j q^i
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for the help!
            – Aaron Fitzpatrick
            Nov 29 at 15:20











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018748%2forder-of-indices-using-index-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          If you have trouble thinking about this sort of thing, take it in stages:



          $$A_{ij}dot{q}^iq^j=A_{kl}dot{q}^kq^l=A_{ji}dot{q}^jq^i,$$where at the first equals I impose $i,,jmapsto k,,l$ while at the second I impose $k,,lmapsto j,,i$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Cool thank you! Now that you say it it seems nearly obvious. I think the fact that it's assumed we should already be familiar with the convention despite having never seen it before has caught me off-guard.
            – Aaron Fitzpatrick
            Nov 29 at 15:18
















          1














          If you have trouble thinking about this sort of thing, take it in stages:



          $$A_{ij}dot{q}^iq^j=A_{kl}dot{q}^kq^l=A_{ji}dot{q}^jq^i,$$where at the first equals I impose $i,,jmapsto k,,l$ while at the second I impose $k,,lmapsto j,,i$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Cool thank you! Now that you say it it seems nearly obvious. I think the fact that it's assumed we should already be familiar with the convention despite having never seen it before has caught me off-guard.
            – Aaron Fitzpatrick
            Nov 29 at 15:18














          1












          1








          1






          If you have trouble thinking about this sort of thing, take it in stages:



          $$A_{ij}dot{q}^iq^j=A_{kl}dot{q}^kq^l=A_{ji}dot{q}^jq^i,$$where at the first equals I impose $i,,jmapsto k,,l$ while at the second I impose $k,,lmapsto j,,i$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          If you have trouble thinking about this sort of thing, take it in stages:



          $$A_{ij}dot{q}^iq^j=A_{kl}dot{q}^kq^l=A_{ji}dot{q}^jq^i,$$where at the first equals I impose $i,,jmapsto k,,l$ while at the second I impose $k,,lmapsto j,,i$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 29 at 15:15









          J.G.

          22.3k22034




          22.3k22034












          • Cool thank you! Now that you say it it seems nearly obvious. I think the fact that it's assumed we should already be familiar with the convention despite having never seen it before has caught me off-guard.
            – Aaron Fitzpatrick
            Nov 29 at 15:18


















          • Cool thank you! Now that you say it it seems nearly obvious. I think the fact that it's assumed we should already be familiar with the convention despite having never seen it before has caught me off-guard.
            – Aaron Fitzpatrick
            Nov 29 at 15:18
















          Cool thank you! Now that you say it it seems nearly obvious. I think the fact that it's assumed we should already be familiar with the convention despite having never seen it before has caught me off-guard.
          – Aaron Fitzpatrick
          Nov 29 at 15:18




          Cool thank you! Now that you say it it seems nearly obvious. I think the fact that it's assumed we should already be familiar with the convention despite having never seen it before has caught me off-guard.
          – Aaron Fitzpatrick
          Nov 29 at 15:18











          1














          Yes, it is the same. Indices don't carry any meaning, they are just labels. As an example



          $$
          sum_i a_i b^i = sum_p a_p b^p
          $$



          or in Einstein's notation



          $$
          a_i b^i = a_p b^p
          $$



          So, coming back to your example



          $$
          A_{ij}dot{q}^i q^j = A_{m n}dot{q}^m q^n = A_{j i}dot{q}^j q^i
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for the help!
            – Aaron Fitzpatrick
            Nov 29 at 15:20
















          1














          Yes, it is the same. Indices don't carry any meaning, they are just labels. As an example



          $$
          sum_i a_i b^i = sum_p a_p b^p
          $$



          or in Einstein's notation



          $$
          a_i b^i = a_p b^p
          $$



          So, coming back to your example



          $$
          A_{ij}dot{q}^i q^j = A_{m n}dot{q}^m q^n = A_{j i}dot{q}^j q^i
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for the help!
            – Aaron Fitzpatrick
            Nov 29 at 15:20














          1












          1








          1






          Yes, it is the same. Indices don't carry any meaning, they are just labels. As an example



          $$
          sum_i a_i b^i = sum_p a_p b^p
          $$



          or in Einstein's notation



          $$
          a_i b^i = a_p b^p
          $$



          So, coming back to your example



          $$
          A_{ij}dot{q}^i q^j = A_{m n}dot{q}^m q^n = A_{j i}dot{q}^j q^i
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Yes, it is the same. Indices don't carry any meaning, they are just labels. As an example



          $$
          sum_i a_i b^i = sum_p a_p b^p
          $$



          or in Einstein's notation



          $$
          a_i b^i = a_p b^p
          $$



          So, coming back to your example



          $$
          A_{ij}dot{q}^i q^j = A_{m n}dot{q}^m q^n = A_{j i}dot{q}^j q^i
          $$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 29 at 15:16









          caverac

          13.1k21029




          13.1k21029












          • Thank you for the help!
            – Aaron Fitzpatrick
            Nov 29 at 15:20


















          • Thank you for the help!
            – Aaron Fitzpatrick
            Nov 29 at 15:20
















          Thank you for the help!
          – Aaron Fitzpatrick
          Nov 29 at 15:20




          Thank you for the help!
          – Aaron Fitzpatrick
          Nov 29 at 15:20


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018748%2forder-of-indices-using-index-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen